United German Citizens wrote:Noticed I never said You, yourself would see a difference or agree. I just said some would see a major difference.
Which there isn't.
No.
Advertisement

by Samuraikoku » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:23 pm

by Hurdegaryp » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:24 pm
Samuraikoku wrote:It has already been done before in interracial marriages. It should, by analogy, take a new precedent for same-sex marriage.
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by United German Citizens » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:24 pm
Samuraikoku wrote:LochNessMontropolis wrote:Humans can agree on whatever they wish, but IF you support Judeo-Christian beliefs (or Muslim), then you have to accept that the Laws of Moses - Laws of God - do not support homosexual love.
Good thing they don't matter, since the validity of marriage is granted by the State.


by Western Borderlands » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:25 pm

by Slarvainian » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:27 pm

by United German Citizens » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:27 pm


by The Nuclear Fist » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:27 pm
United German Citizens wrote:Some people would believe that their are more commanding powers-that-be than our duly elected representatives in the Washington Beltway
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.

by Samuraikoku » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:29 pm
The Nuclear Fist wrote:It's a good thing that the laws of the civilized world are not defined by fictional 'commanding powers-that-be', then, but instead by Earthly governments.

by The Nuclear Fist » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:30 pm
Samuraikoku wrote:The Emperor protects gay marriage. *nods*
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.

by United German Citizens » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:31 pm


by Samuraikoku » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:32 pm

by The Nuclear Fist » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:33 pm
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.

by TomKirk » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:40 pm

by Hurdegaryp » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:43 pm
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by Neo Art » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:44 pm

by Greed and Death » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:45 pm
Neo Art wrote:....the hell?

by The Nuclear Fist » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:47 pm
Hurdegaryp wrote:The Nuclear Fist wrote:Eh, Gork 'n Mork learned about it from Slaanesh. You know, in between taking turns smashing his head open.
Of course there's the easily overlooked detail concerning the Orks being non-sexual (or monosexual, if you like) sentients. They procreate through spores, pretty much like mushrooms. The Orks are pretty much living weapons, being the somewhat mutated result of a rather succesfull bioweapons project of the Ancients. Orks have no sexual feelings, but they usually are capable of building rather crude combat vehicles and weaponry from scratch pretty much from the day they were spawned from their specific patch of fungus. You do not need the concept of marriage when you've got such precious skills from the very moment you came into existence.
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.

by Hurdegaryp » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:47 pm
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by Zephie » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:47 pm
North California wrote:Constitionally speaking, homosexual (and any other) marriage should be protected under the 1st Amendment, as the "right to peacefully assemble" could be interpreted to when two people voluntarily agree to "assemble" with each other (which you could call a marriage, if you wish).
Senestrum wrote:I just can't think of anything to say that wouldn't get me warned on this net-nanny forum.

by Samuraikoku » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:48 pm
Hurdegaryp wrote:The Nuclear Fist wrote:Eh, Gork 'n Mork learned about it from Slaanesh. You know, in between taking turns smashing his head open.
Of course there's the easily overlooked detail concerning the Orks being non-sexual (or monosexual, if you like) sentients. They procreate through spores, pretty much like mushrooms. The Orks are pretty much living weapons, being the somewhat mutated result of a rather succesfull bioweapons project of the Ancients. Orks have no sexual feelings, but they usually are capable of building rather crude combat vehicles and weaponry from scratch pretty much from the day they were spawned from their specific patch of fungus. You do not need the concept of marriage when you've got such precious skills from the very moment you came into existence.

by Hurdegaryp » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:52 pm
The Nuclear Fist wrote:Also, let's stop threadjacking, shall we?
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by The Nuclear Fist » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:52 pm
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.

by Hurdegaryp » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:58 pm
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

by Ceannairceach » Sat Oct 20, 2012 7:00 pm
LochNessMontropolis wrote:"Marriage is legalized and administered by the state"
Marriage is not legalized or administered by the state or federal government. At the time of the writing of the American Constitution, marriage was administered and sanctioned by the church - whatever church you chose - and was a convenant between a man, woman, and God. Government officials, like judges, could perform a civil ceremony, to bind to people, but it did NOT have any religious basis.
Many of those who oppose gay marriage do so because the word "marriage" implies a covenant between the couple and God.

by Shnercropolis » Sat Oct 20, 2012 7:26 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Abaro, Grinning Dragon, Ifreann, Juansonia, Necroghastia, Neu California, Port Caverton, Terminus Station, The Panjshir Valley, The Union of Galaxies, Uiiop, UIJ
Advertisement