NATION

PASSWORD

Homosexual Marriage ban. Constitutional violation?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:23 pm

United German Citizens wrote:Noticed I never said You, yourself would see a difference or agree. I just said some would see a major difference.


Which there isn't.

LochNessMontropolis wrote:
Samuraikoku wrote:


No, dear, the church grants marriage; the state grants civil unions.


:lol:

No.

User avatar
Hurdegaryp
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54204
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Hurdegaryp » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:24 pm

Samuraikoku wrote:It has already been done before in interracial marriages. It should, by analogy, take a new precedent for same-sex marriage.


That seems to be the correct approach, yes. It's all about the rights of the individual, after all. Simply keep religion out of it, it's strictly a legal matter.
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

User avatar
United German Citizens
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 184
Founded: Oct 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby United German Citizens » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:24 pm

Samuraikoku wrote:
LochNessMontropolis wrote:Humans can agree on whatever they wish, but IF you support Judeo-Christian beliefs (or Muslim), then you have to accept that the Laws of Moses - Laws of God - do not support homosexual love.


Good thing they don't matter, since the validity of marriage is granted by the State.


Sure, as long as we are speaking of Earthly matters. Some people would believe that their are more commanding powers-that-be than our duly elected representatives in the Washington Beltway :)
Kämpfen und sterben für freies Deutschland

User avatar
Western Borderlands
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1921
Founded: Sep 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Western Borderlands » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:25 pm

LochNessMontropolis wrote:
Samuraikoku wrote:


No, dear, the church grants marriage; the state grants civil unions.

I'm sorry but this is false.
"Open your eyes don't be this way,Throw all your dreams, the rest will have to wait"-Serj Tankian singing "ching chime"

User avatar
Slarvainian
Minister
 
Posts: 2132
Founded: May 05, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Slarvainian » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:27 pm

Western Borderlands wrote:
LochNessMontropolis wrote:
No, dear, the church grants marriage; the state grants civil unions.

I'm sorry but this is false.


Justice of the peace can do it to
V: Beneath this mask there is more than flesh. Beneath this mask there is an idea, Mr. Creedy. And ideas are bulletproof.

Sophist, Ironist, the po-mo-neo-marxist Jordan Peterson warned you about.

I really enjoy talking ideas with people so feel free to TG me.

User avatar
United German Citizens
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 184
Founded: Oct 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby United German Citizens » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:27 pm

Samuraikoku wrote:
United German Citizens wrote:Noticed I never said You, yourself would see a difference or agree. I just said some would see a major difference.


Which there isn't.


That is your opinion :)
Kämpfen und sterben für freies Deutschland

User avatar
The Nuclear Fist
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33214
Founded: May 02, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nuclear Fist » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:27 pm

United German Citizens wrote:Some people would believe that their are more commanding powers-that-be than our duly elected representatives in the Washington Beltway :)

It's a good thing that the laws of the civilized world are not defined by fictional 'commanding powers-that-be', then, but instead by Earthly governments.

The opinions of those who wound want it otherwise are poisonous and should be disregarded.

@OP: I feel like, if interracial marriage isn't against the law, neither should be homosexual marriage.
[23:24] <Marquesan> I have the feeling that all the porn videos you watch are like...set to Primus' music, Ulysses.
Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .
THE ABSOLUTTM MADMAN ESCAPES JUSTICE ONCE MORE

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:29 pm

The Nuclear Fist wrote:It's a good thing that the laws of the civilized world are not defined by fictional 'commanding powers-that-be', then, but instead by Earthly governments.


The Emperor protects gay marriage. *nods*

User avatar
The Nuclear Fist
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33214
Founded: May 02, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nuclear Fist » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:30 pm

Samuraikoku wrote:The Emperor protects gay marriage. *nods*

Gork 'n Mork says ta marry 'oo ya want.
[23:24] <Marquesan> I have the feeling that all the porn videos you watch are like...set to Primus' music, Ulysses.
Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .
THE ABSOLUTTM MADMAN ESCAPES JUSTICE ONCE MORE

User avatar
United German Citizens
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 184
Founded: Oct 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby United German Citizens » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:31 pm

^^
You both would get along smashingly :lol:
Kämpfen und sterben für freies Deutschland

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:32 pm

The Nuclear Fist wrote:
Samuraikoku wrote:The Emperor protects gay marriage. *nods*

Gork 'n Mork says ta marry 'oo ya want.


I say they'd be wondering "Wot's dis marriage fing? Don't seem like a squig."
Last edited by Samuraikoku on Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The Nuclear Fist
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33214
Founded: May 02, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nuclear Fist » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:33 pm

Samuraikoku wrote:
The Nuclear Fist wrote:Gork 'n Mork says ta marry 'oo ya want.


I say they'd be wondering "Wot's dis marriage fing? Don't seem like a squig."

Eh, Gork 'n Mork learned about it from Slaanesh. You know, in between taking turns smashing his head open.
[23:24] <Marquesan> I have the feeling that all the porn videos you watch are like...set to Primus' music, Ulysses.
Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .
THE ABSOLUTTM MADMAN ESCAPES JUSTICE ONCE MORE

User avatar
TomKirk
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1380
Founded: May 08, 2012
Democratic Socialists

Postby TomKirk » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:40 pm

LochNessMontropolis wrote:
Samuraikoku wrote:


No, dear, the church grants marriage; the state grants civil unions.

No, dear, the church performs "weddings"; the state grants "marriage".
[puppet of Tmutarakhan]
YoLandII: " How is mutation natural? Just because it occurs in nature doesn't mean it's natural. It is not supposed to happen. It is accidental."
Salamanstrom: "Saying it is wrong since it calls it something that was used then is stupid. It's like saying a guy from the 1800s is stupid since he calls an ipod a radio."
Lunatic Goofballs: "The shoe is the pie of the Middle East. The poor bastards."

User avatar
Hurdegaryp
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54204
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Hurdegaryp » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:43 pm

The Nuclear Fist wrote:
Samuraikoku wrote:
I say they'd be wondering "Wot's dis marriage fing? Don't seem like a squig."

Eh, Gork 'n Mork learned about it from Slaanesh. You know, in between taking turns smashing his head open.


Of course there's the easily overlooked detail concerning the Orks being non-sexual (or monosexual, if you like) sentients. They procreate through spores, pretty much like mushrooms. The Orks are pretty much living weapons, being the somewhat mutated result of a rather succesfull bioweapons project of the Ancients. Orks have no sexual feelings, but they usually are capable of building rather crude combat vehicles and weaponry from scratch pretty much from the day they were spawned from their specific patch of fungus. You do not need the concept of marriage when you've got such precious skills from the very moment you came into existence.
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

User avatar
Neo Art
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14258
Founded: Jan 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Neo Art » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:44 pm

....the hell?
if you were Batman you'd be home by now

"Consistency is a matter we are attempting to remedy." - Dread Lady Nathinaca

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:45 pm

Neo Art wrote:....the hell?

The Orks are getting married NeoArt whether you like it or not.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
The Nuclear Fist
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33214
Founded: May 02, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nuclear Fist » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:47 pm

Hurdegaryp wrote:
The Nuclear Fist wrote:Eh, Gork 'n Mork learned about it from Slaanesh. You know, in between taking turns smashing his head open.


Of course there's the easily overlooked detail concerning the Orks being non-sexual (or monosexual, if you like) sentients. They procreate through spores, pretty much like mushrooms. The Orks are pretty much living weapons, being the somewhat mutated result of a rather succesfull bioweapons project of the Ancients. Orks have no sexual feelings, but they usually are capable of building rather crude combat vehicles and weaponry from scratch pretty much from the day they were spawned from their specific patch of fungus. You do not need the concept of marriage when you've got such precious skills from the very moment you came into existence.

I'd like to think I'm very nearly an expert on the Orks, I know this.

Also, let's stop threadjacking, shall we?
[23:24] <Marquesan> I have the feeling that all the porn videos you watch are like...set to Primus' music, Ulysses.
Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .
THE ABSOLUTTM MADMAN ESCAPES JUSTICE ONCE MORE

User avatar
Hurdegaryp
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54204
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Hurdegaryp » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:47 pm

Did you not read anything I wrote? The Orks simply do not care about your feeble human concept of marriage!
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

User avatar
Zephie
Senator
 
Posts: 4548
Founded: Oct 30, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Zephie » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:47 pm

North California wrote:Constitionally speaking, homosexual (and any other) marriage should be protected under the 1st Amendment, as the "right to peacefully assemble" could be interpreted to when two people voluntarily agree to "assemble" with each other (which you could call a marriage, if you wish).

LOL. It's not illegal to be a same-sex couple.
When anybody preaches disunity, tries to pit one of us against each other through class warfare, race hatred, or religious intolerance, you know that person seeks to rob us of our freedom and destroy our very lives.
Senestrum wrote:I just can't think of anything to say that wouldn't get me warned on this net-nanny forum.

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:48 pm

Hurdegaryp wrote:
The Nuclear Fist wrote:Eh, Gork 'n Mork learned about it from Slaanesh. You know, in between taking turns smashing his head open.


Of course there's the easily overlooked detail concerning the Orks being non-sexual (or monosexual, if you like) sentients. They procreate through spores, pretty much like mushrooms. The Orks are pretty much living weapons, being the somewhat mutated result of a rather succesfull bioweapons project of the Ancients. Orks have no sexual feelings, but they usually are capable of building rather crude combat vehicles and weaponry from scratch pretty much from the day they were spawned from their specific patch of fungus. You do not need the concept of marriage when you've got such precious skills from the very moment you came into existence.


Imperium of Man - There were LGBT characters under Ciaphas Cain...

HERO OF THE IMPERIUM!


... and no one particularly cared.

Orks - "Wot's dis marriage fing?"
Necrons - "..."
Tau - "Our bond is strong." (they discriminate between Castes)
Tyranids - "Eat. Consume."

With the Eldar and Dark Eldar things get more complicated. Dark Eldar, it is to be assumed, don't need and don't care for marriage, and nothing is said about the Eldar.
Last edited by Samuraikoku on Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Hurdegaryp
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54204
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Hurdegaryp » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:52 pm

The Nuclear Fist wrote:Also, let's stop threadjacking, shall we?


Why? Everything goes better with Orks, after all. Why generate post after post after post about the emancipation of marriage, when we could be talking about tender subjects such as Ork Gargants?
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

User avatar
The Nuclear Fist
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33214
Founded: May 02, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nuclear Fist » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:52 pm

Hurdegaryp wrote:
The Nuclear Fist wrote:Also, let's stop threadjacking, shall we?


Why? Everything goes better with Orks, after all. Why generate post after post after post about the emancipation of marriage, when we could be talking about tender subjects such as Ork Gargants?

Because there is already a Warhammer 40,000 thread, and threadjacking is against the rules.
[23:24] <Marquesan> I have the feeling that all the porn videos you watch are like...set to Primus' music, Ulysses.
Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .
THE ABSOLUTTM MADMAN ESCAPES JUSTICE ONCE MORE

User avatar
Hurdegaryp
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54204
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Hurdegaryp » Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:58 pm

Hm, that does seem like a significant detail, yes. Well, since I'm a staunch defender of equal rights for those who also are willing to defend the whole concept of equal rights for everyone, it's only logical to defend the right to marry for everyone who's old & wise enough to make that decision. It also only seems logical that the Constitution would protect that right, let's just hope that I'm not being too enlightened here in assuming that.
Last edited by Hurdegaryp on Sat Oct 20, 2012 6:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
CVT Temp wrote:I mean, we can actually create a mathematical definition for evolution in terms of the evolutionary algorithm and then write code to deal with abstract instances of evolution, which basically equates to mathematical proof that evolution works. All that remains is to show that biological systems replicate in such a way as to satisfy the minimal criteria required for evolution to apply to them, something which has already been adequately shown time and again. At this point, we've pretty much proven that not only can evolution happen, it pretty much must happen since it's basically impossible to prevent it from happening.

User avatar
Ceannairceach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26637
Founded: Sep 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Ceannairceach » Sat Oct 20, 2012 7:00 pm

LochNessMontropolis wrote:"Marriage is legalized and administered by the state"

Marriage is not legalized or administered by the state or federal government. At the time of the writing of the American Constitution, marriage was administered and sanctioned by the church - whatever church you chose - and was a convenant between a man, woman, and God. Government officials, like judges, could perform a civil ceremony, to bind to people, but it did NOT have any religious basis.

Many of those who oppose gay marriage do so because the word "marriage" implies a covenant between the couple and God.

When you get married, you get a marriage license. That license is given by the government, not the or a church or religious organization. You pay your forty dollars or so to the government, not the church. Marriage is, was, and forever will be a governmental program, not a religious event.

@}-;-'---

"But who prays for Satan? Who in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most..." -Mark Twain

User avatar
Shnercropolis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9391
Founded: Sep 30, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Shnercropolis » Sat Oct 20, 2012 7:26 pm

There's nothing in the constitution expressly preserving the right to Homosexual marriage.
it is my firm belief that I should never have to justify my beliefs.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Abaro, Grinning Dragon, Ifreann, Juansonia, Necroghastia, Neu California, Port Caverton, Terminus Station, The Panjshir Valley, The Union of Galaxies, Uiiop, UIJ

Advertisement

Remove ads