NATION

PASSWORD

Scientology

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Hetairos
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 105
Founded: May 28, 2009
Ex-Nation

Scientology

Postby Hetairos » Wed Jun 03, 2009 9:24 am

Is anyone here a scientologist?
I can't believe how a (fairly) large institution can have such an absolute opposition to psycology and psychiatry, in the face of so much evidence and reasoning. Whitout psychiatry, people could very well die, because of suicide, or because of their illness provoking them to perform abhorrant acts.
I recently found this website:
http://www.cchr.org/
All of their 'arguments' are either fatally fawed or have been misconstrewed, and it has clearly been designed to manipulate people to believe what they do.
"Germanitas Libertorum"
Embassies and ambassadors in Hetairos:
Allanea-Stepan Kamensky
N3wgr0unds-Cyril Malma
Kim Jong-Ila-Hu Yun
Ledarre-Lord Heratio Wick

User avatar
Colonic Immigration
Minister
 
Posts: 3337
Founded: Mar 29, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Scientology

Postby Colonic Immigration » Wed Jun 03, 2009 9:25 am

Urgh.
RoI
Economic Left/Right: -5.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.97
Western Mercenary Unio - Yeah, you kinda make idiocy an art

Haikus are easy,
They don't always make much sense,
Refrigerator

User avatar
Yootopia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8410
Founded: Dec 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Re: Scientology

Postby Yootopia » Wed Jun 03, 2009 9:25 am

"Religion moulds peoples' beliefs to fit those of its founder shocker"
End the Modigarchy now.

User avatar
Enadail
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5799
Founded: Jun 02, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Scientology

Postby Enadail » Wed Jun 03, 2009 9:26 am

Hetairos wrote:All of their 'arguments' are either fatally fawed or have been misconstrewed, and it has clearly been designed to manipulate people to believe what they do.


Ah, so you mean like other religions basically. But still, Scientology, to me, is among the worst, because they have it in their heads they're above the law.

User avatar
Treznor
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7343
Founded: Antiquity
Democratic Socialists

Re: Scientology

Postby Treznor » Wed Jun 03, 2009 9:31 am

The beliefs and rituals of Scientology are irrelevant. It was created with a purpose, and that purpose was fulfilled.

It made Hubbard rich.

User avatar
Brutanion
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 172
Founded: Jul 11, 2004
Ex-Nation

Re: Scientology

Postby Brutanion » Wed Jun 03, 2009 9:32 am

Enadail wrote:
Hetairos wrote:All of their 'arguments' are either fatally fawed or have been misconstrewed, and it has clearly been designed to manipulate people to believe what they do.


Ah, so you mean like other religions basically. But still, Scientology, to me, is among the worst, because they have it in their heads they're above the law.


And it's clearly made up.
Despite what one might say about various religions, Jesus didn't benefit from Christianity's foundation, Buddha did not become richer for Buddhism and Mohammed did not benefit much from Islam either. And the only thing Jude of Judaism ever had was a Beatles song.

User avatar
Hayteria
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1709
Founded: Dec 18, 2005
Ex-Nation

Re: Scientology

Postby Hayteria » Wed Jun 03, 2009 10:05 am

Brutanion wrote:
Enadail wrote:
Hetairos wrote:All of their 'arguments' are either fatally fawed or have been misconstrewed, and it has clearly been designed to manipulate people to believe what they do.


Ah, so you mean like other religions basically. But still, Scientology, to me, is among the worst, because they have it in their heads they're above the law.


And it's clearly made up.
Despite what one might say about various religions, Jesus didn't benefit from Christianity's foundation, Buddha did not become richer for Buddhism and Mohammed did not benefit much from Islam either. And the only thing Jude of Judaism ever had was a Beatles song.

What makes you think Jesus/Mohammed/whatever religious prophet didn't "benefit"? Even if you're referring to money, what about their fame? Besides, how does a difference like that somehow make other religions uncomparable to Scientology?
Last edited by Hayteria on Wed Jun 03, 2009 10:06 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Treznor
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7343
Founded: Antiquity
Democratic Socialists

Re: Scientology

Postby Treznor » Wed Jun 03, 2009 10:11 am

Hayteria wrote:
Brutanion wrote:
Enadail wrote:Ah, so you mean like other religions basically. But still, Scientology, to me, is among the worst, because they have it in their heads they're above the law.


And it's clearly made up.
Despite what one might say about various religions, Jesus didn't benefit from Christianity's foundation, Buddha did not become richer for Buddhism and Mohammed did not benefit much from Islam either. And the only thing Jude of Judaism ever had was a Beatles song.

What makes you think Jesus/Mohammed/whatever religious prophet didn't "benefit"? Even if you're referring to money, what about their fame? Besides, how does a difference like that somehow make other religions uncomparable to Scientology?

Well, first of all there's not a whole lot of proof that Jesus existed, although that's another topic entirely. Mohammed very clearly benefited, as he spent the rest of his life in a leadership position where he was able to dictate a new morality to his people. How else do you think he got away with marrying a nine-year-old?

The primary difference between Scientology and most other religions is that it didn't borrow its myths and rules from neighboring cultures. Hubbard created a new mythos from scratch, which makes it highly unique. Granted, there are still similarities to other religions but that's because it's hard to be truly original. Hubbard's genius was to start over from the beginning and incorporate a bit of psychology to play up a mysticism that had never before been imagined.

Obviously, he succeeded brilliantly. He died with more wealth than he could spend by himself, and the religion has persisted beyond his death. Although, should Hollywood fall I don't know if Scientology could survive.
Last edited by Treznor on Wed Jun 03, 2009 10:12 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Kadagai
Envoy
 
Posts: 301
Founded: May 02, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Scientology

Postby Kadagai » Wed Jun 03, 2009 10:39 am

Everytime I think of Scientology I giggle on the inside.

But if that's what they believe whatever, just don't bother me.

User avatar
Hetairos
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 105
Founded: May 28, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Scientology

Postby Hetairos » Wed Jun 03, 2009 10:55 am

The problem is that scientology isn't really considered an 'outsider' when it comes to religion. Many millions of people have heard of it, and with such influential people following it, its views on psychiatry actually have the potential to gain a not insignificant amount of public support. That is what worries me, and is the reason I worry about the BNP in the same way, because they actually have the potential to gain seats in the UK and European parliaments.
Last edited by Hetairos on Wed Jun 03, 2009 10:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Germanitas Libertorum"
Embassies and ambassadors in Hetairos:
Allanea-Stepan Kamensky
N3wgr0unds-Cyril Malma
Kim Jong-Ila-Hu Yun
Ledarre-Lord Heratio Wick

User avatar
Flammable Ice
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 389
Founded: Jun 27, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: Scientology

Postby Flammable Ice » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:16 pm

The beliefs of Scientology are no worse than other religions. It's the Church of Scientology's behaviour that is due attention.

User avatar
Lunatic Goofballs
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 23629
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Re: Scientology

Postby Lunatic Goofballs » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:17 pm

I have a thetan in my pants. :)
Life's Short. Munch Tacos.

“Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming "Wow! What a Ride!”
Hunter S. Thompson

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 36962
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Re: Scientology

Postby Katganistan » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:25 pm

Lunatic Goofballs wrote:I have a thetan in my pants. :)

Won't the missus get jealous? Unless she is the thetan, that is....

User avatar
Pax Ordo
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 143
Founded: Jun 02, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Scientology

Postby Pax Ordo » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:29 pm

any religion can claim anything. however i tend to see all religions as simply two people saying tomatoe. one pronounces it (toe-mae-toe) the other pronounces it ( toe-maa-toe) when in reality both of them are speaking about the exact same thing. they simply view it with a different perception, and the fact remains that we continue to argue over whos perception is correct when all in and of themselves are correct given the subjectivity of truth to the indevidual experience of a human being. that isn't to say that some people are way out there with what they believe, but its thier choice to do so, and as such we should respect one another reguardless of choices and simply agree to disagree and leave it at that.

User avatar
Farnhamia Redux
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 429
Founded: Mar 31, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Scientology

Postby Farnhamia Redux » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:31 pm

Pax Ordo wrote:any religion can claim anything. however i tend to see all religions as simply two people saying tomatoe. one pronounces it (toe-mae-toe) the other pronounces it ( toe-maa-toe) when in reality both of them are speaking about the exact same thing. they simply view it with a different perception, and the fact remains that we continue to argue over whos perception is correct when all in and of themselves are correct given the subjectivity of truth to the indevidual experience of a human being. that isn't to say that some people are way out there with what they believe, but its thier choice to do so, and as such we should respect one another reguardless of choices and simply agree to disagree and leave it at that.

Heretic! Someone get a stake and some matches! :D

I personally think that arguing over religion is like two kids arguing about who has the best invisible friend.
Since when is reality a popularity contest? ~ VoijaRisa

User avatar
Pax Ordo
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 143
Founded: Jun 02, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Scientology

Postby Pax Ordo » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:33 pm

agreed. :clap:
Given under the hand of the most gracious.

Dyx Magnus Augustine

User avatar
Hetairos
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 105
Founded: May 28, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Scientology

Postby Hetairos » Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:18 am

Farnhamia Redux wrote:I personally think that arguing over religion is like two kids arguing about who has the best invisible friend.


Ditch the simile there, it is a large number of older kids arguing about who has the best imaginary friend, only some of these kids have weapons and political power to varying degrees.
Last edited by Hetairos on Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:35 am, edited 2 times in total.
"Germanitas Libertorum"
Embassies and ambassadors in Hetairos:
Allanea-Stepan Kamensky
N3wgr0unds-Cyril Malma
Kim Jong-Ila-Hu Yun
Ledarre-Lord Heratio Wick

User avatar
Lunatic Goofballs
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 23629
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Re: Scientology

Postby Lunatic Goofballs » Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:32 am

Katganistan wrote:
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:I have a thetan in my pants. :)

Won't the missus get jealous? Unless she is the thetan, that is....


We have an understanding abut thetans. She has one too. *nod*
Life's Short. Munch Tacos.

“Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming "Wow! What a Ride!”
Hunter S. Thompson

User avatar
Kil-lur
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 7
Founded: May 18, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Scientology

Postby Kil-lur » Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:01 am

You better watch out because Lord Xenu knows where you live.

User avatar
Lunatic Goofballs
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 23629
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Re: Scientology

Postby Lunatic Goofballs » Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:03 am

Kil-lur wrote:You better watch out because Lord Xenu knows where you live.


Yeah I know. He comes over for Poker Nights. He usually brings Buffalo Wings. *nod*
Life's Short. Munch Tacos.

“Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming "Wow! What a Ride!”
Hunter S. Thompson

User avatar
Hoyteca
Diplomat
 
Posts: 680
Founded: Jan 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Re: Scientology

Postby Hoyteca » Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:07 am

Kil-lur wrote:You better watch out because Lord Xenu knows where you live.


I'm not worried. Xenu's no threat as long as Anpu is around.

I don't like Scientology too much. The older religions have the excuse of being formed millennia ago, way before we learned about big bangs and dinosaur bones. There were no telescopes or microscopes. Basically, Abe's guess was as good as Greg's. What's Scientology's excuse? While the older religions are basically collections of legends and myths passed down from generation to generation, Scientology is one big horrible science fiction novel written by *gasp* a science fiction writer.

Plus the other religions have rules demanding that you don't be an asshole. Of course all rules are broken at some point. But does Scientology have rules against, say, random murders ad grand theft? Not really. In fact, Scientology demands that you be a huge asshole to those who dare leave the cult.

It's just a matter of time before they bring out the kool-aid and make Jonestown look like a happy health-club retreat.

User avatar
Calvinsjoy
Attaché
 
Posts: 72
Founded: Apr 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Scientology

Postby Calvinsjoy » Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:54 am

Farnhamia Redux wrote:
Pax Ordo wrote:any religion can claim anything. however i tend to see all religions as simply two people saying tomatoe. one pronounces it (toe-mae-toe) the other pronounces it ( toe-maa-toe) when in reality both of them are speaking about the exact same thing. they simply view it with a different perception, and the fact remains that we continue to argue over whos perception is correct when all in and of themselves are correct given the subjectivity of truth to the indevidual experience of a human being. that isn't to say that some people are way out there with what they believe, but its thier choice to do so, and as such we should respect one another reguardless of choices and simply agree to disagree and leave it at that.

Heretic! Someone get a stake and some matches! :D

I personally think that arguing over religion is like two kids arguing about who has the best invisible friend.


maybe... but My invisible friend created me...

User avatar
Treznor
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7343
Founded: Antiquity
Democratic Socialists

Re: Scientology

Postby Treznor » Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:56 am

Calvinsjoy wrote:
Farnhamia Redux wrote:
Pax Ordo wrote:any religion can claim anything. however i tend to see all religions as simply two people saying tomatoe. one pronounces it (toe-mae-toe) the other pronounces it ( toe-maa-toe) when in reality both of them are speaking about the exact same thing. they simply view it with a different perception, and the fact remains that we continue to argue over whos perception is correct when all in and of themselves are correct given the subjectivity of truth to the indevidual experience of a human being. that isn't to say that some people are way out there with what they believe, but its thier choice to do so, and as such we should respect one another reguardless of choices and simply agree to disagree and leave it at that.

Heretic! Someone get a stake and some matches! :D

I personally think that arguing over religion is like two kids arguing about who has the best invisible friend.


maybe... but My invisible friend created me...

Can we then blame your invisible friend for the design flaws?

User avatar
Zutroy
Diplomat
 
Posts: 925
Founded: May 01, 2004
Ex-Nation

Re: Scientology

Postby Zutroy » Wed Jun 10, 2009 11:01 am

its obviously a scam religion, that goes without saying... but as such, it is remarkably successful. in fact so much so that they were able to carry out a massive surveillance and intimidation operation in the 70's that was one of the largest in history, counting government and non-government activities
"The war of the poor against the rich will be the bloodiest ever waged."
- F. Engels, 1845

User avatar
Ledarre
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 356
Founded: May 18, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Scientology

Postby Ledarre » Wed Jun 10, 2009 11:11 am

Its quite obvious that the universe is ruled by a sentient, giant apple :lol2:
The Murtunian Tribes wrote:
Ledarre wrote:I'm struggling to see the problem here. Just look at my nation, looks like a politically free nation, right? WRONG! The democratically elected parliament requires a unanimous vote to actually pass legalisation and with proportional representation and the number of extremists in parliament this is near impossible.

So the monarchy effectively rules by decree. I have achieved this through answering issues in a certain way... Unfortunately I can’t remember what those issues were. That plus a little bit of RP. Anyway my point is it’s easy to have moderate to high political freedoms and still have absolute power, you just have to be creative.


Huh. That's a rather unique and, I must say, deliciously evil approach. *golfclap*

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Corrian, Dimetrodon Empire, Maximum Imperium Rex, New Temecula, Paddy O Fernature, Plan Neonie, Rivogna, Shrillland, The Vooperian Union, Uiiop, Verkhoyanska

Advertisement

Remove ads