by Hetairos » Wed Jun 03, 2009 9:24 am
by Colonic Immigration » Wed Jun 03, 2009 9:25 am
by Yootopia » Wed Jun 03, 2009 9:25 am
by Enadail » Wed Jun 03, 2009 9:26 am
Hetairos wrote:All of their 'arguments' are either fatally fawed or have been misconstrewed, and it has clearly been designed to manipulate people to believe what they do.
by Treznor » Wed Jun 03, 2009 9:31 am
by Brutanion » Wed Jun 03, 2009 9:32 am
Enadail wrote:Hetairos wrote:All of their 'arguments' are either fatally fawed or have been misconstrewed, and it has clearly been designed to manipulate people to believe what they do.
Ah, so you mean like other religions basically. But still, Scientology, to me, is among the worst, because they have it in their heads they're above the law.
by Hayteria » Wed Jun 03, 2009 10:05 am
Brutanion wrote:Enadail wrote:Hetairos wrote:All of their 'arguments' are either fatally fawed or have been misconstrewed, and it has clearly been designed to manipulate people to believe what they do.
Ah, so you mean like other religions basically. But still, Scientology, to me, is among the worst, because they have it in their heads they're above the law.
And it's clearly made up.
Despite what one might say about various religions, Jesus didn't benefit from Christianity's foundation, Buddha did not become richer for Buddhism and Mohammed did not benefit much from Islam either. And the only thing Jude of Judaism ever had was a Beatles song.
by Treznor » Wed Jun 03, 2009 10:11 am
Hayteria wrote:Brutanion wrote:Enadail wrote:Ah, so you mean like other religions basically. But still, Scientology, to me, is among the worst, because they have it in their heads they're above the law.
And it's clearly made up.
Despite what one might say about various religions, Jesus didn't benefit from Christianity's foundation, Buddha did not become richer for Buddhism and Mohammed did not benefit much from Islam either. And the only thing Jude of Judaism ever had was a Beatles song.
What makes you think Jesus/Mohammed/whatever religious prophet didn't "benefit"? Even if you're referring to money, what about their fame? Besides, how does a difference like that somehow make other religions uncomparable to Scientology?
by Kadagai » Wed Jun 03, 2009 10:39 am
by Hetairos » Wed Jun 03, 2009 10:55 am
by Flammable Ice » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:16 pm
by Lunatic Goofballs » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:17 pm
by Katganistan » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:25 pm
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:I have a thetan in my pants.
by Pax Ordo » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:29 pm
by Farnhamia Redux » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:31 pm
Pax Ordo wrote:any religion can claim anything. however i tend to see all religions as simply two people saying tomatoe. one pronounces it (toe-mae-toe) the other pronounces it ( toe-maa-toe) when in reality both of them are speaking about the exact same thing. they simply view it with a different perception, and the fact remains that we continue to argue over whos perception is correct when all in and of themselves are correct given the subjectivity of truth to the indevidual experience of a human being. that isn't to say that some people are way out there with what they believe, but its thier choice to do so, and as such we should respect one another reguardless of choices and simply agree to disagree and leave it at that.
by Pax Ordo » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:33 pm
by Hetairos » Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:18 am
Farnhamia Redux wrote:I personally think that arguing over religion is like two kids arguing about who has the best invisible friend.
by Lunatic Goofballs » Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:32 am
Katganistan wrote:Lunatic Goofballs wrote:I have a thetan in my pants.
Won't the missus get jealous? Unless she is the thetan, that is....
by Kil-lur » Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:01 am
by Lunatic Goofballs » Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:03 am
Kil-lur wrote:You better watch out because Lord Xenu knows where you live.
by Hoyteca » Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:07 am
Kil-lur wrote:You better watch out because Lord Xenu knows where you live.
by Calvinsjoy » Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:54 am
Farnhamia Redux wrote:Pax Ordo wrote:any religion can claim anything. however i tend to see all religions as simply two people saying tomatoe. one pronounces it (toe-mae-toe) the other pronounces it ( toe-maa-toe) when in reality both of them are speaking about the exact same thing. they simply view it with a different perception, and the fact remains that we continue to argue over whos perception is correct when all in and of themselves are correct given the subjectivity of truth to the indevidual experience of a human being. that isn't to say that some people are way out there with what they believe, but its thier choice to do so, and as such we should respect one another reguardless of choices and simply agree to disagree and leave it at that.
Heretic! Someone get a stake and some matches!
I personally think that arguing over religion is like two kids arguing about who has the best invisible friend.
by Treznor » Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:56 am
Calvinsjoy wrote:Farnhamia Redux wrote:Pax Ordo wrote:any religion can claim anything. however i tend to see all religions as simply two people saying tomatoe. one pronounces it (toe-mae-toe) the other pronounces it ( toe-maa-toe) when in reality both of them are speaking about the exact same thing. they simply view it with a different perception, and the fact remains that we continue to argue over whos perception is correct when all in and of themselves are correct given the subjectivity of truth to the indevidual experience of a human being. that isn't to say that some people are way out there with what they believe, but its thier choice to do so, and as such we should respect one another reguardless of choices and simply agree to disagree and leave it at that.
Heretic! Someone get a stake and some matches!
I personally think that arguing over religion is like two kids arguing about who has the best invisible friend.
maybe... but My invisible friend created me...
by Zutroy » Wed Jun 10, 2009 11:01 am
by Ledarre » Wed Jun 10, 2009 11:11 am
The Murtunian Tribes wrote:Ledarre wrote:I'm struggling to see the problem here. Just look at my nation, looks like a politically free nation, right? WRONG! The democratically elected parliament requires a unanimous vote to actually pass legalisation and with proportional representation and the number of extremists in parliament this is near impossible.
So the monarchy effectively rules by decree. I have achieved this through answering issues in a certain way... Unfortunately I can’t remember what those issues were. That plus a little bit of RP. Anyway my point is it’s easy to have moderate to high political freedoms and still have absolute power, you just have to be creative.
Huh. That's a rather unique and, I must say, deliciously evil approach. *golfclap*
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Corrian, Dimetrodon Empire, Maximum Imperium Rex, New Temecula, Paddy O Fernature, Plan Neonie, Rivogna, Shrillland, The Vooperian Union, Uiiop, Verkhoyanska
Advertisement