NationStates

Posted: **Tue Oct 13, 2009 9:59 pm**

These demonstrations will not get anywhere, since they lack major corporate sponsorship (q.v. the Pepsi thread).

If there's no money in coverage, the media won't care about it.

Posted: **Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:03 pm**

independent REAL media covered it.
corporate media doesn't give a rag about freedom,
only about keeping their corporate masters able to keep conning and ripping everyone off.

Posted: **Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:05 pm**

Cameroi wrote:independent REAL media covered it.
corporate media doesn't give a rag about freedom,
only about keeping their corporate masters able to keep conning and ripping everyone off.

true dat.

But that's where most people turn, isn't it?

Posted: **Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:51 pm**

Don't be shocked. I mean, it was actually a small rally compared the the recent T.E.A Party demonstration, which wasn't really P.C. enough to be faithfully reported by the MSM. Even though this rally was P.C., it had liberals protesting a liberal President. You folk are all supposed to be one big happy family, right?

Posted: **Tue Oct 13, 2009 10:53 pm**

You-Gi-Owe wrote:Don't be shocked. I mean, it was actually a small rally compared the the recent T.E.A Party demonstration,

Actually, by all estimates, they were roughly the same size.

The rest of your post is just inane rambling.

Posted: **Tue Oct 13, 2009 11:00 pm**

Post-Unity Terra wrote:
The Norse Hordes wrote:http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-gays-rally12-2009oct12,0,6043274.story

About as many people showed up to this rally as there were at those teabagging rallies...erm, sorry, 'teaparties'.

Im suprised, since so many consertatives on here were all about the tea parties because they were about keeping FREEDOM!!!!, but they didnt mention anything about an equally as large march on the capitol in favor of actual freedom.

Didn't you get the memo? Freedom means pissing off the democratic party and nothing more.

Yeah I mean't to qoute that the first time before I typed in my response...

Posted: **Tue Oct 13, 2009 11:20 pm**

The Norse Hordes wrote:
You-Gi-Owe wrote:Don't be shocked. I mean, it was actually a small rally compared the the recent T.E.A Party demonstration,

Actually, by all estimates, they were roughly the same size.

yeah the picture i saw looked pretty much on par with the one i crunched the numbers on in the teabagging thread

Posted: **Tue Oct 13, 2009 11:32 pm**

Khadore wrote:Oh it's typical of the fringe media, liberal blogs, liberal occupied forums and left-leaning people won't bother to talk about such things because they want to shut those people down, the real American people down.

Talk about freedom you piss off liberals, Communists, Socialists and Fascists. Um...ok who cares? If they don't like it they can leave their citizenship at the door. I was at one of those teaparties and you saw all walks of life there. Republicans, Conservatives, Independents and even Democrats.

It's all a double standard. You can only praise Obama but if you so much as question him you're villianized, belittled, called a racist, a bigot and every name in the book. I thought this was America, not Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union.

Then you must think gays have every right that straight people do? I mean if you truly believe in liberty as you say you do, and also want to accuse people of hypocrisy.

Posted: **Wed Oct 14, 2009 1:56 am**

Sure gays have a right to be gay....in their own damn closet.

Posted: **Wed Oct 14, 2009 1:58 am**

Khadore wrote:Sure gays have a right to be gay....in their own damn closet.

Joking or serious?

I've totally lost track.

Posted: **Wed Oct 14, 2009 1:59 am**

You-Gi-Owe wrote:Don't be shocked. I mean, it was actually a small rally compared the the recent T.E.A Party demonstration, which wasn't really P.C. enough to be faithfully reported by the MSM.

MSM? I thought Fox News supporting, advertising and following it hand-in-hand did enough of a job "faithfully reporting" it.

Did this gay right protests even get mentioned on Fox?

Posted: **Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:00 am**

You'd think teabaggers and homosexuals would get along better.

Posted: **Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:03 am**

Lunatic Goofballs wrote:You'd think teabaggers and homosexuals would get along better.

I was going to post a picture response to this but that little voice of common sense made itself heard just before I searched for gay teabagger in google images.

Posted: **Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:03 am**

Fartsniffage wrote:
Khadore wrote:Sure gays have a right to be gay....in their own damn closet.

Joking or serious?

I've totally lost track.

I'm being serious.

But let me get something straight here before anyone else gets anymore smart ideas. I thought this was a topic about the tea parties and it didn't help that the link provided kept giving me a '404 error so I didn't know what the hell people were talking about until the last minute. So yeah I had a dumbass moment but my opinion still stands above on gays need to stay in the closet and the hell out of public.

Posted: **Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:04 am**

Fartsniffage wrote:
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:You'd think teabaggers and homosexuals would get along better.

I was going to post a picture response to this but that little voice of common sense made itself heard just before I searched for gay teabagger in google images.

They have pills for that.

Posted: **Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:06 am**

Khadore wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
Khadore wrote:Sure gays have a right to be gay....in their own damn closet.

Joking or serious?

I've totally lost track.

I'm being serious.

But let me get something straight here before anyone else gets anymore smart ideas. I thought this was a topic about the tea parties and it didn't help that the link provided kept giving me a '404 error so I didn't know what the hell people were talking about until the last minute. So yeah I had a dumbass moment but my opinion still stands above on gays need to stay in the closet and the hell out of public.

That's fine... as long as you never publicly act on your sexual preferences either. No chatting up girls, no public kissing, no witnessed wedding, no civil union. No even admitting you're straight. If you want others to live asexually, why shouldn't you?

Posted: **Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:07 am**

Khadore wrote:But let me get something straight here before anyone else gets anymore smart ideas. I thought this was a topic about the tea parties and it didn't help that the link provided kept giving me a '404 error so I didn't know what the hell people were talking about until the last minute. So yeah I had a dumbass moment but my opinion still stands above on gays need to stay in the closet and the hell out of public.

Worried you'll be tempted?

Posted: **Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:08 am**

Fartsniffage wrote:
Khadore wrote:But let me get something straight here before anyone else gets anymore smart ideas. I thought this was a topic about the tea parties and it didn't help that the link provided kept giving me a '404 error so I didn't know what the hell people were talking about until the last minute. So yeah I had a dumbass moment but my opinion still stands above on gays need to stay in the closet and the hell out of public.

Worried you'll be tempted?

That's what happened to Larry Craig; one too many doses of gaydiation. *nod*

Posted: **Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:08 am**

Fartsniffage wrote:
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:You'd think teabaggers and homosexuals would get along better.

I was going to post a picture response to this but that little voice of common sense made itself heard just before I searched for gay teabagger in google images.

Reminds me of a physics teacher who wanted an picture for Young's Slit Experiment, so did a GIS for 'Youngs Slits'... while connected to a projector in front of the class

Posted: **Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:10 am**

Khadore wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
Khadore wrote:Sure gays have a right to be gay....in their own damn closet.

Joking or serious?

I've totally lost track.

I'm being serious.

But let me get something straight here before anyone else gets anymore smart ideas. I thought this was a topic about the tea parties and it didn't help that the link provided kept giving me a '404 error so I didn't know what the hell people were talking about until the last minute. So yeah I had a dumbass moment but my opinion still stands above on gays need to stay in the closet and the hell out of public.

That isn't very freedom loving of you though. So the rich should be free to hoard health care while insurance company trusts jack up prices, and the poor suffer? And Gay people need to hide who they are? That is how you envision a free and equal society in America?

Posted: **Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:13 am**

Last time I checked the normal people (i.e. heterosexuals) outnumbers gays by a large margin. So why is a small interest group belly aching over civil rights to be recognized across the nation if they got a whole rotting cesspool city like San Fransisco all to themselves? Ok first of all Gay marriage is not actually marriage, it is not even a civil union in my book, it's two homos having an orgy which is done everyday in the closet and it should stay that way not out in public. Why? Because it's not normal.

Posted: **Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:15 am**

Khadore wrote:Last time I checked the normal people (i.e. heterosexuals) outnumbers gays by a large margin. So why is a small interest group belly aching over civil rights to be recognized across the nation if they got a whole rotting cesspool city like San Fransisco all to themselves? Ok first of all Gay marriage is not actually marriage, it is not even a civil union in my book, it's two homos having an orgy which is done everyday in the closet and it should stay that way not out in public. Why? Because it's not normal.

The size of a minority suddenly matters in whether or not they get treated like human beings, now?

Posted: **Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:15 am**

Khadore wrote:Last time I checked the normal people (i.e. heterosexuals) outnumbers gays by a large margin. So why is a small interest group belly aching over civil rights to be recognized across the nation if they got a whole rotting cesspool city like San Fransisco all to themselves? Ok first of all Gay marriage is not actually marriage, it is not even a civil union in my book, it's two homos having an orgy which is done everyday in the closet and it should stay that way not out in public. Why? Because it's not normal.

Probably for the same reason those uppity negroes insisted on equality.

Posted: **Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:15 am**

Lunatic Goofballs wrote:That's what happened to Larry Craig; one too many doses of gaydiation. *nod*

It is a danger when in a crowded public place like an airport. That one dose from an unknown homo could be just enough to put you over the edge and make you go cottaging.

I suggest some kind of visual identification for gays, a piece of coloured clothe stitched to their clothing could work, so us straight Real Men (tm) can spot and avoid them. Maybe some research into "Gaydiation Badges" would be a good idea as well, let us measure our daily dose and plan accordingly.

Posted: **Wed Oct 14, 2009 2:16 am**

Khadore wrote:Last time I checked the normal people (i.e. heterosexuals) outnumbers gays by a large margin. So why is a small interest group belly aching over civil rights to be recognized across the nation if they got a whole rotting cesspool city like San Fransisco all to themselves? Ok first of all Gay marriage is not actually marriage, it is not even a civil union in my book, it's two homos having an orgy which is done everyday in the closet and it should stay that way not out in public. Why? Because it's not normal.

posting on NSG? you deviant! only a tiny fraction of the world's population does that! get off the internet now and start doing whatever the rest of the majority is doing -- it's now about 3 AM in America, so the majority is probably asleep, and therefore you must sleep too.

NationStates

Im shocked there wasnt a thread on this...