+eurocommunism
+environmentalism
+female & LGTB rights
+further democratisation of the representation system
+socialism with a human face
+activism
Advertisement

by Camelza » Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:34 am
Quintium wrote:Camelza wrote:+eurocommunism
+environmentalism
+female & LGTB rights
+further democratisation of the representation system
+socialism with a human face
+activism
Interestingly, I can't see any of these things supported by those left-wing parties bring in here. They're conservative, fiercely against female and homosexual rights, many are against democracy, and activism for them means taking to the streets when their prophet is insulted.

by Camelza » Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:54 am
Ifreann wrote:Quintium wrote:
No, but you are currently letting people starve. Because every time you send aid, more people won't die, meaning they're able to have children, meaning the next famine will be exactly the same problem only on a larger scale. Edit: as I said, Africa's population based on current output should be less than 500 million, but it's well over 1 billion now.
But if we don't send aid, people will die, and dead men build no sustainable nations.

by Camelza » Sat Oct 06, 2012 7:05 am
Forsher wrote:Camelza wrote:We shouldn't give them aid,instead we should teach those people how to produce food/dig wells/read by themselfes in order not to be depended on aid programs and foreigners
However,to do that we have first to get rid of the multinational companies taking advantage of the corrupt African governments ..which is kinda hard.
Give a man a fish he eats for a night.
Teach a man to fish he eats for life.
This is something that actually applies. And what's happened is that the net has broken and the aid isn't enough to repair it so the net just gets worse and the catch just gets smaller...

by Camelza » Sat Oct 06, 2012 7:21 am
Ifreann wrote:Camelza wrote:We shouldn't give them aid,instead we should teach those people how to produce food/dig wells/read by themselfes in order not to be depended on aid programs and foreigners
For that to be of any benefit they have to live long enough to learn how to do that and to actually do it.

by Camelza » Sat Oct 06, 2012 9:31 am
Melas wrote:Martean wrote:denyinig that humanoty cames from africa it's like denying that 1+1=2
I don't care if your nation it's orthodox or not.
by the way, you owe me some euros as I rescued your economy.
No you didnt my economy and future are still fucked up cause of the E.U. Also you said we are Catholic fundomentalists when we are not even catholic (or extremely religious to that) also lets say we did came from africa,doesnt that mean we are a superior evolved species?


by Camelza » Sat Oct 06, 2012 9:39 am
Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:No, they're f*cked up because your country fudged its numbers to join the Euro. It's no-one's fault but Greece's.
Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:Oh God, don't you understand how evolution works? This might sound strange to you, but we are actually the same species as black people, with one or two minor variations in melanin pigmentation and bone structure.

by Camelza » Sat Oct 06, 2012 9:46 am
The Blaatschapen wrote:Camelza wrote:We actually never voted on entering EU,the Euro or NATO ...Simitis is to blame,we didn't know the numbers were forged and most of us over here prefered Drachma over euro.
Then blame Simitis, not the EU. It's the people's responsibility to know what their leader is doing. Even more so in a democracy where you can actually choose your leader.

by Camelza » Sat Oct 06, 2012 9:51 am
Zaras wrote:Camelza wrote:We actually never voted on entering EU,the Euro or NATO ...Simitis is to blame,we didn't know the numbers were forged and most of us over here prefered Drachma over euro.
Simitis didn't bring Greece into the EU, Papandreou did in 1981. But it is true, Greece was so completely unprepared to join the eurozone it should've just kept the drachma.

by Camelza » Sat Oct 06, 2012 9:56 am
The Blaatschapen wrote:Camelza wrote:I didn't blame the EU,I'm not Melas and our democrasy is fucked up big time.
The argument was that the EU was blamed, then someone blamed Greece, then you the leader. I put it back to the people, because democatic system *shrugs*
Either way, Greece's economy isn't doing well

by Camelza » Sat Oct 06, 2012 10:02 am
Zaras wrote:Camelza wrote:Actually it was Rallis and Karamanlis' efforts,Papandreou was a fierce radical socialist opposing both NATO & the EEC back in the day ..he simply took over exactly when we entered the EU ..this shows also that most Greeks would have refused to join EU in 1981,if there was a vote on the subject.
I refered to Simitis because he was the one that forged the numbers and brought the Euro.
Yeah. I dunno what Greeks would've objected to - after all, Greece was the first Mediterranean country to join the EEC after they overthrew their dictatorship. Papandreou's anti-NATO and EEC rhetoric was just electoral rhetoric, considering he didn't leave NATO or cancel the EEC membership in office.

by Camelza » Sat Oct 06, 2012 10:15 am
Zaras wrote:Your Daily Mail is showing, please get it under control. Also, the EU helps countries reduce their poverty level, so please get it right.

by Camelza » Sat Oct 06, 2012 10:27 am
Hibernicus wrote:Am I the only one who saw facism in Greece coming?

by Camelza » Sat Oct 06, 2012 10:34 am
Zaras wrote:Camelza wrote:I agree with everything else you say but the EU in economic matters cares mostly for the bankers and multinational company owners,not the people.
Yes, but there's a different thread for the EU's fuckups.
The EU definitely needs to stop doing shit like the CAP and the blatantly biased ECB. But it's not a surprise that the EU would be biased towards corporations and bankers instead of people. It's something we see at most levels of the state as a trend since the 1980s.

by Camelza » Sat Oct 06, 2012 10:42 am
Delanshar wrote:Zaras wrote:
Yes, I like hyperbole in my insults. I know it's bad for me.
Haha... and you expect to be taken seriously..
Debates aren't supposed to be about 'hyperbole' or 'insults' their supposed to be rational disagreements argued in a respectful and at least semi-educated manner.
"hyperbole and insults" are for 4 year olds arguing over whose turn it is to press the elevator button.

by Camelza » Sat Oct 06, 2012 11:25 am
Zaras wrote:Martean wrote:
ETA disolved 2 months ago
Quite a similar thing happened with Northern Ireland. I'm guessing that the EEC didn't intervene in either at first because of the struggle between neofunctionalists and intergovernmentalists, because Ireland only joined in 1973 and Spain in 1986, and post-Maastricht because the EU had no clear remit on how to deal with terrorism.

by Camelza » Sat Oct 06, 2012 12:45 pm

by Camelza » Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:25 pm
Zaras wrote:Camelza wrote:Bitch please,IRA tried to kill Thatcher & Armed Unionists.In a war between nations you always try to kill your enemy and so did both sides
It is terrible but as a whole not only because of IRA.
..they also had many female members and I trust female insticts. ...except Thatcher's,she is no woman,she's the devil.
Dude, I know that. "Thatcher" is a swear word for me, but I'm saying that you can't say the IRA is one of the reasons the UK is a democracy.

by Ceannairceach » Sat Oct 06, 2012 11:11 am

by Ceannairceach » Sat Oct 06, 2012 11:13 am
Zaras wrote:Ceannairceach wrote:Reactionary politics rise when there is a crisis for the reactionary factions to exploit. Fascism, and especially the abhorrent anti-immigrant, oppressive form, is just one of these groups to make a push, somewhat successfully.
Though usually they can't win an election outright, so the fears of a new Nazi state are likely unfounded.

by Ceannairceach » Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:05 pm
Martean wrote:Camelza wrote:Bitch please,IRA tried to kill Thatcher & Armed Unionists.In a war between nations you always try to kill your enemy and so did both sides
It is terrible but as a whole not only because of IRA.
..they also had many female members and I trust female insticts. ...except Thatcher's,she is no woman,she's the devil.
see? tried, and IRA hasn't changed your country's history, unlike ETA

by Ceannairceach » Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:53 am

by Ceannairceach » Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:55 am
Delanshar wrote:Cromarty wrote:it's also widely accepted that Hitler's policies were nothing more than a quick fix, and had World War 2 not started, then the German economy would've collapsed.
This is speculation. Though I hate Hitler, he did get Germany out of recession and had he refrained from starting WWII or committing genocide he might've been remembered as a German FDR who got the country out of a horrible depression.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Infected Mushroom, Maineiacs, Zurkerx
Advertisement