Nobody is talking about putting it off, I'm talking about pulling it in to get married as soon as possible.
It's a good recipe to get divorced young as well, in my experience.
She's 21. It's not like she's 17 or something.
Advertisement
by Allanea » Wed Jun 03, 2009 1:50 am
Nobody is talking about putting it off, I'm talking about pulling it in to get married as soon as possible.
It's a good recipe to get divorced young as well, in my experience.
by Cabra West » Wed Jun 03, 2009 1:53 am
Allanea wrote:Nobody is talking about putting it off, I'm talking about pulling it in to get married as soon as possible.
It's a good recipe to get divorced young as well, in my experience.
She's 21. It's not like she's 17 or something.
by Antebellum South » Wed Jun 03, 2009 1:53 am
Cabra West wrote:Allanea wrote:How do you know if she is, though?
She looks happy in the video.
Besides, this may be the case in your are of the world. Certainly not the case with many people I know.
It is the culturally-accepted thing in some societies to put off marriage - not everywhere.
Nobody is talking about putting it off, I'm talking about pulling it in to get married as soon as possible.
It's a good recipe to get divorced young as well, in my experience.
by Barringtonia » Wed Jun 03, 2009 1:54 am
Antebellum South wrote:I don't know. I personally find no "higher ethical purpose" to vegetarianism whatsoever. I'm Chinese (and I delight in consuming animal flesh like one), and I work at an animal testing facility. Double whammy.
That said, I'm thinking of becoming a vegetarian just because certain Hare Krishna crazies introduced to me the idea that, if I eat an animal, I'll reincarnate as one and get butchered and eaten in my next life.
by Allanea » Wed Jun 03, 2009 1:56 am
The elephant in the room here is religion, clearly, that is the reason she made this decision - fair enough, there's opinion in here but let's not pretend it's just a decision.
I can agree with that, I just feel people can cut themselves off from experience due to, in my opinion, irrational reasons - I've said before [not in this thread] that I welcome irrational decisions, I believe irrationality to be a benefit to mankind, I just find this case a little sad.
by Gauntleted Fist » Wed Jun 03, 2009 1:57 am
21 is too young to be married?Cabra West wrote:Yes. With 17, it wouldn't be legal. She's just 21, for crying out loud... legal, yes, but still way too young.
by Allanea » Wed Jun 03, 2009 1:57 am
Yes. With 17, it wouldn't be legal. She's just 21, for crying out loud... legal, yes, but still way too young.
by Cabra West » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:01 am
Gauntleted Fist wrote:21 is too young to be married?Cabra West wrote:Yes. With 17, it wouldn't be legal. She's just 21, for crying out loud... legal, yes, but still way too young.
...o_O
by Antebellum South » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:01 am
Barringtonia wrote:Antebellum South wrote:I don't know. I personally find no "higher ethical purpose" to vegetarianism whatsoever. I'm Chinese (and I delight in consuming animal flesh like one), and I work at an animal testing facility. Double whammy.
That said, I'm thinking of becoming a vegetarian just because certain Hare Krishna crazies introduced to me the idea that, if I eat an animal, I'll reincarnate as one and get butchered and eaten in my next life.
Watch Sharkwaters, I stopped eating Shark Fin soup at the numerous banquets I attend and I'm often chastised along the lines of it being disrespectful to the host and that it's there, in front of me, I may as well eat it. I respond that it has to start somewhere.
That same pressure, albeit a variation, I feel, is in place in this particular case as well, it's an expectation.
by Allanea » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:03 am
Marriage is a lifetime decision. How can you make a good decision unless you get to know a bit of life, first?
by Barringtonia » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:03 am
Allanea wrote:So? I fail to see why religion is a bad reason to make a decision (though of course Christianity does not prohibit kissing).
Homosexuality,
heterosexuality
Orgies,
consensual incest (provided there are no unhealthy offspring),
Polyamoriness,
Wearing fursuits into bed,
Sex in public,
Necrophilia (provided the other person consented before their death)
And, yes, sexual abstinence.
I really do think that the morally correct approach is to not care.
As far as I am concern, your sexual choice (within the bounds of consent-based sexual ethic) is as much worthy of sadness or admiration as your choice of underwear design.
by Allanea » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:07 am
Not a choice
by Gauntleted Fist » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:08 am
Cabra West wrote:Put it this way :
My gran got married with 20, wished her husband dead for the rest of her life.
My mom got married with barely 21, divorced when 30. Keeps telling me it was the worst thing she's ever done, and keeps telling her children to have as many boyfriends/girlfriends as they can before deciding.
One of my friends got married when 22, divorced when 25.
Another one got married aged 20, seperated when 26 with 3 children... the court battle is epic and still going on.
Another one started getting married aged 19, I think she's just past her 3rd husband now.
Marriage is a lifetime decision. How can you make a good decision unless you get to know a bit of life, first?
by Cabra West » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:17 am
Gauntleted Fist wrote:
Well, if we're doing anecdotal evidence:
Grandmother (Mother's side): Married twice. First at age of sixteen. Husband died of a medical condition. (Married to him around twenty years.)
Re-married around two years after: Second husband died of old age. Married to him circa the same amount of time. (Give or take a few years.)
Has stated that she would have remained with both 'til death, which she did. (She's still alive, just retired last week.)
Grandmother (Father's side): Married at age 20, is now 60, married for 40 years.
Mother/Father: Married age 28/25, haven't divorced yet. (18 years.)
by Gauntleted Fist » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:20 am
And while those numbers do indeed make an impact, that's not the norm, though the eighteen year old divorce rate is closing in on being the norm.Cabra West wrote:Ok, numbers :
# 33% of all first marriages end in separation or divorce after 10 years (32% of White women, 34% of Hispanic women, and 47% of Black women).
# Divorce is more likely when women marry at a younger age (48% of brides married before age 18 divorce in 10 years, compared to 24% married at age 25 or later)
http://www.psychpage.com/family/mod_couples_thx/cdc.html#Z4
by Allanea » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:23 am
Cabra West wrote:Ok, numbers :
# 33% of all first marriages end in separation or divorce after 10 years (32% of White women, 34% of Hispanic women, and 47% of Black women).
# Divorce is more likely when women marry at a younger age (48% of brides married before age 18 divorce in 10 years, compared to 24% married at age 25 or later)
http://www.psychpage.com/family/mod_couples_thx/cdc.html#Z4
by Cabra West » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:26 am
Gauntleted Fist wrote:And while those numbers do indeed make an impact, that's not the norm, though the eighteen year old divorce rate is closing in on being the norm.Cabra West wrote:Ok, numbers :
# 33% of all first marriages end in separation or divorce after 10 years (32% of White women, 34% of Hispanic women, and 47% of Black women).
# Divorce is more likely when women marry at a younger age (48% of brides married before age 18 divorce in 10 years, compared to 24% married at age 25 or later)
http://www.psychpage.com/family/mod_couples_thx/cdc.html#Z4
by Cabra West » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:27 am
Allanea wrote:Cabra West wrote:Ok, numbers :
# 33% of all first marriages end in separation or divorce after 10 years (32% of White women, 34% of Hispanic women, and 47% of Black women).
# Divorce is more likely when women marry at a younger age (48% of brides married before age 18 divorce in 10 years, compared to 24% married at age 25 or later)
http://www.psychpage.com/family/mod_couples_thx/cdc.html#Z4
1. Human beings aren't statistics. Statistics aren't a useful predictor of a given person's life.
2. This woman is not 18.
by Allanea » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:28 am
by Hamilay » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:29 am
Allanea wrote:People being disabled is not a personal choice. I am sure most disabled people would have been healthy if they had the choice.
I no more feel sad for this girl than I do for people who choose have more sex than I do, or for people who color their cars pink, or for people who choose to spend vast sums of money on miniatures for Warhammer Fantasy Battles.
by Gauntleted Fist » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:32 am
I don't understand why it makes you sad.Cabra West wrote:I'm still feeling sorry for her, and the more I think about it, the sadder it makes me.
by Barringtonia » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:35 am
Gauntleted Fist wrote:I don't understand why it makes you sad.
Do you doubt her judgment so much?
by Gauntleted Fist » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:36 am
I can understand that viewpoint.Barringtonia wrote:Gauntleted Fist wrote:I don't understand why it makes you sad.
Do you doubt her judgment so much?
For me, it just does, I've had enormous fun experiencing different partners over time and I feel I've gained good experience in terms of what works and what doesn't - perhaps that experience also constrains me somewhat in terms of forming assumptions.
If nothing else, sexual compatibility is quite important in a relationship, I just feel she's cut herself off from experience for misguided reasons, misguided in my opinion fair enough.
I'm not judging her, I'm just saddened by people who think it's 'worthwhile' or 'special' to abstain until after marriage, such a loss of opportunity.
by Antebellum South » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:40 am
Cabra West wrote:
Ok, numbers :
# 33% of all first marriages end in separation or divorce after 10 years (32% of White women, 34% of Hispanic women, and 47% of Black women).
# Divorce is more likely when women marry at a younger age (48% of brides married before age 18 divorce in 10 years, compared to 24% married at age 25 or later)
http://www.psychpage.com/family/mod_couples_thx/cdc.html#Z4
by Trilateral Commission » Wed Jun 03, 2009 2:55 am
Barringtonia wrote:Antebellum South wrote:I don't know. I personally find no "higher ethical purpose" to vegetarianism whatsoever. I'm Chinese (and I delight in consuming animal flesh like one), and I work at an animal testing facility. Double whammy.
That said, I'm thinking of becoming a vegetarian just because certain Hare Krishna crazies introduced to me the idea that, if I eat an animal, I'll reincarnate as one and get butchered and eaten in my next life.
Watch Sharkwaters, I stopped eating Shark Fin soup at the numerous banquets I attend and I'm often chastised along the lines of it being disrespectful to the host and that it's there, in front of me, I may as well eat it. I respond that it has to start somewhere.
That same pressure, albeit a variation, I feel, is in place in this particular case as well, it's an expectation.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Omphalos, Philjia, Tungstan, Zadanar
Advertisement