NATION

PASSWORD

Capitalism good or bad?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Shining Ys
Attaché
 
Posts: 89
Founded: May 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Shining Ys » Sat Oct 06, 2012 5:57 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:So you want a source on prosperity invented by someone who agrees with YOUR definition of prosperity, as opposed to everyone elses.


I can't speak for the above quoted poster, but what I want is a recognition of the ideological weight of the word "prosperity". Its semantic value is culturally relativistic, meaning its definition is highly susceptible to influence by the controllers of a cultural hegemony, such as the bourgeoisie in capitalist society.
Last edited by Shining Ys on Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:00 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Sat Oct 06, 2012 5:57 pm

The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:Right. The most prosperous system has had only some prosperity.

1:1930 recession. 1980 Recession. 2008 recession. For a "Most prosperous system" it sure is pretty unstable.
2:Source on it being the most prosperous?

I did not say it grows, without any bumps in the road.

You need a source for something so obviously evident? Really?
Image
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Williamson
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1582
Founded: Mar 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Williamson » Sat Oct 06, 2012 5:58 pm

The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
So you want a source on prosperity invented by someone who agrees with YOUR definition of prosperity, as opposed to everyone elses.

I will not exept any source invented by capitalists, like GDP's.

so basically we can only have sources to support your agument. That makes since.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57861
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sat Oct 06, 2012 5:59 pm

The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
So you want a source on prosperity invented by someone who agrees with YOUR definition of prosperity, as opposed to everyone elses.

I will not exept any source invented by capitalists, like GDP's.


PAHAHAhhhahhahaha
Ok.
So, the fact that capitalists have invented a lot of things due to mixed-market capitalism freeing people from feudalism, allowing a system of education to everyone, and organizations outside the control of go-
aw fuck it.
Theres just no reasoning with someone who straight up refuses to accept any source from after the 15th century that wasn't written by some backwater tinpot tyrant or his lackeys.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
The United Soviet Socialist Republic
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17944
Founded: Aug 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Sat Oct 06, 2012 5:59 pm

Sibirsky wrote:
The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:1:1930 recession. 1980 Recession. 2008 recession. For a "Most prosperous system" it sure is pretty unstable.
2:Source on it being the most prosperous?

I did not say it grows, without any bumps in the road.

You need a source for something so obviously evident? Really?
Image

GDP's were invented by capitalists, obviously capitlist countries have higher ones.
Gay and Proudand also a brony
Political Compass:Left: 7.76, Authoritarian: 5.6
I am: Fascist/Corporatist on economy,
Conservative on social issues(Support same sex marriage),
Anti secularist on religion,
Anti-Republican on government,
Interventionist/Imperialist on international issues

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Sat Oct 06, 2012 5:59 pm

The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:Please.

I know more about Lenin and Leninism than you ever will.

Lenin was a coward. He was a liar. He was a tyrant. Any self respecting communist, would not look up to that piece of shit of a human being. Lenin was a failure.

And because he didnt allow elections he was a tyrant? Hmm? He didnt genocide his own people like Stalin, he was liked by his people, and yet because he was state capitalist not free market capitalist he was a tyrant? Yeah riiiiggggghhhhhhttttt. Are ya gonna say every monarch in history was a tyrant to now?

:palm:

He had people killed. Sure, he was less bad than Stalin. But he was still a tyrant. His economic policies have nothing to do with it.

The fact that people died, because of his orders, makes him a tyrant.
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Death Metal
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13542
Founded: Dec 22, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Death Metal » Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:00 pm

The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
1. Because harvest failures never happened in feudalism to cripple the economy for decades.
2. Human development index.

1:Fair enough.
2: :palm: It was invented by capitalists!

Death Metal wrote:
Japan the capitalist democracy, or Japan the feudal empire who didn't even consider the lower castes to be human beings?

The former.


"It was invented by capitalists, so it's wrong" is the exact same logical fallacy as "It was published by the government, so it's wrong"
Only here when I'm VERY VERY VERY bored now.
(Trump is Reagan 2.0: A nationalistic bimbo who will ruin America.)
Death Metal: A nation founded on the most powerful force in the world: METAL! \m/
A non-idealist centre-leftist

Alts: Ronpaulatia, Bisonopolis, Iga, Gygaxia, The Children of Skyrim, Tinfoil Fedoras

Pro: Civil Equality, Scaled Income Taxes, Centralized Govtt, Moderate Business Regulations, Heavy Metal
Con: Censorship in any medium, Sales Tax, Flat Tax, Small Govt, Overly Large Govt, Laissez Faire, AutoTuner.

I support Obama. And so would FA Hayek.

34 arguments Libertarians (and sometimes AnCaps) make, and why they are wrong.

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:00 pm

The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
So you want a source on prosperity invented by someone who agrees with YOUR definition of prosperity, as opposed to everyone elses.

I will not exept any source invented by capitalists, like GDP's.

:palm:
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Williamson
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1582
Founded: Mar 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Williamson » Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:00 pm

The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:I did not say it grows, without any bumps in the road.

You need a source for something so obviously evident? Really?
Image

GDP's were invented by capitalists, obviously capitlist countries have higher ones.

okay so what prove do you want to see?

User avatar
Wesibaden
Diplomat
 
Posts: 632
Founded: Nov 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Wesibaden » Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:01 pm

Private Ownership is good its FOR the people not against
Member of the Imperialistic Three Crowns

User avatar
Shining Ys
Attaché
 
Posts: 89
Founded: May 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Shining Ys » Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:01 pm

When we're forced to argue as socialists about capitalist "prosperity" ("Would the viewer at home be watching this interview on a wide-screen television if you had your way?" - a real quote), the narrative is manipulated to favour capitalist conceptions of quality of life. I couldn't care less about the width of my television screen. Most of what's on it is a debasing insult to the human condition, anyway. What I do care about is free and universal access to the products of my civilisation.

User avatar
The United Soviet Socialist Republic
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17944
Founded: Aug 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:01 pm

Sibirsky wrote:
The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:And because he didnt allow elections he was a tyrant? Hmm? He didnt genocide his own people like Stalin, he was liked by his people, and yet because he was state capitalist not free market capitalist he was a tyrant? Yeah riiiiggggghhhhhhttttt. Are ya gonna say every monarch in history was a tyrant to now?

:palm:

He had people killed. Sure, he was less bad than Stalin. But he was still a tyrant. His economic policies have nothing to do with it.

The fact that people died, because of his orders, makes him a tyrant.

OK! Than Obama is a tyrant for ordering Bin Laden and other terrorists dead. And Bush is a tyrant for that reason to! And Clinton!
Gay and Proudand also a brony
Political Compass:Left: 7.76, Authoritarian: 5.6
I am: Fascist/Corporatist on economy,
Conservative on social issues(Support same sex marriage),
Anti secularist on religion,
Anti-Republican on government,
Interventionist/Imperialist on international issues

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57861
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:01 pm

The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:
Sibirsky wrote: :palm:

He had people killed. Sure, he was less bad than Stalin. But he was still a tyrant. His economic policies have nothing to do with it.

The fact that people died, because of his orders, makes him a tyrant.

OK! Than Obama is a tyrant for ordering Bin Laden and other terrorists dead. And Bush is a tyrant for that reason to! And Clinton!


They were voted in bro. WE killed those people. You don't understand what tyrant means.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
The United Soviet Socialist Republic
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17944
Founded: Aug 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:02 pm

Williamson wrote:
The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:GDP's were invented by capitalists, obviously capitlist countries have higher ones.

okay so what prove do you want to see?

Anything not invented by Capitalists, cause it will be incredibly biased.
Gay and Proudand also a brony
Political Compass:Left: 7.76, Authoritarian: 5.6
I am: Fascist/Corporatist on economy,
Conservative on social issues(Support same sex marriage),
Anti secularist on religion,
Anti-Republican on government,
Interventionist/Imperialist on international issues

User avatar
Vazeckta
Diplomat
 
Posts: 881
Founded: Aug 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vazeckta » Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:02 pm

The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
So you want a source on prosperity invented by someone who agrees with YOUR definition of prosperity, as opposed to everyone elses.

I will not exept any source invented by capitalists, like GDP's.

So you won't accept measure of economic prosperity that are based on economic prosperity?
Political Compass
Economic Left/Right: 10.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.72
I would probably vote with the American Libertarian Party.
I'm a Christian.
Likes:Capitalism, Classical liberalism, religion, state secularism,gay marriage, charity, God
Dislikes:Left-wing economics, statism, authoritarianism, theocracy, state atheism, social security, welfare, UN, DPRK, PRC
Meh:Teetotalism, pro-choice, EU, legalizing drugs
Blazedtown wrote:
Gladia wrote:I hope you two don't plan on procreating.

Why? A family cross burning is a great bonding activity.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57861
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:02 pm

The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:
Williamson wrote:okay so what prove do you want to see?

Anything not invented by Capitalists, cause it will be incredibly biased.


Name something and we shall provide.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
The United Soviet Socialist Republic
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17944
Founded: Aug 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:02 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:OK! Than Obama is a tyrant for ordering Bin Laden and other terrorists dead. And Bush is a tyrant for that reason to! And Clinton!


They were voted in bro. WE killed those people. You don't understand what tyrant means.

:palm:

Parlimentary democracy doesnt give people like you power. Total democracy does.
Gay and Proudand also a brony
Political Compass:Left: 7.76, Authoritarian: 5.6
I am: Fascist/Corporatist on economy,
Conservative on social issues(Support same sex marriage),
Anti secularist on religion,
Anti-Republican on government,
Interventionist/Imperialist on international issues

User avatar
Shining Ys
Attaché
 
Posts: 89
Founded: May 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Shining Ys » Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:03 pm

Hey! Maybe quality of life/prosperity/whatever can't actually be quantified? Maybe that's a capitalist idea, fetishising happiness, turning it into an exchangeable, measurable commodity?
Last edited by Shining Ys on Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The United Soviet Socialist Republic
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17944
Founded: Aug 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:03 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:Anything not invented by Capitalists, cause it will be incredibly biased.


Name something and we shall provide.

Number of starving people perhaps?
Gay and Proudand also a brony
Political Compass:Left: 7.76, Authoritarian: 5.6
I am: Fascist/Corporatist on economy,
Conservative on social issues(Support same sex marriage),
Anti secularist on religion,
Anti-Republican on government,
Interventionist/Imperialist on international issues

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57861
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:03 pm

The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
They were voted in bro. WE killed those people. You don't understand what tyrant means.

:palm:

Parlimentary democracy doesnt give people like you power. Total democracy does.


Actually it does give me power. Especially if you join the parties.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57861
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:03 pm

The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Name something and we shall provide.

Number of starving people perhaps?


As a % of global population?
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:04 pm

The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:I did not say it grows, without any bumps in the road.

You need a source for something so obviously evident? Really?
Image

GDP's were invented by capitalists, obviously capitlist countries have higher ones.

:palm:

Right. The fact that I have lived in both, the USSR, and the US and could make an actual comparison is irrelevant.

My own observations (and the flow of hundreds of millions of immigrants, and their observations), common sense, 0.1 brain cells (really, that is all that is required), all support the GDP numbers.
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Shining Ys
Attaché
 
Posts: 89
Founded: May 16, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Shining Ys » Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:04 pm

Should we include religious ascetics in those figures? Does anyone see my point?

User avatar
The United Soviet Socialist Republic
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17944
Founded: Aug 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:04 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote: :palm:

Parlimentary democracy doesnt give people like you power. Total democracy does.


Actually it does give me power. Especially if you join the parties.

Ugh confused people. You elect people who make decisions for you. Unless you are a politician you are almost powerless.
Gay and Proudand also a brony
Political Compass:Left: 7.76, Authoritarian: 5.6
I am: Fascist/Corporatist on economy,
Conservative on social issues(Support same sex marriage),
Anti secularist on religion,
Anti-Republican on government,
Interventionist/Imperialist on international issues

User avatar
The United Soviet Socialist Republic
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17944
Founded: Aug 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:05 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:Number of starving people perhaps?


As a % of global population?

I was thinking numbers, but that will work.

Sibirsky wrote:
The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:GDP's were invented by capitalists, obviously capitlist countries have higher ones.

:palm:

Right. The fact that I have lived in both, the USSR, and the US and could make an actual comparison is irrelevant.

My own observations (and the flow of hundreds of millions of immigrants, and their observations), common sense, 0.1 brain cells (really, that is all that is required), all support the GDP numbers.

You lived in the Soviet Union?
Gay and Proudand also a brony
Political Compass:Left: 7.76, Authoritarian: 5.6
I am: Fascist/Corporatist on economy,
Conservative on social issues(Support same sex marriage),
Anti secularist on religion,
Anti-Republican on government,
Interventionist/Imperialist on international issues

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Adamede, Dumb Ideologies, El Lazaro, Floofybit, Galloism, Gawdzendia, Necroghastia, Stellar Colonies, TheKeyToJoy, Ultra socialist, Umeria, Valyxias, Zurkerx

Advertisement

Remove ads