NATION

PASSWORD

29-year-old Muslim woman named culture minister of Norway

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Qasarastan
Attaché
 
Posts: 72
Founded: Oct 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Qasarastan » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:04 am

Ahh, this is clearly a sign of mass Islamization, commited by Islamofascists in Norway! Al-Qaeda have smuggle their spy into the Government of Norway, our priority is to kill (also rape as the bonus) her before she exploding the building or something....
I was just RPing the Islamic Fundamentalist nation! Imagine Democratic Saudi Arabia, or slightly more liberal Taliban, or Sunni Iran with no President. Bingo! Qasarastan.
ICly, it's Authoritarian Democracy, not Psychotic Dictatorship.

User avatar
Smiil
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 51
Founded: Oct 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Smiil » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:09 am

The problem is that she is the minister of culture, a post where her own ideales play a vital part, Had she been appointed head of finance or fishing minister (yea that is a real post) there would be no problem, becouse in those posts only hard facts would count, minister of culture is in its nature run by subjective opinions

User avatar
Qasarastan
Attaché
 
Posts: 72
Founded: Oct 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Qasarastan » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:16 am

Smiil wrote:The problem is that she is the minister of culture, a post where her own ideales play a vital part, Had she been appointed head of finance or fishing minister (yea that is a real post) there would be no problem, becouse in those posts only hard facts would count, minister of culture is in its nature run by subjective opinions

..what is the problem? Legalizing burka? Problem?
I was just RPing the Islamic Fundamentalist nation! Imagine Democratic Saudi Arabia, or slightly more liberal Taliban, or Sunni Iran with no President. Bingo! Qasarastan.
ICly, it's Authoritarian Democracy, not Psychotic Dictatorship.

User avatar
Smiil
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 51
Founded: Oct 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Smiil » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:26 am

Qasarastan wrote:
Smiil wrote:The problem is that she is the minister of culture, a post where her own ideales play a vital part, Had she been appointed head of finance or fishing minister (yea that is a real post) there would be no problem, becouse in those posts only hard facts would count, minister of culture is in its nature run by subjective opinions

..what is the problem? Legalizing burka? Problem?


problem is that she have cultural understanding that crashes with the majorety of the people she is going to govern. A comunist country would never install a market liberalist as minister of coin and a militery regime would not instal a passifist as head of the army why would you install a muslim as minister of culture in a contry built upon christian ideals?

User avatar
Baltenstein
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11008
Founded: Jan 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Baltenstein » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:27 am

I don't think that Nrowegian society defines itself as "built upon Christian ideals".
O'er the hills and o'er the main.
Through Flanders, Portugal and Spain.
King George commands and we obey.
Over the hills and far away.


THE NORTH REMEMBERS

User avatar
Qasarastan
Attaché
 
Posts: 72
Founded: Oct 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Qasarastan » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:28 am

Smiil wrote:
Qasarastan wrote:..what is the problem? Legalizing burka? Problem?


problem is that she have cultural understanding that crashes with the majorety of the people she is going to govern. A comunist country would never install a market liberalist as minister of coin and a militery regime would not instal a passifist as head of the army why would you install a muslim as minister of culture in a contry built upon christian ideals?

"Christian Ideals"? Norway? Seriously?
I was just RPing the Islamic Fundamentalist nation! Imagine Democratic Saudi Arabia, or slightly more liberal Taliban, or Sunni Iran with no President. Bingo! Qasarastan.
ICly, it's Authoritarian Democracy, not Psychotic Dictatorship.

User avatar
Smiil
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 51
Founded: Oct 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Smiil » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:31 am

yes seriusly I cant think of anything that have influensed Norwegian culture, more than christanity, but please enlighten me :)

User avatar
Qasarastan
Attaché
 
Posts: 72
Founded: Oct 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Qasarastan » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:37 am

Smiil wrote:yes seriusly I cant think of anything that have influensed Norwegian culture, more than christanity, but please enlighten me :)

Scandinavia, based on my though, is the most secular, liberal, atheistic place, but I'm not said I like it. BTW, Norway is secular, right?
I was just RPing the Islamic Fundamentalist nation! Imagine Democratic Saudi Arabia, or slightly more liberal Taliban, or Sunni Iran with no President. Bingo! Qasarastan.
ICly, it's Authoritarian Democracy, not Psychotic Dictatorship.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163887
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:41 am

Smiil wrote:The problem is that she is the minister of culture, a post where her own ideales play a vital part, Had she been appointed head of finance or fishing minister (yea that is a real post) there would be no problem, becouse in those posts only hard facts would count, minister of culture is in its nature run by subjective opinions

Every post is run on subjective opinions.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Smiil
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 51
Founded: Oct 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Smiil » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:42 am

Baltenstein wrote:I don't think that Nrowegian society defines itself as "built upon Christian ideals".



Not only Noway but most of western europe have been built upon christian ideals, that does not mean that the society is not secular and I dont say that Norwegians bases there daily decitions upon a religius belives, but for 1000 years Norway was under the same have influense of religius leaders much like the rest of the world, that would have to make an inpact.
1) the cross in the flag
2) 7th vers of the national anthem starts "Norwegian man in house and cabbin, thank your great God" and ends "everything that the fathers fought form, all that the mothers have cried for, have the lord made easier, so that we won"
3) The king is still by law required to be christian
4) by 2005 45% of Norwegians belived in the christian God.

these are just some points, but clearly proves that Norwegian culture is atleast partly built upon a christian influense

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163887
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:43 am

Smiil wrote:
Baltenstein wrote:I don't think that Nrowegian society defines itself as "built upon Christian ideals".



Not only Noway but most of western europe have been built upon christian ideals, that does not mean that the society is not secular and I dont say that Norwegians bases there daily decitions upon a religius belives, but for 1000 years Norway was under the same have influense of religius leaders much like the rest of the world, that would have to make an inpact.
1) the cross in the flag
2) 7th vers of the national anthem starts "Norwegian man in house and cabbin, thank your great God" and ends "everything that the fathers fought form, all that the mothers have cried for, have the lord made easier, so that we won"
3) The king is still by law required to be christian
4) by 2005 45% of Norwegians belived in the christian God.

these are just some points, but clearly proves that Norwegian culture is atleast partly built upon a christian influense

None of which means that a Muslim can't be the Culture Minister.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
L Ron Cupboard
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9054
Founded: Mar 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby L Ron Cupboard » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:48 am

I wonder if she likes death metal.
A leopard in every home, you know it makes sense.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163887
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:49 am

L Ron Cupboard wrote:I wonder if she likes death metal.

Who in Norway doesn't?
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Smiil
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 51
Founded: Oct 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Smiil » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:52 am

[quote="Ifreann";p="11294845"
None of which means that a Muslim can't be the Culture Minister.[/quote]

yes it does, the ministers views should reflect the wievs of the majority of the people. It is clear to me that a muslim does not share the same values as the rest of sosiety, had she been appointed minister of education this would be a non-issue becouse her cultral heritage would not influense the job she was doing, but as the case stands she will be desiding which project she should suport, the one that forward the muslim agenda, the christian agenda or the non-religius agenda. And that can become a problem when she has so strong opinions on the subject that may distract her from doing what is right

User avatar
Baltenstein
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11008
Founded: Jan 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Baltenstein » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:58 am

L Ron Cupboard wrote:I wonder if she likes death metal.


Wrong country, you're thinking about Sweden. Norway's thing is Black Metal.
Last edited by Baltenstein on Thu Oct 18, 2012 7:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
O'er the hills and o'er the main.
Through Flanders, Portugal and Spain.
King George commands and we obey.
Over the hills and far away.


THE NORTH REMEMBERS

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163887
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:58 am

Smiil wrote:yes it does, the ministers views should reflect the wievs of the majority of the people.

Is Norway not a democracy? Do you perhaps know of some wrongdoing in her election?
It is clear to me that a muslim does not share the same values as the rest of sosiety,

Which is patently wrong because "the rest of society" includes 106,735 Muslims.
had she been appointed minister of education this would be a non-issue becouse her cultral heritage would not influense the job she was doing,

No more than her cultural heritage is going to influence her opinion now.
but as the case stands she will be desiding which project she should suport, the one that forward the muslim agenda, the christian agenda or the non-religius agenda.

Which she wouldn't do in a post like education? Nonsense.
And that can become a problem when she has so strong opinions on the subject that may distract her from doing what is right

The same as literally every politician in the history of human governments.
Last edited by Ifreann on Thu Oct 18, 2012 7:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Baltenstein
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11008
Founded: Jan 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Baltenstein » Thu Oct 18, 2012 7:02 am

Smiil wrote:
yes it does, the ministers views should reflect the wievs of the majority of the people. It is clear to me that a muslim does not share the same values as the rest of sosiety


Speak for yourself then. Most people probably know that Muslims are perfectly capable of sharing the same values as the rest of society.

had she been appointed minister of education this would be a non-issue becouse her cultral heritage would not influense the job she was doing


Education has also a lot to do with values, you know.

but as the case stands she will be desiding which project she should suport, the one that forward the muslim agenda, the christian agenda or the non-religius agenda. And that can become a problem when she has so strong opinions on the subject that may distract her from doing what is right


There is no "war of agendas" and what you describe is not what culture ministries do, unless they happen to be one-party-dictatorships, which Norway pretty much isn't.
Last edited by Baltenstein on Thu Oct 18, 2012 7:03 am, edited 3 times in total.
O'er the hills and o'er the main.
Through Flanders, Portugal and Spain.
King George commands and we obey.
Over the hills and far away.


THE NORTH REMEMBERS

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163887
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Thu Oct 18, 2012 7:03 am

Baltenstein wrote:
L Ron Cupboard wrote:I wonder if she likes death metal.


Wrong country, you're thinking about Sweden. Norway's think is Black Metal.

Feh, you say potato.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Khelshar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1721
Founded: Jun 21, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Khelshar » Thu Oct 18, 2012 7:06 am

Smiil wrote:yes it does, the ministers views should reflect the wievs of the majority of the people. It is clear to me that a muslim does not share the same values as the rest of sosiety, had she been appointed minister of education this would be a non-issue becouse her cultral heritage would not influense the job she was doing, but as the case stands she will be desiding which project she should suport, the one that forward the muslim agenda, the christian agenda or the non-religius agenda. And that can become a problem when she has so strong opinions on the subject that may distract her from doing what is right



Just because she is a muslim, she has other ideals? I have read about her, see seems to be very integrated. And her job as minister of culture is to make norwegian modern culture better. She will not fight for the ideals and morals of the society, but help the movie industry to get going. And you dont have to a christian to do that. And what ideals do you thin about?

And, Norway is secular. No state chruch, and 45 % of the popluation is in a christian church. I am, but i do not belive in God. And not that many of those 45 does either.
Last edited by Khelshar on Thu Oct 18, 2012 7:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
Nation under re-construction

User avatar
Smiil
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 51
Founded: Oct 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Smiil » Thu Oct 18, 2012 7:17 am

Ifreann wrote:
Smiil wrote:yes it does, the ministers views should reflect the wievs of the majority of the people.

Is Norway not a democracy? Do you perhaps know of some wrongdoing in her election?
It is clear to me that a muslim does not share the same values as the rest of sosiety,

Which is patently wrong because "the rest of society" includes 106,735 Muslims.
had she been appointed minister of education this would be a non-issue becouse her cultral heritage would not influense the job she was doing,

No more than her cultural heritage is going to influence her opinion now.
but as the case stands she will be desiding which project she should suport, the one that forward the muslim agenda, the christian agenda or the non-religius agenda.

Which she wouldn't do in a post like education? Nonsense.
And that can become a problem when she has so strong opinions on the subject that may distract her from doing what is right

The same as literally every politician in the history of human governments.


in norway you wote for political parties, 3 years ago labour party won, and this girl was not mentioned at all, it is first now after the last minister resigned this girl enterd the post. the USA is going to hold a election now in Nowember, lets say Obama wins, and then makes up his gouverment consisting only of muslims, it would still be a valid gouverment but it would not reflect what the majorety of the voters wanted.

in Norway only 3,3% of the population is muslim

yes but the difference is that education is an objectiv culture is subjectiv

again, she wouldent, she would decide how long the students would need to be at school each day, the learning platform is decided by 2/3 majority in the storting (congress)

last one I agree on, but the difference is that if she had ben nonreligius/christian she would have the suport of around 50% of the population if she is muslime she would have the suport of #% of the population

User avatar
Khelshar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1721
Founded: Jun 21, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Khelshar » Thu Oct 18, 2012 7:38 am

Smiil wrote:

last one I agree on, but the difference is that if she had ben nonreligius/christian she would have the suport of around 50% of the population if she is muslime she would have the suport of #% of the population


Yeah, and then we can say she represents 3 % of the population(though i dont think she does, and neither does she). Then she represents those 3 %, as we have to be representative.

But that is not why she was chosen. That was because the prime minister wanted her to be the minister, so no matter what she would belive in, it would not be representative, because no one elected her but the prime minister.
Nation under re-construction

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163887
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Thu Oct 18, 2012 8:02 am

Smiil wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Is Norway not a democracy? Do you perhaps know of some wrongdoing in her election?

Which is patently wrong because "the rest of society" includes 106,735 Muslims.

No more than her cultural heritage is going to influence her opinion now.

Which she wouldn't do in a post like education? Nonsense.

The same as literally every politician in the history of human governments.


in norway you wote for political parties, 3 years ago labour party won, and this girl was not mentioned at all,

Not to you, perhaps, but she was elected then. The party with the support of the Norwegian people has appointed her to this post. They have a mandate from the people, and by extension so does she.
it is first now after the last minister resigned this girl enterd the post. the USA is going to hold a election now in Nowember, lets say Obama wins, and then makes up his gouverment consisting only of muslims, it would still be a valid gouverment but it would not reflect what the majorety of the voters wanted.

Except that the voters wanted Obama to be in a position where he could appoint anyone he wanted.

in Norway only 3,3% of the population is muslim

And those people are part of Norwegian society.

yes but the difference is that education is an objectiv culture is subjectiv

Education is not objective. Tell me how much a teacher of three years experience should, objectively, be paid. Then show me the method by which you calculated that number.

again, she wouldent, she would decide how long the students would need to be at school each day, the learning platform is decided by 2/3 majority in the storting (congress)

And you think she can just do whatever she wants as the Culture Minister? Bollocks. If she gains the ire of her party she can, I assume, be removed from the post. Or the party.

last one I agree on, but the difference is that if she had ben nonreligius/christian she would have the suport of around 50% of the population if she is muslime she would have the suport of #% of the population

This is only true if Norway is a country of bigots that can only support people of their own religion. Which I very much doubt.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
EnragedMaldivians
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8451
Founded: Feb 01, 2010
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby EnragedMaldivians » Thu Oct 18, 2012 8:15 am

Smiil wrote:
Qasarastan wrote:..what is the problem? Legalizing burka? Problem?


problem is that she have cultural understanding that crashes with the majorety of the people she is going to govern. A comunist country would never install a market liberalist as minister of coin and a militery regime would not instal a passifist as head of the army why would you install a muslim as minister of culture in a contry built upon christian ideals?


Whining about Muslim culture ministers hence alienating Muslims and indicating that their cultural background prevents them from being truly Norwegian is a great way to integrate them into the mainstream.

In fact, I can think of no conceivable route through which such actions would incentivise any Muslims to increasingly retreat into their religious identity - and I'm positive that none of them will harbour any grudges over this treatment and gravitate towards Political Islam out of spite. Well done.
Taking a break.

User avatar
Vecherd
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6161
Founded: Jun 16, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Vecherd » Thu Oct 18, 2012 8:21 am

Gravlen wrote:
Vecherd wrote:She supports forced marriages, therefore I am against her. New low even for Labour.

http://www.dagsavisen.no/nyemeninger/al ... ost_255835
http://www.verdidebatt.no/debatt/cat12/ ... ost_321918

Unsurprisingly, both you and the former head of the Norwegian Defence League are wrong, since there's a difference between arranged marriages and forced marriages. As she points out, forced marriages are illegal under Norwegian law.


Unlike you I am not a member though ;)

Arranged marriages is not good, the parents/third party of two parts agree to wed away two people means a lot of pressure and can also go against the ideals of multiculturalism which I think is bad.
[align=center]Frie markeder Frie folk
[spoiler=Political Stuff]Left/Right: 8.12
Authoritarian/Libertarian: -10.00

User avatar
EnragedMaldivians
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8451
Founded: Feb 01, 2010
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby EnragedMaldivians » Thu Oct 18, 2012 8:28 am

Vecherd wrote:
Gravlen wrote:Unsurprisingly, both you and the former head of the Norwegian Defence League are wrong, since there's a difference between arranged marriages and forced marriages. As she points out, forced marriages are illegal under Norwegian law.


Unlike you I am not a member though ;)

Arranged marriages is not good, the parents/third party of two parts agree to wed away two people means a lot of pressure and can also go against the ideals of multiculturalism which I think is bad.


Look, I don't particularly like arranged marriage but there really is a difference between two families introducing their two children for them to find out if they'd like to become spouses, and downright "ordering" them to get married. The latter should be illegal but I see no reason for the former to be illegal.
Taking a break.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 0rganization, Almonaster Nuevo, American Legionaries, Brazilcomestoyou, Cerula, Ethel mermania, Hammer Britannia, Ineva, Kaumudeen, Khedivate-of-Egypt, Kreushia, Repreteop, Saint Freya, The Huskar Social Union, Western Theram, Zancostan

Advertisement

Remove ads