Advertisement
by Qasarastan » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:04 am
by Smiil » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:09 am
by Qasarastan » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:16 am
Smiil wrote:The problem is that she is the minister of culture, a post where her own ideales play a vital part, Had she been appointed head of finance or fishing minister (yea that is a real post) there would be no problem, becouse in those posts only hard facts would count, minister of culture is in its nature run by subjective opinions
by Smiil » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:26 am
Qasarastan wrote:Smiil wrote:The problem is that she is the minister of culture, a post where her own ideales play a vital part, Had she been appointed head of finance or fishing minister (yea that is a real post) there would be no problem, becouse in those posts only hard facts would count, minister of culture is in its nature run by subjective opinions
..what is the problem? Legalizing burka? Problem?
by Baltenstein » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:27 am
by Qasarastan » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:28 am
Smiil wrote:Qasarastan wrote:..what is the problem? Legalizing burka? Problem?
problem is that she have cultural understanding that crashes with the majorety of the people she is going to govern. A comunist country would never install a market liberalist as minister of coin and a militery regime would not instal a passifist as head of the army why would you install a muslim as minister of culture in a contry built upon christian ideals?
by Qasarastan » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:37 am
Smiil wrote:yes seriusly I cant think of anything that have influensed Norwegian culture, more than christanity, but please enlighten me
by Ifreann » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:41 am
Smiil wrote:The problem is that she is the minister of culture, a post where her own ideales play a vital part, Had she been appointed head of finance or fishing minister (yea that is a real post) there would be no problem, becouse in those posts only hard facts would count, minister of culture is in its nature run by subjective opinions
by Smiil » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:42 am
Baltenstein wrote:I don't think that Nrowegian society defines itself as "built upon Christian ideals".
by Ifreann » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:43 am
Smiil wrote:Baltenstein wrote:I don't think that Nrowegian society defines itself as "built upon Christian ideals".
Not only Noway but most of western europe have been built upon christian ideals, that does not mean that the society is not secular and I dont say that Norwegians bases there daily decitions upon a religius belives, but for 1000 years Norway was under the same have influense of religius leaders much like the rest of the world, that would have to make an inpact.
1) the cross in the flag
2) 7th vers of the national anthem starts "Norwegian man in house and cabbin, thank your great God" and ends "everything that the fathers fought form, all that the mothers have cried for, have the lord made easier, so that we won"
3) The king is still by law required to be christian
4) by 2005 45% of Norwegians belived in the christian God.
these are just some points, but clearly proves that Norwegian culture is atleast partly built upon a christian influense
by L Ron Cupboard » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:48 am
by Ifreann » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:49 am
L Ron Cupboard wrote:I wonder if she likes death metal.
by Smiil » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:52 am
by Baltenstein » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:58 am
L Ron Cupboard wrote:I wonder if she likes death metal.
by Ifreann » Thu Oct 18, 2012 6:58 am
Smiil wrote:yes it does, the ministers views should reflect the wievs of the majority of the people.
It is clear to me that a muslim does not share the same values as the rest of sosiety,
had she been appointed minister of education this would be a non-issue becouse her cultral heritage would not influense the job she was doing,
but as the case stands she will be desiding which project she should suport, the one that forward the muslim agenda, the christian agenda or the non-religius agenda.
And that can become a problem when she has so strong opinions on the subject that may distract her from doing what is right
by Baltenstein » Thu Oct 18, 2012 7:02 am
Smiil wrote:
yes it does, the ministers views should reflect the wievs of the majority of the people. It is clear to me that a muslim does not share the same values as the rest of sosiety
had she been appointed minister of education this would be a non-issue becouse her cultral heritage would not influense the job she was doing
but as the case stands she will be desiding which project she should suport, the one that forward the muslim agenda, the christian agenda or the non-religius agenda. And that can become a problem when she has so strong opinions on the subject that may distract her from doing what is right
by Khelshar » Thu Oct 18, 2012 7:06 am
Smiil wrote:yes it does, the ministers views should reflect the wievs of the majority of the people. It is clear to me that a muslim does not share the same values as the rest of sosiety, had she been appointed minister of education this would be a non-issue becouse her cultral heritage would not influense the job she was doing, but as the case stands she will be desiding which project she should suport, the one that forward the muslim agenda, the christian agenda or the non-religius agenda. And that can become a problem when she has so strong opinions on the subject that may distract her from doing what is right
by Smiil » Thu Oct 18, 2012 7:17 am
Ifreann wrote:Smiil wrote:yes it does, the ministers views should reflect the wievs of the majority of the people.
Is Norway not a democracy? Do you perhaps know of some wrongdoing in her election?It is clear to me that a muslim does not share the same values as the rest of sosiety,
Which is patently wrong because "the rest of society" includes 106,735 Muslims.had she been appointed minister of education this would be a non-issue becouse her cultral heritage would not influense the job she was doing,
No more than her cultural heritage is going to influence her opinion now.but as the case stands she will be desiding which project she should suport, the one that forward the muslim agenda, the christian agenda or the non-religius agenda.
Which she wouldn't do in a post like education? Nonsense.And that can become a problem when she has so strong opinions on the subject that may distract her from doing what is right
The same as literally every politician in the history of human governments.
by Khelshar » Thu Oct 18, 2012 7:38 am
Smiil wrote:
last one I agree on, but the difference is that if she had ben nonreligius/christian she would have the suport of around 50% of the population if she is muslime she would have the suport of #% of the population
by Ifreann » Thu Oct 18, 2012 8:02 am
Smiil wrote:Ifreann wrote:Is Norway not a democracy? Do you perhaps know of some wrongdoing in her election?
Which is patently wrong because "the rest of society" includes 106,735 Muslims.
No more than her cultural heritage is going to influence her opinion now.
Which she wouldn't do in a post like education? Nonsense.
The same as literally every politician in the history of human governments.
in norway you wote for political parties, 3 years ago labour party won, and this girl was not mentioned at all,
it is first now after the last minister resigned this girl enterd the post. the USA is going to hold a election now in Nowember, lets say Obama wins, and then makes up his gouverment consisting only of muslims, it would still be a valid gouverment but it would not reflect what the majorety of the voters wanted.
in Norway only 3,3% of the population is muslim
yes but the difference is that education is an objectiv culture is subjectiv
again, she wouldent, she would decide how long the students would need to be at school each day, the learning platform is decided by 2/3 majority in the storting (congress)
last one I agree on, but the difference is that if she had ben nonreligius/christian she would have the suport of around 50% of the population if she is muslime she would have the suport of #% of the population
by EnragedMaldivians » Thu Oct 18, 2012 8:15 am
Smiil wrote:Qasarastan wrote:..what is the problem? Legalizing burka? Problem?
problem is that she have cultural understanding that crashes with the majorety of the people she is going to govern. A comunist country would never install a market liberalist as minister of coin and a militery regime would not instal a passifist as head of the army why would you install a muslim as minister of culture in a contry built upon christian ideals?
by Vecherd » Thu Oct 18, 2012 8:21 am
Gravlen wrote:Vecherd wrote:She supports forced marriages, therefore I am against her. New low even for Labour.
http://www.dagsavisen.no/nyemeninger/al ... ost_255835
http://www.verdidebatt.no/debatt/cat12/ ... ost_321918
Unsurprisingly, both you and the former head of the Norwegian Defence League are wrong, since there's a difference between arranged marriages and forced marriages. As she points out, forced marriages are illegal under Norwegian law.
by EnragedMaldivians » Thu Oct 18, 2012 8:28 am
Vecherd wrote:Gravlen wrote:Unsurprisingly, both you and the former head of the Norwegian Defence League are wrong, since there's a difference between arranged marriages and forced marriages. As she points out, forced marriages are illegal under Norwegian law.
Unlike you I am not a member though
Arranged marriages is not good, the parents/third party of two parts agree to wed away two people means a lot of pressure and can also go against the ideals of multiculturalism which I think is bad.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: 0rganization, Almonaster Nuevo, American Legionaries, Brazilcomestoyou, Cerula, Ethel mermania, Hammer Britannia, Ineva, Kaumudeen, Khedivate-of-Egypt, Kreushia, Repreteop, Saint Freya, The Huskar Social Union, Western Theram, Zancostan
Advertisement