The God-Realm wrote:Snail-land wrote:
What bothers me about this post is that you seem to see women as interchangeable objects for your use, differentiated primarily by physical characteristics such as body shape and hair color. You discriminate based on arbitrary aesthetic standards as though such trivial distinctions could accurately determine another human being's worth, or her compatibility as a partner. Women are not types of things to be selected because of slight physical deviations, the way you would go to a store and choose one brand of soda over another. Women are people, each with her own individual thoughts and feelings. It baffles me why any woman would knowingly choose to be with someone who thought of them in such a manner. I can only assume that they have either been conditioned to think that being treated that way in unavoidable, or they do not know that you are being superficial. Either way, it is disturbing to me that anyone would select a mate for the color of her hair or the shape of her body. Her hair will probably turn white someday, and when she gets older, she will probably gain weight. If you picked her for her body, what will you have left?
And men are not chosen by women on by how successful they are? Women want a nice car, a nice house, a shitton of money, a shit ton of jewels, and they kick the less successful men away.
Don'r pretend women are more oppressed than us.
You're placing all women in a rather greedy light.
Not all women want a shit ton of jewels. I can assure you that I, personally, could care less for jewels. All I want is a man who's good to me, who doesn't abuse me, who keeps me safe and makes me feel loved and respected.
If a nice car, a nice house and a lot of money are included in that, I would consider those a bonus, but I don't really care if they happen. That is not what relationships or love are based on. Or at least, they shouldn't be.






