NATION

PASSWORD

The 2012 Three Ring Circus AKA The US Presidential Election

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Who do you want to win?

President Barack Obama
423
42%
Governor Mitt Romney
180
18%
A third party candidate
185
18%
Who cares and/or I ain't American
75
7%
It doesn't matter as the Mods are gonna launch their coup any time now and I for one welcome our Modly overlords
146
14%
 
Total votes : 1009

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:35 pm

I can't get over Ann Romney saying, "Stop it. This is hard. You want to try it? Get in the ring," I just imagine this spoiled rich brat stomping her feet and shrieking.

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111683
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:40 pm

Khadgar wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:Ryan was boo'd by Seniors at an AARP campaign stop.

...In LA, so it isn't terribly shocking, that's a very split state. But I have to admit, he handled it well.


Ha ha!

I'm pretty down, no "Romney making an ass out of himself" news yet today.

I don't know, he released his 2011 tax returns, which show him paying about 14.1%.

And "In an amended return, Paul Ryan, the vice presidential candidate, told the I.R.S. he and his wife had 'inadvertently' failed to report $61,122 in income from 2011." How the fuck to you forget about 61 grand?

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012 ... eturns/?hp

Now, to compare that 14.1% to others ...

The New York Times wrote:Romney’s Taxes Compared With Everyone Else’s
By ANNIE LOWREY
The Romney campaign revealed Friday afternoon that Mitt Romney and his wife, Ann, paid a 14.1 percent effective federal tax rate in 2011, paying $1.9 million in taxes on $13.7 million in income, much of it from investments. (That $13.7 million in income most likely puts him in the top 0.01 percent of earners, by the way.)

Where does that effective tax rate put him in the universe of taxpayers? The Romneys paid a higher effective tax rate than the average middle-income American, though a significantly lower rate than the average rich, or very rich, American.

According to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, the middle quintile of taxpayers – earning between $33,542 and $59,486 a year – had an effective direct federal tax rate of about 12 percent in 2011. The top 1 percent of earners, making more than $532,613 a year, paid a direct federal tax rate of about 22.7 percent. And the top 0.1 percent of earners, making more than $2,178,886 a year, paid a direct federal tax rate of about 21.4 percent.

(We’re just using income, employee-side payroll and estate taxes in this comparison. A fuller picture would include state and local, employer-side payroll and corporate taxes.)

Still, the Romneys revealed that they paid more taxes than they really owed, pushing their effective federal rate higher. The couple made more than $4 million in charitable donations in 2011, but claimed a deduction for only $2.25 million of those donations “to conform to the governor’s statement” that he “paid at least 13 percent in income taxes in each of the last 10 years.”

In light of that, expect Mr. Romney to take some heat for this statement, which he made to ABC News in July: “ I don’t pay more than are legally due and frankly if I had paid more than are legally due I don’t think I’d be qualified to become president. I’d think people would want me to follow the law and pay only what the tax code requires.”
Last edited by Farnhamia on Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:41 pm

The Emerald Dawn wrote:I can't get over Ann Romney saying, "Stop it. This is hard. You want to try it? Get in the ring," I just imagine this spoiled rich brat stomping her feet and shrieking.


Romney's campaign is falling apart like the Mir Space Station, and by now it's starting that atmospheric re-entry.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111683
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:43 pm

Gauthier wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I can't get over Ann Romney saying, "Stop it. This is hard. You want to try it? Get in the ring," I just imagine this spoiled rich brat stomping her feet and shrieking.


Romney's campaign is falling apart like the Mir Space Station, and by now it's starting that atmospheric re-entry.

Let's not get complacent. The debates are yet to come. A bit of slick showmanship and Mitt could recover some momentum.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:44 pm

Farnhamia wrote:
Gauthier wrote:
Romney's campaign is falling apart like the Mir Space Station, and by now it's starting that atmospheric re-entry.

Let's not get complacent. The debates are yet to come. A bit of slick showmanship and Mitt could recover some momentum.


Like during the Republican primaries?

"I'll wager ten thousand dollars!"
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:44 pm

Farnhamia wrote:
Gauthier wrote:
Romney's campaign is falling apart like the Mir Space Station, and by now it's starting that atmospheric re-entry.

Let's not get complacent. The debates are yet to come. A bit of slick showmanship and Mitt could recover some momentum.

He's lulling us into a false sense of security. See, in the debates he's going to unveil the Real Mitt, and go by the name Willard Romney for the rest of the campaign to disassociate himself from his earlier gaffes.

User avatar
Sdaeriji
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7566
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Sdaeriji » Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:45 pm

I cannot wrap my head around why Romney would take all that heat for all those months about such a remarkably unremarkable tax return.
Farnhamia wrote:What part of the four-letter word "Rules" are you having trouble with?
Farnhamia wrote:four-letter word "Rules"

User avatar
Of the Free Socialist Territories
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8370
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Of the Free Socialist Territories » Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:46 pm

Gauthier wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I can't get over Ann Romney saying, "Stop it. This is hard. You want to try it? Get in the ring," I just imagine this spoiled rich brat stomping her feet and shrieking.


Romney's campaign is falling apart like the Mir Space Station, and by now it's starting that atmospheric re-entry.


Except Mir's re-entry was intentional, was it not? This is more like Fuckupshima.
Don't be deceived when our Revolution has finally been stamped out and they tell you things are better now even if there's no poverty to see, because the poverty's been hidden...even if you ever got more wages and could afford to buy more of these new and useless goods which these new industries foist on you, and even if it seems to you that "you never had so much" - that is only the slogan of those who have much more than you.

Marat, "Marat/Sade"

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:46 pm

The Emerald Dawn wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:Let's not get complacent. The debates are yet to come. A bit of slick showmanship and Mitt could recover some momentum.

He's lulling us into a false sense of security. See, in the debates he's going to unveil the Real Mitt, and go by the name Willard Romney for the rest of the campaign to disassociate himself from his earlier gaffes.


Romney's had more transformations than a Michael Bay film.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:47 pm

Gauthier wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:He's lulling us into a false sense of security. See, in the debates he's going to unveil the Real Mitt, and go by the name Willard Romney for the rest of the campaign to disassociate himself from his earlier gaffes.


Romney's had more transformations than a Michael Bay film.

More explosions too.

User avatar
Of the Free Socialist Territories
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8370
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Of the Free Socialist Territories » Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:48 pm

The Emerald Dawn wrote:
Gauthier wrote:
Romney's had more transformations than a Michael Bay film.

More explosions too.


And less intelligent dialogue.
Don't be deceived when our Revolution has finally been stamped out and they tell you things are better now even if there's no poverty to see, because the poverty's been hidden...even if you ever got more wages and could afford to buy more of these new and useless goods which these new industries foist on you, and even if it seems to you that "you never had so much" - that is only the slogan of those who have much more than you.

Marat, "Marat/Sade"

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:49 pm

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:More explosions too.


And less intelligent dialogue.

Worse actors.

User avatar
Of the Free Socialist Territories
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8370
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Of the Free Socialist Territories » Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:49 pm

The Emerald Dawn wrote:
Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
And less intelligent dialogue.

Worse actors.


And a bigger budget.
Don't be deceived when our Revolution has finally been stamped out and they tell you things are better now even if there's no poverty to see, because the poverty's been hidden...even if you ever got more wages and could afford to buy more of these new and useless goods which these new industries foist on you, and even if it seems to you that "you never had so much" - that is only the slogan of those who have much more than you.

Marat, "Marat/Sade"

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111683
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:51 pm

Sdaeriji wrote:I cannot wrap my head around why Romney would take all that heat for all those months about such a remarkably unremarkable tax return.

He'd promised to release this one, so he did. It's the earlier ones that people wonder about. I suspect they show that when he said he had severed his relationship with Bain he was still listing himself as working there and that he was receiving compensation.

14% of $13.7 million is about 7% less than the average for his income bracket, the top 0.1%. And apparently the Romneys didn't report $2 million in charitable donations so they would pay more than they owed. Sounds like, "Well, Governor, you're running for President, you probably won't be able to avoid releasing this return, so let's not report these deductions here. That brings your effective rate up to about 14%, that should be good."
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Fri Sep 21, 2012 3:01 pm

Farnhamia wrote:
Sdaeriji wrote:I cannot wrap my head around why Romney would take all that heat for all those months about such a remarkably unremarkable tax return.

He'd promised to release this one, so he did. It's the earlier ones that people wonder about. I suspect they show that when he said he had severed his relationship with Bain he was still listing himself as working there and that he was receiving compensation.

14% of $13.7 million is about 7% less than the average for his income bracket, the top 0.1%. And apparently the Romneys didn't report $2 million in charitable donations so they would pay more than they owed. Sounds like, "Well, Governor, you're running for President, you probably won't be able to avoid releasing this return, so let's not report these deductions here. That brings your effective rate up to about 14%, that should be good."

And heaven forefend if he had to admit that he was a....moocher.

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111683
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Fri Sep 21, 2012 3:20 pm

The Emerald Dawn wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:He'd promised to release this one, so he did. It's the earlier ones that people wonder about. I suspect they show that when he said he had severed his relationship with Bain he was still listing himself as working there and that he was receiving compensation.

14% of $13.7 million is about 7% less than the average for his income bracket, the top 0.1%. And apparently the Romneys didn't report $2 million in charitable donations so they would pay more than they owed. Sounds like, "Well, Governor, you're running for President, you probably won't be able to avoid releasing this return, so let's not report these deductions here. That brings your effective rate up to about 14%, that should be good."

And heaven forefend if he had to admit that he was a....moocher.

Indeed. I don't think he's in any danger of paying no income tax, though. I'm always of two minds about income taxes in campaigns. The whole idea is to pay as little as you legitimately can. It's the annual game we play. Rich people can hire very good tax accountants, I have no problem with that. It's the not reporting some deductions in order to pay more that I find annoying, because it goes against the game and it looks contrived. And I can't help wondering what there is in the returns he won't show us.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Fri Sep 21, 2012 3:30 pm

OHHHHHH i see...

romney didnt take all his charitible deductions because that is the only way he kept his taxes HIGH. if he had taken his deduction for his tithing to the church he would be a liar who said he never paid less than 13%
whatever

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111683
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Fri Sep 21, 2012 3:32 pm

Ashmoria wrote:OHHHHHH i see...

romney didnt take all his charitible deductions because that is the only way he kept his taxes HIGH. if he had taken his deduction for his tithing to the church he would be a liar who said he never paid less than 13%

Yeah ... heh ... And there's this at the end of the article I quoted:

In light of that, expect Mr. Romney to take some heat for this statement, which he made to ABC News in July: “I don’t pay more than are legally due and frankly if I had paid more than are legally due I don’t think I’d be qualified to become president. I’d think people would want me to follow the law and pay only what the tax code requires.”
Last edited by Farnhamia on Fri Sep 21, 2012 3:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Dude Ranch
Secretary
 
Posts: 40
Founded: Dec 08, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Dude Ranch » Fri Sep 21, 2012 3:38 pm

Wamitoria wrote:
Dude Ranch wrote:I am not of voting age yet, being 16 years old, but I would vote for Obama.

I would not vote for Romney. That said, the reason is based on his characteristics. He seems untrustworthy, fraudulent, and overall repulsive as the man trying to run this country.

Also, the infighting between these two different parties is really getting old. To the teenage brain, it just tells me that the politicians you older people vote for just can't get anything done. It is rather hopeless to watch for a guy like me, still trying to grab a handle of what politics really is. America just seems like a very divided country, and that isn't good for the next generation. I don't want to clean up after your people's messes, get something done and don't only think about yourselves. Think of the ones that come after you as well.

The problem is that the parties have fundamentally different viewpoints on what government should do. One wants the government to help everyone and the other only believes that government should be used to give advantages to rich people and fetuses.

It's not as simple as "just get along."


But isn't the key to politics compromise? By saying "just get along", I don't mean they have to be happy and chummy with each other; I just expect them to be able to compromise. It seems as if compromise hasn't been a mindset on Capitol Hill in a long time, though..
Left/Right -1.38
Libertarian/Authoritarian -0.41

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Fri Sep 21, 2012 3:38 pm

ohmygod look at the photo of romney in this news article

the caption says the photo was taken today

MITT ISNT TAN LIKE HE WAS YESTERDAY IN FLORIDA

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la ... 2610.story
whatever

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Fri Sep 21, 2012 3:40 pm

Ashmoria wrote:ohmygod look at the photo of romney in this news article

the caption says the photo was taken today

MITT ISNT TAN LIKE HE WAS YESTERDAY IN FLORIDA

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la ... 2610.story

He shed his skin. And his political views.

User avatar
Wamitoria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18852
Founded: Jun 28, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Wamitoria » Fri Sep 21, 2012 3:42 pm

Dude Ranch wrote:But isn't the key to politics compromise?

Yes. But you can't compromise with extremists. They take, and take, and take, and take, and will try to back out of anything that they were supposed to give.

And compromise was standard procedure prior to 2008.
Last edited by Wamitoria on Fri Sep 21, 2012 3:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Wonder where all the good posters went? Look no further!

Hurry, before the Summer Nazis show up again!

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111683
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Fri Sep 21, 2012 3:47 pm

Dude Ranch wrote:
Wamitoria wrote:The problem is that the parties have fundamentally different viewpoints on what government should do. One wants the government to help everyone and the other only believes that government should be used to give advantages to rich people and fetuses.

It's not as simple as "just get along."


But isn't the key to politics compromise? By saying "just get along", I don't mean they have to be happy and chummy with each other; I just expect them to be able to compromise. It seems as if compromise hasn't been a mindset on Capitol Hill in a long time, though..

Compromise is so 20th century. The 21st century political paradigm is "permanent majority" (a tip o' the hat to Tom "The Hammer" DeLay).

Sarcasm aside, I agree with you, it should be. Perhaps after the death of the Republican Party we can get back to that.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Telesha
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 462
Founded: Apr 17, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Telesha » Fri Sep 21, 2012 4:16 pm

The Emerald Dawn wrote:I can't get over Ann Romney saying, "Stop it. This is hard. You want to try it? Get in the ring," I just imagine this spoiled rich brat stomping her feet and shrieking.


My wife and I were actually talking (read: arguing) about this yesterday. She was sure that Ann was just waiting for a chance to get into this kerfuffle, and would today. I didn't think so because I honestly didn't believe the Romney campaign would be so stupid as to have her in to whine for Romney by proxy.

Shows what I know...

I just want to know this: what possible good would Ann's statements do? At best she sounds like a mother scolding children, at worst she just sounds like she's whining for Mitt.

User avatar
The Doofishatropolis of Doofishistan
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 195
Founded: Jun 02, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Doofishatropolis of Doofishistan » Fri Sep 21, 2012 4:23 pm

short and sweet:

they both suck, mitt sucks more.

i'm canadian.
Political Compass results:
Economic Left/Right: -6.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.46
Pro: Choice, Carbon Tax, Geothermal Energy, LGBT Rights, Free Speech, Animal Rights, Marijuana Legalization, Sex Positivism, Gender Equality, Democracy
Anti: Abstinence-Only Education, Xenophobia, Homophobia, Islamophobia, Fundamentalism, Blind Patriotism, PeTA (I'm a veggie and even I hate these guys XD)
I am a Green Liberal Communitarian.
Yes, I am a Vegetarian, but I won't force my zeal on all you omnivores, unlike most Politically-minded Vegetarians. And no, for the last time, I do not eat fish.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Based Illinois, Dimetrodon Empire, EuroStralia, Fractalnavel, Heavenly Assault, Kaztropol, Pasong Tirad, Rusozak, Ryemarch, Terminus Station, The Federal United Core of Carnem, The Holy Therns, The Pirateariat, The Remnant of James, The United Penguin Commonwealth, Umeria, Vassenor, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads