NATION

PASSWORD

The 2012 Three Ring Circus AKA The US Presidential Election

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Who do you want to win?

President Barack Obama
423
42%
Governor Mitt Romney
180
18%
A third party candidate
185
18%
Who cares and/or I ain't American
75
7%
It doesn't matter as the Mods are gonna launch their coup any time now and I for one welcome our Modly overlords
146
14%
 
Total votes : 1009

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Fri Sep 21, 2012 10:44 am

Northern Dominus wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:Take a look at the fact that the 47% number that is constantly parroted almost exclusively includes FOX' target audience.The American Taliban
Hey, if the Newsroom went to great lengths to point out the demographic you're trying to describe it's only fair to actually use the proper term now isn't it?

The Emerald Dawn wrote:Fast and Furious is out. Eric Holder has been found to not have known before he terminated the program upon finding out. Seems like a field office decided to do this on their own.

My biggest criticism is that this seems to indicate a lack of central government control, rather than an excess of it. Some areas of the media are saying that Obama started this program, because F&F started in '09, ignoring that Operation: Wide Receiver which started in '06.
And it's not going to stop the American Taliban candidates in congress from continuing to drag Holder into hearings. Because facts be damned, it was Holder's, and by extension the President's fault anyway.

See, he wanted to get the guns into the Mexicans hands so that they could help him during his second term by engaging in a coup de tat and creating a failed narco-state on America's southern border, threatening all those good honest god fearing whites.

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Fri Sep 21, 2012 10:59 am

In 2011, Willard paid 1.9 million in taxes.

One point nine million.

1,900,000 million.

Also, running for president is hard. For realsies. Please stop being harsh, it's rude.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Fri Sep 21, 2012 11:16 am

The Emerald Dawn wrote:In 2011, Willard paid 1.9 million in taxes.

One point nine million.

1,900,000 million.

Also, running for president is hard. For realsies. Please stop being harsh, it's rude.


Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal’s Peggy Noonan has only gotten harsher.
“This week I called [the Romney campaign] incompetent, but only because I was being polite,” the former White House speechwriter wrote Friday. “I really meant ‘rolling calamity.’”


UmadAnnRomney?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Fri Sep 21, 2012 11:17 am

Mavorpen wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:In 2011, Willard paid 1.9 million in taxes.

One point nine million.

1,900,000 million.

Also, running for president is hard. For realsies. Please stop being harsh, it's rude.


Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal’s Peggy Noonan has only gotten harsher.
“This week I called [the Romney campaign] incompetent, but only because I was being polite,” the former White House speechwriter wrote Friday. “I really meant ‘rolling calamity.’”


UmadAnnRomney?

Heh, Ms. Noonan's quote was awesomeness. I only said incompetent because I'm held to the Hayes Code. I really meant "Absolute Clusterfuck".

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Fri Sep 21, 2012 11:20 am

The Emerald Dawn wrote:Heh, Ms. Noonan's quote was awesomeness. I only said incompetent because I'm held to the Hayes Code. I really meant "Absolute Clusterfuck".

I can already see the Noonan/trollface hybrids.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Fri Sep 21, 2012 11:24 am

The Emerald Dawn wrote:In 2011, Willard paid 1.9 million in taxes.

One point nine million.

1,900,000 million.

Also, running for president is hard. For realsies. Please stop being harsh, it's rude.

Well to be fair, it is hard. When you're on the receiving end, Ann. *nods*
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Fri Sep 21, 2012 11:25 am

Norstal wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:In 2011, Willard paid 1.9 million in taxes.

One point nine million.

1,900,000 million.

Also, running for president is hard. For realsies. Please stop being harsh, it's rude.

Well to be fair, it is hard. When you're on the receiving end, Ann. *nods*

Imagine what she'll say when she hears what the Iranians call her. Hell, imagine what she'll say when the British Press Corps gets ahold of her.

User avatar
New Chalcedon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12226
Founded: Sep 20, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby New Chalcedon » Fri Sep 21, 2012 11:57 am

The Emerald Dawn wrote:In 2011, Willard paid 1.9 million in taxes.

One point nine million.


Context, please. $1,900,000 is, after all, a fairly impressively high stack of $100 bills.

But how much was Mitt Romney's income for 2011?
Fuck it all. Let the world burn - there's no way roaches could do a worse job of being decent than we have.

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Fri Sep 21, 2012 12:00 pm

New Chalcedon wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:In 2011, Willard paid 1.9 million in taxes.

One point nine million.


Context, please. $1,900,000 is, after all, a fairly impressively high stack of $100 bills.

But how much was Mitt Romney's income for 2011?

My apologies. 13.7 million.

User avatar
Wamitoria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18852
Founded: Jun 28, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Wamitoria » Fri Sep 21, 2012 12:00 pm

New Chalcedon wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:In 2011, Willard paid 1.9 million in taxes.

One point nine million.


Context, please. $1,900,000 is, after all, a fairly impressively high stack of $100 bills.

But how much was Mitt Romney's income for 2011?

Enough so that 1.9 million is more than 13% of his income.

Although, had he taken all deductions, he would have paid 9%.
Wonder where all the good posters went? Look no further!

Hurry, before the Summer Nazis show up again!

User avatar
New Chalcedon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12226
Founded: Sep 20, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby New Chalcedon » Fri Sep 21, 2012 12:03 pm

The Emerald Dawn wrote:
New Chalcedon wrote:
Context, please. $1,900,000 is, after all, a fairly impressively high stack of $100 bills.

But how much was Mitt Romney's income for 2011?

My apologies. 13.7 million.


Ah. So, once again, Mitt Romney paid an effective tax rate of 13.9%.

Is he trying to lose by releasing this?

Wamitoria wrote:
New Chalcedon wrote:
Context, please. $1,900,000 is, after all, a fairly impressively high stack of $100 bills.

But how much was Mitt Romney's income for 2011?

Enough so that 1.9 million is more than 13% of his income.

Although, had he taken all deductions, he would have paid 9%.


Only barely, while many teachers, doctors, nurses &tc pay 20-25% in taxes.
Fuck it all. Let the world burn - there's no way roaches could do a worse job of being decent than we have.

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Fri Sep 21, 2012 12:10 pm

New Chalcedon wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:My apologies. 13.7 million.


Ah. So, once again, Mitt Romney paid an effective tax rate of 13.9%.

Is he trying to lose by releasing this?

Wamitoria wrote:Enough so that 1.9 million is more than 13% of his income.

Although, had he taken all deductions, he would have paid 9%.


Only barely, while many teachers, doctors, nurses &tc pay 20-25% in taxes.

I hate to trumpet this, but to make this point I'm going to have to. I, a legless, chickenless, egg, pay an effective rate of 25% federal and 9% state taxes.

I pay 20% more than Romney, per dollar.

User avatar
Fal Dara in Shienar
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 399
Founded: Mar 07, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Fal Dara in Shienar » Fri Sep 21, 2012 12:23 pm

The Emerald Dawn wrote:
New Chalcedon wrote:
Ah. So, once again, Mitt Romney paid an effective tax rate of 13.9%.

Is he trying to lose by releasing this?



Only barely, while many teachers, doctors, nurses &tc pay 20-25% in taxes.

I hate to trumpet this, but to make this point I'm going to have to. I, a legless, chickenless, egg, pay an effective rate of 25% federal and 9% state taxes.

I pay 20% more than Romney, per dollar.


I'm not sure many understand why that matters. He pays the amount the IRS wants. Huzzah.
Last edited by Fal Dara in Shienar on Fri Sep 21, 2012 12:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
One of the great triumphs of the nineteenth century was to limit the connotation of the word "immoral" in such a way that, for practical purposes, only those were immoral who drank too much or made too copious love. Those who indulged in any or all of the other deadly sins could look down in righteous indignation on the lascivious and the gluttonous.... In the name of all lechers and boozers I most solemnly protest against the invidious distinction made to our prejudice.
—Aldous Huxley

User avatar
Wikkiwallana
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22500
Founded: Mar 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Wikkiwallana » Fri Sep 21, 2012 12:26 pm

Alien Space Bats wrote:
New Chalcedon wrote:On one level, I can perfectly understand the "47%" scandal very easily. Mitt Romney has always exuded the odour of someone whose mentality is one of entitlement: he's entitled to his very posh education, his dad's rolodex, his first house (purchased for him and Ann by George Romney), his share portfolio to pay his way through Harvard, etc. etc.

On another, I just don't get it. In what world are food stamps, Social Security, Medicare and unemployment insurance "entitlements", but $8 billion annually in cash-in-hand subsidies to the big oil companies alone just the natural order of things?

The right believes that the poor are intrinsically lazy, while the rich are intrinsically industrious.

Therefore, the best way to motivate the poor to work hard is through deprivation. As their lives grow harsher and more austere, their desperation will keep them from reverting back into their natural sloth and instead keep them focused on their work, as only through work can they survive. The less they have, the better things will be for everyone throughout society.

The rich, OTOH, are different. They are motivated by success, and the more they enjoy, the harder they will work. Allowing them to have it all only whets their appetite for more, unleashing their creative energies for the good of society.

Ergo, it is in fact bad to offer food stamps, but good to offer oil subsidies. Reverse Robin Hood tax policies are the key to transforming an economy into a roaring engine of unlimited growth.

<pause>

Or so goes the theory. Personally, I think it's a self-serving crock of shit.

You think right, according to Moody's:
Image
Proud Scalawag and Statist!

Please don't confuse my country for my politics; my country is being run as a parody, my posts aren't.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Xenohumanity wrote:
Nulono wrote:Snip
I'm a pro-lifer who runs a nation of dragon-men...
And even I think that's stupid.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Fri Sep 21, 2012 12:31 pm

Fal Dara in Shienar wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I hate to trumpet this, but to make this point I'm going to have to. I, a legless, chickenless, egg, pay an effective rate of 25% federal and 9% state taxes.

I pay 20% more than Romney, per dollar.


I'm not sure many understand why that matters. He pays the amount the IRS wants. Huzzah.

He pays the amount that the millionaires in Congress have been petitioned by the millionaires on Wall Street to ask for.

Let me break this down a little more visually.

1,000,000 x 14% = 140,000
75,000 x 34% = 25,500

1,000,000 - 140,000 = 860,000
75,000 - 25,500 = 49,500

1,000,000 x 34% = 340,000

1,000,000 - 340,000 = 660,000

49,500 / 660,000 = 13 1/3

You're telling me he can't live on 13 and 1/3 times the amount I do?

User avatar
Wikkiwallana
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22500
Founded: Mar 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Wikkiwallana » Fri Sep 21, 2012 1:12 pm

The Archregimancy wrote:How on earth did a US election thread get derailed into a technical discussion of pyramid building during the 4th Dynasty?

We're Generalites, it's what we do.
Proud Scalawag and Statist!

Please don't confuse my country for my politics; my country is being run as a parody, my posts aren't.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Xenohumanity wrote:
Nulono wrote:Snip
I'm a pro-lifer who runs a nation of dragon-men...
And even I think that's stupid.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

User avatar
The Archregimancy
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 29259
Founded: Aug 01, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Archregimancy » Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:13 pm

TomKirk wrote:
The Archregimancy wrote:
While basically factually accurate, that NatGeo link overemphasises the positives at the expense of the considerable negatives.


How on earth did a US election thread get derailed into a technical discussion of pyramid building during the 4th Dynasty?

<considers splitting this off into a separate thread>

Because restoring the policies of the 4th Dynasty is Romney's secret "jobs plan"?


Frankly, Romney strikes me as more of a 7th Dynasty man.

You know... Old Kingdom falls apart into economic chaos as an increasingly marginalised central government attempts to cling on to the lost glories of the past, and centuries later no-one's really sure whether the leader ever existed or not anyway.

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:21 pm

The Archregimancy wrote:
TomKirk wrote:Because restoring the policies of the 4th Dynasty is Romney's secret "jobs plan"?


Frankly, Romney strikes me as more of a 7th Dynasty man.

You know... Old Kingdom falls apart into economic chaos as an increasingly marginalised central government attempts to cling on to the lost glories of the past, and centuries later no-one's really sure whether the leader ever existed or not anyway.

Just an FYI, from Ireland: http://www.giveblood.ie/Clinical_Services/Bone_Marrow_Registry/

I think the analogy works, especially considering all the relics we have in the Republican party.

User avatar
The Archregimancy
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 29259
Founded: Aug 01, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Archregimancy » Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:22 pm

Fal Dara in Shienar wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:I hate to trumpet this, but to make this point I'm going to have to. I, a legless, chickenless, egg, pay an effective rate of 25% federal and 9% state taxes.

I pay 20% more than Romney, per dollar.


I'm not sure many understand why that matters. He pays the amount the IRS wants. Huzzah.


Not quite.

Having previously made a pledge that he paid 'at least 13%' of his income in taxes over the last few years, one of his accounts clearly noticed that were he to claim back all of the money he was entitled in tax rebates for his charitable donations (and let's be fair - he and Ann give vast quantities of money to charity; at 30% of their income, just over twice as much as they pay in tax), he would pay less than 13% of his income in tax - forcing him to underclaim his charity rebate in order not to counter a claim he'd made earlier in the presidential campaign.

Linky thing

Or to put it another way:

* The Romneys donated $4,020,772 to charity in 2011, amounting to nearly 30% of their income.
* The Romneys claimed a deduction for $2.25 million of those charitable contributions.
* The Romneys’ generous charitable donations in 2011 would have significantly reduced their tax obligation for the year. The Romneys thus limited their deduction of charitable contributions to conform to the Governor’s statement in August, based upon the January estimate of income, that he paid at least 13% in income taxes in each of the last 10 years.


Another linky thing.

Summed up: Romney technically paid more than he owed in taxes over the last tax year, but only for narrow political reasons.

Had he not been running for president, he would have claimed the full deduction and paid less in tax.

Except he also said this in August: "I pay all the taxes that are legally required and not a dollar more; I don’t think you want someone as the candidate for president who pays more taxes than he owes.”

Whoops.
Last edited by The Archregimancy on Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:24 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Wamitoria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18852
Founded: Jun 28, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Wamitoria » Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:25 pm

Wonder where all the good posters went? Look no further!

Hurry, before the Summer Nazis show up again!

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:27 pm


Hyper-aggressive, centrally controlled religion attempts to silence dissent from within. Film at 11.

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:30 pm

Ryan was boo'd by Seniors at an AARP campaign stop.

...In LA, so it isn't terribly shocking, that's a very split state. But I have to admit, he handled it well.

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:30 pm

The Emerald Dawn wrote:

Hyper-aggressive, centrally controlled religion attempts to silence dissent from within. Film at 11.


Scientology with a longer history and bigger areas of control.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Khadgar
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11006
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Khadgar » Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:32 pm

The Emerald Dawn wrote:Ryan was boo'd by Seniors at an AARP campaign stop.

...In LA, so it isn't terribly shocking, that's a very split state. But I have to admit, he handled it well.


Ha ha!

I'm pretty down, no "Romney making an ass out of himself" news yet today.

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Fri Sep 21, 2012 2:33 pm

Gauthier wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:Hyper-aggressive, centrally controlled religion attempts to silence dissent from within. Film at 11.


Scientology with a longer history and bigger areas of control.

The Catholic Church, with a shorter history and dreams of reaching such heights.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Based Illinois, Dimetrodon Empire, EuroStralia, Fractalnavel, Heavenly Assault, Kaztropol, Pasong Tirad, Rusozak, Ryemarch, Terminus Station, The Federal United Core of Carnem, The Holy Therns, The Pirateariat, The Remnant of James, The United Penguin Commonwealth, Umeria, Vassenor, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads