NATION

PASSWORD

The 2012 Three Ring Circus AKA The US Presidential Election

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Who do you want to win?

President Barack Obama
423
42%
Governor Mitt Romney
180
18%
A third party candidate
185
18%
Who cares and/or I ain't American
75
7%
It doesn't matter as the Mods are gonna launch their coup any time now and I for one welcome our Modly overlords
146
14%
 
Total votes : 1009

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:00 am

Objectiveland wrote:
The Emerald Dawn wrote:No one here is taking you seriously.


That's because the kool aid has clouded your judgement. "Independence is the recognition of the fact that yours is the responsibility of judgment and nothing can help you escape it—that no substitute can do your thinking, as no pinch-hitter can live your life—that the vilest form of self-abasement and self-destruction is the subordination of your mind to the mind of another." Ayn Rand


You don't get to accuse others of drinking the Kool-Aid when half of your posts are the quotes of another person rather than thoughts and opinions that you've come up with on your own.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:01 am

Objectiveland wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:Well, maybe you'd be taken more seriously if you stop dropping Rand quotes at a drop of a hat, start listening to what we're saying, and stop thinking that everything is in absolutes...


“There are no absolutes,” they chatter, blanking out the fact that they are uttering an absolute. - John Galt

"I wouldn't worry too much about it. Remember when Disney acquired Marvel about 2 years ago and people (namely reddit) was concerned about bah, bah no wah chota kama eesay, Solo? Ho, ho, hooo..." - /u/becomesjabbathehutt

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:02 am

Objectiveland wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:Well, maybe you'd be taken more seriously if you stop dropping Rand quotes at a drop of a hat, start listening to what we're saying, and stop thinking that everything is in absolutes...


“There are no absolutes,” they chatter, blanking out the fact that they are uttering an absolute. - John Galt


Nope.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:03 am

Objectiveland wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:Well, maybe you'd be taken more seriously if you stop dropping Rand quotes at a drop of a hat, start listening to what we're saying, and stop thinking that everything is in absolutes...

“There are no absolutes,” they chatter, blanking out the fact that they are uttering an absolute. - John Galt

Yeah, you missed my point.
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111674
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:04 am

Individuality-ness wrote:
Objectiveland wrote:“There are no absolutes,” they chatter, blanking out the fact that they are uttering an absolute. - John Galt

Yeah, you missed my point.

And once again, Objectiveland seizes control of the thread. Let's not indulge him, shall we?
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
New England and The Maritimes
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28872
Founded: Aug 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New England and The Maritimes » Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:04 am

Individuality-ness wrote:
Objectiveland wrote:“There are no absolutes,” they chatter, blanking out the fact that they are uttering an absolute. - John Galt

Yeah, you missed my point.

Never you mind him. Move along.
All aboard the Love Train. Choo Choo, honeybears. I am Ininiwiyaw Rocopurr:Get in my bed, you perfect human being.
Yesterday's just a memory

Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

Also, Bonobos
Formerly Brandenburg-Altmark Me.

User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:06 am

What do you think is the likelihood of Obama winning the electoral college and not the popular vote?
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:06 am

The Emerald Dawn wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Mitt becomes black?

He tried that before the Univision interview.

Also, I'm fairly sure that the GOP is going to ignore black voters and move straight to attacking the Latino vote next.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:06 am

Individuality-ness wrote:What do you think is the likelihood of Obama winning the electoral college and not the popular vote?

Unlikely. I see him winning both.

User avatar
New England and The Maritimes
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28872
Founded: Aug 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New England and The Maritimes » Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:07 am

Individuality-ness wrote:What do you think is the likelihood of Obama winning the electoral college and not the popular vote?

Fairly high because of the ridiculous concentration Romney has in the deep south.
All aboard the Love Train. Choo Choo, honeybears. I am Ininiwiyaw Rocopurr:Get in my bed, you perfect human being.
Yesterday's just a memory

Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

Also, Bonobos
Formerly Brandenburg-Altmark Me.

User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:07 am

Divair wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:What do you think is the likelihood of Obama winning the electoral college and not the popular vote?

Unlikely. I see him winning both.

Because of early voting and hurricane Sandy?
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:08 am

Individuality-ness wrote:
Divair wrote:Unlikely. I see him winning both.

Because of early voting and hurricane Sandy?

You mean God's divine intervention. *nods*
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:08 am

Individuality-ness wrote:
Divair wrote:Unlikely. I see him winning both.

Because of early voting and hurricane Sandy?

No, just because he is more popular.

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41634
Founded: Antiquity
New York Times Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:08 am

Individuality-ness wrote:What do you think is the likelihood of Obama winning the electoral college and not the popular vote?

Slim. The election will be 'close', but it just doesn't seem like it's going to be that close. I think that we're too fascinated by something like that 'happening' again. There just doesn't seem like there is too much of a chance of it.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:08 am

Individuality-ness wrote:What do you think is the likelihood of Obama winning the electoral college and not the popular vote?


Possible, but not likely. If that happens, it will put many on both sides in the awkward but not uncommon position of having to switch sides from arguments that they were making 12 years ago, and I will find it to be hilarious.

User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:08 am

New England and The Maritimes wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:What do you think is the likelihood of Obama winning the electoral college and not the popular vote?

Fairly high because of the ridiculous concentration Romney has in the deep south.

Plus, we have Hurricane Sandy, blowing out power - assuming that they can't get it back up by next Tuesday...
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
New England and The Maritimes
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28872
Founded: Aug 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New England and The Maritimes » Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:09 am

Cannot think of a name wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:What do you think is the likelihood of Obama winning the electoral college and not the popular vote?

Slim. The election will be 'close', but it just doesn't seem like it's going to be that close. I think that we're too fascinated by something like that 'happening' again. There just doesn't seem like there is too much of a chance of it.

Well, Obama is pulling 5-10 point leads in his "solid" states while Romney pulls 15-25 point leads in his, and that's a pretty wide disparity.
All aboard the Love Train. Choo Choo, honeybears. I am Ininiwiyaw Rocopurr:Get in my bed, you perfect human being.
Yesterday's just a memory

Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

Also, Bonobos
Formerly Brandenburg-Altmark Me.

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41634
Founded: Antiquity
New York Times Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:10 am

New England and The Maritimes wrote:
Cannot think of a name wrote:Slim. The election will be 'close', but it just doesn't seem like it's going to be that close. I think that we're too fascinated by something like that 'happening' again. There just doesn't seem like there is too much of a chance of it.

Well, Obama is pulling 5-10 point leads in his "solid" states while Romney pulls 15-25 point leads in his, and that's a pretty wide disparity.

Except that the states where Romney is as solid are also lower population states, whereas where Obama is strong are places like California, the most populous state in the union.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
The Steel Magnolia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8134
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Steel Magnolia » Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:11 am

According to 538:

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com wrote:Romney wins popular vote 24.3%
Obama wins popular vote but loses electoral college 1.8%
Romney wins popular vote but loses electoral college 5.1%

User avatar
New England and The Maritimes
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28872
Founded: Aug 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New England and The Maritimes » Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:12 am

Cannot think of a name wrote:
New England and The Maritimes wrote:Well, Obama is pulling 5-10 point leads in his "solid" states while Romney pulls 15-25 point leads in his, and that's a pretty wide disparity.

Except that the states where Romney is as solid are also lower population states, whereas where Obama is strong are places like California, the most populous state in the union.

That's true, but then you take a 22 point lead in Texas vs Obama's 3-6 point lead in Pennsylvania as an example, and the margins are slim in most of the swing states as well. It's not incredibly unlikely.
All aboard the Love Train. Choo Choo, honeybears. I am Ininiwiyaw Rocopurr:Get in my bed, you perfect human being.
Yesterday's just a memory

Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

Also, Bonobos
Formerly Brandenburg-Altmark Me.

User avatar
Individuality-ness
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37712
Founded: Mar 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Individuality-ness » Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:13 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:Because of early voting and hurricane Sandy?

You mean God's divine intervention. *nods*

:lol:

Divair wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:Because of early voting and hurricane Sandy?

No, just because he is more popular.

In the Kerry states, yes.

Cannot think of a name wrote:
Individuality-ness wrote:What do you think is the likelihood of Obama winning the electoral college and not the popular vote?

Slim. The election will be 'close', but it just doesn't seem like it's going to be that close. I think that we're too fascinated by something like that 'happening' again. There just doesn't seem like there is too much of a chance of it.

I know right now the electoral vote is pretty much going for Obama, so I'm not too worried about that. I just hope that I don't wake up the morning of 7 November to the news that Romney's the president-elect. *shudders*
"I should have listened to her, so hard to keep control. We kept on eating but our bloated bellies still not full."
Poetry Thread | How to Not Rape | Aspergers v. Assburgers | You Might be an Altie If... | Factbook/Extension

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41634
Founded: Antiquity
New York Times Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:13 am

New England and The Maritimes wrote:
Cannot think of a name wrote:Except that the states where Romney is as solid are also lower population states, whereas where Obama is strong are places like California, the most populous state in the union.

That's true, but then you take a 22 point lead in Texas vs Obama's 3-6 point lead in Pennsylvania as an example, and the margins are slim in most of the swing states as well. It's not incredibly unlikely.

That's not really a fair comparison. You've taken what was a swing state and compared it to a state that was never in play.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:15 am

New England and The Maritimes wrote:
Cannot think of a name wrote:Except that the states where Romney is as solid are also lower population states, whereas where Obama is strong are places like California, the most populous state in the union.

That's true, but then you take a 22 point lead in Texas vs Obama's 3-6 point lead in Pennsylvania as an example, and the margins are slim in most of the swing states as well. It's not incredibly unlikely.


A better comparison for Texas would probably be something like California, where President Obama has a 23 point advantage.

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:16 am

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
New England and The Maritimes wrote:That's true, but then you take a 22 point lead in Texas vs Obama's 3-6 point lead in Pennsylvania as an example, and the margins are slim in most of the swing states as well. It's not incredibly unlikely.


The only A better comparison for Texas would probably be something like California, where President Obama has a 23 point advantage.

Population-wise, that's as good as you can get.

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:19 am

The Emerald Dawn wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
The only A better comparison for Texas would probably be something like California, where President Obama has a 23 point advantage.

Population-wise, that's as good as you can get.


I approve of your fix.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Duvniask, Emotional Support Crocodile, Kenmoria, Kitsuva, Upper Ireland

Advertisement

Remove ads