Advertisement

by Priory Academy USSR » Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:02 am

by Varijnland » Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:04 am
Tagmatium wrote:Varijnland wrote:they want to change England's terrible justice policies regarding muslims including a case where 4 muslim women beat up another women (because she was White) and were let off because the Judge said they were not used to alcohol.
Source, please.
Because that just sounds like bullshit propaganda.

by Tagmatium » Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:07 am
Priory Academy USSR wrote:I think they were all killed by the Muslamic Ray Guns
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...

by Varijnland » Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:09 am
Tagmatium wrote:Priory Academy USSR wrote:I think they were all killed by the Muslamic Ray Guns
Presumably he'd just finished his breakfast Special Brew.

by Nationalist State of Knox » Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:10 am
Ifreann wrote:Knox: /ˈɡɪl.ɡə.mɛʃ/

by Tagmatium » Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:10 am
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...

by Ostroeuropa » Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:11 am

by Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f » Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:11 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:Ifreann wrote:Pretty sure we'd have heard of it if they'd all been stabbed to death.
Turns out those dastardly Europeans foisted a right to free expression upon you.
Again, parliamentary supremacy would mean it doesn't apply. That's the line of the government, even if I don't agree with it. If parliament passes a law against free speech, it trumps all previous treaties and laws.
Incidentally, protection of health and morals allows ANY violation. It's a totally useless article.
Allowed exceptions:
interests of national security
territorial integrity or public safety
prevention of disorder or crime
protection of health or morals
protection of the reputation or the rights of others
preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence
maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary
Name for me one type of speech you couldn't ban using one of these exceptions.
Also, a very good example of how much free speech we have under that provision.
European Nations With Laws Outlawing Genocide Denial
Austria
Belgium
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Czech Republic
France
Germany
Hungary
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
The Netherlands
The European Union's executive Commission proposed a European Union-wide anti-racism xenophobia law in 2001, which included the criminalization of Holocaust denial.

by Ostroeuropa » Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:13 am
Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f wrote:
That and of course the entire libel laws thing....where UK law firms make a killing suppressing stories...
that too.
by Tagmatium » Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:14 am
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...

by Ostroeuropa » Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:17 am

by Fnordgasm 5 » Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:20 am

by Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f » Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:30 am
Fnordgasm 5 wrote:I assume they took a good hard look at themselves and decided to grow up?

by Fnordgasm 5 » Thu Sep 13, 2012 10:35 am

by Forsakia » Thu Sep 13, 2012 11:09 am
Ifreann wrote:The Greater Aryan Race wrote:Those who live by the sword, die by the sword.
Pretty sure we'd have heard of it if they'd all been stabbed to death.Ostroeuropa wrote:
Actually not. It's a huge point of contention.
Until recently we had blasphemy laws. We have a culture that is strongly in favour (nominally) of free speech, but a government that wont pass acts to support it.
MOSTLY because of parliamentary superiority. We cant pass a free speech law giving us the right to free speech, since any new law banning certain speech would automatically supercede it.
Turns out those dastardly Europeans foisted a right to free expression upon you.

by Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f » Thu Sep 13, 2012 11:16 am

by Cosmopoles » Thu Sep 13, 2012 11:28 am
Varijnland wrote:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2070562/Muslim-girl-gang-kicked-Rhea-Page-head-yelling-kill-white-slag-FREED.html
*other link not working*
You were saying?

by Scottish Highlands and Islands » Thu Sep 13, 2012 11:31 am
Varijnland wrote:a case where 4 muslim women beat up another women (because she was White) and were let off because the Judge said they were not used to alcohol. It also seems that you are more likely to be attacked for condeming radical islam than you are for supporting them nowadays which is completely wrong.

by Ad Nihilo » Thu Sep 13, 2012 11:37 am

by Lackadaisical2 » Thu Sep 13, 2012 11:43 am
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.

by Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f » Thu Sep 13, 2012 11:45 am
Lackadaisical2 wrote:Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f wrote:
No 1st amendment in the UK...hate speech is illegal.
Good thing I didn't mention the 1st amendment then. I can however safely assume that the EDL were legally allowed to have their public meeting since the police were there to separate the protestors...


by Nadkor » Thu Sep 13, 2012 11:58 am
Lackadaisical2 wrote:Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f wrote:They had a rally in Walthamstow a couple of weeks ago...
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jakew ... breakdown/
Wow, anti-EDL protestors violate the free speech of 'fascists' how ironic.

by Ostroeuropa » Thu Sep 13, 2012 12:00 pm

by Nadkor » Thu Sep 13, 2012 12:02 pm
Lackadaisical2 wrote:Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f wrote:
No 1st amendment in the UK...hate speech is illegal.
Good thing I didn't mention the 1st amendment then. I can however safely assume that the EDL were legally allowed to have their public meeting since the police were there to separate the protestors...

by Ad Nihilo » Thu Sep 13, 2012 12:08 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:I disagree with this.
If you drown out someones speech by shouting, you havn't given them the right to speak really.
Freedom of speech implies the freedom of people to listen to ideas and judge them for themselves.
It's the listener who loses out in those cases.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Eurocom, Kubra
Advertisement