That is entirely possible - but where?
Either a system leads to giving the cushy seats to the Best of the Best
OR it is leads to giving chushy seats to those who are Not the Best of the Best - aka the less qualified.
Advertisement

by Norsklow » Tue Sep 11, 2012 7:27 am

by Free Soviets » Tue Sep 11, 2012 7:28 am

by Ifreann » Tue Sep 11, 2012 7:31 am
Free Soviets wrote:Ifreann wrote:My point is that they don't have a leg to stand on, because affirmative action does not involve giving jobs to people less-/unqualified.
hmm, this lack of legs to stand on seems discriminatory. prosthetics and accessible buildings for everyone who whines about reverse racism!

by The Reasonable » Tue Sep 11, 2012 7:38 am
Farnhamia wrote:The Reasonable wrote:
...And this is why you were never the one who managed to convince me of liberal ideas, but rather other, much more understanding people...
Simply put, you always try to insult the opposing argument instead of discussing how it's mistaken. And affirmative action isn't even the best way to deal with entrenched discrimination- the best way is to invest more on education for under-represented minorities so that they may be equally qualified later.
More education? In the United States, in this day and age? You go try to get an increase to a school budget passed on the basis of "We need to educate our children to be more accepting of all people," I dare you, you Antii-American multicultural socialist, you.

by Sidhae » Tue Sep 11, 2012 7:40 am

by Free Soviets » Tue Sep 11, 2012 7:48 am
Sidhae wrote:I've always wanted to ask those affirmative-action policy-makers - don't you think it's a little too late to try and atone for the sins of slave traders and segregationists?
The only thing affirmative action has accomplished is instilled minorities with a huge ego and even bigger sense of entitlement without any actual merit to back it all up. These days you still hear them whining about the "white man keeping them down", and "racism" has become the first word of abuse that a Black person will spew out whenever a White person does something that displeases him, even for a legitimate reason.
They could legitimately complain about discrimination 50 years ago, but in today's wildly-abused civil rights paradise, that word has no relevance.

by Ifreann » Tue Sep 11, 2012 7:49 am
Sidhae wrote:I've always wanted to ask those affirmative-action policy-makers - don't you think it's a little too late to try and atone for the sins of slave traders and segregationists?
The only thing affirmative action has accomplished is instilled minorities with a huge ego and even bigger sense of entitlement without any actual merit to back it all up. These days you still hear them whining about the "white man keeping them down", and "racism" has become the first word of abuse that a Black person will spew out whenever a White person does something that displeases him, even for a legitimate reason.
They could legitimately complain about discrimination 50 years ago, but in today's wildly-abused civil rights paradise, that word has no relevance.


by Mavorpen » Tue Sep 11, 2012 7:51 am
Sidhae wrote:I've always wanted to ask those affirmative-action policy-makers - don't you think it's a little too late to try and atone for the sins of slave traders and segregationists?
The only thing affirmative action has accomplished is instilled minorities with a huge ego and even bigger sense of entitlement without any actual merit to back it all up. These days you still hear them whining about the "white man keeping them down", and "racism" has become the first word of abuse that a Black person will spew out whenever a White person does something that displeases him, even for a legitimate reason.
They could legitimately complain about discrimination 50 years ago, but in today's wildly-abused civil rights paradise, that word has no relevance.
Free Soviets wrote:hell, if you send out identical resumes with different names, the 'whiter' sounding name will get vastly more call-backs.
the past ain't even past.

by Occupied Deutschland » Tue Sep 11, 2012 7:54 am

by Ifreann » Tue Sep 11, 2012 8:00 am
Mavorpen wrote:Free Soviets wrote:hell, if you send out identical resumes with different names, the 'whiter' sounding name will get vastly more call-backs.
the past ain't even past.
Going off of this, I actually sent a resume in to a Wal-Mart, and when I was called for the interview, the guy literally admitted that the only reason he scheduled the interview was because my name is "white" and I didn't sound like the "stereotypical black guy."
Occupied Deutschland wrote:Ifreann wrote:It's really got nothing to do with atoning for past sins.
So why does it get based off of race in any way? If affirmative action programs are designed to assist the poor/disadvantaged-financially perhaps these programs should be geared towards anyone who is poor instead of minorities just because minorities have a higher chance of being poor.
I mean, that in itself is pretty racist.

by The Reasonable » Tue Sep 11, 2012 8:03 am
Ifreann wrote:Sidhae wrote:I've always wanted to ask those affirmative-action policy-makers - don't you think it's a little too late to try and atone for the sins of slave traders and segregationists?
It's really got nothing to do with atoning for past sins.The only thing affirmative action has accomplished is instilled minorities with a huge ego and even bigger sense of entitlement without any actual merit to back it all up. These days you still hear them whining about the "white man keeping them down", and "racism" has become the first word of abuse that a Black person will spew out whenever a White person does something that displeases him, even for a legitimate reason.
He said, judging millions upon millions of people with nary a scrap of evidence.They could legitimately complain about discrimination 50 years ago, but in today's wildly-abused civil rights paradise, that word has no relevance.
Do please go on. Explain to us how there is no more discrimination in society.

by Mavorpen » Tue Sep 11, 2012 8:04 am
Ifreann wrote:I'm given to understand that studies have been done along these lines. Otherwise identical CVs and applications are sent out, some with typically white names, some with typically black names. The phony details on the black CVs and applications got less call backs.

by Zambeze » Tue Sep 11, 2012 8:13 am
Free Soviets wrote:Sidhae wrote:I've always wanted to ask those affirmative-action policy-makers - don't you think it's a little too late to try and atone for the sins of slave traders and segregationists?
The only thing affirmative action has accomplished is instilled minorities with a huge ego and even bigger sense of entitlement without any actual merit to back it all up. These days you still hear them whining about the "white man keeping them down", and "racism" has become the first word of abuse that a Black person will spew out whenever a White person does something that displeases him, even for a legitimate reason.
They could legitimately complain about discrimination 50 years ago, but in today's wildly-abused civil rights paradise, that word has no relevance.
what's funny about this is that it is so obviously disconnected from reality that you would think it was somebody mocking people who complain about affirmative action...only it is also literally exactly what they say. makes it impossible to judge on the merits.
anyways, there are still people alive today who threw rocks at black kids who dared go to the white school. and the legacy of that sort of thing continues in a huge way. hell, if you send out identical resumes with different names, the 'whiter' sounding name will get vastly more call-backs.
the past ain't even past.

by Mavorpen » Tue Sep 11, 2012 8:29 am
Rasseland wrote:I am about as against it as you can get. Why should a less qualified black man get a job that a more qualified white man would do better just because every one hated the black man's grandpa?

by Shard_Head » Tue Sep 11, 2012 8:36 am
Rasseland wrote:I am about as against it as you can get. Why should a less qualified black man get a job that a more qualified white man would do better just because every one hated the black man's grandpa?

by Farnhamia » Tue Sep 11, 2012 8:53 am
The Reasonable wrote:Farnhamia wrote:More education? In the United States, in this day and age? You go try to get an increase to a school budget passed on the basis of "We need to educate our children to be more accepting of all people," I dare you, you Antii-American multicultural socialist, you.
Haha...this is what some people don't understand about me. I'm all for funding education programs aimed at under-served people (and that includes minorities AND whites, mostly living in poverty in the US) and am all for teaching our children to be accepting of all people, but affirmative action, to work in its long term goal of eliminating discrimination, should not automatically give an advantage to under-represented minorities, but rather give them the resources to succeed on their own merits.

by Norsklow » Tue Sep 11, 2012 8:58 am
Ifreann wrote:Norsklow wrote:
That is entirely possible - but where?
Either a system leads to giving the cushy seats to the Best of the Best
OR it is leads to giving chushy seats to those who are Not the Best of the Best - aka the less qualified.
Why would affirmative action lead to Asian-Americans getting the cushy seats?Free Soviets wrote:hmm, this lack of legs to stand on seems discriminatory. prosthetics and accessible buildings for everyone who whines about reverse racism!
We have no legs, and we won't stand for this injustice!

by The Reasonable » Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:03 am
Farnhamia wrote:The Reasonable wrote:
Haha...this is what some people don't understand about me. I'm all for funding education programs aimed at under-served people (and that includes minorities AND whites, mostly living in poverty in the US) and am all for teaching our children to be accepting of all people, but affirmative action, to work in its long term goal of eliminating discrimination, should not automatically give an advantage to under-represented minorities, but rather give them the resources to succeed on their own merits.
Ha ha ... Way to miss the point. Anti-tax people have been running around slashing school budgets for decades. Any attempt to increase them will be seen as an attempt by the lazy members of the teachers' unions to grab some sweet, sweet tax money. What you believe is irrelevant, it's what other people believe, the people who will vote on those budgets, and they don't agree with you.
Rasseland wrote:I am about as against it as you can get. Why should a less qualified black man get a job that a more qualified white man would do better just because every one hated the black man's grandpa?

by Sulamalik » Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:32 am
Freiheit Reich wrote:"Economically disadvantaged and angry urban youth music."
Is that a nicer and more modern term to use?

by Sidhae » Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:37 am
The Reasonable wrote:Ifreann wrote:It's really got nothing to do with atoning for past sins.
He said, judging millions upon millions of people with nary a scrap of evidence.
Do please go on. Explain to us how there is no more discrimination in society.
As much as I hate Ifreann's single-sided rhetoric without trying to understand the opposing side a lot of the time, I will have to agree with him on this one. Sidhae, some people are like that. Not all minorities are. Affirmative action is well-meaning, in my opinion, but a better solution is equal access to good education- something that will take longer and will be more expensive, but will go a long way in truly taking care of the problem of discrimination.
And Ifreann, the study you cited was in Freakonomics, and highlights a problem with racism and discrimination and does not necessarily support affirmative action.
As with affirmative action for the well-off, that's unfair- people can't help what race they are, so why should they be advantaged or disadvantaged purely based on that and not what they've done or what they've experienced?

by Norstal » Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:42 am
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Ad Nihilo » Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:49 am
Sidhae wrote:It is said that the road to hell is always paved with good intents.
The principles of non-discrimination and affirmative action are self-contradictory. You cannot claim to be colour-blind yet provide a particular minority group with advantages simply because of their membership of that group, regardless of how disadvantaged they might have been in the past.
All that wouldn't be an issue if people just accepted that it's not human nature to be colour-blind. Races do exist and they are a major factor in how humans identify "us" from "them". In an area where one race has a numerical majority over others, it will obviously dominate over others and favour it's own members with various privileges. That's just how things work, and trying to regulate that will achieve nothing besides causing more confusion without any actual result - exactly the thing that's happened in the European - dominated America. Discrimination still exists, even though people go to extreme lengths to pretend that it doesn't by using political correctness, affirmative actions and other absurd nonsense that's really just sweeping the dirt under the carpet.
I figure racial and ethnic discrimination will only end when everyone accepts that all humans are inherently racist and learn to respect that rather than fight it or pretend that it's not true.

by Norstal » Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:53 am
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Seperates » Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:55 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Benjium, Caitistana, Cannot think of a name, Cybernetic, DutchFormosa, Elejamie, Fartsniffage, Gravlen, Ifreann, ITALO-FRANCO, Kenmoria, Melexico, Ostroeuropa, Pizza Friday Forever91, Ryemarch, The Chinese Soviet, The Crimson Isles, Tinhampton
Advertisement