NATION

PASSWORD

Affirmative Action

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:21 pm

Neo Art wrote:How, exactly, do you know that?

The fact is, this pathetic mangling of an argument has so been beaten to death, I can actually find something I already posted addressing it (subject of male privlege not white privilege, but the concept remains the same). I literally don't have to change a single word of what I said MONTHS ago.


Boo hoo! I'm a member of an historically disadvantaged group, so I feel the need for the government to force colleges/businesses to discriminate against others in order to benefit me!
Last edited by Saiwania on Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:21 pm

Birkinghamia wrote:
Seperates wrote:Based on the fact that I can go walking down the street at night and people won't randomly walk across the street so that they are on the opposite sidewalk, while my roommate (who is black, but otherwise of the same stature and build) can't walk down the same street without somebody randomly crossing the street.

The problem with your argument is that you're fitting everyone into a neat little box.

Society just isn't like that.


Where do you live? Because I could argue the same.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:22 pm

Look if you think your disadvantaged just say your black on your applications, or like me say your native American.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:23 pm

Saiwania wrote:
Neo Art wrote:How, exactly, do you know that?

The fact is, this pathetic mangling of an argument has so been beaten to death, I can actually find something I already posted addressing it (subject of male privlege not white privilege, but the concept remains the same). I literally don't have to change a single word of what I said MONTHS ago.


Boo hoo! I'm a member of an historically disadvantaged group, so I feel the need for the government to force colleges/businesses to discriminate against others in order to benefit me!


I've never done this, nor do I advocate for this. How about you actually stop with the generalizations?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:24 pm

greed and death wrote:Look if you think your disadvantaged just say your black on your applications, or like me say your native American.


For a job application? That's the stupidest idea.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Neo Art
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14258
Founded: Jan 09, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Neo Art » Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:24 pm

Saiwania wrote:Boo hoo! I'm a member of an historically disadvantaged group, so I feel the need for the government to force colleges/businesses to discriminate against others in order to benefit me!


Wait, who the fuck are you talking to? Seriously, again, I think you think you're being clever or profound here, but I honestly can't discern exactly what the fuck you're trying to say.

is this how you want to represent your side? Is this how you want to lead the charge? By being so pathetically bad at making an actual argument that you're forced to put up some strawman of your opposition as being nothing more than a mewling minority, with a hand out for "reparations", like some 21st century internet version of blackface?

Despite the fact that the person you're talking to is an upper class heterosexual white male?

Seriously? THIS is where you want to plant that particular flag?

REALLY?
if you were Batman you'd be home by now

"Consistency is a matter we are attempting to remedy." - Dread Lady Nathinaca

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:24 pm

Saiwania wrote:
Neo Art wrote:How, exactly, do you know that?

The fact is, this pathetic mangling of an argument has so been beaten to death, I can actually find something I already posted addressing it (subject of male privlege not white privilege, but the concept remains the same). I literally don't have to change a single word of what I said MONTHS ago.


Boo hoo! I'm a member of an historically disadvantaged group, so I feel the need for the government to force colleges/businesses to discriminate against others in order to benefit me!

I wonder if anyone knows how affirmative actions work at all.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Skywarp
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 157
Founded: Dec 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Skywarp » Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:25 pm

Big Jim P wrote:
Skywarp wrote:
You're wrong, the truth consisted of three in this case, whereas lying bullshit consisted of one.


Care to refute the statement then?


Fairly easy, because affirmative action does not bias people on the basis of characteristic [x]. In fact it implements systems to ensure that discrimination is not practiced. Now, you may content with things past under the supposed guise of "affirmative action" which aren't (such as race quotas) and as such were struck under that.... but it does not apply to the principal of affirmative action itself. Or in short, you're wrong by precept.

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:25 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
greed and death wrote:Look if you think your disadvantaged just say your black on your applications, or like me say your native American.


For a job application? That's the stupidest idea.

Normally those don't ask except for HR purposes not used in hiring.

But university admissions, go for it.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:25 pm

Norstal wrote:
Occupied Deutschland wrote:*shrug* That one-in-a-million exception is still going to receive the benefits of affirmative action, along with his children. How about we pursue the entirely reasonable policy of attaching these benefits to one's family's income level so we don't have ANY one in a million exceptions and the underprivileged folks get the help they "need" instead of handing it out like goodies based on sex or ethnic/racial lineage? Or are minorities not good enough to compete with poor white people for positions?

I really want to taste this myth of "minorities gets hired automatically." Because so far, I haven't experienced it.


Me too. I would tell my parents about this phenomenon so they can quit their jobs and get brand new ones within the span of a couple of hours.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:25 pm

Mavorpen wrote:I've never done this, nor do I advocate for this. How about you actually stop with the generalizations?


Perhaps I did go a bit too far, I apologize. But in my view, that is exactly what affirmative action is about in practice. You can't implement it without purposefully putting some groups at a disadvantage.
Last edited by Saiwania on Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
Norsklow
Senator
 
Posts: 4477
Founded: Aug 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Norsklow » Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:25 pm

Norstal wrote:
Saiwania wrote:
Boo hoo! I'm a member of an historically disadvantaged group, so I feel the need for the government to force colleges/businesses to discriminate against others in order to benefit me!

I wonder if anyone knows how affirmative actions work at all.


LABOURAffirmative Action Isn't Working
Joseph Stalin, 20 million plus dead -Mao-Tse-Dong, 40 million plus dead - Pol Pot, 2 million dead -Kim-Il-Sung, 5 million dead - Fidel Castro, 1 million dead.

"We the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have done so much, with so little, for so long, we are now qualified to do anything, with nothing"

Don't call me Beny! Am I your Father or something? http://paanluelwel2011.wordpress.com/20 ... honorable/
And I way too young to be Beny bith.
NationStates: Because FOX is for douchebags.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:26 pm

Saiwania wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:I've never done this, nor do I advocate for this. How about you actually stop with the generalizations?


Perhaps I did go a bit too far, I apologize. But in my view, that is exactly what affirmative action is about in practice.


Except, it isn't.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:27 pm

Norsklow wrote:
Norstal wrote:I wonder if anyone knows how affirmative actions work at all.


LABOURAffirmative Action Isn't Working

The American with Disability Act isn't working?

Then how come I keep seeing those blue wheelchair symbols everywhere.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Norsklow
Senator
 
Posts: 4477
Founded: Aug 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Norsklow » Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:27 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Saiwania wrote:
Boo hoo! I'm a member of an historically disadvantaged group, so I feel the need for the government to force colleges/businesses to discriminate against others in order to benefit me!


I've never done this, nor do I advocate for this. How about you actually stop with the generalizations?


Hmmm. Wasn't that what I said to you in re Keynes?
Joseph Stalin, 20 million plus dead -Mao-Tse-Dong, 40 million plus dead - Pol Pot, 2 million dead -Kim-Il-Sung, 5 million dead - Fidel Castro, 1 million dead.

"We the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have done so much, with so little, for so long, we are now qualified to do anything, with nothing"

Don't call me Beny! Am I your Father or something? http://paanluelwel2011.wordpress.com/20 ... honorable/
And I way too young to be Beny bith.
NationStates: Because FOX is for douchebags.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:27 pm

greed and death wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
For a job application? That's the stupidest idea.

Normally those don't ask except for HR purposes not used in hiring.

But university admissions, go for it.


You know what employers do instead? They look at your name. If you have a "black name" you're less likely to get a callback from an employer.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Occupied Deutschland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18796
Founded: Oct 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Occupied Deutschland » Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:28 pm

Norstal wrote:
Occupied Deutschland wrote:*shrug* That one-in-a-million exception is still going to receive the benefits of affirmative action, along with his children. How about we pursue the entirely reasonable policy of attaching these benefits to one's family's income level so we don't have ANY one in a million exceptions and the underprivileged folks get the help they "need" instead of handing it out like goodies based on sex or ethnic/racial lineage? Or are minorities not good enough to compete with poor white people for positions?

I really want to taste this myth of "minorities gets hired automatically." Because so far, I haven't experienced it.

That is a myth, so it doesn't really have a taste.

I have never and will never claim that minorities get hired automatically due to Affirmative Action, that's ridiculous. The problem is weighting these people more because of their minority status at all. If we don't want discrimination in the workplace/college...how about we don't discriminate in the workplace/college?
I'm General Patton.
Even those who are gone are with us as we go on.

Been busy lately--not around much.

User avatar
Norsklow
Senator
 
Posts: 4477
Founded: Aug 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Norsklow » Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:28 pm

Norstal wrote:
Norsklow wrote:
LABOURAffirmative Action Isn't Working

The American with Disability Act isn't working?

Then how come I keep seeing those blue wheelchair symbols everywhere.


How come I see you claiming that you're still not getting the square deal?
I would support it - if it did. But it doesn't.
Joseph Stalin, 20 million plus dead -Mao-Tse-Dong, 40 million plus dead - Pol Pot, 2 million dead -Kim-Il-Sung, 5 million dead - Fidel Castro, 1 million dead.

"We the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have done so much, with so little, for so long, we are now qualified to do anything, with nothing"

Don't call me Beny! Am I your Father or something? http://paanluelwel2011.wordpress.com/20 ... honorable/
And I way too young to be Beny bith.
NationStates: Because FOX is for douchebags.

User avatar
Norsklow
Senator
 
Posts: 4477
Founded: Aug 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Norsklow » Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:29 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
greed and death wrote:Normally those don't ask except for HR purposes not used in hiring.

But university admissions, go for it.


You know what employers do instead? They look at your name. If you have a "black name" you're less likely to get a callback from an employer.


Hear Hear!

Zip code works too.
Last edited by Norsklow on Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Joseph Stalin, 20 million plus dead -Mao-Tse-Dong, 40 million plus dead - Pol Pot, 2 million dead -Kim-Il-Sung, 5 million dead - Fidel Castro, 1 million dead.

"We the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have done so much, with so little, for so long, we are now qualified to do anything, with nothing"

Don't call me Beny! Am I your Father or something? http://paanluelwel2011.wordpress.com/20 ... honorable/
And I way too young to be Beny bith.
NationStates: Because FOX is for douchebags.

User avatar
Gravlen
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16632
Founded: Jul 01, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Gravlen » Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:30 pm

One of the biggest problems with affirmative action seem to be that many of the critics doesn't know what affirmative action actually is.
EnragedMaldivians wrote:That's preposterous. Gravlens's not a white nationalist; Gravlen's a penguin.

Unio de Sovetaj Socialismaj Respublikoj wrote:There is no use arguing the definition of murder with someone who has a picture of a penguin with a chainsaw as their nations flag.

User avatar
Birkinghamia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 668
Founded: Jul 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Birkinghamia » Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:30 pm

Neo Art wrote:
Birkinghamia wrote:You were arguing the whole time that that was "unfair".


You seem lost, perhaps a nap? Might help.

So, I guess you concede.


The whole time you argued that colleges choosing selectively was unfair. Then you said that it's up to colleges to decide who's qualified to attend.

You're not making sense. If I'm misunderstanding your position, please explain.

Neo Art wrote:He's not "qualified"? Someone is deciding he isn't "worth" it? Someone in a room somewhere decides that because of some characteristic of him, he doesn't get to go to Harvard?

Sounds a WHOLE lot like discrimination to me.

Neo Art wrote:I am not sure who you think should determine who is qualified to receive a college education, other than the college.


You've contradicted yourself.

And I disagree.


I know you do. You're wrong.

Are you under some silly notion that all opinions are valuable and yours needs some degree of validation simply because you believe in it? Lots of people believe in all sorts of damned silly things, you're no exception. Not all beliefs are equally valid.

Everyone has their own opinions of how qualified others' beliefs are.

I'm not sure what relevance this has to the topic we're attempting to debate.
Economic Left/Right: 0.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.67

Christian, moderate, New Yorker.
Ich spreche Deutsch.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:31 pm

Occupied Deutschland wrote:
Norstal wrote:I really want to taste this myth of "minorities gets hired automatically." Because so far, I haven't experienced it.

That is a myth, so it doesn't really have a taste.

I have never and will never claim that minorities get hired automatically due to Affirmative Action, that's ridiculous. The problem is weighting these people more because of their minority status at all. If we don't want discrimination in the workplace/college...how about we don't discriminate in the workplace/college?


That's what Affirmative Action is trying to do on a racial, color, etc basis. While the disability acts address people with disabilities. You're pretending we are doing nothing about discrimination. We are.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:32 pm

Norstal wrote:
Norsklow wrote:
LABOURAffirmative Action Isn't Working

The American with Disability Act isn't working?

Then how come I keep seeing those blue wheelchair symbols everywhere.

You seem to be confusing accommodation with affirmative action.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:34 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
greed and death wrote:Normally those don't ask except for HR purposes not used in hiring.

But university admissions, go for it.


You know what employers do instead? They look at your name. If you have a "black name" you're less likely to get a callback from an employer.

See with a proper name and zip code for employment purposes and a proper check of minority status on university admissions, a white male can get the advantage of both.

Shoot with the new transgender movement the white male can claim to be a girl if he/she chooses.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Tue Sep 11, 2012 2:35 pm

Norsklow wrote:
Norstal wrote:The American with Disability Act isn't working?

Then how come I keep seeing those blue wheelchair symbols everywhere.


How come I see you claiming that you're still not getting the square deal?

Do you have problems with reading comprehension or something?

There's different areas of affirmative action. It's not a single monolithic policy that encompasses everything about a person. Currently we have one that effectively protects disabled, veterans, etc. but not ones for others.

I would support it - if it did. But it doesn't.

You really think those ramps and those parking spots for the handicapped existed everywhere before the legislation don't you?
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Thermodolia, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads