Saint Jade IV wrote:I am well aware of our apathy towards religion as a people. However, politically, due to Aussie attitudes like, "She'll be right mate" creating a politically apathetic population, religious groups are gaining ground in influencing policy.
Which is why I doubt that they will get much influence, remember this is an old law not one that is being debated in the one house of Queensland's parliament.
Australian Parliamentary Library Website wrote:In each State and Territory, the law provides that the crime of unlawful abortion is punishable by lengthy periods of imprisonment. In Victoria the penalty is five years' imprisonment for both the woman and the abortionist and one year's imprisonment for supplying or procuring anything to assist. In New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory the penalty is ten years' imprisonment for the woman and the abortionist, and five years for supplying or procuring. In South Australia the penalty is life imprisonment for the woman and the abortionist, and three years for supplying or procuring. In the Northern Territory the penalty is seven years' imprisonment for all parties. In Tasmania the penalty for all involved is 21 years' imprisonment and/or a fine as determined by the court. In Queensland (and until recently in Western Australia) the penalty is seven years' imprisonment for the woman, 14 years for the abortionist, and three years for supplying or procuring. Changes to the law in Western Australia have replaced these penalties with a fine of $50 000 where the abortionist is a qualified medical practitioner, and a penalty of five years' imprisonment where the abortionist is not. A woman on whom an unlawful abortion is performed is no longer subject to any legal punishment in Western Australia.
So it is a crime in Queensland. Unless to save the life of the mother. Which is the issue at stake. Noone has been prosecuted for a good long time, so nobody saw a reason to change the law. Now it may be too late.
You should become a journalist.
It does say unlawful arbortion now is this when it is done by backstreet butchers? Or if one is a qualified doctor and uses correct procedure that it is not unlawful or may just even supply RU486 through prescription?
The case in front of the courts is not this but rather a woman did it
on her own and used an
illegal drug that was
smuggled in to the country.