Anti-Americanism on NationStates

[Ierm]

It was a constitutional monarchy before the USA was born...

But the power rested in the King not PM until pre-WW1 post-1820

I found the oldest continuous government in the world.

Most Serene Republic of San Marino

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Marino

[The Tiger Kingdom]

That is because everyone is jealous of America and its achievements

THIS MAN DOES NOT SPEAK FOR US

[The Nuclear Fist]

[One who bitches is One who is jealous

Yes, everyone who ever complains about something is clearly jealous of it. That makes perfect sense if you don't really think about it.

Nuff said

It's not like you were going to say anything worth saying, anyway.

Besides the fact i enjoy my freedom get to own Tactical Rifles with out a permit AND can be full auto ftw

You're not allowed to own a firearm without a permit in the US, as far as I am aware. And, believe it or not, not everyone enjoys masturbatory circle jerks over weapons catalogues. I know, it's bizarre, but some of us have better things to do.

[Ostroeuropa]

...Not really, the UK has been essentially a parliamentary democracy since 1700ish.
The "Powers" of the king were an ever decreasing set of rights, their authority to actually do stuff was dead.

See, it is the ardument of when the King had less powers then the Parliment.

What powers do you think the king had in 1700?

[The Holy Dominion of Inesea]

But the power rested in the King not PM until pre-WW1 post-1820

I found the oldest continuous government in the world.

Most Serene Republic of San Marino

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Marino

Raped by Nazi's in WW2, became part of Germany Military Government for a total of less a month.

[The Holy Dominion of Inesea]

See, it is the ardument of when the King had less powers then the Parliment.

What powers do you think the king had in 1700?

Declaration of War, propose laws, veto laws, send troops, requisition conscription

[United Gackle]

[One who bitches is One who is jealous

Yes, everyone who ever complains about something is clearly jealous of it. That makes perfect sense if you don't really think about it.

Nuff said

It's not like you were going to say anything worth saying, anyway.

Besides the fact i enjoy my freedom get to own Tactical Rifles with out a permit AND can be full auto ftw

You're not allowed to own a firearm without a permit in the US, as far as I am aware. And, believe it or not, not everyone enjoys masturbatory circle jerks over weapons catalogues. I know, it's bizarre, but some of us have better things to do.

LOL well that is where your WRONG

I know the gun laws here you can open carry a firearm as long as it is NOT loaded

to carry a concealed weapon such as a pistol you need to be 21 or older and have a permit

Also i own 2 M-16's, and 2 M4's you do not need a permit ask any gun dealership now IF it was full auto that on the other hand YOU NEED a permit for just like you can own a Tank i have a friend whose uncle owns a Sherman

You came to the wrong person man i know my guns and weapons i deal with gun dealerships also own a glock and i do have a permit to carry a concealed weapon for it as well

[Ostroeuropa]

What powers do you think the king had in 1700?

Declaration of War, propose laws, veto laws, send troops, requisition conscription

Declaration of war is only done on the advice/request of parliament. It is not a power in the traditional sense. Please find an example of it's use where parliament did not propose/vote for it.

Proposing laws is a power all MP's have too.

Send troops? No, the generals do this. And again, parliament was in charge. The army is PARLIAMENTS army. Ever since cromwell. 0 oaths to the monarch, no royal commands.

Conscription too, it's PARLIAMENTS army.

Law Veto wasn't used much, And I don't think at all post 1700.

[The Nuclear Fist]

You came to the wrong person man i know my guns and weapons i deal with gun dealerships also own a glock and i do have a permit to carry a concealed weapon as well

Personally, I don't give two rusty fucks about how many shooty toys you own, dear. What I find particularly annoying is you stating that those of us who criticize the US, whether justified or otherwise, are jealous of your country.

If what you've just shown us is representative of most Americans (although I doubt it is), we have nothing to be jealous of.

[The Holy Dominion of Inesea]

Declaration of War, propose laws, veto laws, send troops, requisition conscription

Declaration of war is only done on the advice/request of parliament. It is not a power in the traditional sense. Please find an example of it's use where parliament did not propose/vote for it.

Proposing laws is a power all MP's have too.

Send troops? No, the generals do this. And again, parliament was in charge. The army is PARLIAMENTS army. Ever since cromwell. 0 oaths to the monarch, no royal commands.

Conscription too, it's PARLIAMENTS army.

Law Veto wasn't used much, And I don't think at all post 1700.

King George the Third di all of this in his reign. He ruled 1780-1810 abouit.

[Ostroeuropa]

Declaration of war is only done on the advice/request of parliament. It is not a power in the traditional sense. Please find an example of it's use where parliament did not propose/vote for it.

Proposing laws is a power all MP's have too.

Send troops? No, the generals do this. And again, parliament was in charge. The army is PARLIAMENTS army. Ever since cromwell. 0 oaths to the monarch, no royal commands.

Conscription too, it's PARLIAMENTS army.

Law Veto wasn't used much, And I don't think at all post 1700.

King George the Third di all of this in his reign. He ruled 1780-1810 abouit.

Could you please cite examples.
EDIT: I understand why you've made this mistake, by the way. Blaming George III for what the British Parliament did was useful for american propoganda about the war.
And to some extent, that propoganda has distorted the view americans hold of the system in place.

[The Holy Dominion of Inesea]

American War of Independence, sent troops before Parliment WAS aware
Many Failed Vetos
EDIT: Looka t powers of King in 1700's-1800's. Look at them now. See any changes?

[United Gackle]

You came to the wrong person man i know my guns and weapons i deal with gun dealerships also own a glock and i do have a permit to carry a concealed weapon as well

Personally, I don't give two rusty fucks about how many shooty toys you own, dear. What I find particularly annoying is you stating that those of us who criticize the US, whether justified or otherwise, are jealous of your country.

If what you've just shown us is representative of most Americans (although I doubt it is), we have nothing to be jealous of.

Do you see me hating on any country such as Russia, China, or any other nation??? No you do not therefore i ain't jealous

To be Jealous is for the immature

[Nadkor]

yes, but power switched from the king to the PM all through 19th century. And the Vatican City was fouded in 1929 and The Holy See is not a country

...Not really, the UK has been essentially a parliamentary democracy since 1700ish.
The "Powers" of the king were an ever decreasing set of rights, their authority to actually do stuff was dead.

This.

[Ostroeuropa]

American War of Independence, sent troops before Parliment WAS aware
Many Failed Vetos
EDIT: Looka t powers of King in 1700's-1800's. Look at them now. See any changes?

Cite your source please. He did no such thing.

[Nightkill the Emperor]

Personally, I don't give two rusty fucks about how many shooty toys you own, dear. What I find particularly annoying is you stating that those of us who criticize the US, whether justified or otherwise, are jealous of your country.

If what you've just shown us is representative of most Americans (although I doubt it is), we have nothing to be jealous of.

Do you see me hating on any country such as Russia, China, or any other nation??? No you do not therefore i ain't jealous

To be Jealous is for the immature

So let's discuss your immature jealousy of the UK and China.

[The Nuclear Fist]

Do you see me hating on any country such as Russia, China, or any other nation???

By stating that everyone who criticizes the US is jealous of it, you are doing just that, yes. But I am rather certain you've made more explicit posts to that nature.

No you do not therefore i ain't jealous

If only you were jealous of a grammar teacher.

To be Jealous is for the immature

Not particularly, no.

[The Holy Dominion of Inesea]

World Book Ecyclopedia: Books, J,M, and B

[United Gackle]

Do you see me hating on any country such as Russia, China, or any other nation??? No you do not therefore i ain't jealous

To be Jealous is for the immature

So let's discuss your immature jealousy of the UK and China.

No sense of Humor for this youngster i am guessing

[Ostroeuropa]

World Book Ecyclopedia: Books, J,M, and B

Any online sources lol
This seems like a dodge to me.
The fact is,if you review history, George III was constantly dismayed by his utter lack of power over parliament.
It'd been this way for a while too. He knew he couldn't veto a law without ministerial approval too, so when a bill he disliked passed the commons, he had to resort to telling the lords to please vote against it. (They did, and the commons PASSED IT ANYWAY using parliamentary supremacy)

[Nightkill the Emperor]

So let's discuss your immature jealousy of the UK and China.

No sense of Humor for this youngster i am guessing

I have a sense of humour. When there is humour, I will sense it.

[The Nuclear Fist]

I have a sense of humour. When there is humour, I will sense it.

I am sensing a lot of hypocrisy with our friend, here, and I find that humourous.

[The Tiger Kingdom]

No sense of Humor for this youngster i am guessing

I have a sense of humour. When there is humour, I will sense it.

What is this "humour" you speak of? Is that some sort of Continental affectation?

[The Holy Dominion of Inesea]

World Book Ecyclopedia: Books, J,M, and B

Any online sources lol
This seems like a dodge to me.
The fact is,if you review history, George III was constantly dismayed by his utter lack of power over parliament.
It'd been this way for a while too

Oh, I use Print Sources. It draws from the fact i like to read books and such, Plus, i didn't spend hundreds of dollars and pounds on it, not to use it.
Plus World Book is a great Cite for School papers.

[Valhallion]

Yes, everyone who ever complains about something is clearly jealous of it. That makes perfect sense if you don't really think about it.


It's not like you were going to say anything worth saying, anyway.


You're not allowed to own a firearm without a permit in the US, as far as I am aware. And, believe it or not, not everyone enjoys masturbatory circle jerks over weapons catalogues. I know, it's bizarre, but some of us have better things to do.

LOL well that is where your WRONG

I know the gun laws here you can open carry a firearm as long as it is NOT loaded

to carry a concealed weapon such as a pistol you need to be 21 or older and have a permit

Also i own 2 M-16's, and 2 M4's you do not need a permit ask any gun dealership now IF it was full auto that on the other hand YOU NEED a permit for just like you can own a Tank i have a friend whose uncle owns a Sherman

You came to the wrong person man i know my guns and weapons i deal with gun dealerships also own a glock and i do have a permit to carry a concealed weapon for it as well

if they are not full auto then they are noy the m-16 or the m-4, you own to long ar-15 and two short ar-15. A m16/m4 require a class 3 license and are heavily regulated by the federal government. If you dont own a class 3 license and you do won fully automatic weapons under your name then i suggest you get that class 3 in a hurry cause you face 5-10 years in butt rape hell for each of them so you could spend 20-40 years being buba new girlfriend.