Capitalism vs. Communism

[4years]

No.
Galileo demonstrated Aristotle's 'common sense' to be just a little bit off on that point, I believe.

..in a vacuum.

I said no to your question "in an atmosphere?" which would imply a vacuum.
Besides the point was a famous example of why "common sense" is a terrible argument.

[Sociobiology]

Claim

Claim

Claim

Flame?

No proof to be found.

In an atmosphere?

No.
Galileo demonstrated Aristotle's 'common sense' to be just a little bit off on that point, I believe.

as for the society thing you can point to anthropology

[Jassysworth 1]

No... it is common sense that you can't have large scale stateless, moneyless, and classless societies solving all of the world's major problems.

1) It's impractical to create such societies

Claim

2) It's impossible to sustain such societies on a large scale

Claim

3) Any attempts to create such societies, if taken far enough, will bring chaos, death, and destruction to the world

Claim

4) Only those who are incredibly naive would believe communism is possible.

Flame?

No proof to be found.

Where's your proof that acceleration do to gravity varies with mass?
"Common sense"

In an atmosphere?

They have all failed thus far (no large-scale communist societies lasting to the present day) and so common sense is thus far completely backed by the record.

Tell me where is a single instance where communism has worked? It never has worked in the modern age and whenever it has been tried, for whatever reason it has always failed. Until you show me otherwise, I will stick to common sense thank you.

Oh and for the record, you can't control large populations and keep track of everyone and keep things efficiently without a state.Nor can you have high technology.

Economics says you need individualistic incentives with differential rewards to maintain a productive and progressive economy.