"Pepperspray cop" has been photoshopped a lot, but the original image is 100% real. He's fucking spraying people who are already on the ground in surrender from about half the distance he's supposed to. And he got off incredibly light for it.
Advertisement

by Phocidaea » Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:37 pm

by Sulamalik » Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:37 pm
North Calaveras wrote:Sulamalik wrote:
To be fair, in many cases the cops were using way too much force to subdue peaceful protesters.
They asked for it in mass a lot of the time though, and they were given ample reminders in some cases but when they were legitmently subdued by law enforcement they would bitch and cry wolf.
Freiheit Reich wrote:"Economically disadvantaged and angry urban youth music."
Is that a nicer and more modern term to use?

by North Calaveras » Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:38 pm
Phocidaea wrote:Sulamalik wrote:
To be fair, in many cases the cops were using way too much force to subdue peaceful protesters.
"Pepperspray cop" has been photoshopped a lot, but the original image is 100% real. He's fucking spraying people who are already on the ground in surrender from about half the distance he's supposed to. And he got off incredibly light for it.

by North Calaveras » Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:39 pm
Sulamalik wrote:North Calaveras wrote:
They asked for it in mass a lot of the time though, and they were given ample reminders in some cases but when they were legitmently subdued by law enforcement they would bitch and cry wolf.
Complaining that riot cops are assaulting you with tear gas and truncheons isn't crying wolf. It's not a legitimate use of force. Police officer's don't shoot an unarmed drunk when he's resisting arrest. Police shouldn't use overwhelming less-lethal force to arrest people for peacefully protesting.

by Sulamalik » Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:39 pm
North Calaveras wrote:Phocidaea wrote:
"Pepperspray cop" has been photoshopped a lot, but the original image is 100% real. He's fucking spraying people who are already on the ground in surrender from about half the distance he's supposed to. And he got off incredibly light for it.
on the ground surrending, they looked like they were blocking him to me, surrendering usually implied making way for the person.
Freiheit Reich wrote:"Economically disadvantaged and angry urban youth music."
Is that a nicer and more modern term to use?

by Sulamalik » Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:40 pm
North Calaveras wrote:Sulamalik wrote:
Complaining that riot cops are assaulting you with tear gas and truncheons isn't crying wolf. It's not a legitimate use of force. Police officer's don't shoot an unarmed drunk when he's resisting arrest. Police shouldn't use overwhelming less-lethal force to arrest people for peacefully protesting.
When did the police use overwhelming "lethal" force?
Freiheit Reich wrote:"Economically disadvantaged and angry urban youth music."
Is that a nicer and more modern term to use?

by North Calaveras » Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:41 pm

by North Calaveras » Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:43 pm

by Sulamalik » Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:45 pm
Freiheit Reich wrote:"Economically disadvantaged and angry urban youth music."
Is that a nicer and more modern term to use?

by Phocidaea » Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:46 pm
Sulamalik wrote:North Calaveras wrote:
on the ground surrending, they looked like they were blocking him to me, surrendering usually implied making way for the person.
A legitimate use of force by the Police on resisting protesters

by North Calaveras » Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:47 pm
Sulamalik wrote:North Calaveras wrote:
actually the line seems to surround the police in a large circle...I'm watching the video right now and that is what I see
Hmm. Fair enough.
Still though, it's hard to see the sense in deliberately spraying teargas in people's faces. Even if it clears the way, it doesn't solve the underlying reason why these people protest.

by Sulamalik » Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:49 pm
North Calaveras wrote:Sulamalik wrote:
Hmm. Fair enough.
Still though, it's hard to see the sense in deliberately spraying teargas in people's faces. Even if it clears the way, it doesn't solve the underlying reason why these people protest.
If they were legally allowed to do what they did then I don't see a problem, but as far as I know surrounding police and taunting them is asking for pepper-spray(the surrounding part more importantly.
Freiheit Reich wrote:"Economically disadvantaged and angry urban youth music."
Is that a nicer and more modern term to use?

by North Calaveras » Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:49 pm
Sulamalik wrote:North Calaveras wrote:
If they were legally allowed to do what they did then I don't see a problem, but as far as I know surrounding police and taunting them is asking for pepper-spray(the surrounding part more importantly.
Committing a crime is asking for pepper-spray. Exercising your freedom of speech shouldn't. Like I said, police violence doesn't solve problems, it just aggravates them.

by Capitalist America » Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:50 pm

by Armedland » Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:50 pm

by Sulamalik » Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:52 pm
Annette Spicuzza, the U.C. Davis police chief, told The Sacramento Bee that the officers used pepper spray on Friday because the police were surrounded by students. 'There was no way out of that circle,' she told the newspaper. 'They were cutting the officers off from their support. It's a very volatile situation.' The videos, however, show officers freely moving about and show students behaving peacefully. The university reported no instances of violence by any protesters."
Freiheit Reich wrote:"Economically disadvantaged and angry urban youth music."
Is that a nicer and more modern term to use?

by North Calaveras » Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:52 pm
Armedland wrote:I was moderately supportive of occupy when it began, but I doubt it's going to go anywhere from here. It's declined and it only gets publicity when it's disruptive now.

by The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace » Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:54 pm
Armedland wrote:I was moderately supportive of occupy when it began, but I doubt it's going to go anywhere from here. It's declined and it only gets publicity when it's disruptive now.

by North Calaveras » Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:56 pm
The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace wrote:Armedland wrote:I was moderately supportive of occupy when it began, but I doubt it's going to go anywhere from here. It's declined and it only gets publicity when it's disruptive now.
Ha, you could say the same about the Tea Party these days.
Occupy did bring up some issues, but in the end people just couldn't take the beatings I guess.

by Sphyxia » Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:58 pm
North Calaveras wrote:The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace wrote:
Ha, you could say the same about the Tea Party these days.
Occupy did bring up some issues, but in the end people just couldn't take the beatings I guess.
Hey the Tea Party usually cleans up after themselves and they actually have been able to influence politics(for better or worse)

by Sulamalik » Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:58 pm
North Calaveras wrote:The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace wrote:
Ha, you could say the same about the Tea Party these days.
Occupy did bring up some issues, but in the end people just couldn't take the beatings I guess.
Hey the Tea Party usually cleans up after themselves and they actually have been able to influence politics(for better or worse)
Freiheit Reich wrote:"Economically disadvantaged and angry urban youth music."
Is that a nicer and more modern term to use?

by North Calaveras » Sun Sep 09, 2012 6:59 pm
Sulamalik wrote:North Calaveras wrote:
Hey the Tea Party usually cleans up after themselves and they actually have been able to influence politics(for better or worse)
Comparing the Tea Party to the Occupy movement is kinda apples to oranges. The Tea Party has an established hierarchy with substantial corporate funding and Republican support while Occupy is basically anarchy.

by Sulamalik » Sun Sep 09, 2012 7:00 pm
North Calaveras wrote:Sulamalik wrote:
Comparing the Tea Party to the Occupy movement is kinda apples to oranges. The Tea Party has an established hierarchy with substantial corporate funding and Republican support while Occupy is basically anarchy.
I dont really believe that being a Tea Partier myself, but even if that were the case, still much much better than the shit occupy pulls.
Freiheit Reich wrote:"Economically disadvantaged and angry urban youth music."
Is that a nicer and more modern term to use?

by North Calaveras » Sun Sep 09, 2012 7:02 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cannot think of a name, Concejos Unidos, Elejamie, Ethel mermania, The Ambis
Advertisement