What is to you the worst/most terrifying ideology?

[Jakaragua]

For ones that have been practiced, Nazism/Fascism, Stalinism or Theorcracy wouldn't be very pleasant in the slightest. For the merely idealized, any sort of "Right-Libertarianism/MInarchism/Anarchism".

[Bleckonia]

Nazism, Stalinism, Theocracy

[Nordengrund]

The extreme left and the extreme right are both pretty bad.

[Shnercropolis]

if we're being hypothetical, police state.
If we're being practical, communist police state.

[The Steel Magnolia]

The extreme left and the extreme right are both pretty bad.

Says a "Constitutionalist".


Yeah that's extreme right.

Anyway, Objectivism and anything Theocratic.

[Maurepas]

The one that harms people it disagrees with.

[Sioux Countystate]

Communism. I don't get why people here defend it. It's the ideology that gave us the gulags, or North Korean generals suspected of plotting to kill KJI being covered in gas and set on fire in a STADIUM full of people.

[Maurepas]

Communism. I don't get why people here defend it. It's the ideology that gave us the gulags, or North Korean generals suspected of plotting to kill KJI being covered in gas and set on fire in a STADIUM full of people.

Because none of those states actually followed Marx's ideology.

It'd be like calling Christianity the "most terrifying ideology" because of the Branch-Davidians or the KKK.

[Sioux Countystate]

Communism. I don't get why people here defend it. It's the ideology that gave us the gulags, or North Korean generals suspected of plotting to kill KJI being covered in gas and set on fire in a STADIUM full of people.

Because none of those states actually followed Marx's ideology.

It'd be like calling Christianity the "most terrifying ideology" because of the Branch-Davidians or the KKK.

Christianity has many sects and groups which do not follow those ideologies. How come no commie county has ever followed Marx's ideology, assuming that Cuba/PRNK/USSR is not the ultimate result of it?

[Maurepas]

Because none of those states actually followed Marx's ideology.

It'd be like calling Christianity the "most terrifying ideology" because of the Branch-Davidians or the KKK.

Christianity has many sects and groups which do not follow those ideologies. How come no commie county has ever followed Marx's ideology, assuming that Cuba/PRNK/USSR is not the ultimate result of it?

Personally? I'd argue because it simply isn't feasible on a large scale. You can only really see it implemented on the Commune level, but I think it breaks down on the National level. But Marx argues for the end of the Nation-state anyway, not that I think that is practical either.

But, tbqh, one could really say the same of Christianity, it's just that not every sect fails to follow through violence.

[The De Danann Nation]

Pretty simple question.

Personally off the top of my head it has to be something akin to National Bolshevism.
Whilst the ideology itself does not appear to have any consitency whatsoever, it seems to generally be a blanket term for people who like the extreme xenophobia and racial policies of Hitler whilst promoting the economic and totalitarian ideals of Joseph Stalin.

What is to you the most terrifying ideology?

Pacifism and theocracies.Those two things show just how stupid we humans are.

[Foguk]

I fear theocracy.

I fear my country turning into an Iraq or an Afghanistan.

The only thing comes anywhere near it is any politician resembling Reagan. I would seriously consider leaving leaving the country if we had a prolonged period of Reaganomics. I shudder at the thought.

[Moving Forward Inc]

The one that harms people it disagrees with.

The problem here is that all ideologies inevitably end up hurting people it disagrees with.

Liberals will always tax conservatives, and conservatives will always ban liberals from having abortions.
Even Right-libertarians such as myself who oppose initiation of force will support putting Neo-nazi mass murderer's in jail or executing them because we think the fact that they were killing Jews or Multiculturalist's isn't a good enough excuse and that retaliatory force is OK.

[Maurepas]

The one that harms people it disagrees with.

The problem here is that all ideologies inevitably end up hurting people it disagrees with.

Liberals will always tax conservatives, and conservatives will always ban liberals from having abortions.
Even Right-libertarians such as myself who oppose initiation of force will support putting Neo-nazi mass murderer's in jail or executing them because we think the fact that they were killing Jews or Multiculturalist's isn't a good enough excuse and that retaliatory force is OK.

And I'm usually not happy when it occurs. The problem with deciding a definitive "most" terrifying, is that it changes at a constant rate.

It's the one that's harming people at a given time.

[Hockenberg]

Isolationism.

[Foguk]

Isolationism.

Ok, you have to elaborate on this.

[Barbary Bay]

Militant theocracies / ultra nationalism

[Sidhae]

Stalinism and left-wing liberalism. The first I find abhorrent for historical reasons, and the last for endorsing actions and ideas both degenerate and detrimental to the nation under the guise of "liberty" and "civil rights", as well as often being grossly hypocritical.

[Priory Academy USSR]

Stalinism and left-wing liberalism. The first I find abhorrent for historical reasons, and the last for endorsing actions and ideas both degenerate and detrimental to the nation under the guise of "liberty" and "civil rights", as well as often being grossly hypocritical.

What have the Democrats (I presume you're an American) done that is bad while claiming to be a 'civil right'? There haven't been any particularly bad liberalising laws passed to the best of my knowledge.

[Lompe Steen HAHA]

The one that harms people it disagrees with.

HEAR HEAR!

[Republic of Tao Yuan]

Nazism, Stalinism, Theocracy

Agreed

[Zaras]

How come no commie county has ever followed Marx's ideology, assuming that Cuba/PRNK/USSR is not the ultimate result of it?

Because of those fucks Lenin and Stalin.

[Zaras]

Stalinism and left-wing liberalism. The first I find abhorrent for historical reasons, and the last for endorsing actions and ideas both degenerate and detrimental to the nation under the guise of "liberty" and "civil rights", as well as often being grossly hypocritical.

What have the Democrats (I presume you're an American) done that is bad while claiming to be a 'civil right'? There haven't been any particularly bad liberalising laws passed to the best of my knowledge.

Uh, Priory? Sidhae's a Nazi. I think you can extrapolate the answer from there.

[The Revolutionary Proletarian Republic]

To me the extreme right is the worst thing ever

[Priory Academy USSR]

What have the Democrats (I presume you're an American) done that is bad while claiming to be a 'civil right'? There haven't been any particularly bad liberalising laws passed to the best of my knowledge.

Uh, Priory? Sidhae's a Nazi. I think you can extrapolate the answer from there.

Oh. That explains a lot.

Ignore my last post, then.