Like close Gitmo and reduce nuclear stockpiles?
Advertisement
by Lunatic Goofballs » Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:17 am
by Czardas » Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:17 am
F1-Insanity wrote:So, what exactly has Obama done that makes him 'deserve' it more than, say, Morgan Tsvangirai? The latter being someone who actually puts his own life on the line to try and work for peace?
It just confirms what I have been saying for years, the Nobel prize committee is a bunch of leftists promoting leftist politics. Oh, and to some folks here, no they are not anti-USA, they are pro-leftist.
by Verdeguay » Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:18 am
F1-Insanity wrote:So, what exactly has Obama done that makes him 'deserve' it more than, say, Morgan Tsvangirai? The latter being someone who actually puts his own life on the line to try and work for peace?
It just confirms what I have been saying for years, the Nobel prize committee is a bunch of leftists promoting leftist politics. Oh, and to some folks here, no they are not anti-USA, they are pro-leftist.
by Northwest Slobovia » Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:18 am
by Hairless Kitten II » Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:18 am
by Lunatic Goofballs » Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:19 am
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
I can understand his promises, and I can see what LG said earlier. But to me, which in the larger scheme of things matters not, Barrack Obama winning the NPP on mere promises of what he will do is... vapid. I wouldn't have given him the prize. He really hasn't ''done'' anything with those promises, just yet.
by Lunatic Goofballs » Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:21 am
Northwest Slobovia wrote:My, how the standards have fallen over the years...
Let's looks at the other US presidents who have gotten the laurels for peace:
Teddy Roosevelt (1906): negotiated peace between Russian and Japan
Woodrow Wilson (1919): founded the League of Nations, the predcessor to the UN
Jimmy Carter (2002): negotiated peace between Israel and Egypt
vs:
Barak Obama (2009): is a nicer guy than George Bush
by Lunatic Goofballs » Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:21 am
Hairless Kitten II wrote:But...but...Obamala solved that major crisis, you know the policeman vs. the scholar war, with only one tool: beer.
Maybe they were impressed by this at the Nobel Factory?
by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:21 am
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Northwest Slobovia wrote:My, how the standards have fallen over the years...
Let's looks at the other US presidents who have gotten the laurels for peace:
Teddy Roosevelt (1906): negotiated peace between Russian and Japan
Woodrow Wilson (1919): founded the League of Nations, the predcessor to the UN
Jimmy Carter (2002): negotiated peace between Israel and Egypt
vs:
Barak Obama (2009): is a nicer guy than George Bush
I think that demonstrates just what the world thought of Bush.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria
by Lunatic Goofballs » Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:22 am
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Northwest Slobovia wrote:My, how the standards have fallen over the years...
Let's looks at the other US presidents who have gotten the laurels for peace:
Teddy Roosevelt (1906): negotiated peace between Russian and Japan
Woodrow Wilson (1919): founded the League of Nations, the predcessor to the UN
Jimmy Carter (2002): negotiated peace between Israel and Egypt
vs:
Barak Obama (2009): is a nicer guy than George Bush
I think that demonstrates just what the world thought of Bush.
IIRC, GW Bush was one of the candidates for this year's NPP.
by Vervaria » Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:23 am
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Northwest Slobovia wrote:My, how the standards have fallen over the years...
Let's looks at the other US presidents who have gotten the laurels for peace:
Teddy Roosevelt (1906): negotiated peace between Russian and Japan
Woodrow Wilson (1919): founded the League of Nations, the predcessor to the UN
Jimmy Carter (2002): negotiated peace between Israel and Egypt
vs:
Barak Obama (2009): is a nicer guy than George Bush
I think that demonstrates just what the world thought of Bush.
IIRC, GW Bush was one of the candidates for this year's NPP.
I wonder how long this thread would have been if he won it.
Robustian wrote:If you disagree with me, you are wrong. Period.
Ashmoria wrote:it worries me more when people who hate the government and dont think it can do a good job at anything get into power and start running things.
Wanderjar wrote:hiding behind this "I WANT SOURCES" wall is very quaint
Self--Esteem wrote:No. I love smearing those people who evidently like their country blown by a nuke and who are too foolish to realise that middle-eastern terrorism is nothing to be fond of.
Novistranaya wrote:After the Civil War, the majority of Southerners were more than happy to accept defeat and acknowledge the fact that (though not immediately) blacks were going to have the same rights as them.
by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:23 am
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Northwest Slobovia wrote:My, how the standards have fallen over the years...
Let's looks at the other US presidents who have gotten the laurels for peace:
Teddy Roosevelt (1906): negotiated peace between Russian and Japan
Woodrow Wilson (1919): founded the League of Nations, the predcessor to the UN
Jimmy Carter (2002): negotiated peace between Israel and Egypt
vs:
Barak Obama (2009): is a nicer guy than George Bush
I think that demonstrates just what the world thought of Bush.
IIRC, GW Bush was one of the candidates for this year's NPP.
I wonder how long this thread would have been if he won it.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria
by Obama Jugen III » Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:23 am
Czardas wrote:F1-Insanity wrote:So, what exactly has Obama done that makes him 'deserve' it more than, say, Morgan Tsvangirai? The latter being someone who actually puts his own life on the line to try and work for peace?
It just confirms what I have been saying for years, the Nobel prize committee is a bunch of leftists promoting leftist politics. Oh, and to some folks here, no they are not anti-USA, they are pro-leftist.
Out of curiosity, do you think Henry Kissinger or Yasser Arafat were leftists as well?
by Lunatic Goofballs » Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:26 am
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Northwest Slobovia wrote:My, how the standards have fallen over the years...
Let's looks at the other US presidents who have gotten the laurels for peace:
Teddy Roosevelt (1906): negotiated peace between Russian and Japan
Woodrow Wilson (1919): founded the League of Nations, the predcessor to the UN
Jimmy Carter (2002): negotiated peace between Israel and Egypt
vs:
Barak Obama (2009): is a nicer guy than George Bush
I think that demonstrates just what the world thought of Bush.
IIRC, GW Bush was one of the candidates for this year's NPP.
I wonder how long this thread would have been if he won it.
Dude, it would be kilometric.
by Vittos Ordination » Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:27 am
Obama Jugen III wrote:Czardas wrote:F1-Insanity wrote:So, what exactly has Obama done that makes him 'deserve' it more than, say, Morgan Tsvangirai? The latter being someone who actually puts his own life on the line to try and work for peace?
It just confirms what I have been saying for years, the Nobel prize committee is a bunch of leftists promoting leftist politics. Oh, and to some folks here, no they are not anti-USA, they are pro-leftist.
Out of curiosity, do you think Henry Kissinger or Yasser Arafat were leftists as well?
Well, Arafat was, of course. He was supported (at times directly) by the Soviet Union. And since Israel's rattle-snake-like self-defense is perceived as extreme militarism by the left, anyone opposing Israel scores brownie points with post-soviet-union left. Yes, I know that the prize was also given to Rabin, but only because he made a move which was nearly suicidal for Israel.
by FreeSatania » Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:27 am
Northwest Slobovia wrote:My, how the standards have fallen over the years...
Let's looks at the other US presidents who have gotten the laurels for peace:
Teddy Roosevelt (1906): negotiated peace between Russian and Japan
Woodrow Wilson (1919): founded the League of Nations, the predcessor to the UN
Jimmy Carter (2002): negotiated peace between Israel and Egypt
vs:
Barak Obama (2009): is a nicer guy than George Bush
by You-Gi-Owe » Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:28 am
Hairless Kitten II wrote:One question: Why?
by Lunatic Goofballs » Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:28 am
Vittos Ordination wrote:Obama Jugen III wrote:Czardas wrote:F1-Insanity wrote:So, what exactly has Obama done that makes him 'deserve' it more than, say, Morgan Tsvangirai? The latter being someone who actually puts his own life on the line to try and work for peace?
It just confirms what I have been saying for years, the Nobel prize committee is a bunch of leftists promoting leftist politics. Oh, and to some folks here, no they are not anti-USA, they are pro-leftist.
Out of curiosity, do you think Henry Kissinger or Yasser Arafat were leftists as well?
Well, Arafat was, of course. He was supported (at times directly) by the Soviet Union. And since Israel's rattle-snake-like self-defense is perceived as extreme militarism by the left, anyone opposing Israel scores brownie points with post-soviet-union left. Yes, I know that the prize was also given to Rabin, but only because he made a move which was nearly suicidal for Israel.
Let me guess: Since you call yourself a righty, you consider everything you disagree with to be leftist?
by FreeSatania » Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:29 am
Vittos Ordination wrote:Obama Jugen III wrote:Czardas wrote:F1-Insanity wrote:So, what exactly has Obama done that makes him 'deserve' it more than, say, Morgan Tsvangirai? The latter being someone who actually puts his own life on the line to try and work for peace?
It just confirms what I have been saying for years, the Nobel prize committee is a bunch of leftists promoting leftist politics. Oh, and to some folks here, no they are not anti-USA, they are pro-leftist.
Out of curiosity, do you think Henry Kissinger or Yasser Arafat were leftists as well?
Well, Arafat was, of course. He was supported (at times directly) by the Soviet Union. And since Israel's rattle-snake-like self-defense is perceived as extreme militarism by the left, anyone opposing Israel scores brownie points with post-soviet-union left. Yes, I know that the prize was also given to Rabin, but only because he made a move which was nearly suicidal for Israel.
Let me guess: Since you call yourself a righty, you consider everything you disagree with to be leftist?
by Lunatic Goofballs » Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:29 am
by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:30 am
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Northwest Slobovia wrote:My, how the standards have fallen over the years...
Let's looks at the other US presidents who have gotten the laurels for peace:
Teddy Roosevelt (1906): negotiated peace between Russian and Japan
Woodrow Wilson (1919): founded the League of Nations, the predcessor to the UN
Jimmy Carter (2002): negotiated peace between Israel and Egypt
vs:
Barak Obama (2009): is a nicer guy than George Bush
I think that demonstrates just what the world thought of Bush.
IIRC, GW Bush was one of the candidates for this year's NPP.
I wonder how long this thread would have been if he won it.
Dude, it would be kilometric.
Grave N Idle and Cat Tribes and many others would have spontaneously awoken, having sensed a great disturbance in the Force, called out of work and glued themselves to their seat with a box of HoHos and a self-warming teapot full of chai.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria
by Obama Jugen III » Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:30 am
Vittos Ordination wrote:Obama Jugen III wrote:Czardas wrote:F1-Insanity wrote:So, what exactly has Obama done that makes him 'deserve' it more than, say, Morgan Tsvangirai? The latter being someone who actually puts his own life on the line to try and work for peace?
It just confirms what I have been saying for years, the Nobel prize committee is a bunch of leftists promoting leftist politics. Oh, and to some folks here, no they are not anti-USA, they are pro-leftist.
Out of curiosity, do you think Henry Kissinger or Yasser Arafat were leftists as well?
Well, Arafat was, of course. He was supported (at times directly) by the Soviet Union. And since Israel's rattle-snake-like self-defense is perceived as extreme militarism by the left, anyone opposing Israel scores brownie points with post-soviet-union left. Yes, I know that the prize was also given to Rabin, but only because he made a move which was nearly suicidal for Israel.
Let me guess: Since you call yourself a righty, you consider everything you disagree with to be leftist?
by Northwest Slobovia » Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:30 am
by Borinata » Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:31 am
by Lunatic Goofballs » Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:31 am
Northwest Slobovia wrote:
...cause, as we know, when Alfred Nobel endowed his Prizes, he whispered to the first Committee, "Let's see who we can piss off with these babies!".
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bienenhalde, Dapant, Deblar, El Lazaro, Emotional Support Crocodile, Floofybit, Hammer Britannia, Hidrandia, Keltionialang, Luziyca, Plan Neonie, Republics of the Solar Union, The Jay Republic, Tungstan, Unclear, W3C [Validator]
Advertisement