Advertisement
by Roan Cara » Sun Aug 26, 2012 3:29 am
by Jewcrew » Sun Aug 26, 2012 3:40 am
Transhuman Proteus wrote:Radiatia wrote:Ah yes, parasites, another of God's beautiful creatures that he lovingly and carefully designed. While on LSD.
I like Stephen Fry's comment on the matter:
"…and I love when people watch, I don’t know, David Attenborough or a Discovery Planet type thing, you know, and see the absolute phenomenal majesty and complexity, and bewildering beauty of nature, and you stare at it, and then somebody next to you goes “and how can you say there’s no God? Look at that!”
And then five minutes later, you’re looking at the life cycle of a parasitic worm whose job is to bury itself in the eyeball of a little lamb, and eat the eyeball from inside while the lamb dies in horrible agony, and then you turn to them and say: “where’s your God now?”"
by Nazis in Space » Sun Aug 26, 2012 3:52 am
Common, but completely bullshit myth.Risottia wrote:The panda is a bear - a carnivorous animal with a carnivorous digestive tract not designed to break down plant matter - that eats grass. And it needs help to have sex. Edit: In case you didn't know, bamboo is a type of grass.
I know, but that's just a bit sad - and clearly bound for extinction if some stupid humans didn't think that masturbating pandas is a good way to spend some time...
by Turan Federasyonu » Sun Aug 26, 2012 3:54 am
by Turan Federasyonu » Sun Aug 26, 2012 3:56 am
by Turan Federasyonu » Sun Aug 26, 2012 4:04 am
by The Truth and Light » Sun Aug 26, 2012 4:18 am
by Cameroi » Sun Aug 26, 2012 4:28 am
by Jewcrew » Sun Aug 26, 2012 4:36 am
Nazis in Space wrote:Common, but completely bullshit myth.Risottia wrote:I know, but that's just a bit sad - and clearly bound for extinction if some stupid humans didn't think that masturbating pandas is a good way to spend some time...
Pandas in captivity aren't much into sex.
Pandas in the wild have no such issues, they bang with the best of 'em.
They're getting killed off via habitat destruction, not lack of sex.
Of course, since the media in general wrote about 'No-Sex Pandas' without the addendum of 'In Captivity', a bunch of hurr durr nature is retarded conservation is for fags!' faggots proceeded to propagate the 'Pandas would go extinct if not for humans masturbating them! See how stupid environmentalism is?!'.
And you fell for it.
Congrats.
by Old Tyrannia » Sun Aug 26, 2012 4:49 am
Divair wrote:Xathranaar wrote:If it's a joke, I must have missed the punchline.
The Emperor Penguin lives on the most inhospitable land on earth and travels miles from its feeding grounds to a climate so severe that few predictors can hope to survive it. It is a supreme swimmer, and one tough motherfucker. It is the bad-ass of the bird world.
They're training for their invasion of the world.
by Charlotte Ryberg » Sun Aug 26, 2012 5:06 am
by Terruana » Sun Aug 26, 2012 5:06 am
The Mongol Ilkhanate wrote:My church teaches Evolution in its schools. I have no qualm with it on a religious basis, (we do not, however, believe it was how humans originated, dunno about everything else.)
by Meridiani Planum » Sun Aug 26, 2012 5:11 am
The Mongol Ilkhanate wrote:Don't you think it'd be too evolutionarily complicated?
by Unchecked Expansion » Sun Aug 26, 2012 5:14 am
Jewcrew wrote:
I think anyone with half a brain realize that this is only an 'in captivity' issue. I did not for one moment think that pandas in the wild did not reproduce. If they didn't, they would have died out before even becoming a distinct species. So calm down and have a soda.
Edit: The far more impressive argument against the continued existence of the Panda is that it is a carnivore that eats bamboo. It should be quite obvious that, evolutionarily, it is destined for failure.
by Herskerstad » Sun Aug 26, 2012 5:22 am
by Transhuman Proteus » Sun Aug 26, 2012 5:22 am
Jewcrew wrote:Nazis in Space wrote:Common, but completely bullshit myth.
Pandas in captivity aren't much into sex.
Pandas in the wild have no such issues, they bang with the best of 'em.
They're getting killed off via habitat destruction, not lack of sex.
Of course, since the media in general wrote about 'No-Sex Pandas' without the addendum of 'In Captivity', a bunch of hurr durr nature is retarded conservation is for fags!' faggots proceeded to propagate the 'Pandas would go extinct if not for humans masturbating them! See how stupid environmentalism is?!'.
And you fell for it.
Congrats.
I think anyone with half a brain realize that this is only an 'in captivity' issue. I did not for one moment think that pandas in the wild did not reproduce. If they didn't, they would have died out before even becoming a distinct species. So calm down and have a soda.
Edit: The far more impressive argument against the continued existence of the Panda is that it is a carnivore that eats bamboo. It should be quite obvious that, evolutionarily, it is destined for failure.
by The Tofu Islands » Sun Aug 26, 2012 5:25 am
Jewcrew wrote:Edit: The far more impressive argument against the continued existence of the Panda is that it is a carnivore that eats bamboo. It should be quite obvious that, evolutionarily, it is destined for failure.
by Varijnland » Sun Aug 26, 2012 5:27 am
by Ad Nihilo » Sun Aug 26, 2012 6:06 am
Jewcrew wrote:Edit: The far more impressive argument against the continued existence of the Panda is that it is a carnivore that eats bamboo. It should be quite obvious that, evolutionarily, it is destined for failure.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Emotional Support Crocodile, New Fortilla, Rary, Tungstan
Advertisement