Advertisement

by The Jahistic Unified Republic » Tue Aug 21, 2012 9:55 am
The Emerald Dawn wrote:"Considering Officer Krupke was patently idiotic to charge these young men in the first place, we're dropping the charges in the interest of not wasting any more of the Judiciary's time with farcical charges brought by officers who require more training on basic legal principles."

by Wamitoria » Tue Aug 21, 2012 10:00 am
The Jahistic Unified Republic wrote:http://www.newsplex.com/home/headlines/Newsletter_Calls_for_Armed_Revolution_if_Obama_Re-elected_150853845.html

by Kazarogkai » Tue Aug 21, 2012 10:14 am
Hydesland wrote:pssssht SEE! REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS, TWO SIDES OF THE SAME COIN AM I RIGHT GUYS!? DON'T BE A CHUMP SHEEP, AM I RIGHT GUYS?

by Fal Dara in Shienar » Tue Aug 21, 2012 10:21 am

by Wikkiwallana » Tue Aug 21, 2012 10:53 am
Fal Dara in Shienar wrote:In related news, a nonsensical if law-abiding call to revolution is published. Moral outrage follows. Some wonder why it matters.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

by Farnhamia » Tue Aug 21, 2012 10:56 am

by Prussia-Steinbach » Tue Aug 21, 2012 11:09 am
Fal Dara in Shienar wrote:In related news, a nonsensical if law-abiding call to revolution is published. Moral outrage follows. Some wonder why it matters.

by Soviet Russia Republic » Tue Aug 21, 2012 11:14 am

by Saruhan » Tue Aug 21, 2012 11:17 am
Soviet Russia Republic wrote:I could support this. I'm sure Putin always wanted Alaska.
Caninope wrote:The idea of Pakistan, India and Bangladesh reuniting is about as logical as the idea that Barack Obama will kill his wife, marry Ahmadinejad in a ceremony officiated by Mitt Romney during the 7th Inning Stretch of the Yankees-Red Sox game, and then the happy couple will then go challenge President Xi for the position of General Secretary of the CCP in a gladiatorial fight to the death involving roaches, slingshots, and hard candies.

by Nationstatelandsville » Tue Aug 21, 2012 11:20 am

by Wamitoria » Tue Aug 21, 2012 11:26 am

by Wamitoria » Tue Aug 21, 2012 11:28 am

by Farnhamia » Tue Aug 21, 2012 11:30 am
Soviet Russia Republic wrote:I could support this. I'm sure Putin always wanted Alaska.

by Wamitoria » Tue Aug 21, 2012 11:30 am

by Socialdemokraterne » Tue Aug 21, 2012 11:37 am

by New England and The Maritimes » Tue Aug 21, 2012 11:55 am
Socialdemokraterne wrote:US Constitution, Article III, Section 3:Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attained.
The newsletter could be used as evidence of intent to commit treason, and possibly also an overt act of preparation to levy war against the United States. So hypothetically this newsletter is treasonous, but I'm not certain it would be found as such. The two witnesses are not necessary to prove intent or a treasonable nature of the act, they are only needed to prove the act occurred.
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

by Wikkiwallana » Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:05 pm
Socialdemokraterne wrote:US Constitution, Article III, Section 3:Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attained.
The newsletter could be used as evidence of intent to commit treason, and possibly also an overt act of preparation to levy war against the United States. So hypothetically this newsletter is treasonous, but I'm not certain it would be found as such. The two witnesses are not necessary to prove intent or a treasonable nature of the act, they are only needed to prove the act occurred.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

by Union of Species » Tue Aug 21, 2012 1:03 pm

by Samuraikoku » Tue Aug 21, 2012 1:18 pm
President Obama, is a “political socialist ideologue unlike anything world history has ever witnessed or recognized,” and that the only option is “armed revolution should we fail with the power of the vote in November:” If one is confused as to what Republicans consider is a “political socialist ideologue,” the newsletter claims President Obama “shuns biblical praise, handicaps economic ability, disrespects the honor of earned military might,” and that under Obama, “the government is out of control, and this opportunity, must not be forsaken for we shall not have any coarse (sic) but armed revolution.”

by New England and The Maritimes » Tue Aug 21, 2012 1:19 pm
Samuraikoku wrote:President Obama, is a “political socialist ideologue unlike anything world history has ever witnessed or recognized,” and that the only option is “armed revolution should we fail with the power of the vote in November:” If one is confused as to what Republicans consider is a “political socialist ideologue,” the newsletter claims President Obama “shuns biblical praise, handicaps economic ability, disrespects the honor of earned military might,” and that under Obama, “the government is out of control, and this opportunity, must not be forsaken for we shall not have any coarse (sic) but armed revolution.”
"Oi! Dis Obama boy'z a git dat sez all Orks'r equals, an'we ain't havin' dat fing 'cos we shud be da Boss! And if da boyz won't vote us then we'z gonna stomp Obama! WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGH!"

Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

by Samuraikoku » Tue Aug 21, 2012 1:20 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Fractalnavel, Loddhist Communist Experiment
Advertisement