Advertisement

by Penguinmark » Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:10 pm
Quebec and Atlantic Canada wrote:It's either going to go Pinochet's way or the way of the Beer Hall Putsch. Hopefully the latter, except they all get slammed with the death penalty instead of a pussy-footed 9 months in jail.

by Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f » Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:17 pm

by Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f » Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:19 pm
The Theban Legion wrote:
Don't worry bro... The Global Small Arms Ban Treaty will be signed into law immediately after Obama wins his second term. You will be easy pickings and the government will probably not compensate you for your property that they confinscate under the new Global law. This aside, I don't support this stupidity either, just wanted to comment on how both you and I will probably be screwed no matter who gets elected. We'll both be disarmed by violent and ignorant mobs of party partisans.

by Yewhohohopia » Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:22 pm

by Geilinor » Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:24 pm
A Republican committee said that? There are so many instances popping up of Republicans embarrassing themselves during this campaign season.
by Yewhohohopia » Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:24 pm
Genivaria wrote:Arrest them for Sedition.

by Aleckandor » Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:30 pm


by Yewhohohopia » Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:34 pm

by Jewcrew » Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:34 pm
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:So, they are using the Bible in defence of their revolt? Perhaps I should bring out my own verses.The Apostle Paul, in the Book of Romans, Chapter 13, verses 1-7, wrote:Let everyone be subject to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God. Consequently, whoever rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves. For rulers hold no terror for those who do right, but for those who do wrong. Do you want to be free from fear of the one in authority? Then do what is right and you will be commended. For the one in authority is God's servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for rulers do not bear the sword for no reason. They are God's servants, agents of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer. Therefore, it is necessary to submit to the authorities, not only because of possible punishment but also as a matter of conscience. This is also why you pay taxes, for the authorities are God's servants, who give their full time to governing. Give to everyone what you owe them: If you owe taxes, pay taxes; if revenue, then revenue; if respect, then respect; if honor, then honor.

by Samuraikoku » Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:35 pm

by Wikkiwallana » Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:37 pm
United States of Republicans wrote:If Obama again
No more Guns
No more 2nd amendment
Taxes raised more
77.8 millions out of work
A liberal/socialist kingdom
FIGHT FOR LIBERTY NOT LIBERALISM FORWARD
Vote Romney/Ryan 2012
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.


by Wikkiwallana » Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:43 pm
Socialdemokraterne wrote:This is absolutely pathetic. The editor has literally stated that circumventing the results of a free and fair election with military force is the proper way to preserve the integrity of the US republic. What a moron.
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

by Jewcrew » Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:45 pm
Wikkiwallana wrote:Socialdemokraterne wrote:This is absolutely pathetic. The editor has literally stated that circumventing the results of a free and fair election with military force is the proper way to preserve the integrity of the US republic. What a moron.
He's not the first to say so recently, nor is he likely to be the last.

by Silent Majority » Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:45 pm
Hydesland wrote:pssssht SEE! REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS, TWO SIDES OF THE SAME COIN AM I RIGHT GUYS!? DON'T BE A CHUMP SHEEP, AM I RIGHT GUYS?


by Jinckus » Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:45 pm

by Seperates » Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:46 pm
Jinckus wrote:Er, just a quick addition, I don't believe Obama is a threat to my rights to bare arms, I'm only arguing the point.

by Silent Majority » Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:47 pm

by Yumyumsuppertime » Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:47 pm
Jinckus wrote:Er, just a quick addition, I don't believe Obama is a threat to my rights to bare arms, I'm only arguing the point.

by Demphor » Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:48 pm
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
For what? For reporting what the newsletter said?
At any rate, I should add a disclaimer: This is a single article written by a single member of the Greene County, VA GOP, and likely does not represent the views of the Republican Party as a whole. However, the fact that he hasn't been called out on it yet is very telling.
iiWiki • National Anthem of Demphor“When my information changes, I alter my conclusions. What do you do, sir?"

by Geilinor » Mon Aug 20, 2012 3:49 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Fractalnavel, Loddhist Communist Experiment
Advertisement