Desperate Measures wrote:Things would be easier if all republicans were this stupid.
True but at least it would make a clearer line in the sand for me personally.
Advertisement

by Desperate Measures » Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:23 am
Desperate Measures wrote:Things would be easier if all republicans were this stupid.

by Saiwania » Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:24 am
Norstal wrote:Growing government does grow jobs you idiot senator.

by Person012345 » Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:24 am
Gauthier wrote:The Republicans will simply pass a law classifying rape-induced pregnancies as "Immaculate Conceptions" which will of course be against the law to abort.

by Poorisolation » Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:26 am
Ashmoria wrote:Northern Dominus wrote:And yet it's not going to matter.
He represents rural (see "river-billy") Missouri in his district. As long as he keeps harping boilerplate issues and playing to their latent racism in that neck of the woods doubtless he'll get reelected.
hes not up for re-election. he is running against claire mccaskill for the senate.

by The House of Petain » Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:27 am
Poorisolation wrote:Ashmoria wrote:hes not up for re-election. he is running against claire mccaskill for the senate.
I think the point being made is even assuming* that he will likely be kept out of the Senate give him two years and he will pop back up in the House of Representatives.
*Please for the Love of God or Reason or Marshmallows someone tell me he is trailing so badly in the polls he is out of sight.

by Nazi Flower Power » Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:28 am

by Ashmoria » Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:38 am
The House of Petain wrote:Poorisolation wrote:
I think the point being made is even assuming* that he will likely be kept out of the Senate give him two years and he will pop back up in the House of Representatives.
*Please for the Love of God or Reason or Marshmallows someone tell me he is trailing so badly in the polls he is out of sight.
In one poll he was up 11 points. However, I think it has gotten closer.

by Yes Im Biop » Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:47 am
Nazi Flower Power wrote:Yes Im Biop wrote:
He is also human. Which should come with it's own 'Shit Happens' Sticker.
This isn't just a slip of the tongue like saying the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor or something. Anybody can make a slip of the tongue, but this is different. How often do people say a whole sentence by mistake? He said exactly what he intended to say at the time, and it's only after the fact that he realized it wasn't a good idea. The fact that he EVER wanted to say that in public is inexcusable. It's not something that would ever come out of any reasonable person's mouth.
[violet] wrote:Urggg... trawling through ads looking for roman orgies...
Idaho Conservatives wrote:FST creates a half-assed thread, goes on his same old feminist rant, and it turns into a thirty page dogpile in under twenty four hours. Just another day on NSG.
Immoren wrote:Saphirasia and his ICBCPs (inter continental ballistic cattle prod)

by Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f » Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:59 am
The House of Petain wrote:
I don't know about that, but I do know that businesses that grow jobs are certainly preferable to government jobs. Competition is a great thing, and when you have a federal "business" that has nothing to compete against...they get lazy, inefficient, and stupid.

by 4years » Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:59 am
Alien Space Bats wrote:This is, of course, just another example of how Republican thinking is no longer grounded in reality, but rather in ideological necessity.
If you start from the premise that abortion is bad, you have to consider the possibility of a rape victim wanting to get an abortion. Since extremism is now the rule withing the GOP rather than the exception, the only ideologically proper response to this situation is to come up with some justification for why a rape victim should have to bear the rapist's baby.
Ultimately, this ideological necessity forces people into various highly uncomfortable positions: There is no such thing as rape (what people call rape is merely Surprise Sex With Strangers™ (in which consent is conferred through situational factors, such as provocative dress or poor life-style decisions involving one's choice in parking spaces); rape exists, but Real Rape™ does not produce babies; or Real Rape™ does produce babies, but these blessed children are a beautiful life-changing gift from God, presented in a sort of "broken" way that only a lifetime of pious reflection can help us truly understand.
If it were just abortion and rape, it would be bad enough. But it's everything: Oil pipelines are good for caribou; global climate change can't be man-made, because only God can change the world; only tax cuts for the rich improve the economy; stimulus spending is only good when a Republican President is in the White House; if your income falls and your expenses don't, then you're spending more money; real world data has no relevance when it comes to discussing economics; and it's not racism to believe that African-Americans don't know the value or importance of work, but it is racism to call such sentiments examples of racist ideation. I could go on and on and on and on, but what would be the point?
It would be like shooting fish in a barrel, only less satisfying.

by Alien Space Bats » Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:03 am
The Black Forrest wrote:Alien Space Bats wrote:And then there are attitudes like this, which are increasingly becoming the norm in the GOP - a Party increasingly disconnected from reality:“First of all, from what I understand from doctors, (pregnancy from rape) is really rare... If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.”
- Rep. Todd Akin, Republican Candidate for the U.S. Senate (MO)
This is Akin trying to explain why there ought to be no rape exception when in comes to abortion: Because innocent girls never get pregnant from rape when it's Real Rape™ (as opposed to Surprise Sex With Strangers™, apparently), there doesn't need to be a rape exception, see?
I wonder in that means there ought to be a new rule: If the girl gets pregnant, the perp gets off - after all, if must not have been Real Rape™, because if it were, she'd have never been able to conceive, right?
The Republican Party has now officially degenerated from a legitimate political movement into a genuine societal affliction.
EDIT: To discuss Akin's comments further, go to the NSG thread on the subject.
You have to admit it's a rather interesting approach to "the bitch was asking for it" argument.
What is scary is there is enough people who subscribe to it. Well I should say they are ok with it if he gets elected.

by Gauthier » Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:06 am
Alien Space Bats wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
You have to admit it's a rather interesting approach to "the bitch was asking for it" argument.
What is scary is there is enough people who subscribe to it. Well I should say they are ok with it if he gets elected.
<quoted from the NSG Presidential debate thread>
"Bitch was asking for it," indeed...

by Northern Dominus » Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:08 am
Shariaist, no.Turan Federasyonu wrote:Is this congressman a Shariatist?

by Anzilluania » Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:08 am

by Gauthier » Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:08 am
Turan Federasyonu wrote:Is this congressman a Shariatist?

by Nazi Flower Power » Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:13 am
Yes Im Biop wrote:Nazi Flower Power wrote:
This isn't just a slip of the tongue like saying the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor or something. Anybody can make a slip of the tongue, but this is different. How often do people say a whole sentence by mistake? He said exactly what he intended to say at the time, and it's only after the fact that he realized it wasn't a good idea. The fact that he EVER wanted to say that in public is inexcusable. It's not something that would ever come out of any reasonable person's mouth.
Wait...Someone actually said that?
If you me? A Lot...
This is the current idiot right? Not the guy that argued about Satatory Rape? Sorry Was reading about 12 posts so i may be a bit confused. (Though now i want a Shit Happens sticker)
by Kingdom of the Polar Bear » Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:15 am

by Saiwania » Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:19 am

by Xeng He » Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:21 am
New England and The Maritimes wrote:Yet he will still get votes from Republicans. Because it doesn't matter how thoroughly disgusting and terrible someone is; if they have an R next to their name, they get votes.
Blazedtown wrote:[an ism is] A term used by people who won't admit their true beliefs, or don't have any.

by Zambeze » Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:22 am
Person012345 wrote:Everyone should probably just start moving out of the US now. I mean, it was a nice little experiment and all, worked for a hundred years or so but it's probably time to call it quits. I hear Canada has lots of space.

by Northern Dominus » Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:24 am
Under normal circumstances this would have been the death-knell for Akins.Saiwania wrote:It is rather cruel and insensitive for him to say that, but I want to point out that this isn't the first time.
In the 1990 Texas gubernatorial race, Clayton Williams (R) lost against Ann Richards for comparing rape to bad weather, saying "If it's inevitable, just relax and enjoy it." He was initially ahead by 20 points but that pretty much derailed his campaign. I hope Todd Akin loses by a landslide, I can't condone what he said.

by Alien Space Bats » Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:33 am
Anzilluania wrote:Is this guy related to George Bush? I see a intelectual simularity.

by Gauthier » Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:35 am
Northern Dominus wrote:Under normal circumstances this would have been the death-knell for Akins.Saiwania wrote:It is rather cruel and insensitive for him to say that, but I want to point out that this isn't the first time.
In the 1990 Texas gubernatorial race, Clayton Williams (R) lost against Ann Richards for comparing rape to bad weather, saying "If it's inevitable, just relax and enjoy it." He was initially ahead by 20 points but that pretty much derailed his campaign. I hope Todd Akin loses by a landslide, I can't condone what he said.
However in a world where the Republican's War on Women still has traction, where Santorum was a serious contender for the Republican presidential nomination, this probably will be little more than a speedbump, especially since he has the backing of the biggest neo-con propaganda machine ever created.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Bienenhalde, Eragon Island, Gawdzendia, Greater Miami Shores 3, Haganham, Hirota, Immoren, Kernen, Pizza Friday Forever91, Rary, Senkaku, The Black Forrest, Thermodolia
Advertisement