I must be tired because I'm not seeing the connection.
Advertisement

by New Rogernomics » Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:30 am
Sci fi genre.

by New Rogernomics » Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:39 am
World Government -> Space Colonies -> Sci fi.

by New Rogernomics » Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:44 am
Never mind, 'Islam will rule the world' and all that jazz.

by Genivaria » Sun Aug 19, 2012 3:08 pm

by Blakk Metal » Sun Aug 19, 2012 4:49 pm
Genivaria wrote:Meridiani Planum wrote:
A world government could be libertarian in the short run. However, if it were to gradually become authoritarian, there would be no escape, and no comparison that one could make to other societies. This would only encourage authoritarianism.
Right, and then come the mass riots, armed rebellion and assassinations.
Divair wrote:New Rogernomics wrote:Yes you can, the UN is based on the principle of nations under a single centralized body trying to work together and failing. This is contrary to World Federalist movements.![]()
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Federalist_Movement
The UN has no authority. A world government would.

by Somali Caliphate » Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:03 pm
Divair wrote:Somali Caliphate wrote:If a world government like this came into existence, then I think Arabic should be made the lingua franca. It is the most superior language on Earth and has incredible comprehensiveness unmatched by any language. It can also easily absorb the culture and concepts of other peoples, so it wouldn't leave people out.
No.

by Genivaria » Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:07 pm
Somali Caliphate wrote:Divair wrote:No.
Why not? Are you prejudiced. I'm not suggesting that Arabic is made humanity's onky language. Just the world's major lingua franca. Linguistically speaking, it is superior because it is so comptehensive in its meaning, and its depth. It can also be kh earned quite quickly because most of the meanings in Arabic aee non wird. For examp kick e, you can say Zayd hit Amr in 6 ways without changing any of the words. For example one word istansaroo, means an entire sentence (they sought help).although it is difficult to explain without the arabi here, basically each lettet and viwel in that word corresponds to a meaning. Isn't tgat incredible. In English ou would gave to say 'They sought help and specify they were males. But in Arabic, it soecifies between a male ans f mn a female mn e they if that makes sense. Basically those three english words equalled one arabic word. And still, just just one letter or vowel and you can change who it is that is seeking help. This is why linguists the world over have said Arabic is the most superior language on the face of the Earth. I'm not even Arab, so I'm not being biased!
This is why linguists the world over have said Arabic is the most superior language on the face of the Earth.

by Divair » Mon Aug 20, 2012 7:05 am
Somali Caliphate wrote:Divair wrote:No.
Why not? Are you prejudiced. I'm not suggesting that Arabic is made humanity's onky language. Just the world's major lingua franca. Linguistically speaking, it is superior because it is so comptehensive in its meaning, and its depth. It can also be kh earned quite quickly because most of the meanings in Arabic aee non wird. For examp kick e, you can say Zayd hit Amr in 6 ways without changing any of the words. For example one word istansaroo, means an entire sentence (they sought help).although it is difficult to explain without the arabi here, basically each lettet and viwel in that word corresponds to a meaning. Isn't tgat incredible. In English ou would gave to say 'They sought help and specify they were males. But in Arabic, it soecifies between a male ans f mn a female mn e they if that makes sense. Basically those three english words equalled one arabic word. And still, just just one letter or vowel and you can change who it is that is seeking help. This is why linguists the world over have said Arabic is the most superior language on the face of the Earth. I'm not even Arab, so I'm not being biased!

by The Calldari State » Mon Aug 20, 2012 7:22 am


by Betalia » Mon Aug 20, 2012 8:01 am

by Distruzio » Tue Aug 21, 2012 1:44 pm
Nordengrund wrote:I will try to keep religious discussion to a minimum in this thread, but my faith teaches that there will be a one world government ran by the Antichrist. I think at first it would be effecient, then leads to destruction.

by Scrooge Mc Duck Company » Tue Aug 21, 2012 2:25 pm

by Israslovakahzerbajan » Tue Aug 21, 2012 2:28 pm
Dumb Ideologies wrote:
Oh, I bet it counts alright...otaku gets anyone a x50 multiplier on their hell points.

by Conscentia » Wed Aug 22, 2012 4:09 am
Scrooge Mc Duck Company wrote:If one should be one World Language, it should be Ancient Greek, or something else ancient and difficult. I read from some one about German for example be a more "efficient" (that is how he called it) better than English. But they are basicaly dialects-languages from one main one: Latin. A language that was influenced mostly by Greek and other ones. Try learning something unique and hard like Chinese or Basque. Leave all those bullsh*t languages aside. Not mind speaking Sumerian too.![]()
But I agree in the first place that only Space Exploration Era will move nations towards each other. When the existance of a global organization that will exploit global resources to fund and support those missions will be necessery.
| Misc. Test Results And Assorted Other | The NSG Soviet Last Updated: Test Results (2018/02/02) | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |

by Scrooge Mc Duck Company » Sat Sep 01, 2012 11:03 am
Conscentia wrote:
German is not a dialect of Latin. Romance languages (Latin & it's descendants) & Germanic languages are two different language families.
Last i read, "good" for English was "gut" for German and "Dictatorship" (the "ship" part always seemed irrelevant for me-why should be there? as for friendship...wierd...) was "Diktatur".
Why would you intentionally want the international auxiliary language to be a difficult or rare language? Surely it would be better to choose a simple language so that it can be quickly learned by everyone & easily adopted.
Because if languages evolve together with human brain (and therefore civilization), the daily use of a more difficult (and so, more evolved) language is essential.

by Norsklow » Sat Sep 01, 2012 11:05 am

by Conscentia » Sat Sep 01, 2012 11:37 am
Scrooge Mc Duck Company wrote:Last i read, "good" for English was "gut" for German and "Dictatorship" (the "ship" part always seemed irrelevant for me-why should be there? as for friendship...wierd...) was "Diktatur"
That would be because English is a germanic language, not a romance language. It evolved from Old English, which is a west germanic language influenced by Old Norse (a north germanic language).
Norman & French influence have since added much romance influence to English as the language evolved.
Because if languages evolve together with human brain (and therefore civilization), the daily use of a more difficult (and so, more evolved) language is essential.
I disagree. Ambiguity, illogic, & difficulty are neither necessary nor desirable.
The Greek Language contains the most words than any other language in the world, except perhaps, the Chinese.
How is that relevant?
Norsklow wrote:So how does the Greek Language connect to the Basq language?
| Misc. Test Results And Assorted Other | The NSG Soviet Last Updated: Test Results (2018/02/02) | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |

by Scrooge Mc Duck Company » Sat Sep 01, 2012 11:38 am
Norsklow wrote:So how does the Greek Language connect to the Basq language?

by Scrooge Mc Duck Company » Sat Sep 01, 2012 12:11 pm
Conscentia wrote:Scrooge Mc Duck Company wrote:Last i read, "good" for English was "gut" for German and "Dictatorship" (the "ship" part always seemed irrelevant for me-why should be there? as for friendship...wierd...) was "Diktatur"
That would be because English is a germanic language, not a romance language. It evolved from Old English, which is a west germanic language influenced by Old Norse (a north germanic language).
Norman & French influence have since added much romance influence to English as the language evolved.
Really? I didn't know that. Thank you.
Because if languages evolve together with human brain (and therefore civilization), the daily use of a more difficult (and so, more evolved) language is essential.
I disagree. Ambiguity, illogic, & difficulty are neither necessary nor desirable.
Don't be absurd. There is no language more accurate and rich than Ancient Greek in Europe, and hardly is to the world. To those who dare say that I only say this: imagine the huge amount of words in Greek against any other language. You better do some more research.
The Greek Language contains the most words than any other language in the world, except perhaps, the Chinese.
How is that relevant?
It means it's richer and more accurate, as I explained.Norsklow wrote:So how does the Greek Language connect to the Basq language?
It doesn't, Euskara isn't an Indo-European language.

by Norsklow » Sat Sep 01, 2012 12:56 pm


by Conscentia » Sat Sep 01, 2012 1:35 pm
Scrooge Mc Duck Company wrote:Really? I didn't know that. Thank you.
Your welcome.
You might find this interesting:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Indo-European_language
Don't be absurd. There is no language more accurate and rich than Ancient Greek in Europe, and hardly is to the world. To those who dare say that I only say this: imagine the huge amount of words in Greek against any other language. You better do some more research.
Lojban is a constructed language specifically designed to be unambiguous & logical. It's also designed to remove the restrictions which language can place on thought. I would argue that it is far more accurate than Ancient Greek.
I also question why you think that Ancient Greek is so accurate & rich in comparison to other languages.
It means it's richer and more accurate, as I explained.
More words does not necessarily mean more accurate.
And I don't recall you explaining why you think the bigger the vocabulary the more advanced the language.
And what exactly do you mean by rich anyway?
| Misc. Test Results And Assorted Other | The NSG Soviet Last Updated: Test Results (2018/02/02) | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Achan, Cachard Calia, Emotional Support Crocodile, Floofybit, Forsher, Grinning Dragon, Ifreann, In-dia, Saor Alba
Advertisement