I'm not even paying attention to that discussion anymore.
Advertisement
by United Marxist Nations » Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:14 pm
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.
by Cannot think of a name » Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:15 pm
by United Marxist Nations » Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:15 pm
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.
by Des-Bal » Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:16 pm
Cannot think of a name wrote:No it's not. You are continuing to see what you want to see.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
by Cannot think of a name » Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:17 pm
by Des-Bal » Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:17 pm
Cannot think of a name wrote:You are wrong.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
by Dempublicents1 » Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:20 pm
Firdausia wrote:You can't honestly say that if I go out in public in my bra and panties, that someone will think I'm wearing a consealing outfit and that if I go outside wrapped up from head to toe like a Saudi, that someone will think it's a reavealing outfit. People's opinions of what's revealing isn't that broad.
Des-Bal wrote:Yeah there's a difference between spying on people and observing them when they go into public.
If women feel "intimidated" by going out in revealing clothing you can only be saying that wearing revealing clothing invites crime or that women need to toughen up.
by Cannot think of a name » Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:21 pm
by Liriena » Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:24 pm
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Des-Bal » Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:25 pm
Cannot think of a name wrote:You are insufferable. You don't even see the contradiction in your own statement while you try to twist around an argument you clearly do not understand.
Look up the word "sometimes" and you might start to see how you've undermined your own admittedly feeble argument.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
by Cameroi » Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:28 pm
by Occupied Deutschland » Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:29 pm
Liriena wrote:Woohoo! Another tu quoque thread by what my first hypothesis would be a butthurt conservative who is trying to justify chauvinism.
by Cannot think of a name » Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:38 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Cannot think of a name wrote:You are insufferable. You don't even see the contradiction in your own statement while you try to twist around an argument you clearly do not understand.
Look up the word "sometimes" and you might start to see how you've undermined your own admittedly feeble argument.
Look up the word can. You can survive being shot in the face, this doesn't mean you can't die from being shot in the face.
by Des-Bal » Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:41 pm
Cannot think of a name wrote:=
Moving on...
A man can sometimes assume that a woman is wearing clothes because she desires to be looked at.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
by Agymnum » Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:41 pm
Cameroi wrote:objectification of women, AND men, has its place, as something for each to fap to. it doesn't have any place else though.
by Dempublicents1 » Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:43 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Cannot think of a name wrote:What, do you want woman kind to respond to some anecdotal shit that happened to you in a club?
He wanted a response to the phenomonae of glitter sprinkled breasts. If a woman takes a special effort to cover her breasts in glitter what purpose does that serve except for drawing attention.
by Des-Bal » Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:49 pm
Dempublicents1 wrote:[
I think glitter is fun. And can look good.
Why are you so stuck on glittered breasts specifically anyway? I've covered my arms in glitter before. I've put glitter in my hair. I use glitter eyeshadow sometimes. I've even contemplated getting glitter lipstick. The last time I wore glitter, it was white glittery stuff that a bunch of us put on because we were going somewhere with UV lights and glow-in-the-dark stuff and we thought it might look cool (it actually did nothing, but my black and white converse looked awesome!)
I do it because it's fun and I like the way it looks (although the hair thing is a pain in the ass to clean up after).
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
by Cannot think of a name » Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:50 pm
by Les Quebecoise » Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:50 pm
by Des-Bal » Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:55 pm
Cannot think of a name wrote:Not this bullshit again.
I'm not dancing around with you on this. Because I already addressed this and you've again only saw what you wanted to see. If you need answers, read the posts I've already made. If you want to debate what the definition of 'is' is, find someone else to circle jerk with.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
by Cannot think of a name » Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:59 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Cannot think of a name wrote:Not this bullshit again.
I'm not dancing around with you on this. Because I already addressed this and you've again only saw what you wanted to see. If you need answers, read the posts I've already made. If you want to debate what the definition of 'is' is, find someone else to circle jerk with.
This isn't a dance, this is my position. It is made of two ideas. Do you agree with it yes or no. If you disagree which part do you disagree with.
by Dempublicents1 » Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:02 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Cannot think of a name wrote:What the monkey fuck are you talking about?
You asked me if we could assume Sarah Palin and Jessica Mills were wearing their clothes for the same reason, doesn't that imply we can determine why they are wearing what they're wearing? You conceded that somethings were worn to invite attention. Combine those two ideas. You can assume that some women are wearing what they are to invite attention.
by Des-Bal » Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:02 pm
Cannot think of a name wrote:Please to be consulting posts already made addressing this very line of thought, or explain why you think it does not apply. I am not here to validate you.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
by Cannot think of a name » Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:05 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Cannot think of a name wrote:Please to be consulting posts already made addressing this very line of thought, or explain why you think it does not apply. I am not here to validate you.
I'm not seeking validation I'm telling you that for this to continue you're either going to have to agree with me or disagree with me you've chosen to ignore and dissect the question. You were confused by ambiguities which have now been clarified, answer the question please.
by Des-Bal » Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:08 pm
Cannot think of a name wrote:Tell you what, why don't you answer my question...what do you think a yes or no answer is going to prove? Why do you think that idea matters in the slightest?
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ineva, Keltionialang, Likhinia, Maximum Imperium Rex, Plan Neonie, Simonia, Singaporen Empire, The French National Workers State, Tungstan, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement