NATION

PASSWORD

Kill the women first.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:21 pm

Gimmadonis wrote:
Virtud Tierra wrote:
Gimmadonis wrote:
What if they use a bendy straw?


Good point. They have something like that, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_urination_device

it does not work nearly as well as advertised from what I understand. Its basically pissing in a funnel with a hose strapped to yourself. imagine how it would work for you.


I was imagining a bendy straw duct-taped (Note: duct tape is mandatory. cuz duct-tape is awesome) to a woman's crotch, and being duct-taped to the "bottle" in question. jJst a thought.

My first thought was these:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximum_Absorbency_Garment

User avatar
Lacadaemon
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5322
Founded: Aug 26, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Lacadaemon » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:21 pm

New Kereptica wrote:And Starship Troopers is on the reading lists of the Army, Navy, and Marine Corps, as well as four out of the five US military academies.


Talk about the dumbing down of America.
The kind of middle-class mentality which actuates both those responsible for strategy and government has little knowledge of the new psychology and organizing ability of the totalitarian States. The forces we are fighting are governed neither by the old strategy nor follow the old tactics.

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:22 pm

The Grand World Order wrote:
The Rifle Brigade wrote:
So, we've decided to write a letter to Parliament (the legislative body, not the band) and to ranking Staff Officers suggesting that we stop all this discriminatory twaddle and start allowing women to volunteer for front line duty. We hope you Yanks will do the same.



Well, IIRC, women DO serve frontline in the US military. Course, I could be wrong.

However, there's the whole problem with the whole Time of the Month... one thing's for sure, if you have female soldiers, you don't want them having their periods in the middle of combat.


God no. There'd be blood everywhere. All over the battlefield.

Ah.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
New Kereptica
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6691
Founded: Apr 14, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby New Kereptica » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:22 pm

Lacadaemon wrote:
New Kereptica wrote:And Starship Troopers is on the reading lists of the Army, Navy, and Marine Corps, as well as four out of the five US military academies.


Talk about the dumbing down of America.


Indeed. Some of Heinlein's earlier stuff was good, but the later...
Blouman Empire wrote:Natural is not nature.

KiloMikeAlpha wrote:Umm hmm.... mind if I siggy that as a reminder to those who think that it is cool to shove their bat-shit crazy atheist beliefs on those of us who actually have a clue?

Teccor wrote:You're actually arguing with Kereptica? It's like arguing with a far-Left, militantly atheist brick wall.

Bluth Corporation wrote:No. A free market literally has zero bubbles.

JJ Place wrote:I have a few more pressing matters to attend to right now; I'll be back later this evening to continue my one-man against the world struggle.

Mercator Terra wrote: Mental illness is a myth.

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:23 pm

Grave_n_idle wrote:
The Grand World Order wrote:
The Rifle Brigade wrote:
So, we've decided to write a letter to Parliament (the legislative body, not the band) and to ranking Staff Officers suggesting that we stop all this discriminatory twaddle and start allowing women to volunteer for front line duty. We hope you Yanks will do the same.



Well, IIRC, women DO serve frontline in the US military. Course, I could be wrong.

However, there's the whole problem with the whole Time of the Month... one thing's for sure, if you have female soldiers, you don't want them having their periods in the middle of combat.


God no. There'd be blood everywhere. All over the battlefield.

Ah.

:rofl:

User avatar
Barringtonia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9908
Founded: Feb 05, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Barringtonia » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:24 pm

The Grand World Order wrote:
Gimmadonis wrote:
The Grand World Order wrote:
The Rifle Brigade wrote:
So, we've decided to write a letter to Parliament (the legislative body, not the band) and to ranking Staff Officers suggesting that we stop all this discriminatory twaddle and start allowing women to volunteer for front line duty. We hope you Yanks will do the same.



Well, IIRC, women DO serve frontline in the US military. Course, I could be wrong.

However, there's the whole problem with the whole Time of the Month... one thing's for sure, if you have female soldiers, you don't want them having their periods in the middle of combat.


I think they're more preoccupied with all the bullets flying around.

That, and I think stress causes women to have irregular periods. But I'm a boy, so wtf do I know?


It's still going to get ugly, and I don't just mean with menstrual fluids all over the place...


Isn't that a good thing, you could just say 'I think the enemy just asked if you were being irrationally angry cos it's that time of month, yeah, those enemies, over there...'

Shock and awe is what you would see.
I hear babies cry, I watch them grow
They'll learn much more than I'll ever know
And I think to myself, what a wonderful world



User avatar
The Rifle Brigade
Diplomat
 
Posts: 893
Founded: Sep 21, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rifle Brigade » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:26 pm

Okay, I re-edited the OP to widen the topic.
I'll trade a woman's sense of equality for safety. -Bladeslayer

I'm just saying if the only change you can point to is the change that was made, then it would appear it didn't really change all that much, did it? -Hiddenrun

I rarely, if ever, argue on a factual basis; my arguments are based on logic, or should be ignored. -Kashindahar

User avatar
The Rifle Brigade
Diplomat
 
Posts: 893
Founded: Sep 21, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rifle Brigade » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:27 pm

Barringtonia wrote:Isn't that a good thing, you could just say 'I think the enemy just asked if you were being irrationally angry cos it's that time of month, yeah, those enemies, over there...'

Shock and awe is what you would see.


Now you're just giving cause for the Russians to weaponize Midol.
I'll trade a woman's sense of equality for safety. -Bladeslayer

I'm just saying if the only change you can point to is the change that was made, then it would appear it didn't really change all that much, did it? -Hiddenrun

I rarely, if ever, argue on a factual basis; my arguments are based on logic, or should be ignored. -Kashindahar

User avatar
Aelosia
Senator
 
Posts: 4531
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Aelosia » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:28 pm

I have used said "devices" plenty of times and they are useful even when you can't easily open your legs. So I think those may work inside a tank. Although the only time I have been inside a tank was in a museum.

I can't believe you have never heard of female urinating gadgets before. Are you sure you are either girls, or have you ever touched one of those thing sknown as women? Have you ever gone to a concert? Excursions? Whoah.
My ratings in the top 100:
Aelosia is ranked 12th in the world for Lowest Unemployment Rates
Aelosia is ranked 12th in the world for Lowest Unemployment Rates
Aelosia is ranked 12th in the world for Largest Defense Forces
Aelosia is ranked 13th in the world for Most Scientifically Advanced
Aelosia is ranked 20th in the world for Most Cultured
Aelosia is ranked 24th in the world for Most Subsidized Industry
Aelosia is ranked 25th in the world for Fastest-Growing Economies
Aelosia is ranked 38th in the world for Largest Public Transport Department
Aelosia is ranked 42th in the world for Largest Publishing Industry
Aelosia is ranked 51th in the world for Largest Information Technology Sector
Aelosia is ranked 61th in the world for Largest Arms Manufacturing Sector

Factbook so far.

User avatar
Lucky Bicycle Works
Diplomat
 
Posts: 884
Founded: Jul 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Lucky Bicycle Works » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:28 pm

Ryadn wrote:
Gimmadonis wrote:
Virtud Tierra wrote:
Gimmadonis wrote:
What if they use a bendy straw?


Good point. They have something like that, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_urination_device

it does not work nearly as well as advertised from what I understand. Its basically pissing in a funnel with a hose strapped to yourself. imagine how it would work for you.


I was imagining a bendy straw duct-taped (Note: duct tape is mandatory. cuz duct-tape is awesome) to a woman's crotch, and being duct-taped to the "bottle" in question. jJst a thought.


As Mur'v said, it takes a bit of ingenuity to piss in a bottle, but it's not impossible. And it doesn't require duct tape (sorry).


We didn't hear such arguments for why women shouldn't go into space, did we?

If pissing in a bottle is impossible for women, it should be doubly impossible in zero gravity. But we didn't hear that argument, oh no.

It'll tell you why not. The USSR did it first.
Lucky Bicycle Works, previously BunnySaurus Bugsii.
"My town is a teacher.
Oh, trucks and beers and memories
All spread out on the road.
Oh, my town is a leader of children,
To where Caution
Is a Long Wide Load"

-- Mark Seymour

User avatar
Virtud Tierra
Diplomat
 
Posts: 861
Founded: Aug 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Virtud Tierra » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:30 pm

Maurepas wrote:
Gimmadonis wrote:
Virtud Tierra wrote:
Gimmadonis wrote:
What if they use a bendy straw?


Good point. They have something like that, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_urination_device

it does not work nearly as well as advertised from what I understand. Its basically pissing in a funnel with a hose strapped to yourself. imagine how it would work for you.


I was imagining a bendy straw duct-taped (Note: duct tape is mandatory. cuz duct-tape is awesome) to a woman's crotch, and being duct-taped to the "bottle" in question. jJst a thought.

My first thought was these:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximum_Absorbency_Garment


Ok, you also realize that you would have two uniforms to cycle through in a 2 week period, right? Pissing your pants, no matter how 'maximum" your absorbency is, is an increased chance for urinary tract infections and everything else. I don't have a vagina but I know that having a soiled rag pressed to your special lady parts for 4 hours in the 140 degree humid environes of a tank wearing the same uniform you've been wearing for 8 days already is a bad idea.

Men don't have the same risks for urinary tract infections. You know why?

User avatar
Virtud Tierra
Diplomat
 
Posts: 861
Founded: Aug 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Virtud Tierra » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:34 pm

Lucky Bicycle Works wrote:
Ryadn wrote:
Gimmadonis wrote:
Virtud Tierra wrote:
Gimmadonis wrote:
What if they use a bendy straw?


Good point. They have something like that, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_urination_device

it does not work nearly as well as advertised from what I understand. Its basically pissing in a funnel with a hose strapped to yourself. imagine how it would work for you.


I was imagining a bendy straw duct-taped (Note: duct tape is mandatory. cuz duct-tape is awesome) to a woman's crotch, and being duct-taped to the "bottle" in question. jJst a thought.


As Mur'v said, it takes a bit of ingenuity to piss in a bottle, but it's not impossible. And it doesn't require duct tape (sorry).


We didn't hear such arguments for why women shouldn't go into space, did we?

If pissing in a bottle is impossible for women, it should be doubly impossible in zero gravity. But we didn't hear that argument, oh no.

It'll tell you why not. The USSR did it first.


They had space-suits man! You can piss in a space-suit you can't piss your pants in a tank. A tank isn't a space ship! We don't wear spacesuits in a tank, we wear some mono-colored green NOMEX coveralls which does not cost the taxpayer 12 million dollars, unlike a goddamn space suit.

Come on man, I know pissing in zero-G would be tough but they have a space station, a space suit and they don't need to drink 3 quarts of water an hour to stay alive.

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:35 pm

Virtud Tierra wrote:
Maurepas wrote:
Gimmadonis wrote:
Virtud Tierra wrote:
Gimmadonis wrote:
What if they use a bendy straw?


Good point. They have something like that, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_urination_device

it does not work nearly as well as advertised from what I understand. Its basically pissing in a funnel with a hose strapped to yourself. imagine how it would work for you.


I was imagining a bendy straw duct-taped (Note: duct tape is mandatory. cuz duct-tape is awesome) to a woman's crotch, and being duct-taped to the "bottle" in question. jJst a thought.

My first thought was these:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximum_Absorbency_Garment


Ok, you also realize that you would have two uniforms to cycle through in a 2 week period, right? Pissing your pants, no matter how 'maximum" your absorbency is, is an increased chance for urinary tract infections and everything else. I don't have a vagina but I know that having a soiled rag pressed to your special lady parts for 4 hours in the 140 degree humid environes of a tank wearing the same uniform you've been wearing for 8 days already is a bad idea.

Men don't have the same risks for urinary tract infections. You know why?

Noted, as has been stated, its not a real concern, however, ;)

User avatar
Virtud Tierra
Diplomat
 
Posts: 861
Founded: Aug 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Virtud Tierra » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:36 pm

Maurepas wrote:Noted, as has been stated, its not a real concern, however, ;)


How is a urinary tract infection not a concern?

User avatar
New Kereptica
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6691
Founded: Apr 14, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby New Kereptica » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:36 pm

Virtud Tierra wrote:They had space-suits man! You can piss in a space-suit you can't piss your pants in a tank. A tank isn't a space ship! We don't wear spacesuits in a tank, we wear some mono-colored green NOMEX coveralls which does not cost the taxpayer 12 million dollars, unlike a goddamn space suit.

Come on man, I know pissing in zero-G would be tough but they have a space station, a space suit and they don't need to drink 3 quarts of water an hour to stay alive.


In Soviet Russia, space suit cost 38 rubles and 5 day ration of vodka.
Last edited by New Kereptica on Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Blouman Empire wrote:Natural is not nature.

KiloMikeAlpha wrote:Umm hmm.... mind if I siggy that as a reminder to those who think that it is cool to shove their bat-shit crazy atheist beliefs on those of us who actually have a clue?

Teccor wrote:You're actually arguing with Kereptica? It's like arguing with a far-Left, militantly atheist brick wall.

Bluth Corporation wrote:No. A free market literally has zero bubbles.

JJ Place wrote:I have a few more pressing matters to attend to right now; I'll be back later this evening to continue my one-man against the world struggle.

Mercator Terra wrote: Mental illness is a myth.

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:37 pm

Virtud Tierra wrote:
Maurepas wrote:Noted, as has been stated, its not a real concern, however, ;)


How is a urinary tract infection not a concern?

The not being able to piss in a bottle crisis, isnt a real concern, ;)

User avatar
Virtud Tierra
Diplomat
 
Posts: 861
Founded: Aug 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Virtud Tierra » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:44 pm

Maurepas wrote:
Virtud Tierra wrote:
Maurepas wrote:Noted, as has been stated, its not a real concern, however, ;)


How is a urinary tract infection not a concern?

The not being able to piss in a bottle crisis, isnt a real concern, ;)


It is a real concern, dude. I know it sounds silly, but if you can't drink enough water, you will probably die. If you can't effectively piss in a bottle inside of a cramped tank in front of a couple of dudes, you cannot do the former.

Yeah, you have to be able to piss in bottles if you are a tanker. A penis, oh man, that is really what lets the mission charlie-mike toward victory.

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:51 pm

Virtud Tierra wrote:
Maurepas wrote:
Virtud Tierra wrote:
Maurepas wrote:Noted, as has been stated, its not a real concern, however, ;)


How is a urinary tract infection not a concern?

The not being able to piss in a bottle crisis, isnt a real concern, ;)


It is a real concern, dude. I know it sounds silly, but if you can't drink enough water, you will probably die. If you can't effectively piss in a bottle inside of a cramped tank in front of a couple of dudes, you cannot do the former.

Yeah, you have to be able to piss in bottles if you are a tanker. A penis, oh man, that is really what lets the mission charlie-mike toward victory.

I almost dont want to say this, but...

Prove a Woman cant effectively piss in a bottle inside a tank.

User avatar
Anti-Social Darwinism
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1282
Founded: Dec 18, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Anti-Social Darwinism » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:53 pm

Virtud Tierra wrote:
Meargra wrote:i uh think the women could get the morale up in the army if you know what i mean :o


http://www.questia.com/googleScholar.qs ... 5001896680

Nope. Statistics show that mixed gender units have the worst morale in the Army. You know a good way to turn life-long friends into enemies and how to produce knife-fights in the barracks parking lot? Throw in one, decent looking female into the unit. Next thing you know, you have a posse of guys carrying this soldier's tools, escorting her everywhere and everyone intenetly trying to get into this woman's pants and she is loving every moment of it, she is climbing the rank structure in more then one sense of the term.

If you want people to focus on the mission and focus on the job, you remove all distractions. A single female surrounded by 30 guys is going to serve as a distraction and you will have people going to their cave-man roots and fighting over her since she is like the last woman on earth in that tiny social group.


Statistics can show whatever you want them to show. All you have to do is pick and choose.

My daughter was on a mixed-gender ship for three years when she was in the Navy. The ship was a Destroyer-Tender, crew of about 1750, @800 were women - both officers and enlisted. Morale was no better or worse than the all-male ships. I know, because my son was on an all-male Destroyer on the other side of the world and his stories of morale issues bore this out. Anecdotal, I know, but anecdotes are part of the data-set. Oddly enough, he told me that when he was assigned to another Destroyer at a later date, one with a mixed crew, morale actually improved.

And no one, not even the military bureaucracy, would be stupid enough to put one woman in with a bunch of men and expect it to work well. I suspect that any bureaucrat who did that was actually setting it up to fail.
NSG's resident curmudgeon.

Add 6,771 posts from the old NSG.

User avatar
Anti-Social Darwinism
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1282
Founded: Dec 18, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Anti-Social Darwinism » Wed Oct 07, 2009 10:00 pm

The Grand World Order wrote:
Gimmadonis wrote:
The Grand World Order wrote:
The Rifle Brigade wrote:
So, we've decided to write a letter to Parliament (the legislative body, not the band) and to ranking Staff Officers suggesting that we stop all this discriminatory twaddle and start allowing women to volunteer for front line duty. We hope you Yanks will do the same.



Well, IIRC, women DO serve frontline in the US military. Course, I could be wrong.

However, there's the whole problem with the whole Time of the Month... one thing's for sure, if you have female soldiers, you don't want them having their periods in the middle of combat.


I think they're more preoccupied with all the bullets flying around.

That, and I think stress causes women to have irregular periods. But I'm a boy, so wtf do I know?


It's still going to get ugly, and I don't just mean with menstrual fluids all over the place...


Actually, there are meds that take care of that - just in case you haven't been paying attention to recent medical advances.
NSG's resident curmudgeon.

Add 6,771 posts from the old NSG.

User avatar
Virtud Tierra
Diplomat
 
Posts: 861
Founded: Aug 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Virtud Tierra » Wed Oct 07, 2009 10:04 pm

Maurepas wrote:I almost dont want to say this, but...

Prove a Woman cant effectively piss in a bottle inside a tank.


Come on now, I already have an example of the conditions inside of the tank and makes my point clear of why it is not a simple thing to do. If thought experiments work for quantum physics they work for the physics of pissing in a bottle in a cramped seat, ok?

You want me to show you a picture of a women sitting in the gunner's seat trying to manuvere a bottle to to piss in while her tank commander is resting his legs on her shoulders?

Well sorry, I don't have any pictures like that because there is no such thing as a woman tanker.

User avatar
Anti-Social Darwinism
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1282
Founded: Dec 18, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Anti-Social Darwinism » Wed Oct 07, 2009 10:11 pm

Virtud Tierra wrote:
Maurepas wrote:I almost dont want to say this, but...

Prove a Woman cant effectively piss in a bottle inside a tank.


Come on now, I already have an example of the conditions inside of the tank and makes my point clear of why it is not a simple thing to do. If thought experiments work for quantum physics they work for the physics of pissing in a bottle in a cramped seat, ok?

You want me to show you a picture of a women sitting in the gunner's seat trying to manuvere a bottle to to piss in while her tank commander is resting his legs on her shoulders?

Well sorry, I don't have any pictures like that because there is no such thing as a woman tanker.


This from Wikipedia about women in the Russian militlary during WWII

[edit] Land forces
The Soviet Union also used women for sniping duties extensively, and to great effect, including Nina Alexeyevna Lobkovskaya and Ukrainian Lyudmila Pavlichenko (who killed over 300 enemy soldiers). The Soviets found that sniper duties fit women well, since good snipers are patient, careful, deliberate, can avoid hand-to-hand combat, and need higher levels of aerobic conditioning than other troops. Women also served as machine gunners, tank drivers, medics, communication personnel and political officers. Manshuk Mametova was a machine gunner from Kazakhstan and was the first Soviet Asian woman to receive the Hero of the Soviet Union for acts of bravery.

So, yes, women drove tanks in wartime - not the nice, big luxurious tanks of today, but tiny, cramped WWII Soviet tanks.
NSG's resident curmudgeon.

Add 6,771 posts from the old NSG.

User avatar
Lucky Bicycle Works
Diplomat
 
Posts: 884
Founded: Jul 08, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Lucky Bicycle Works » Wed Oct 07, 2009 10:16 pm

Virtud Tierra wrote:
Lucky Bicycle Works wrote:
Ryadn wrote:
Gimmadonis wrote:
Virtud Tierra wrote:
Gimmadonis wrote:
What if they use a bendy straw?


Good point. They have something like that, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_urination_device

it does not work nearly as well as advertised from what I understand. Its basically pissing in a funnel with a hose strapped to yourself. imagine how it would work for you.


I was imagining a bendy straw duct-taped (Note: duct tape is mandatory. cuz duct-tape is awesome) to a woman's crotch, and being duct-taped to the "bottle" in question. jJst a thought.


As Mur'v said, it takes a bit of ingenuity to piss in a bottle, but it's not impossible. And it doesn't require duct tape (sorry).


We didn't hear such arguments for why women shouldn't go into space, did we?

If pissing in a bottle is impossible for women, it should be doubly impossible in zero gravity. But we didn't hear that argument, oh no.

It'll tell you why not. The USSR did it first.


They had space-suits man! You can piss in a space-suit you can't piss your pants in a tank. A tank isn't a space ship! We don't wear spacesuits in a tank, we wear some mono-colored green NOMEX coveralls which does not cost the taxpayer 12 million dollars, unlike a goddamn space suit.

Come on man, I know pissing in zero-G would be tough but they have a space station, a space suit and they don't need to drink 3 quarts of water an hour to stay alive.


Your irony is pleasing. In the original spirit of the thread, and in recognition of my own light heart in posting what you reply to. :)

Better not to carry it further tho' I think. I will turn serious sooner or later, so better it be done quickly I think.

Also, I reserve the right to put hijackers in a headlock. Lest my own head be forcibly ground into the Hershey Bar in some vigilante's pocket, I'm taking the 'chute and jumping out now.
Lucky Bicycle Works, previously BunnySaurus Bugsii.
"My town is a teacher.
Oh, trucks and beers and memories
All spread out on the road.
Oh, my town is a leader of children,
To where Caution
Is a Long Wide Load"

-- Mark Seymour

User avatar
Virtud Tierra
Diplomat
 
Posts: 861
Founded: Aug 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Virtud Tierra » Wed Oct 07, 2009 10:17 pm

Anti-Social Darwinism wrote:
Virtud Tierra wrote:
Maurepas wrote:I almost dont want to say this, but...

Prove a Woman cant effectively piss in a bottle inside a tank.


Come on now, I already have an example of the conditions inside of the tank and makes my point clear of why it is not a simple thing to do. If thought experiments work for quantum physics they work for the physics of pissing in a bottle in a cramped seat, ok?

You want me to show you a picture of a women sitting in the gunner's seat trying to manuvere a bottle to to piss in while her tank commander is resting his legs on her shoulders?

Well sorry, I don't have any pictures like that because there is no such thing as a woman tanker.


This from Wikipedia about women in the Russian militlary during WWII

[edit] Land forces
The Soviet Union also used women for sniping duties extensively, and to great effect, including Nina Alexeyevna Lobkovskaya and Ukrainian Lyudmila Pavlichenko (who killed over 300 enemy soldiers). The Soviets found that sniper duties fit women well, since good snipers are patient, careful, deliberate, can avoid hand-to-hand combat, and need higher levels of aerobic conditioning than other troops. Women also served as machine gunners, tank drivers, medics, communication personnel and political officers. Manshuk Mametova was a machine gunner from Kazakhstan and was the first Soviet Asian woman to receive the Hero of the Soviet Union for acts of bravery.

So, yes, women drove tanks in wartime - not the nice, big luxurious tanks of today, but tiny, cramped WWII Soviet tanks.


Define "tank driver" because there are plenty of armored vehicles female soldiers drive today that could be described as tanks.

Everything you just listed is something that the USA Army already does.

We are not talking about women driving M1114s or M1117s or carrying a machinegun, we are talking about putting women in all-male combat units.

Besides, if you knew anything about tanks you'd know WWII tanks were much more spacious then modern tanks. It was a single crew compartment with a hull floor and a half-turret. Nothing like modern tanks with electronics bolted everywhere sitting in a turret basket, please spare me with arguments about tank design, dude.

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 36968
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Katganistan » Wed Oct 07, 2009 10:21 pm

BladeSlayer Land wrote:The problem with women on the front lines is their lack of strength. Women are 70% weaker than men in upper body strength and 33% weaker than men in lower body strength.
The "chivalry" effect would also be difficult to overpass. The classic "leave no man behind" thought process would be even more difficult to overpass with women. When male soldiers risk everything to help a female soldier, everything is jeopardized, the mission, the safety of other soldiers, and the safety of innocent civilians. The risks are simply too great for the small amount of help they would provide.

Puhleese. I've been on public transportation. You're telling me that your average can't-be-bothered-to-get-up-for-an-expectant-mother guy is going to throw his life away for a fellow soldier because she's a woman?

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Danternoust, Floofybit, ImSaLiA, Keltionialang, Kostane, Plan Neonie, Shrillland, The Vooperian Union, Tungstan

Advertisement

Remove ads