We can just replace "people" in the first law with "Everyone except the people we send you to fight".
And maybe give them less self-preservation.
Advertisement
by Gimmadonis » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:03 pm
Muravyets wrote:Your argument is like the Eiffel Tower sculpted out of bullshit.
by RightLeaningChristians » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:05 pm
by Gimmadonis » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:06 pm
RightLeaningChristians wrote:I'd rather have women on the frontlines, than African-Americans.
Muravyets wrote:Your argument is like the Eiffel Tower sculpted out of bullshit.
by Virtud Tierra » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:07 pm
Muravyets wrote:Women can piss out of their clothes and into bottles just fine. Just because you can't imagine it, doesn't mean it's not possible.
Seriously, I really am tired of these arguments that are based on nothing but daydreams -- especially when the dreamers are so lacking in imagination.
by Lacadaemon » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:07 pm
by New Kereptica » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:07 pm
RightLeaningChristians wrote:I'd rather have women on the frontlines, than African-Americans.
Blouman Empire wrote:Natural is not nature.
KiloMikeAlpha wrote:Umm hmm.... mind if I siggy that as a reminder to those who think that it is cool to shove their bat-shit crazy atheist beliefs on those of us who actually have a clue?
Teccor wrote:You're actually arguing with Kereptica? It's like arguing with a far-Left, militantly atheist brick wall.
Bluth Corporation wrote:No. A free market literally has zero bubbles.
JJ Place wrote:I have a few more pressing matters to attend to right now; I'll be back later this evening to continue my one-man against the world struggle.
Mercator Terra wrote: Mental illness is a myth.
by Gimmadonis » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:09 pm
Virtud Tierra wrote:Muravyets wrote:Women can piss out of their clothes and into bottles just fine. Just because you can't imagine it, doesn't mean it's not possible.
Seriously, I really am tired of these arguments that are based on nothing but daydreams -- especially when the dreamers are so lacking in imagination.
Ok, Mr. Imagination, you are sitting in a tank, in a narrow seat, your legs are closed because they are pinned between the screen on the left with the maingun and the screen of the turret basket on the right. You are leaning forward in your seat to press your eye against an optical sight to look out for the enemy. It is 140 degrees in the tank and your shift is 4 hours long. You are a wearing a jump-suit/ coveralls. You are a woman and you have to take a piss, you cannot abandon your duty which means your face is pressed up against the sight. You can barely open your legs because you know, tanks are fucking cramped. You have a bottle and no penis. Your supervisor is sitting in a seat right behind you, with his legs resting on the top of your back rest.
Easier said then done.
Muravyets wrote:Your argument is like the Eiffel Tower sculpted out of bullshit.
by Ryadn » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:10 pm
Virtud Tierra wrote:Muravyets wrote:Women can piss out of their clothes and into bottles just fine. Just because you can't imagine it, doesn't mean it's not possible.
Seriously, I really am tired of these arguments that are based on nothing but daydreams -- especially when the dreamers are so lacking in imagination.
Ok, Mr. Imagination, you are sitting in a tank, in a narrow seat, your legs are closed because they are pinned between the screen on the left with the maingun and the screen of the turret basket on the right. You are leaning forward in your seat to press your eye against an optical sight to look out for the enemy. It is 140 degrees in the tank and your shift is 4 hours long. You are a wearing a jump-suit/ coveralls. You are a woman and you have to take a piss, you cannot abandon your duty which means your face is pressed up against the sight. You can barely open your legs because you know, tanks are fucking cramped. You have a bottle and no penis. Your supervisor is sitting in a seat right behind you, with his legs resting on the top of your back rest.
Easier said then done.
by RightLeaningChristians » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:10 pm
by Virtud Tierra » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:12 pm
Ryadn wrote:Virtud Tierra wrote:Meargra wrote:i uh think the women could get the morale up in the army if you know what i mean
http://www.questia.com/googleScholar.qs ... 5001896680
Nope. Statistics show that mixed gender units have the worst morale in the Army. You know a good way to turn life-long friends into enemies and how to produce knife-fights in the barracks parking lot? Throw in one, decent looking female into the unit. Next thing you know, you have a posse of guys carrying this soldier's tools, escorting her everywhere and everyone intenetly trying to get into this woman's pants and she is loving every moment of it, she is climbing the rank structure in more then one sense of the term.
If you want people to focus on the mission and focus on the job, you remove all distractions. A single female surrounded by 30 guys is going to serve as a distraction and you will have people going to their cave-man roots and fighting over her since she is like the last woman on earth in that tiny social group.
There you go, ladies and gents. Women are lazy sluts and men are uncontrollable rapists who will abandon all their training for the chance to sleep with a female soldier. Humanity in VT's imagination is hardly worth fighting for.
by Aelosia » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:13 pm
by Gimmadonis » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:14 pm
Virtud Tierra wrote:You seem to think the military is some sort of armed version of high school and combat is pretty much like COD4 and Starship Troopers.
Muravyets wrote:Your argument is like the Eiffel Tower sculpted out of bullshit.
by The Grand World Order » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:15 pm
The Rifle Brigade wrote:
So, we've decided to write a letter to Parliament (the legislative body, not the band) and to ranking Staff Officers suggesting that we stop all this discriminatory twaddle and start allowing women to volunteer for front line duty. We hope you Yanks will do the same.
by New Kereptica » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:15 pm
Virtud Tierra wrote:Hardly. Please tell me about your experiences in the military, bro. I'm not talking about every single fucking case here, I'm talking about the social dynamics that occur this sort of situation. You seem to think the military is some sort of armed version of high school and combat is pretty much like COD4 and Starship Troopers.
I said that example because I've seen it happen and its the best example to illustrate when the system fails somewhere between its ideal and its execution. If you want to argue then by all means do so, trying to refute my stance by discrediting me as a fucking bigot by putting words into my mouth and setting up strawmen is bullshit.
Blouman Empire wrote:Natural is not nature.
KiloMikeAlpha wrote:Umm hmm.... mind if I siggy that as a reminder to those who think that it is cool to shove their bat-shit crazy atheist beliefs on those of us who actually have a clue?
Teccor wrote:You're actually arguing with Kereptica? It's like arguing with a far-Left, militantly atheist brick wall.
Bluth Corporation wrote:No. A free market literally has zero bubbles.
JJ Place wrote:I have a few more pressing matters to attend to right now; I'll be back later this evening to continue my one-man against the world struggle.
Mercator Terra wrote: Mental illness is a myth.
by Gimmadonis » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:16 pm
The Grand World Order wrote:The Rifle Brigade wrote:
So, we've decided to write a letter to Parliament (the legislative body, not the band) and to ranking Staff Officers suggesting that we stop all this discriminatory twaddle and start allowing women to volunteer for front line duty. We hope you Yanks will do the same.
Well, IIRC, women DO serve frontline in the US military. Course, I could be wrong.
However, there's the whole problem with the whole Time of the Month... one thing's for sure, if you have female soldiers, you don't want them having their periods in the middle of combat.
Muravyets wrote:Your argument is like the Eiffel Tower sculpted out of bullshit.
by Virtud Tierra » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:16 pm
Gimmadonis wrote:
What if they use a bendy straw?
by Ryadn » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:17 pm
Virtud Tierra wrote:Ryadn wrote:Virtud Tierra wrote:Meargra wrote:i uh think the women could get the morale up in the army if you know what i mean
http://www.questia.com/googleScholar.qs ... 5001896680
Nope. Statistics show that mixed gender units have the worst morale in the Army. You know a good way to turn life-long friends into enemies and how to produce knife-fights in the barracks parking lot? Throw in one, decent looking female into the unit. Next thing you know, you have a posse of guys carrying this soldier's tools, escorting her everywhere and everyone intenetly trying to get into this woman's pants and she is loving every moment of it, she is climbing the rank structure in more then one sense of the term.
If you want people to focus on the mission and focus on the job, you remove all distractions. A single female surrounded by 30 guys is going to serve as a distraction and you will have people going to their cave-man roots and fighting over her since she is like the last woman on earth in that tiny social group.
There you go, ladies and gents. Women are lazy sluts and men are uncontrollable rapists who will abandon all their training for the chance to sleep with a female soldier. Humanity in VT's imagination is hardly worth fighting for.
Hardly. Please tell me about your experiences in the military, bro. I'm not talking about every single fucking case here, I'm talking about the social dynamics that occur this sort of situation. You seem to think the military is some sort of armed version of high school and combat is pretty much like COD4 and Starship Troopers.
I said that example because I've seen it happen and its the best example to illustrate when the system fails somewhere between its ideal and its execution. If you want to argue then by all means do so, trying to refute my stance by discrediting me as a fucking bigot by putting words into my mouth and setting up strawmen is bullshit.
by Maurepas » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:18 pm
The Grand World Order wrote:The Rifle Brigade wrote:
So, we've decided to write a letter to Parliament (the legislative body, not the band) and to ranking Staff Officers suggesting that we stop all this discriminatory twaddle and start allowing women to volunteer for front line duty. We hope you Yanks will do the same.
Well, IIRC, women DO serve frontline in the US military. Course, I could be wrong.
However, there's the whole problem with the whole Time of the Month... one thing's for sure, if you have female soldiers, you don't want them having their periods in the middle of combat.
Today, women can serve on American combat ships, including in command roles. However women are not permitted to serve on submarines or to participate in special forces programs such as Navy SEALs. Women enlisted soldiers are barred from serving in Infantry, Special Forces, Artillery, Armor, and Air Defense Artillery, however female enlisted members and officers can hold staff positions in every branch of the Army except infantry and armor.
by The Grand World Order » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:18 pm
Gimmadonis wrote:The Grand World Order wrote:The Rifle Brigade wrote:
So, we've decided to write a letter to Parliament (the legislative body, not the band) and to ranking Staff Officers suggesting that we stop all this discriminatory twaddle and start allowing women to volunteer for front line duty. We hope you Yanks will do the same.
Well, IIRC, women DO serve frontline in the US military. Course, I could be wrong.
However, there's the whole problem with the whole Time of the Month... one thing's for sure, if you have female soldiers, you don't want them having their periods in the middle of combat.
I think they're more preoccupied with all the bullets flying around.
That, and I think stress causes women to have irregular periods. But I'm a boy, so wtf do I know?
by The Rifle Brigade » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:18 pm
Virtud Tierra wrote:
Right. Look at the GNP of Iraq in 2009 and compare it to 2002. What does that imply, if anything?
Please, tell me your opinion, Mr. Commando.
by Gimmadonis » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:19 pm
Virtud Tierra wrote:Gimmadonis wrote:
What if they use a bendy straw?
Good point. They have something like that, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_urination_device
it does not work nearly as well as advertised from what I understand. Its basically pissing in a funnel with a hose strapped to yourself. imagine how it would work for you.
Muravyets wrote:Your argument is like the Eiffel Tower sculpted out of bullshit.
by New Kereptica » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:20 pm
Blouman Empire wrote:Natural is not nature.
KiloMikeAlpha wrote:Umm hmm.... mind if I siggy that as a reminder to those who think that it is cool to shove their bat-shit crazy atheist beliefs on those of us who actually have a clue?
Teccor wrote:You're actually arguing with Kereptica? It's like arguing with a far-Left, militantly atheist brick wall.
Bluth Corporation wrote:No. A free market literally has zero bubbles.
JJ Place wrote:I have a few more pressing matters to attend to right now; I'll be back later this evening to continue my one-man against the world struggle.
Mercator Terra wrote: Mental illness is a myth.
by Ryadn » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:20 pm
Gimmadonis wrote:Virtud Tierra wrote:Gimmadonis wrote:
What if they use a bendy straw?
Good point. They have something like that, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_urination_device
it does not work nearly as well as advertised from what I understand. Its basically pissing in a funnel with a hose strapped to yourself. imagine how it would work for you.
I was imagining a bendy straw duct-taped (Note: duct tape is mandatory. cuz duct-tape is awesome) to a woman's crotch, and being duct-taped to the "bottle" in question. jJst a thought.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, El Lazaro, Ethel mermania, Ineva, Keltionialang, Prion-Cirus Imperium, Taosun, The Kharkivan Cossacks, The ligma republic, The Lone Alliance, Tiami, Trollgaard, Uiiop, Zantalio
Advertisement