NATION

PASSWORD

Kill the women first.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:44 pm

Virtud Tierra wrote:
Maurepas wrote:
Virtud Tierra wrote:
There you go. You need a penis to operate a tank. Any other former 19Ks have an alternative hypothesis?

I think Astronauts get around this.....


Dude, its exactly 1.00 earth gravities inside of a tank and spacecraft have multiple rooms. They piss in a 4 million dollar toliet, which is utterly lacking in our 3 million dollar tank.

That wasnt what I was referring to, :lol2:

User avatar
New Kereptica
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6691
Founded: Apr 14, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby New Kereptica » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:45 pm

Virtud Tierra wrote:
Maurepas wrote:
Virtud Tierra wrote:
There you go. You need a penis to operate a tank. Any other former 19Ks have an alternative hypothesis?

I think Astronauts get around this.....


Dude, its exactly 1.00 earth gravities inside of a tank and spacecraft have multiple rooms. They piss in a 4 million dollar toliet, which is utterly lacking in our 3 million dollar tank.


A rather dubious claim.
Blouman Empire wrote:Natural is not nature.

KiloMikeAlpha wrote:Umm hmm.... mind if I siggy that as a reminder to those who think that it is cool to shove their bat-shit crazy atheist beliefs on those of us who actually have a clue?

Teccor wrote:You're actually arguing with Kereptica? It's like arguing with a far-Left, militantly atheist brick wall.

Bluth Corporation wrote:No. A free market literally has zero bubbles.

JJ Place wrote:I have a few more pressing matters to attend to right now; I'll be back later this evening to continue my one-man against the world struggle.

Mercator Terra wrote: Mental illness is a myth.

User avatar
Muravyets
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12755
Founded: Aug 18, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Muravyets » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:46 pm

Virtud Tierra wrote:If it of any consideration I can personally attest to the idea that you need a penis to be a combat soldier, at least reguarding to tanks.

See, its hot inside of a tank, like 140+ degrees inside because it is a metal box sitting the the sun with hot hydralics and machines running inside. So you drink water so you don't die. Bottles and bottles of water, a 3 quarts an hour. Well, that water has to go somewhere and its ultimately back into one the bottles you drank from.

Laying reclined or sitting down inside of a tank, I imagine it would be impossible to piss into an empty waterbottle without the dynamic, point-anywhere utility of a penis. Zip down the fly, point and shoot, all the while looking through the optics.

Like to see a woman do that. They'd have to stand up, almost completely undo their nomex uniform and piss in front of two other dudes inside the tank's crew compartment. Or they could, you know, squat outside of the tank and get shot, or die of dehydration.

There you go. You need a penis to operate a tank. Any other former 19Ks have an alternative hypothesis?

Women can piss out of their clothes and into bottles just fine. Just because you can't imagine it, doesn't mean it's not possible.

Seriously, I really am tired of these arguments that are based on nothing but daydreams -- especially when the dreamers are so lacking in imagination.
Kick back at Cafe Muravyets
And check out my other RP, too. (Don't take others' word for it -- see for yourself. ;) )
I agree with Muravyets because she scares me. -- Verdigroth
However, I am still not the topic of this thread.

User avatar
Virtud Tierra
Diplomat
 
Posts: 861
Founded: Aug 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Virtud Tierra » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:48 pm

Meargra wrote:i uh think the women could get the morale up in the army if you know what i mean :o


http://www.questia.com/googleScholar.qs ... 5001896680

Nope. Statistics show that mixed gender units have the worst morale in the Army. You know a good way to turn life-long friends into enemies and how to produce knife-fights in the barracks parking lot? Throw in one, decent looking female into the unit. Next thing you know, you have a posse of guys carrying this soldier's tools, escorting her everywhere and everyone intenetly trying to get into this woman's pants and she is loving every moment of it, she is climbing the rank structure in more then one sense of the term.

If you want people to focus on the mission and focus on the job, you remove all distractions. A single female surrounded by 30 guys is going to serve as a distraction and you will have people going to their cave-man roots and fighting over her since she is like the last woman on earth in that tiny social group.

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:49 pm

Muravyets wrote:
Virtud Tierra wrote:If it of any consideration I can personally attest to the idea that you need a penis to be a combat soldier, at least reguarding to tanks.

See, its hot inside of a tank, like 140+ degrees inside because it is a metal box sitting the the sun with hot hydralics and machines running inside. So you drink water so you don't die. Bottles and bottles of water, a 3 quarts an hour. Well, that water has to go somewhere and its ultimately back into one the bottles you drank from.

Laying reclined or sitting down inside of a tank, I imagine it would be impossible to piss into an empty waterbottle without the dynamic, point-anywhere utility of a penis. Zip down the fly, point and shoot, all the while looking through the optics.

Like to see a woman do that. They'd have to stand up, almost completely undo their nomex uniform and piss in front of two other dudes inside the tank's crew compartment. Or they could, you know, squat outside of the tank and get shot, or die of dehydration.

There you go. You need a penis to operate a tank. Any other former 19Ks have an alternative hypothesis?

Women can piss out of their clothes and into bottles just fine. Just because you can't imagine it, doesn't mean it's not possible.

Idk...I actually do know that this is a little more difficult, Sister + Father's 18 Wheeler....Although, Im not seeing how its the be-all, end-all, of Women not being allowed in Tanks...

User avatar
Muravyets
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12755
Founded: Aug 18, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Muravyets » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:50 pm

Maurepas wrote:
Muravyets wrote:
Virtud Tierra wrote:If it of any consideration I can personally attest to the idea that you need a penis to be a combat soldier, at least reguarding to tanks.

See, its hot inside of a tank, like 140+ degrees inside because it is a metal box sitting the the sun with hot hydralics and machines running inside. So you drink water so you don't die. Bottles and bottles of water, a 3 quarts an hour. Well, that water has to go somewhere and its ultimately back into one the bottles you drank from.

Laying reclined or sitting down inside of a tank, I imagine it would be impossible to piss into an empty waterbottle without the dynamic, point-anywhere utility of a penis. Zip down the fly, point and shoot, all the while looking through the optics.

Like to see a woman do that. They'd have to stand up, almost completely undo their nomex uniform and piss in front of two other dudes inside the tank's crew compartment. Or they could, you know, squat outside of the tank and get shot, or die of dehydration.

There you go. You need a penis to operate a tank. Any other former 19Ks have an alternative hypothesis?

Women can piss out of their clothes and into bottles just fine. Just because you can't imagine it, doesn't mean it's not possible.

Idk...I actually do know that this is a little more difficult, Sister + Father's 18 Wheeler....Although, Im not seeing how its the be-all, end-all, of Women not being allowed in Tanks...

Well, we managed it in Girl Scouts.
Kick back at Cafe Muravyets
And check out my other RP, too. (Don't take others' word for it -- see for yourself. ;) )
I agree with Muravyets because she scares me. -- Verdigroth
However, I am still not the topic of this thread.

User avatar
New Kereptica
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6691
Founded: Apr 14, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby New Kereptica » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:50 pm

Virtud Tierra wrote:
Meargra wrote:i uh think the women could get the morale up in the army if you know what i mean :o


http://www.questia.com/googleScholar.qs ... 5001896680

Nope. Statistics show that mixed gender units have the worst morale in the Army. You know a good way to turn life-long friends into enemies and how to produce knife-fights in the barracks parking lot? Throw in one, decent looking female into the unit. Next thing you know, you have a posse of guys carrying this soldier's tools, escorting her everywhere and everyone intenetly trying to get into this woman's pants and she is loving every moment of it, she is climbing the rank structure in more then one sense of the term.

If you want people to focus on the mission and focus on the job, you remove all distractions. A single female surrounded by 30 guys is going to serve as a distraction and you will have people going to their cave-man roots and fighting over her since she is like the last woman on earth in that tiny social group.


Do you support excluding gays from the military as well?
Blouman Empire wrote:Natural is not nature.

KiloMikeAlpha wrote:Umm hmm.... mind if I siggy that as a reminder to those who think that it is cool to shove their bat-shit crazy atheist beliefs on those of us who actually have a clue?

Teccor wrote:You're actually arguing with Kereptica? It's like arguing with a far-Left, militantly atheist brick wall.

Bluth Corporation wrote:No. A free market literally has zero bubbles.

JJ Place wrote:I have a few more pressing matters to attend to right now; I'll be back later this evening to continue my one-man against the world struggle.

Mercator Terra wrote: Mental illness is a myth.

User avatar
Gimmadonis
Diplomat
 
Posts: 604
Founded: Dec 05, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Gimmadonis » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:51 pm

I say we just hurry the fuck up with military robots. That'll solve this problem real fast.

All in agreement?
Muravyets wrote:Your argument is like the Eiffel Tower sculpted out of bullshit.

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:51 pm

Muravyets wrote:
Maurepas wrote:
Muravyets wrote:
Virtud Tierra wrote:If it of any consideration I can personally attest to the idea that you need a penis to be a combat soldier, at least reguarding to tanks.

See, its hot inside of a tank, like 140+ degrees inside because it is a metal box sitting the the sun with hot hydralics and machines running inside. So you drink water so you don't die. Bottles and bottles of water, a 3 quarts an hour. Well, that water has to go somewhere and its ultimately back into one the bottles you drank from.

Laying reclined or sitting down inside of a tank, I imagine it would be impossible to piss into an empty waterbottle without the dynamic, point-anywhere utility of a penis. Zip down the fly, point and shoot, all the while looking through the optics.

Like to see a woman do that. They'd have to stand up, almost completely undo their nomex uniform and piss in front of two other dudes inside the tank's crew compartment. Or they could, you know, squat outside of the tank and get shot, or die of dehydration.

There you go. You need a penis to operate a tank. Any other former 19Ks have an alternative hypothesis?

Women can piss out of their clothes and into bottles just fine. Just because you can't imagine it, doesn't mean it's not possible.

Idk...I actually do know that this is a little more difficult, Sister + Father's 18 Wheeler....Although, Im not seeing how its the be-all, end-all, of Women not being allowed in Tanks...

Well, we managed it in Girl Scouts.

Well, I guess yall were more creative than she was...although I hate this line of thought for making me think of that, :?

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:53 pm

Gimmadonis wrote:I say we just hurry the fuck up with military robots. That'll solve this problem real fast.

All in agreement?

Um...Idk...

Image

User avatar
Muravyets
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12755
Founded: Aug 18, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Muravyets » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:53 pm

Gimmadonis wrote:I say we just hurry the fuck up with military robots. That'll solve this problem real fast.

All in agreement?

I think I'd rather just find a substitute for military action altogether. Breaking stuff -- even if it's just stuff -- always leaves such a mess to clean up.
Kick back at Cafe Muravyets
And check out my other RP, too. (Don't take others' word for it -- see for yourself. ;) )
I agree with Muravyets because she scares me. -- Verdigroth
However, I am still not the topic of this thread.

User avatar
Gimmadonis
Diplomat
 
Posts: 604
Founded: Dec 05, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Gimmadonis » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:53 pm

Maurepas wrote:
Gimmadonis wrote:I say we just hurry the fuck up with military robots. That'll solve this problem real fast.

All in agreement?

Um...Idk...

Image



Oh... Right...

Shit, we're back where we started now, aren't we?
Muravyets wrote:Your argument is like the Eiffel Tower sculpted out of bullshit.

User avatar
Virtud Tierra
Diplomat
 
Posts: 861
Founded: Aug 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Virtud Tierra » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:54 pm

New Kereptica wrote:
Virtud Tierra wrote:
Meargra wrote:i uh think the women could get the morale up in the army if you know what i mean :o


http://www.questia.com/googleScholar.qs ... 5001896680

Nope. Statistics show that mixed gender units have the worst morale in the Army. You know a good way to turn life-long friends into enemies and how to produce knife-fights in the barracks parking lot? Throw in one, decent looking female into the unit. Next thing you know, you have a posse of guys carrying this soldier's tools, escorting her everywhere and everyone intenetly trying to get into this woman's pants and she is loving every moment of it, she is climbing the rank structure in more then one sense of the term.

If you want people to focus on the mission and focus on the job, you remove all distractions. A single female surrounded by 30 guys is going to serve as a distraction and you will have people going to their cave-man roots and fighting over her since she is like the last woman on earth in that tiny social group.


Do you support excluding gays from the military as well?


No, why should I? Gays can be as gay as they want, they are just restricted against making their sexual preference known to others so it doesn't create problems. Also, its not even an enforced regulation. People decide they want out of the Army and try the "lol I'm gay!, really!" and you know what they do? Nothing at all. I knew plenty of utterly flaming gays in the Army. Why exclude them if they don't cause any trouble?

With females in a male-dominated unit, it can only cause trouble in the vast majority of the cases.

User avatar
Muravyets
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12755
Founded: Aug 18, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Muravyets » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:54 pm

Maurepas wrote:Well, I guess yall were more creative than she was...although I hate this line of thought for making me think of that, :?

Sorry. It's just that we were city girls, and we were all paranoid about poison oak when we went camping. We sought to minimize our exposure. Like everything in life, there's a trick to it.
Kick back at Cafe Muravyets
And check out my other RP, too. (Don't take others' word for it -- see for yourself. ;) )
I agree with Muravyets because she scares me. -- Verdigroth
However, I am still not the topic of this thread.

User avatar
Gimmadonis
Diplomat
 
Posts: 604
Founded: Dec 05, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Gimmadonis » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:56 pm

Muravyets wrote:
Maurepas wrote:Well, I guess yall were more creative than she was...although I hate this line of thought for making me think of that, :?

Sorry. It's just that we were city girls, Livin' in a lonely world. We took the midnight train going an-y-whereeeeee...


Fix'd.
Muravyets wrote:Your argument is like the Eiffel Tower sculpted out of bullshit.

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:56 pm

Muravyets wrote:
Maurepas wrote:Well, I guess yall were more creative than she was...although I hate this line of thought for making me think of that, :?

Sorry. It's just that we were city girls, and we were all paranoid about poison oak when we went camping. We sought to minimize our exposure. Like everything in life, there's a trick to it.

No, no, no...Thats fine, even a little hot, lol...

My sister's attempt at pissing in a bottle though, :?

Id tried to block it out, :lol2:
Last edited by Maurepas on Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Lacadaemon
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5322
Founded: Aug 26, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Lacadaemon » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:56 pm

Gimmadonis wrote:I say we just hurry the fuck up with military robots. That'll solve this problem real fast.

All in agreement?


Yes. Skynet. What could possibly go wrong.
The kind of middle-class mentality which actuates both those responsible for strategy and government has little knowledge of the new psychology and organizing ability of the totalitarian States. The forces we are fighting are governed neither by the old strategy nor follow the old tactics.

User avatar
New Kereptica
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6691
Founded: Apr 14, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby New Kereptica » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:57 pm

Virtud Tierra wrote:
New Kereptica wrote:
Virtud Tierra wrote:
Meargra wrote:i uh think the women could get the morale up in the army if you know what i mean :o


http://www.questia.com/googleScholar.qs ... 5001896680

Nope. Statistics show that mixed gender units have the worst morale in the Army. You know a good way to turn life-long friends into enemies and how to produce knife-fights in the barracks parking lot? Throw in one, decent looking female into the unit. Next thing you know, you have a posse of guys carrying this soldier's tools, escorting her everywhere and everyone intenetly trying to get into this woman's pants and she is loving every moment of it, she is climbing the rank structure in more then one sense of the term.

If you want people to focus on the mission and focus on the job, you remove all distractions. A single female surrounded by 30 guys is going to serve as a distraction and you will have people going to their cave-man roots and fighting over her since she is like the last woman on earth in that tiny social group.


Do you support excluding gays from the military as well?


No, why should I? Gays can be as gay as they want, they are just restricted against making their sexual preference known to others so it doesn't create problems. Also, its not even an enforced regulation. People decide they want out of the Army and try the "lol I'm gay!, really!" and you know what they do? Nothing at all. I knew plenty of utterly flaming gays in the Army. Why exclude them if they don't cause any trouble?

With females in a male-dominated unit, it can only cause trouble in the vast majority of the cases.


Ban sexually motivated actions. That would solve all of the "distraction" problems.
Blouman Empire wrote:Natural is not nature.

KiloMikeAlpha wrote:Umm hmm.... mind if I siggy that as a reminder to those who think that it is cool to shove their bat-shit crazy atheist beliefs on those of us who actually have a clue?

Teccor wrote:You're actually arguing with Kereptica? It's like arguing with a far-Left, militantly atheist brick wall.

Bluth Corporation wrote:No. A free market literally has zero bubbles.

JJ Place wrote:I have a few more pressing matters to attend to right now; I'll be back later this evening to continue my one-man against the world struggle.

Mercator Terra wrote: Mental illness is a myth.

User avatar
Gimmadonis
Diplomat
 
Posts: 604
Founded: Dec 05, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Gimmadonis » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:58 pm

Lacadaemon wrote:
Gimmadonis wrote:I say we just hurry the fuck up with military robots. That'll solve this problem real fast.

All in agreement?


Yes. Skynet. What could possibly go wrong.


But what if we do Newton's third law of robotics or whatever? Wouldn't that fix it?
Muravyets wrote:Your argument is like the Eiffel Tower sculpted out of bullshit.

User avatar
Ryadn
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8028
Founded: Sep 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Ryadn » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:58 pm

Virtud Tierra wrote:If it of any consideration I can personally attest to the idea that you need a penis to be a combat soldier, at least reguarding to tanks.

See, its hot inside of a tank, like 140+ degrees inside because it is a metal box sitting the the sun with hot hydralics and machines running inside. So you drink water so you don't die. Bottles and bottles of water, a 3 quarts an hour. Well, that water has to go somewhere and its ultimately back into one the bottles you drank from.

Laying reclined or sitting down inside of a tank, I imagine it would be impossible to piss into an empty waterbottle without the dynamic, point-anywhere utility of a penis. Zip down the fly, point and shoot, all the while looking through the optics.

Like to see a woman do that. They'd have to stand up, almost completely undo their nomex uniform and piss in front of two other dudes inside the tank's crew compartment. Or they could, you know, squat outside of the tank and get shot, or die of dehydration.

There you go. You need a penis to operate a tank. Any other former 19Ks have an alternative hypothesis?


After reading this, I don't just disbelieve you've been a soldier---I disbelieve you've ever actually met a woman.
"I hate you! I HATE you collectivist society. You can't tell me what to do, you're not my REAL legitimate government. As soon as my band takes off, and I invent a perpetual motion machine, I am SO out of here!" - Neo Art

"But please, explain how a condom breaking is TOTALLY different from a tire getting blown out. I mean, in one case, a piece of rubber you're relying on to remain intact so that your risk of negative consequences won't significantly increase breaks through no inherent fault of your own, and in the other case, a piece of rubber you're relying on to remain intact so that your risk of negative consequences won't significantly increase breaks through no inherent fault of your own." - The Norwegian Blue

User avatar
New Kereptica
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6691
Founded: Apr 14, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby New Kereptica » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:59 pm

Gimmadonis wrote:
Lacadaemon wrote:
Gimmadonis wrote:I say we just hurry the fuck up with military robots. That'll solve this problem real fast.

All in agreement?


Yes. Skynet. What could possibly go wrong.


But what if we do Newton's third law of robotics or whatever? Wouldn't that fix it?


The Third Law is that they have to protect themselves...

It's rather useless, harmful even, without the first two.
Blouman Empire wrote:Natural is not nature.

KiloMikeAlpha wrote:Umm hmm.... mind if I siggy that as a reminder to those who think that it is cool to shove their bat-shit crazy atheist beliefs on those of us who actually have a clue?

Teccor wrote:You're actually arguing with Kereptica? It's like arguing with a far-Left, militantly atheist brick wall.

Bluth Corporation wrote:No. A free market literally has zero bubbles.

JJ Place wrote:I have a few more pressing matters to attend to right now; I'll be back later this evening to continue my one-man against the world struggle.

Mercator Terra wrote: Mental illness is a myth.

User avatar
Gimmadonis
Diplomat
 
Posts: 604
Founded: Dec 05, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Gimmadonis » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:00 pm

New Kereptica wrote:
Gimmadonis wrote:
Lacadaemon wrote:
Gimmadonis wrote:I say we just hurry the fuck up with military robots. That'll solve this problem real fast.

All in agreement?


Yes. Skynet. What could possibly go wrong.


But what if we do Newton's third law of robotics or whatever? Wouldn't that fix it?


The Third Law is that they have to protect themselves...

It's rather useless, harmful even, without the first two.


Oh... Well we better put those in, too.
Muravyets wrote:Your argument is like the Eiffel Tower sculpted out of bullshit.

User avatar
Ryadn
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8028
Founded: Sep 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Ryadn » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:01 pm

Virtud Tierra wrote:
Meargra wrote:i uh think the women could get the morale up in the army if you know what i mean :o


http://www.questia.com/googleScholar.qs ... 5001896680

Nope. Statistics show that mixed gender units have the worst morale in the Army. You know a good way to turn life-long friends into enemies and how to produce knife-fights in the barracks parking lot? Throw in one, decent looking female into the unit. Next thing you know, you have a posse of guys carrying this soldier's tools, escorting her everywhere and everyone intenetly trying to get into this woman's pants and she is loving every moment of it, she is climbing the rank structure in more then one sense of the term.

If you want people to focus on the mission and focus on the job, you remove all distractions. A single female surrounded by 30 guys is going to serve as a distraction and you will have people going to their cave-man roots and fighting over her since she is like the last woman on earth in that tiny social group.


There you go, ladies and gents. Women are lazy sluts and men are uncontrollable rapists who will abandon all their training for the chance to sleep with a female soldier. Humanity in VT's imagination is hardly worth fighting for.
"I hate you! I HATE you collectivist society. You can't tell me what to do, you're not my REAL legitimate government. As soon as my band takes off, and I invent a perpetual motion machine, I am SO out of here!" - Neo Art

"But please, explain how a condom breaking is TOTALLY different from a tire getting blown out. I mean, in one case, a piece of rubber you're relying on to remain intact so that your risk of negative consequences won't significantly increase breaks through no inherent fault of your own, and in the other case, a piece of rubber you're relying on to remain intact so that your risk of negative consequences won't significantly increase breaks through no inherent fault of your own." - The Norwegian Blue

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:01 pm

Gimmadonis wrote:
Oh... Well we better put those in, too.

What we should do, is make them instead of Robots, Remote-Controlled soldiers...Itd be like Halo, only, your character is in a real battlefield...

:lol2:

User avatar
New Kereptica
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6691
Founded: Apr 14, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby New Kereptica » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:01 pm

Gimmadonis wrote:
New Kereptica wrote:
Gimmadonis wrote:
Lacadaemon wrote:
Gimmadonis wrote:I say we just hurry the fuck up with military robots. That'll solve this problem real fast.

All in agreement?


Yes. Skynet. What could possibly go wrong.


But what if we do Newton's third law of robotics or whatever? Wouldn't that fix it?


The Third Law is that they have to protect themselves...

It's rather useless, harmful even, without the first two.


Oh... Well we better put those in, too.


Well, robots with the Third Law would be rather useless in warfare.
Blouman Empire wrote:Natural is not nature.

KiloMikeAlpha wrote:Umm hmm.... mind if I siggy that as a reminder to those who think that it is cool to shove their bat-shit crazy atheist beliefs on those of us who actually have a clue?

Teccor wrote:You're actually arguing with Kereptica? It's like arguing with a far-Left, militantly atheist brick wall.

Bluth Corporation wrote:No. A free market literally has zero bubbles.

JJ Place wrote:I have a few more pressing matters to attend to right now; I'll be back later this evening to continue my one-man against the world struggle.

Mercator Terra wrote: Mental illness is a myth.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Beliras, Cerespasia, Cerula, Dimetrodon Empire, Emotional Support Crocodile, Fartsniffage, General TN, Ifreann, Inferior, Kreushia, Nimzonia, Pale Dawn, Shidei, Three Galaxies, Zantalio

Advertisement

Remove ads