Virtud Tierra wrote:
Dude, its exactly 1.00 earth gravities inside of a tank and spacecraft have multiple rooms. They piss in a 4 million dollar toliet, which is utterly lacking in our 3 million dollar tank.
That wasnt what I was referring to,
Advertisement
by Maurepas » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:44 pm
Virtud Tierra wrote:
Dude, its exactly 1.00 earth gravities inside of a tank and spacecraft have multiple rooms. They piss in a 4 million dollar toliet, which is utterly lacking in our 3 million dollar tank.
by New Kereptica » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:45 pm
Virtud Tierra wrote:
Dude, its exactly 1.00 earth gravities inside of a tank and spacecraft have multiple rooms. They piss in a 4 million dollar toliet, which is utterly lacking in our 3 million dollar tank.
Blouman Empire wrote:Natural is not nature.
KiloMikeAlpha wrote:Umm hmm.... mind if I siggy that as a reminder to those who think that it is cool to shove their bat-shit crazy atheist beliefs on those of us who actually have a clue?
Teccor wrote:You're actually arguing with Kereptica? It's like arguing with a far-Left, militantly atheist brick wall.
Bluth Corporation wrote:No. A free market literally has zero bubbles.
JJ Place wrote:I have a few more pressing matters to attend to right now; I'll be back later this evening to continue my one-man against the world struggle.
Mercator Terra wrote: Mental illness is a myth.
by Muravyets » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:46 pm
Virtud Tierra wrote:If it of any consideration I can personally attest to the idea that you need a penis to be a combat soldier, at least reguarding to tanks.
See, its hot inside of a tank, like 140+ degrees inside because it is a metal box sitting the the sun with hot hydralics and machines running inside. So you drink water so you don't die. Bottles and bottles of water, a 3 quarts an hour. Well, that water has to go somewhere and its ultimately back into one the bottles you drank from.
Laying reclined or sitting down inside of a tank, I imagine it would be impossible to piss into an empty waterbottle without the dynamic, point-anywhere utility of a penis. Zip down the fly, point and shoot, all the while looking through the optics.
Like to see a woman do that. They'd have to stand up, almost completely undo their nomex uniform and piss in front of two other dudes inside the tank's crew compartment. Or they could, you know, squat outside of the tank and get shot, or die of dehydration.
There you go. You need a penis to operate a tank. Any other former 19Ks have an alternative hypothesis?
by Virtud Tierra » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:48 pm
Meargra wrote:i uh think the women could get the morale up in the army if you know what i mean
by Maurepas » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:49 pm
Muravyets wrote:Virtud Tierra wrote:If it of any consideration I can personally attest to the idea that you need a penis to be a combat soldier, at least reguarding to tanks.
See, its hot inside of a tank, like 140+ degrees inside because it is a metal box sitting the the sun with hot hydralics and machines running inside. So you drink water so you don't die. Bottles and bottles of water, a 3 quarts an hour. Well, that water has to go somewhere and its ultimately back into one the bottles you drank from.
Laying reclined or sitting down inside of a tank, I imagine it would be impossible to piss into an empty waterbottle without the dynamic, point-anywhere utility of a penis. Zip down the fly, point and shoot, all the while looking through the optics.
Like to see a woman do that. They'd have to stand up, almost completely undo their nomex uniform and piss in front of two other dudes inside the tank's crew compartment. Or they could, you know, squat outside of the tank and get shot, or die of dehydration.
There you go. You need a penis to operate a tank. Any other former 19Ks have an alternative hypothesis?
Women can piss out of their clothes and into bottles just fine. Just because you can't imagine it, doesn't mean it's not possible.
by Muravyets » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:50 pm
Maurepas wrote:Muravyets wrote:Virtud Tierra wrote:If it of any consideration I can personally attest to the idea that you need a penis to be a combat soldier, at least reguarding to tanks.
See, its hot inside of a tank, like 140+ degrees inside because it is a metal box sitting the the sun with hot hydralics and machines running inside. So you drink water so you don't die. Bottles and bottles of water, a 3 quarts an hour. Well, that water has to go somewhere and its ultimately back into one the bottles you drank from.
Laying reclined or sitting down inside of a tank, I imagine it would be impossible to piss into an empty waterbottle without the dynamic, point-anywhere utility of a penis. Zip down the fly, point and shoot, all the while looking through the optics.
Like to see a woman do that. They'd have to stand up, almost completely undo their nomex uniform and piss in front of two other dudes inside the tank's crew compartment. Or they could, you know, squat outside of the tank and get shot, or die of dehydration.
There you go. You need a penis to operate a tank. Any other former 19Ks have an alternative hypothesis?
Women can piss out of their clothes and into bottles just fine. Just because you can't imagine it, doesn't mean it's not possible.
Idk...I actually do know that this is a little more difficult, Sister + Father's 18 Wheeler....Although, Im not seeing how its the be-all, end-all, of Women not being allowed in Tanks...
by New Kereptica » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:50 pm
Virtud Tierra wrote:Meargra wrote:i uh think the women could get the morale up in the army if you know what i mean
http://www.questia.com/googleScholar.qs ... 5001896680
Nope. Statistics show that mixed gender units have the worst morale in the Army. You know a good way to turn life-long friends into enemies and how to produce knife-fights in the barracks parking lot? Throw in one, decent looking female into the unit. Next thing you know, you have a posse of guys carrying this soldier's tools, escorting her everywhere and everyone intenetly trying to get into this woman's pants and she is loving every moment of it, she is climbing the rank structure in more then one sense of the term.
If you want people to focus on the mission and focus on the job, you remove all distractions. A single female surrounded by 30 guys is going to serve as a distraction and you will have people going to their cave-man roots and fighting over her since she is like the last woman on earth in that tiny social group.
Blouman Empire wrote:Natural is not nature.
KiloMikeAlpha wrote:Umm hmm.... mind if I siggy that as a reminder to those who think that it is cool to shove their bat-shit crazy atheist beliefs on those of us who actually have a clue?
Teccor wrote:You're actually arguing with Kereptica? It's like arguing with a far-Left, militantly atheist brick wall.
Bluth Corporation wrote:No. A free market literally has zero bubbles.
JJ Place wrote:I have a few more pressing matters to attend to right now; I'll be back later this evening to continue my one-man against the world struggle.
Mercator Terra wrote: Mental illness is a myth.
by Gimmadonis » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:51 pm
Muravyets wrote:Your argument is like the Eiffel Tower sculpted out of bullshit.
by Maurepas » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:51 pm
Muravyets wrote:Maurepas wrote:Muravyets wrote:Virtud Tierra wrote:If it of any consideration I can personally attest to the idea that you need a penis to be a combat soldier, at least reguarding to tanks.
See, its hot inside of a tank, like 140+ degrees inside because it is a metal box sitting the the sun with hot hydralics and machines running inside. So you drink water so you don't die. Bottles and bottles of water, a 3 quarts an hour. Well, that water has to go somewhere and its ultimately back into one the bottles you drank from.
Laying reclined or sitting down inside of a tank, I imagine it would be impossible to piss into an empty waterbottle without the dynamic, point-anywhere utility of a penis. Zip down the fly, point and shoot, all the while looking through the optics.
Like to see a woman do that. They'd have to stand up, almost completely undo their nomex uniform and piss in front of two other dudes inside the tank's crew compartment. Or they could, you know, squat outside of the tank and get shot, or die of dehydration.
There you go. You need a penis to operate a tank. Any other former 19Ks have an alternative hypothesis?
Women can piss out of their clothes and into bottles just fine. Just because you can't imagine it, doesn't mean it's not possible.
Idk...I actually do know that this is a little more difficult, Sister + Father's 18 Wheeler....Although, Im not seeing how its the be-all, end-all, of Women not being allowed in Tanks...
Well, we managed it in Girl Scouts.
by Muravyets » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:53 pm
Gimmadonis wrote:I say we just hurry the fuck up with military robots. That'll solve this problem real fast.
All in agreement?
by Gimmadonis » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:53 pm
Muravyets wrote:Your argument is like the Eiffel Tower sculpted out of bullshit.
by Virtud Tierra » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:54 pm
New Kereptica wrote:Virtud Tierra wrote:Meargra wrote:i uh think the women could get the morale up in the army if you know what i mean
http://www.questia.com/googleScholar.qs ... 5001896680
Nope. Statistics show that mixed gender units have the worst morale in the Army. You know a good way to turn life-long friends into enemies and how to produce knife-fights in the barracks parking lot? Throw in one, decent looking female into the unit. Next thing you know, you have a posse of guys carrying this soldier's tools, escorting her everywhere and everyone intenetly trying to get into this woman's pants and she is loving every moment of it, she is climbing the rank structure in more then one sense of the term.
If you want people to focus on the mission and focus on the job, you remove all distractions. A single female surrounded by 30 guys is going to serve as a distraction and you will have people going to their cave-man roots and fighting over her since she is like the last woman on earth in that tiny social group.
Do you support excluding gays from the military as well?
by Muravyets » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:54 pm
Maurepas wrote:Well, I guess yall were more creative than she was...although I hate this line of thought for making me think of that,
by Gimmadonis » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:56 pm
Muravyets wrote:Your argument is like the Eiffel Tower sculpted out of bullshit.
by Maurepas » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:56 pm
Muravyets wrote:Maurepas wrote:Well, I guess yall were more creative than she was...although I hate this line of thought for making me think of that,
Sorry. It's just that we were city girls, and we were all paranoid about poison oak when we went camping. We sought to minimize our exposure. Like everything in life, there's a trick to it.
by Lacadaemon » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:56 pm
Gimmadonis wrote:I say we just hurry the fuck up with military robots. That'll solve this problem real fast.
All in agreement?
by New Kereptica » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:57 pm
Virtud Tierra wrote:New Kereptica wrote:Virtud Tierra wrote:Meargra wrote:i uh think the women could get the morale up in the army if you know what i mean
http://www.questia.com/googleScholar.qs ... 5001896680
Nope. Statistics show that mixed gender units have the worst morale in the Army. You know a good way to turn life-long friends into enemies and how to produce knife-fights in the barracks parking lot? Throw in one, decent looking female into the unit. Next thing you know, you have a posse of guys carrying this soldier's tools, escorting her everywhere and everyone intenetly trying to get into this woman's pants and she is loving every moment of it, she is climbing the rank structure in more then one sense of the term.
If you want people to focus on the mission and focus on the job, you remove all distractions. A single female surrounded by 30 guys is going to serve as a distraction and you will have people going to their cave-man roots and fighting over her since she is like the last woman on earth in that tiny social group.
Do you support excluding gays from the military as well?
No, why should I? Gays can be as gay as they want, they are just restricted against making their sexual preference known to others so it doesn't create problems. Also, its not even an enforced regulation. People decide they want out of the Army and try the "lol I'm gay!, really!" and you know what they do? Nothing at all. I knew plenty of utterly flaming gays in the Army. Why exclude them if they don't cause any trouble?
With females in a male-dominated unit, it can only cause trouble in the vast majority of the cases.
Blouman Empire wrote:Natural is not nature.
KiloMikeAlpha wrote:Umm hmm.... mind if I siggy that as a reminder to those who think that it is cool to shove their bat-shit crazy atheist beliefs on those of us who actually have a clue?
Teccor wrote:You're actually arguing with Kereptica? It's like arguing with a far-Left, militantly atheist brick wall.
Bluth Corporation wrote:No. A free market literally has zero bubbles.
JJ Place wrote:I have a few more pressing matters to attend to right now; I'll be back later this evening to continue my one-man against the world struggle.
Mercator Terra wrote: Mental illness is a myth.
by Gimmadonis » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:58 pm
Muravyets wrote:Your argument is like the Eiffel Tower sculpted out of bullshit.
by Ryadn » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:58 pm
Virtud Tierra wrote:If it of any consideration I can personally attest to the idea that you need a penis to be a combat soldier, at least reguarding to tanks.
See, its hot inside of a tank, like 140+ degrees inside because it is a metal box sitting the the sun with hot hydralics and machines running inside. So you drink water so you don't die. Bottles and bottles of water, a 3 quarts an hour. Well, that water has to go somewhere and its ultimately back into one the bottles you drank from.
Laying reclined or sitting down inside of a tank, I imagine it would be impossible to piss into an empty waterbottle without the dynamic, point-anywhere utility of a penis. Zip down the fly, point and shoot, all the while looking through the optics.
Like to see a woman do that. They'd have to stand up, almost completely undo their nomex uniform and piss in front of two other dudes inside the tank's crew compartment. Or they could, you know, squat outside of the tank and get shot, or die of dehydration.
There you go. You need a penis to operate a tank. Any other former 19Ks have an alternative hypothesis?
by New Kereptica » Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:59 pm
Blouman Empire wrote:Natural is not nature.
KiloMikeAlpha wrote:Umm hmm.... mind if I siggy that as a reminder to those who think that it is cool to shove their bat-shit crazy atheist beliefs on those of us who actually have a clue?
Teccor wrote:You're actually arguing with Kereptica? It's like arguing with a far-Left, militantly atheist brick wall.
Bluth Corporation wrote:No. A free market literally has zero bubbles.
JJ Place wrote:I have a few more pressing matters to attend to right now; I'll be back later this evening to continue my one-man against the world struggle.
Mercator Terra wrote: Mental illness is a myth.
by Gimmadonis » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:00 pm
New Kereptica wrote:
The Third Law is that they have to protect themselves...
It's rather useless, harmful even, without the first two.
Muravyets wrote:Your argument is like the Eiffel Tower sculpted out of bullshit.
by Ryadn » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:01 pm
Virtud Tierra wrote:Meargra wrote:i uh think the women could get the morale up in the army if you know what i mean
http://www.questia.com/googleScholar.qs ... 5001896680
Nope. Statistics show that mixed gender units have the worst morale in the Army. You know a good way to turn life-long friends into enemies and how to produce knife-fights in the barracks parking lot? Throw in one, decent looking female into the unit. Next thing you know, you have a posse of guys carrying this soldier's tools, escorting her everywhere and everyone intenetly trying to get into this woman's pants and she is loving every moment of it, she is climbing the rank structure in more then one sense of the term.
If you want people to focus on the mission and focus on the job, you remove all distractions. A single female surrounded by 30 guys is going to serve as a distraction and you will have people going to their cave-man roots and fighting over her since she is like the last woman on earth in that tiny social group.
by Maurepas » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:01 pm
Gimmadonis wrote:
Oh... Well we better put those in, too.
by New Kereptica » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:01 pm
Blouman Empire wrote:Natural is not nature.
KiloMikeAlpha wrote:Umm hmm.... mind if I siggy that as a reminder to those who think that it is cool to shove their bat-shit crazy atheist beliefs on those of us who actually have a clue?
Teccor wrote:You're actually arguing with Kereptica? It's like arguing with a far-Left, militantly atheist brick wall.
Bluth Corporation wrote:No. A free market literally has zero bubbles.
JJ Place wrote:I have a few more pressing matters to attend to right now; I'll be back later this evening to continue my one-man against the world struggle.
Mercator Terra wrote: Mental illness is a myth.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Beliras, Cerespasia, Cerula, Dimetrodon Empire, Emotional Support Crocodile, Fartsniffage, General TN, Ifreann, Inferior, Kreushia, Nimzonia, Pale Dawn, Shidei, Three Galaxies, Zantalio
Advertisement