NationStates

Wikkiwallana wrote:

FranksFreedom wrote:
Still better than NDAA-bama

You mean the NDAA that simply reaffirms the AUMF which Paul voted for?

Des-Bal wrote:

Wikkiwallana wrote:First line of the post is "One stop shop for all my "Paul is awful" needs", what more do you want?

Specifics on which each of those links goes to. You can't expect to throw that up every time someone says "Ron Paul" and have them sift through each individual post trying to figure out what specifically you were addressing.

Wikkiwallana wrote:

Des-Bal wrote:
Specifics on which each of those links goes to. You can't expect to throw that up every time someone says "Ron Paul" and have them sift through each individual post trying to figure out what specifically you were addressing.

I can't edit the post, the thread is locked, and has been for some time. They aren't links to every single mention of Paul, but to the good, detailed explanations of his policies, statements, and actions, and the explanations of why they are so atrocious.

Telesha wrote:

Des-Bal wrote:
Specifics on which each of those links goes to. You can't expect to throw that up every time someone says "Ron Paul" and have them sift through each individual post trying to figure out what specifically you were addressing.

Been meaning to sift through it all anyway:

One stop shop for all my "Paul is awful" needs:
Ron Paul is no Friend to Progressives
Racism, support of DOMA, PMCs, and against the Civil Rights Act
More racism, Paul "approved every line" of racist newsletters
even MORE racism: "95% of African American men in DC are semi-criminal or entirely criminal"
Still more racism from Paul
Paul's stances from the man himself: anti-aborton, privatize energy, end NHS
We The People Act
Paul on anti-sodomy laws: states have the power to regulate sex
Paul's 2012 Republican Primary shenanigans
Only states had power to abolish slavery
No right to privacy, and even more. 2 posts
"US should declare bankruptcy"
Paul acknowledges and defends racist remarks
Ron Paul's ranking on "Secular Score Card."
Why the gold standard is a bad idea
more on State's Rights
Why defaulting would be a very bad thing

Wikkiwallana: if you think I've mis-summarized any of these, let me know.

Wikkiwallana wrote:Later; I only have 15 minutes before I start getting ready for my weekly D&D session.

Edit: typo

Farnhamia wrote:

Wikkiwallana wrote:I can't edit the post, the thread is locked, and has been for some time. They aren't links to every single mention of Paul, but to the good, detailed explanations of his policies, statements, and actions, and the explanations of why they are so atrocious.

Telesha took care of it ...

Wikkiwallana wrote:Later; I only have 15 minutes before I start getting ready for my weekly D&D session.

Edit: typo

Seperates wrote:Heh... so they're becoming more like democrats?

Brewdomia wrote:

Kohlastan wrote:what about FDR's fireside chats which helped calm Ameria's paniced bank runs, has a done something like that? not really . . . FDR is clearly the better president because of his Fireside Chats,which probly only compare to Carters apperances durring the oil crisis, and his New Deal, an overhal that only can be compared to TR's Square Deal.

Carter was a bad President. He really wasn't a liberal and didn't attempt any grand liberal legislation like Clinton or Obama, and combined with a string of bad luck, had a bumbling foreign policy.

Farnhamia wrote:

Wikkiwallana wrote:Later; I only have 15 minutes before I start getting ready for my weekly D&D session.

Edit: typo

Only you ...

Telesha wrote:

Des-Bal wrote:
Specifics on which each of those links goes to. You can't expect to throw that up every time someone says "Ron Paul" and have them sift through each individual post trying to figure out what specifically you were addressing.

Been meaning to sift through it all anyway:

One stop shop for all my "Paul is awful" needs:
Ron Paul is no Friend to Progressives
Racism, support of DOMA, PMCs, and against the Civil Rights Act
More racism, Paul "approved every line" of racist newsletters
even MORE racism: "95% of African American men in DC are semi-criminal or entirely criminal"
Still more racism from Paul
Paul's stances from the man himself: anti-aborton, privatize energy, end NHS
We The People Act
Paul on anti-sodomy laws: states have the power to regulate sex
Paul's 2012 Republican Primary shenanigans
Only states had power to abolish slavery
No right to privacy, and even more. 2 posts
"US should declare bankruptcy"
Paul acknowledges and defends racist remarks
Ron Paul's ranking on "Secular Score Card."
Why the gold standard is a bad idea
more on State's Rights
Why defaulting would be a very bad thing

Wikkiwallana: if you think I've mis-summarized any of these, let me know.

Seperates wrote:

Liriena wrote:
Finally.

Meh, I would be happy only if it was because there was a more liberal area of the Republican party splitting it, and not a stupidly conservative area...

Farnhamia wrote:

greed and death wrote:Even the regular Democrats drug things out. A few hecklers form a town hall meeting and it took the President to get them back on track.

Lyndon Johnson's ghost was probably howling, watching that spectacle of the President not being able to control his own party. Lyndon would have made a few phone calls, had a few meetings and people would have been lined up, ready to vote.

Bottle wrote:It's so adorable how the GOP continues to put up this front of Ron Paul being such a crazy maverick...and how so many "libertarians" fall for it.

Hint: Ron Paul is just New Coke.

Novairia wrote:(Image)

North California wrote:Libertarians should tell the GOP to go fuck itself and finally move to the Libertarian Party.

Onza wrote:

North California wrote:Libertarians should tell the GOP to go fuck itself and finally move to the Libertarian Party.

It seems that they are only interested in the GOP's size. They refuse to move to the Libertarian party because then they wouldn't get enough attention.

North California wrote:

Onza wrote:
It seems that they are only interested in the GOP's size. They refuse to move to the Libertarian party because then they wouldn't get enough attention.

Then the other option is to have people in the Libertarian Party infiltrate the GOP and drive the neoconservatives out.

North California wrote:

Onza wrote:
It seems that they are only interested in the GOP's size. They refuse to move to the Libertarian party because then they wouldn't get enough attention.

Then the other option is to have people in the Libertarian Party infiltrate the GOP and drive the neoconservatives out.

Caninope wrote:

North California wrote:
Then the other option is to have people in the Libertarian Party infiltrate the GOP and drive the neoconservatives out.

No. Neoconservatives can have rather good ideas, especially in moderation, and I'd like to have them around to balance out libertarians and paleoconservatives.

Onza wrote:

Caninope wrote:No. Neoconservatives can have rather good ideas, especially in moderation, and I'd like to have them around to balance out libertarians and paleoconservatives.

I just dislike conservative idea's altogether. I don't have a problem with the "I respect your beliefs" type, but whenever they condemn you for being liberal, that's the type I dislike.