Lyndon Johnson's ghost was probably howling, watching that spectacle of the President not being able to control his own party. Lyndon would have made a few phone calls, had a few meetings and people would have been lined up, ready to vote.
Advertisement
by Farnhamia » Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:13 am
by Noobubersland » Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:17 am
Gravlen wrote:Ah, republicans are turning into Croats...
by Ethel mermania » Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:24 am
Khadgar wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:While I don't know the infighting and rules,and whether romney's folks are right or wrong. unseating paul would make romney look more middle of the road to america. Giving him a more orderly convention, and better being able to show the party united behind him.
And who are the paul supporters going to vote for? Obama?
A refusal to vote for Romney is a de facto vote for Obama, at least in several states.
by Greed and Death » Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:25 am
Farnhamia wrote:greed and death wrote:Even the regular Democrats drug things out. A few hecklers form a town hall meeting and it took the President to get them back on track.
Lyndon Johnson's ghost was probably howling, watching that spectacle of the President not being able to control his own party. Lyndon would have made a few phone calls, had a few meetings and people would have been lined up, ready to vote.
by FranksFreedom » Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:25 am
by Ryanisking » Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:26 am
by TaQud » Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:26 am
Ryanisking wrote:i am republican and i wish i could be libertian and support johnson but ultimately if we do that we would be too weak to win do go rommeny
by Arkinesia » Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:27 am
Khadgar wrote:Good old Ron Paul, not content to simply be a failure, he has to drag down the rest of the Republican party with him.
Disappointment Panda wrote:Don't hope for a life without problems. There's no such thing. Instead, hope for a life full of good problems.
by Farnhamia » Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:28 am
greed and death wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Lyndon Johnson's ghost was probably howling, watching that spectacle of the President not being able to control his own party. Lyndon would have made a few phone calls, had a few meetings and people would have been lined up, ready to vote.
The difference between electing a junior Senator to the Presidency, and electing a former Senate majority leader who engineered his party retaking the majority in the Senate in the face of the ever popular IKE.
Don't take this the wrong way but it was likely a good thing Kennedy got shot, he never would have been able to pull off the types of results that LBJ did.
If not for Vietnam he would have likely been held higher than FDR in Democratic circles.
by FranksFreedom » Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:30 am
Khadgar wrote:Good old Ron Paul, not content to simply be a failure, he has to drag down the rest of the Republican party with him.
by Nationalist State of Knox » Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:30 am
TaQud wrote:who is this benefiting the most?
Ifreann wrote:Knox: /ˈɡɪl.ɡə.mɛʃ/
by Arkinesia » Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:31 am
greed and death wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Lyndon Johnson's ghost was probably howling, watching that spectacle of the President not being able to control his own party. Lyndon would have made a few phone calls, had a few meetings and people would have been lined up, ready to vote.
The difference between electing a junior Senator to the Presidency, and electing a former Senate majority leader who engineered his party retaking the majority in the Senate in the face of the ever popular IKE.
Don't take this the wrong way but it was likely a good thing Kennedy got shot, he never would have been able to pull off the types of results that LBJ did.
If not for Vietnam he would have likely been held higher than FDR in Democratic circles.
Disappointment Panda wrote:Don't hope for a life without problems. There's no such thing. Instead, hope for a life full of good problems.
by Kohlastan » Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:32 am
by Arkinesia » Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:32 am
Disappointment Panda wrote:Don't hope for a life without problems. There's no such thing. Instead, hope for a life full of good problems.
by Khadgar » Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:33 am
FranksFreedom wrote:Khadgar wrote:Good old Ron Paul, not content to simply be a failure, he has to drag down the rest of the Republican party with him.
Failure....good one, oh wait your weren't joking...https://twitter.com/#!/search/?q=%23ronpaul2012
by Farnhamia » Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:34 am
by Kohlastan » Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:35 am
Silent Majority wrote:I'm not really sure it would benefit the more libertarian republicans to split off from the party, I don't think there are enough of them that a third party would gain much if any electoral success. Currently they benefit from the resources, and media attention brought from being associated with a major party, and both those would disappear if there were a split.
by Silent Majority » Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:35 am
Khadgar wrote:FranksFreedom wrote:
Failure....good one, oh wait your weren't joking...https://twitter.com/#!/search/?q=%23ronpaul2012
The existence of astroturf paulbots is not evidence of success. It is evidence of a competent script writer. Here's what Ronulans can never ever answer. If Ron Paul is so motherfucking popular, why don't people vote for him?
by Khadgar » Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:36 am
Silent Majority wrote:Khadgar wrote:
The existence of astroturf paulbots is not evidence of success. It is evidence of a competent script writer. Here's what Ronulans can never ever answer. If Ron Paul is so motherfucking popular, why don't people vote for him?
They get sent to FEMA death camps before they can vote.
by Farnhamia » Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:38 am
by Nationstatelandsville » Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:38 am
by Silent Majority » Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:38 am
by Kohlastan » Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:43 am
by Greed and Death » Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:43 am
Farnhamia wrote:greed and death wrote:The difference between electing a junior Senator to the Presidency, and electing a former Senate majority leader who engineered his party retaking the majority in the Senate in the face of the ever popular IKE.
Don't take this the wrong way but it was likely a good thing Kennedy got shot, he never would have been able to pull off the types of results that LBJ did.
If not for Vietnam he would have likely been held higher than FDR in Democratic circles.
I know what you mean about Kennedy and I agree. And yeah, that is the difference.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: 0rganization, Bombadil, Eurocom, ImSaLiA, Likhinia, New Temecula, Spirit of Hope, Tungstan
Advertisement