Oh, I see. Carry on, then.
Advertisement
by Yandere Schoolgirls » Mon Aug 06, 2012 3:19 am
Novairia wrote:Yandere Schoolgirls wrote:Another great day for NASA, and a bad day for the taxpayer. How long will we let NASA waste our precious tax dollars that could be spent elsewhere in the economy? Abolishing NASA would lower taxes allowing us to purchase things that we actually need. Landing on Mars presents no more of a scientific significance than landing in the desert, albeit at least in the desert there are actual lifeforms and occurrences we could learn about, not just red rocks and sand. NASA is a waste of money, and should be abolished immediately.
You sir are not a very bright person indeed.. Was science to hard a subject in the 7th grade?
Spent elsewhere in the economy..
Like GM / Bank bailouts?
Tossing trillions of dollars of debt laden stimulus funding into locations where it was not needed?
Or maybe you would like to divert more funding into helping the work capable welfare leeches buy more drugs and booze?
Funding into Education / Science R&D / Military / Health (NASA and affiliates fall into all of those catagories) has always proven to provide larger return for every $ spent.
And you would place it where it either hampers economic growth or returns a much lower % return to the people and Gov?
Please, find a cliff and think for once.
Now im going to bed so I can get up and have an early start at work, make some hours, pay my taxes to help society, and continue living my awesome life.
NMaa949 wrote:If corporations head space exploration, and end up administrating the population of some moon, or even a space station, that's rather fascist, as per the aforesaid definition.
Remember, If corporations head the government - that's fascist. If corporations are the government, that's definitely fascist.
If, for example, the people of a moon or a space station, or perhaps even a ship, have to go to a corporation rather than a government, that's fascist. Try again. I think you're getting closer.
Okay try this. If, to become an astronaut, you have to go to a corporation rather than a government, that's fascist.
by NMaa949 » Mon Aug 06, 2012 3:22 am
Yandere Schoolgirls wrote:Sigh, so basically by your own argument assumes all corporations become fascist entities-or that private space corporations will. Do you realize how ridiculous that sounds or are you just saving face? That's like calling Microsoft fascist, or A&T fascist. In retrospect it doesn't matter, because the real problem aren't the corporations it's the government.
Distruzio wrote:The Soviet Union? Nazi Germany? Fascist Italy? Each authoritarian democracies and each thoroughly tyrannical.
Bralia wrote:Exploring demands risk. Exploration may not reveal something useful. And yet we still do it. Because something could be found that could revolutionize the world. Yandere, if you don't want to stick even your nose out the front door, that's your own business, but don't try and drag the rest of the world along with you.
by Yandere Schoolgirls » Mon Aug 06, 2012 3:29 am
NMaa949 wrote:Yandere Schoolgirls wrote:Sigh, so basically by your own argument assumes all corporations become fascist entities-or that private space corporations will. Do you realize how ridiculous that sounds or are you just saving face? That's like calling Microsoft fascist, or A&T fascist. In retrospect it doesn't matter, because the real problem aren't the corporations it's the government.
Not only are corporations dictatorships, they are run by business interests. They are, in short, fascist.
by NMaa949 » Mon Aug 06, 2012 3:35 am
Distruzio wrote:The Soviet Union? Nazi Germany? Fascist Italy? Each authoritarian democracies and each thoroughly tyrannical.
Bralia wrote:Exploring demands risk. Exploration may not reveal something useful. And yet we still do it. Because something could be found that could revolutionize the world. Yandere, if you don't want to stick even your nose out the front door, that's your own business, but don't try and drag the rest of the world along with you.
by Miss Defied » Mon Aug 06, 2012 5:50 am
Ailiailia wrote:I've only read the first two pages, but I'm seeing a lot of posters who seem to think this is the first landing on Mars, or the first rover on Mars.
True enough that Mars landings have an eerily bad record for successful deployment, but this isn't the first to succeed. That would be Viking 1 in 1975.
First "landing" was a Soviet rover mission Mars 2, which crashed in November 1971. Mars 3 in the same year did land but died seconds later. Those were the first attempted rovers (though they were designed to walk no further than 15 meters from the lander). The first successful rover was Sojourner in 1997.
Hrmph. Just so you kids don't think you're doing anything really new.
by Volnotova » Mon Aug 06, 2012 6:15 am
by Mavorpen » Mon Aug 06, 2012 7:47 am
Yandere Schoolgirls wrote:Typhlochactas wrote:
Show me evidence that NASA is a major factor in the national debt. Money doesn't go nowhere. The money goes on buying things for their projects and hiring employees. Silicon Valley loves NASA for this reason.
It's well known that NASA is running up a deficit that continuously grows, look it up yourself. Also, it doesn't have to take up a major portion of debt, that doesn't matter. What matters is that it's an ultimately unsustainable venture, and space travel could be better handled be the private sector.
Yeah, and those things that they buy shoot up demand and increase consumer prices higher than they would have been had they been left alone making harder for poorer people to afford things.
by The House of Petain » Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:42 am
by Farnhamia » Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:43 am
Mavorpen wrote:Yandere Schoolgirls wrote:
It's well known that NASA is running up a deficit that continuously grows, look it up yourself. Also, it doesn't have to take up a major portion of debt, that doesn't matter. What matters is that it's an ultimately unsustainable venture, and space travel could be better handled be the private sector.
Yeah, and those things that they buy shoot up demand and increase consumer prices higher than they would have been had they been left alone making harder for poorer people to afford things.
How cute, you think you know about science.
by Unita Teccon Olympia Enclave » Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:50 am
by Hittanryan » Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:51 am
by Farnhamia » Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:54 am
Karcha wrote:Deploying flares!
by Ifreann » Mon Aug 06, 2012 8:57 am
Hittanryan wrote:OK, ignoring the partisan bullshit in the thread so far, what say we appreciate this engineering feat for what it is, hmm?
by Sentinel XV » Mon Aug 06, 2012 9:46 am
Maurepas wrote:Next stop, Machine Cult of Mars!
‹ all genius is a conquering of chaos and mystery ›
by Nationstatelandsville » Mon Aug 06, 2012 9:50 am
by The Lone Alliance » Mon Aug 06, 2012 10:24 am
by Nationstatelandsville » Mon Aug 06, 2012 10:28 am
The Lone Alliance wrote:This is a glorious advancement for humanity. I'm glad it worked out, considering we still have one of the other two rover's functioning that brings us back to two I think.
All brought to you by something called government.
So Libertarians? Where is your probe to mars?
Oh wait it's not profitable and therefore it doesn't matter.
Suck it "Private Sector does it better" crowd.
by Occupied Deutschland » Mon Aug 06, 2012 10:33 am
The Lone Alliance wrote:This is a glorious advancement for humanity. I'm glad it worked out, considering we still have one of the other two rover's functioning that brings us back to two I think.
All brought to you by something called government.
So Libertarians? Where is your probe to mars?
Oh wait it's not profitable and therefore it doesn't matter.
Suck it "Private Sector does it better" crowd.
Everyone just ignore Yandere Schoolgirls, he\she just Jealous that nothing he\she can think of could beat what happened, hell he\she is actually stupid enough to believe that austerity works!
by The Lone Alliance » Mon Aug 06, 2012 10:40 am
Sorry, I'm happy but these comments saying "We should dissolve NASA" piss me off, and Occupied you obviously didn't read the entire thread.Nationstatelandsville wrote:Oh, Jesus Christ, can we just be happy? We just shot a piece of metal a nearly unfathomable distance into space and it landed on a distant world to teach us about it. Isn't that fantastic enough without it having to prove a point?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Diarcesia, El Lazaro, Grandocantorica, Hidrandia, Niolia, Pale Dawn, Pasong Tirad, Port Carverton, Shrillland, Soviet Haaregrad, The Two Jerseys, The Vooperian Union, Yasuragi
Advertisement