Advertisement

by Audacious Huxley » Wed Aug 08, 2012 1:07 am

by Kalaspia-Shimarata » Wed Aug 08, 2012 1:14 am

by Lessnt » Wed Aug 08, 2012 1:51 am
Kalaspia-Shimarata wrote:Who cares? Since Iran was Persia and Persia used to attack Greece
Why do America have the right to nukes but Iran don't? Piss off you hypocrites and let the Persians do what they want!

by Pribram » Wed Aug 08, 2012 2:00 am

by Kalaspia-Shimarata » Wed Aug 08, 2012 2:02 am

by Partially Blind People » Wed Aug 08, 2012 2:04 am
Vulkanas wrote:And so, after many months of fighting, squabbling, and not doing much else, nothing was accomplished.
THE END

by Chinamerica » Wed Aug 08, 2012 2:12 am

by Lessnt » Wed Aug 08, 2012 2:17 am
Chinamerica wrote:How the hell could anyone think this? Are you insane? Iran is a terrible regime that have made countless human rights violations; Israel is the only true democracy in the Middle East. Who cares if they 'don't treat Palestinians very well'? Palestine are the agressors, not Israel!
If Iran gets a nuclear weapon, there will be war, doesn't matter if Obama or Romney or damn Mickey Mouse is elected.

by Costa Fiero » Wed Aug 08, 2012 2:18 am
Chinamerica wrote:Israel is the only true democracy in the Middle East.

by Partially Blind People » Wed Aug 08, 2012 2:20 am
Vulkanas wrote:And so, after many months of fighting, squabbling, and not doing much else, nothing was accomplished.
THE END

by Pribram » Wed Aug 08, 2012 2:44 am

by Myrensis » Wed Aug 08, 2012 8:53 am
Chinamerica wrote:How the hell could anyone think this? Are you insane? Iran is a terrible regime that have made countless human rights violations; Israel is the only true democracy in the Middle East. Who cares if they 'don't treat Palestinians very well'? Palestine are the agressors, not Israel!

by Of the Free Socialist Territories » Wed Aug 08, 2012 8:55 am
Lessnt wrote:Chinamerica wrote:How the hell could anyone think this? Are you insane? Iran is a terrible regime that have made countless human rights violations; Israel is the only true democracy in the Middle East. Who cares if they 'don't treat Palestinians very well'? Palestine are the agressors, not Israel!
If Iran gets a nuclear weapon, there will be war, doesn't matter if Obama or Romney or damn Mickey Mouse is elected.
We should an elect a Cow to office.
The arabs would have to respect our leader then.


by EnragedMaldivians » Wed Aug 08, 2012 9:27 am
Lessnt wrote:Chinamerica wrote:How the hell could anyone think this? Are you insane? Iran is a terrible regime that have made countless human rights violations; Israel is the only true democracy in the Middle East. Who cares if they 'don't treat Palestinians very well'? Palestine are the agressors, not Israel!
If Iran gets a nuclear weapon, there will be war, doesn't matter if Obama or Romney or damn Mickey Mouse is elected.
We should an elect a Cow to office.
The arabs would have to respect our leader then.

by Farnhamia » Wed Aug 08, 2012 9:29 am

by Ralkovia » Wed Aug 08, 2012 10:17 am
Kalaspia-Shimarata wrote:Who cares? Since Iran was Persia and Persia used to attack Greece
Why do America have the right to nukes but Iran don't? Piss off you hypocrites and let the Persians do what they want!
Kirav wrote:This is NationStates. Our Jews live in Ralkovia.
Maudlnya wrote:You guys talking about Ralkovia?
*mutters something about scariness up to 11*
Releign wrote:Leningrad Union: Help me against Ralkovia
That's a Jew octopus with a machine gun.
I think I will pass.

by The-_Sicarii » Wed Aug 08, 2012 10:19 am
Corporate Councils wrote:The-_Sicarii wrote:1. Ahmadinejad is sort of in charge.
2. Refer to 1.
3. US sends nucs to Israel, Israel modifies them and sends them back. This is relevant because without them, the US would be much less capable of remaining a nuclear power given how much we suck in the STEM fields. And, of course, superior tech is key to success in any given area. Russia's 10,000 nucs actually reinforce my argument.
Next, you're arguments don't assume that Russia and China want a world absent US hegemony.
Also, Iran's pressure on Saudi Arabia drives up oil prices. High oil prices are vital to Russia's economy.
Now, on Ancient Greece: the Peloponnesian War led to the collapse of the economies of most of the Greek city-states. This in turn caused Macedon to take advantage of their weakness and take over.
1. Sort of in charge? No, Khamenei is the absolute ruler of Iran, he calls the shots. Ahmadinejad is his subordinate, period.
2. Refuted
3. Do you have any proof that the US is dependent on a foreign country to maintain our nuclear arsenal? Also, though we lag in the STEM areas, we are still more-or-less the world leader in developing technology. I'm pretty sure our $500 military budget has some money set aside for keeping our nukes in working order.
4. Russia and China would prefer to see a world less dominated by the US, but they're not about to launch a nuclear war against us over Iran in order to do so. They're both well aware of the concept of MAD and have not yet built their secret moon bases to escape such consequences. Also, the relationship between Iran and its patrons might not be as strong as you think given that both China and Russia are highly repressive towards Muslims within their own borders and put down any talk of Islamic revolution with a heavy hand.
5. High oil prices are also good for Russia's economy, but I don't see Iran restricting the flow of oil from the Straight of Hormuz (where their own oil flows through) which would cripple their oil-export based economy in order to help the "Lesser Satan".
6. Athens had actually recovered her fleet, economy, government, and most of her empire within a decade of losing to Sparta. Sparta's own economy was the strongest it had ever been as a result of its hegemony and the Boetians reached a high point in their power. The reason that the Macedonians were able to annex their Greek cousins is because Phillip II had done a better job at unifying his people than Demosthenes. Might I suggest Donald Kagan's book on the topic if you'd like to learn more?
If you would recall your original argument was:The-_Sicarii wrote:Then, economy collapse empirically leads to war.
Quite the opposite of what you just claimed.

by The-_Sicarii » Wed Aug 08, 2012 10:26 am
Kalaspia-Shimarata wrote:Who cares? Since Iran was Persia and Persia used to attack Greece
Why do America have the right to nukes but Iran don't? Piss off you hypocrites and let the Persians do what they want!

by The-_Sicarii » Wed Aug 08, 2012 10:33 am
Lessnt wrote:Luckily saudi is bypassing the strait.
They just need to build more pipes.
Partially Blind People wrote:Why not Janeron? Islamic civilisations tend to be far more understanding of people than those formed on Christianity in the west. If it wasn't for all of the Western intervention there has been over the years and the resentment it has caused towards the west, Iran would be one of the most trustworthy countries with the nuke.
Besides they don't have the tech to launch it yet anyway.

by Socialist EU » Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:03 am
The-_Sicarii wrote:Lessnt wrote:Luckily saudi is bypassing the strait.
They just need to build more pipes.
If that were happening, the US would not be so worried about Iran blocking the Strait.Partially Blind People wrote:Why not Janeron? Islamic civilisations tend to be far more understanding of people than those formed on Christianity in the west. If it wasn't for all of the Western intervention there has been over the years and the resentment it has caused towards the west, Iran would be one of the most trustworthy countries with the nuke.
Besides they don't have the tech to launch it yet anyway.
Iran has one of the most advanced militaries in the region. Delivering a nuclear weapon would be easy; making the weapon is the part they're working on.
Turkey is an [authoritarian] democracy

by SD_Film Artists » Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:21 am
Socialist EU wrote:*Telegram on sanctions against Iran*

by Socialist EU » Wed Aug 08, 2012 11:52 am
SD_Film Artists wrote:Socialist EU wrote:*Telegram on sanctions against Iran*
What would be a better solution other than an ineffective "working class revolution"? Iran can't continue in how it's behaving, but a military intervention is disproportional and will likely only make things worse. Sanctions punish the nation without creating more war. Iran can lift the sanctions anytime it wants to by complying with the international community.

by Myrensis » Wed Aug 08, 2012 12:37 pm
The-_Sicarii wrote:1. He is the head of the Supreme National Security Council, which controls the nuclear policy and actions of Iran.
2. refer to 1.
3. Our MILITARY SPENDING is not the same as our SCIENTIFIC ABILITY. Israel has people who are better at developing nucs than the people the US has, so the US has Israel modify the nucs.
4. On MAD- once a nuc is launched, all bets are off. MAD is not relevant once there is already a chance of the AD part happening.
5. Iran never has and never will stop THEIR OWN oil exports. You seem to have missed that I'm talking about SAUDI ARABIA's oil exports. And they're helping this "Lesser Satan" already. In addition, Iran does not trade off with Russia nearly as much as Saudi Arabia, so Russia is OK with this scenario. Russia needs high oil prices because oil is CENTRAL TO THEIR ECONOMY.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Fractalnavel, Loddhist Communist Experiment, Oceasia, Picairn
Advertisement