Incest: Elephant or Open Door?

[Raeyh]

Literally? Like if you went to the Chrysler building in New York, there would be a huge disembodied brain?

Corporations have brains.

Where? Where are these corporate brains?

[Baftrick]

So siblings aren't allowed to procreate because of an increased risk of passing down recessive genetic diseases. Then why not ban people with said genetic diseases from reproducing, too? The risk is far greater for them, so it would make much more sense. Why do we let people with Down syndrome have children? If you want to ban incest for this reason, you absolutely have to ban the other, or else you're just a hypocrite.

No, siblings shouldn't be able to reproduce with one another because they're siblings.

Well, at least you're consistent. Bigoted, moralistic, and self-righteous, but consistent. Props, I guess.

[NMaa949]

No, siblings shouldn't be able to reproduce with one another because they're siblings.

Do you understand how reproduction works?

[Genivaria]

Wincest.

[Huskvarneque]

Incest should remain locked up and be tossed into a ravine.

Same feel here too.. though you may want to shoot it a few times, have it checked by a doctor to be clinicly dead, then incinerate it, have its ashes mixed with diesel, re-incinerated it, take its new ashes and mix with concrete, pour ashcrete into the lock box, lock said box, haul it into a ravine, dig 20 foot deep by 20 foot diameter hole, concrete 4 feet of of hole bottom, wait for it to set, wrap lock box with celophane and duct tape, place box in hole, fill 10 feet of hole with concrete, wait for it to set, cover remaining 6 feet of hole with clay and top soil.

THEN nuke the area with a 500kt salted fission bomb, airbursted at 200 feet, causing the area to be a no enter zone for a few hundred years. That way they will never ever find the Incest again.

Sounds like what I want to do to humanity... *cough**cough*

But no, seriously, whatever, if two people who are related want to get intimate, who are us other people to tell them yes or no? Eww.... people getting involved in other peoples business... d:

[Luziyca]

So siblings aren't allowed to procreate because of an increased risk of passing down recessive genetic diseases. Then why not ban people with said genetic diseases from reproducing, too? The risk is far greater for them, so it would make much more sense. Why do we let people with Down syndrome have children? If you want to ban incest for this reason, you absolutely have to ban the other, or else you're just a hypocrite.

No, siblings shouldn't be able to reproduce with one another because they're siblings.

Suppose in a household, you have a nuclear family, two parents, and twins: one boy, one girl (or as I'll refer from hereon forward, XY and XX). XY and XX want to have sex, but the parents say they can only have sex TOGETHER. So, they head down to the family cabin, and get druunk. 40 weeks later, XX gives birth to a child.

Both XX and XY are proud, and the parents allow them to have sex with however the hell they like.

[NMaa949]

Wincest.

Wincest.

[The Crimson Realm]

Again, people need mental help if they're 'consenting' to having sexual relations with their brother, mother, or whatever... I really am not even going to play as if I'm accepting to this. It's illegal, not because it's 'frowned upon', but simply because some things are wrong.

Your perception of what is wrong does not seem to be very good.
Tell me how in a free society if two consenting persons engage in the act of incest it is immoral.

Well, two people can consent all they want and have all the sex they want in private... As long as they aren't brother/sister/dad/mother/etc. And your opinion on my 'perception of wrong' can go along with incest into a ravine. I refuse to be plagued by such... Idk what to call this now... Grotesqueness (?), why is this thread not closed yet -.-

[NMaa949]

Where? Where are these corporate brains?

They are in the upper part of the organs mistakenly refered to as people or humans.

[Genivaria]

Your perception of what is wrong does not seem to be very good.
Tell me how in a free society if two consenting persons engage in the act of incest it is immoral.

Well, two people can consent all they want and have all the sex they want in private... As long as they aren't brother/sister/dad/mother/etc. And your opinion on my 'perception of wrong' can go along with incest into a ravine. I refuse to be plagued by such... Idk what to call this now... Grotesqueness (?), why is this thread not closed yet -.-

"Omg its so gross ewwww stop talking about it! Censor!Censor!Censor!"

[The Crimson Realm]

No, siblings shouldn't be able to reproduce with one another because they're siblings.

Suppose in a household, you have a nuclear family, two parents, and twins: one boy, one girl (or as I'll refer from hereon forward, XY and XX). XY and XX want to have sex, but the parents say they can only have sex TOGETHER. So, they head down to the family cabin, and get druunk. 40 weeks later, XX gives birth to a child.

Both XX and XY are proud, and the parents allow them to have sex with however the hell they like.

Um, then the twins should be punished according to their crimes. Incest is a crime. Point blank. And it should stay that way forever and ever and ever

[Baftrick]

Your perception of what is wrong does not seem to be very good.
Tell me how in a free society if two consenting persons engage in the act of incest it is immoral.

Well, two people can consent all they want and have all the sex they want in private... As long as they aren't brother/sister/dad/mother/etc. And your opinion on my 'perception of wrong' can go along with incest into a ravine. I refuse to be plagued by such... Idk what to call this now... Grotesqueness (?), why is this thread not closed yet -.-

Maybe because the mods aren't nearly as closed-minded as you are. Controversial opinions aren't against the rules. Moreover, grotesqueness? A hundred years ago, people would say the same about interracial couplings. Your views are, like then, a product of a common yet bigoted mindset.

[Luziyca]

Your perception of what is wrong does not seem to be very good.
Tell me how in a free society if two consenting persons engage in the act of incest it is immoral.

Well, two people can consent all they want and have all the sex they want in private... As long as they aren't brother/sister/dad/mother/etc. And your opinion on my 'perception of wrong' can go along with incest into a ravine. I refuse to be plagued by such... Idk what to call this now... Grotesqueness (?), why is this thread not closed yet -.-

The reason why the thread is not closed yet is because it is like an abortion thread; annoying and inconclusive, but good to bring up (even more rarely THAN abortion).

[NMaa949]

As long as they aren't brother/sister/dad/mother/etc.

What about wincest?

[Page]

Your perception of what is wrong does not seem to be very good.
Tell me how in a free society if two consenting persons engage in the act of incest it is immoral.

Well, two people can consent all they want and have all the sex they want in private... As long as they aren't brother/sister/dad/mother/etc. And your opinion on my 'perception of wrong' can go along with incest into a ravine. I refuse to be plagued by such... Idk what to call this now... Grotesqueness (?), why is this thread not closed yet -.-

Cause all the puns and jokes haven't been made yet.

[Raeyh]

Well, two people can consent all they want and have all the sex they want in private... As long as they aren't brother/sister/dad/mother/etc. And your opinion on my 'perception of wrong' can go along with incest into a ravine. I refuse to be plagued by such... Idk what to call this now... Grotesqueness (?), why is this thread not closed yet -.-

Maybe because the mods aren't nearly as closed-minded as you are. Controversial opinions aren't against the rules. Moreover, grotesqueness? A hundred years ago, people would say the same about interracial couplings. Your views are, like then, a product of a common yet bigoted mindset.

Interracial couplings leads to healthy children. Incest does not.

[Luziyca]

Suppose in a household, you have a nuclear family, two parents, and twins: one boy, one girl (or as I'll refer from hereon forward, XY and XX). XY and XX want to have sex, but the parents say they can only have sex TOGETHER. So, they head down to the family cabin, and get druunk. 40 weeks later, XX gives birth to a child.

Both XX and XY are proud, and the parents allow them to have sex with however the hell they like.

Um, then the twins should be punished according to their crimes. Incest is a crime. Point blank. And it should stay that way forever and ever and ever

Until incest is legal, in which case you vote for someone who wants it banned, but because it is a minority, incest will be legalized. The more closed minded a society is, the more likely it'll tumble down the slope that South Africa did back in '48 and never escaped 'til '94.

[Mavorpen]

No, seriously... Wtf am I even seeing right now? Who in their right mind advocates incest in any way or even contemplates allowing it? What sort of stuff have I stumbled into... It's quite disturbing, seeing the minds of people opened on the internet.

Ah, an ignorant comment. I expected nothing less.

[The Crimson Realm]

Well, two people can consent all they want and have all the sex they want in private... As long as they aren't brother/sister/dad/mother/etc. And your opinion on my 'perception of wrong' can go along with incest into a ravine. I refuse to be plagued by such... Idk what to call this now... Grotesqueness (?), why is this thread not closed yet -.-

Maybe because the mods aren't nearly as closed-minded as you are. Controversial opinions aren't against the rules. Moreover, grotesqueness? A hundred years ago, people would say the same about interracial couplings. Your views are, like then, a product of a common yet bigoted mindset.

Again, if believing incest is horrible is bigoted, then I'll be a bigoted mofo all-day everyday. See, if you want to go screw your brother, be my guest, but I hope your ass gets the penalty (whatever penalty that may be) for doing it. On that note, what is the legal penalty for incest?

[NMaa949]

Interracial couplings leads to healthy children. Incest does not.

I'll have you know a lot of people are unhealthy.

[Mavorpen]

Interracial couplings leads to healthy children. Incest does not.

Hence why you don't... wait for it... reproduce!

[Genivaria]

Maybe because the mods aren't nearly as closed-minded as you are. Controversial opinions aren't against the rules. Moreover, grotesqueness? A hundred years ago, people would say the same about interracial couplings. Your views are, like then, a product of a common yet bigoted mindset.

Again, if believing incest is horrible is bigoted, then I'll be a bigoted mofo all-day everyday. See, if you want to go screw your brother, be my guest, but I hope your ass gets the penalty (whatever penalty that may be) for doing it. On that note, what is the legal penalty for incest?

Why?

[Moving Forward Inc]

Your perception of what is wrong does not seem to be very good.
Tell me how in a free society if two consenting persons engage in the act of incest it is immoral.

Well, two people can consent all they want and have all the sex they want in private... As long as they aren't brother/sister/dad/mother/etc. And your opinion on my 'perception of wrong' can go along with incest into a ravine. I refuse to be plagued by such... Idk what to call this now... Grotesqueness (?), why is this thread not closed yet -.-

I don't care how grotesque you think it is, there are thousands of legal things that are much more disgusting.
What I am concerned about is that you have no moral argument.
The way I see morals all persons should be guaranteed maximum freedom, and where freedoms are contradictory (Example: Murder will take away someones freedom to live their lives how they see fit as they would be dead) you place rights, and the offenders of these rights are prosecuted.

If two consenting persons, who are related, have consensual sex, then how does it infringe on the freedoms of others?

[Dracoria]

Well, two people can consent all they want and have all the sex they want in private... As long as they aren't brother/sister/dad/mother/etc. And your opinion on my 'perception of wrong' can go along with incest into a ravine. I refuse to be plagued by such... Idk what to call this now... Grotesqueness (?), why is this thread not closed yet -.-

The reason why the thread is not closed yet is because it is like an abortion thread; annoying and inconclusive, but good to bring up (even more rarely THAN abortion).

Seems like, among other things, it's bringint up plenty of bile.

In a most amusing way!

[Genivaria]

Interracial couplings leads to healthy children. Incest does not.

Hence why you don't... wait for it... reproduce!

Hey Mav, are you still a woman?