Imota wrote:If all of America's political parties were to disappear tomorrow, we'd have a billion new ones on Tuesday, and by the end of the week they'd coalesce into two big ones.
I would agree; the presence of only two major political parties that agree on half of the things and engage in positively vitriolic mudslinging over the other half is really a symptom of an underlying series of issues. Namely, if we want to see a range of political parties and a distribution of influence among such parties that more accurately reflects the diversity of views among the American people, we would need to change two things:
1) We need to repudiate (or the Supreme Court needs to overturn) Citizens United; letting unlimited cash flow into elections at every level of government breeds a degree of polarization and corruption that is unhealthy for this nation.
2) We need to shake up the way we elect federal officials. The president would need to be elected directly by the people, and both the President and members of the House of Representatives would need to be elected via IRV (instant runoff voting), while the number of Senators per state would double or triple (preferably triple) and Senators would need to be elected via STV (the single transferable vote).