NATION

PASSWORD

Why "Planned Parenthood" is wrong.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Blakk Metal
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6737
Founded: Jun 07, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Blakk Metal » Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:51 am

Parchelon wrote:
Blakk Metal wrote:But abortion is self-defense. :palm:

You aren't giving the fetus a higher status. You are enacting totalitarianism.


1. But self defence is viable only if the attacker is a criminal or a belligerent in a conflict, if that person is actually attacking you and if there is no other option but to kill. In the case of abortion none of these are true: the 'attacker' is not a moral agent and is incapable of the mens rea (guilty mind) necessary to commit a crime, they aren't deliberately attacking the mother but are rather simply trying to exist in the only way possible for them, and there are options other than killing to resolve the 'violation' of the mother's rights.

You seem to think that self-defense is justice. It ain't.
2. How the heck is trying to safeguard both human's rights in this case totalitarianism?

You seem to have fallen into a common trap: Believing that life itself is a right. It is not. That is an illusion and is merely a result of bodily possession.
Parchelon wrote:2. Yes but if a rock falls on someone you hardly would declare it anything other than innocent in the injury since it cannot chose to fall. Thus the unborn are just as innocent of the violation of their mother's rights because they simply cannot chose to do anything in the situation.

SELF DEFENSE IS NOT JUSTICE. GET THAT ITG BULLSHIT OUT OF YOUR HEAD.
The Equine Dominion wrote:
Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:Can you find me the verse in the Bible where God says "Thou shalt not use contraception"?


"Judah said to Onan, "Lie with your brother's wife and fulfill your duty to her as a brother-in-law to produce offspring for your brother."But Onan knew that the offspring would not be his; so whenever he lay with his brother's wife, he spilled his semen on the ground to keep from producing offspring for his brother.What he did was wicked in the lord's sight."

As for masturbation, I already said that you are the same sex as yourself. To achieve orgasm at your own hands shows at least some level of auto eroticism, which is homosexual.

:palm:

User avatar
Grinning Dragon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10403
Founded: May 16, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Grinning Dragon » Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:51 am

The Equine Dominion wrote:
Wamitoria wrote:wut


You are the same gender as yourself. Therefore, auto eroticism is homosexual.

/Sigh I don't even, ugh, WTF??!??!
Do wet dreams fall into this category?

User avatar
Of the Free Socialist Territories
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8370
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Of the Free Socialist Territories » Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:52 am

Parchelon wrote:
The Realm of God wrote:
Your denying peoples right to bodily sovereignty.


No i am trying to point out that there needs to be a balance between the mother and unborn child's rights.


And by removing the right from the mother to have an abortion, you're completely removing any rights of hers around the issue of choice, so that plainly isn't a balance.
Don't be deceived when our Revolution has finally been stamped out and they tell you things are better now even if there's no poverty to see, because the poverty's been hidden...even if you ever got more wages and could afford to buy more of these new and useless goods which these new industries foist on you, and even if it seems to you that "you never had so much" - that is only the slogan of those who have much more than you.

Marat, "Marat/Sade"

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159117
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:52 am

Tekania wrote:
Farnhamia wrote: :lol:
:eyebrow:
No.


Ohhh, then this bears as interesting line of thought then in consequence..... that would mean since a transexual's mental and physical genders aren't the same, then masturbation would be okay in that case.

What if you wore a glove? Would that make you glovesexual?

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111683
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:52 am

Tekania wrote:
Farnhamia wrote: :lol:
:eyebrow:
No.


Ohhh, then this bears as interesting line of thought then in consequence..... that would mean since a transexual's mental and physical genders aren't the same, then masturbation would be okay in that case.

Good point. I always remember what Woody Allen said, "Don't knock masturbation. It's sex with someone I care about very deeply."
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Of the Free Socialist Territories
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8370
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Of the Free Socialist Territories » Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:53 am

Ifreann wrote:
Tekania wrote:
Ohhh, then this bears as interesting line of thought then in consequence..... that would mean since a transexual's mental and physical genders aren't the same, then masturbation would be okay in that case.

What if you wore a glove? Would that make you glovesexual?


*considers bringing sandpaper into the debate*

*thinks better of it*
Don't be deceived when our Revolution has finally been stamped out and they tell you things are better now even if there's no poverty to see, because the poverty's been hidden...even if you ever got more wages and could afford to buy more of these new and useless goods which these new industries foist on you, and even if it seems to you that "you never had so much" - that is only the slogan of those who have much more than you.

Marat, "Marat/Sade"

User avatar
The Equine Dominion
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 60
Founded: Apr 13, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Equine Dominion » Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:54 am

The Realm of God wrote:
The Equine Dominion wrote:
You are the same gender as yourself. Therefore, auto eroticism is homosexual.


Read and be enlightened.

The Vatican follows the line of the philosopher Plato. Plato said that matter was evil and that the mind, the spirit and The Good are good. Masterbation is a sin because it uses the mind, which is good to please the matter which is evil. Thus it's ignoring Jesus' teaching that minds must be pure and you must not sin even in your mind.

"For he who looks lustfully at a women has commited adultary against her,"

It's not the masterbation, it's the images in your head that are sinful.


Indeed the images in your head are sinful. But it is still sinful to masturbate, because it is homosexual.

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
The American Medical Dictionary wrote:Medical Dictionary
homosexuality ho·mo·sex·u·al·i·ty (hō'mə-sěk'sh&oomacr;-āl'ĭ-tē, -mō-)
n.

Sexual orientation to persons of the same sex.

Sexual activity with another of the same sex.


Sexual orientation to yourself is autoeroticism, which is introverted eroticism. Sexual orientation to others of the same gender is homosexuality, which is extroverted eroticism. It's not quantum physics.


Your dictionary is faulty. Homosexuality is attraction to people of your own sex. You are of your own sex. There is no distinction (or if there is, it is arbitrary) between extroverted and introverted sexuality.
I RP with a much higher population than my nation's actual population. Assumption otherwise will be punished wth death by chocolate. You have been warned.
THE EQUINE DOMINION - PUTTING THE FIRE AND BRIMSTONE BACK INTO CHRISTIANITY

User avatar
Northern Dominus
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14337
Founded: Aug 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Northern Dominus » Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:54 am

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
Ifreann wrote:What if you wore a glove? Would that make you glovesexual?


*considers bringing sandpaper into the debate*

*thinks better of it*
...that seems well beyond BDSM norms.
Battletech RP: Giant walking war machines, space to surface fighters, and other implements blowing things up= lots of fun! Sign up here
We even have a soundtrack!

RIP Caroll Shelby 1923-2012
Aurora, Oak Creek, Happy Valley, Sandy Hook. Just how high a price are we willing to pay?

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159117
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:55 am

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
Ifreann wrote:What if you wore a glove? Would that make you glovesexual?


*considers bringing sandpaper into the debate*

*thinks better of it*

There is the issue of other, more traditional....implements, too.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:55 am

The Equine Dominion wrote:
Your dictionary is faulty. Homosexuality is attraction to people of your own sex. You are of your own sex. There is no distinction (or if there is, it is arbitrary) between extroverted and introverted sexuality.


So, you don't like facts.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Tekania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21669
Founded: May 26, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tekania » Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:55 am

Ifreann wrote:
Tekania wrote:
Ohhh, then this bears as interesting line of thought then in consequence..... that would mean since a transexual's mental and physical genders aren't the same, then masturbation would be okay in that case.

What if you wore a glove? Would that make you glovesexual?


That would be practicing safe sex. unless it is sparkly and white in and make hoot noises, in which case you're Jacksoning-off.
Such heroic nonsense!

User avatar
Parchelon
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 194
Founded: Jul 28, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Parchelon » Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:56 am

The Realm of God wrote:
The Equine Dominion wrote:
Masturbation is homosexual. Assuming, that is, that you are the same sex as yourself. The Bible stands against homosexuality.


:rofl: no.

The Vatican follows the line of the philosopher Plato. Plato said that matter was evil and that the mind, the spirit and The Good are good.


Being a catholic myself I feel the need to say that I find this statement problematic. In pretty much everything I have heard from the Catholic Church matter has been deemed good, God made matter and said it was good, God was incarnated in matter. I could probably find a reference in the Catechism of the Catholic church if you wish. If memory serves properly this sounds like a gnostic approach to reality.

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111683
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:56 am

Northern Dominus wrote:
Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:
*considers bringing sandpaper into the debate*

*thinks better of it*
...that seems well beyond BDSM norms.

Though it does add a new layer of meaning to saying someone "likes it rough."
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Northern Dominus
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14337
Founded: Aug 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Northern Dominus » Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:57 am

Tekania wrote:
Ifreann wrote:What if you wore a glove? Would that make you glovesexual?


That would be practicing safe sex. unless it is sparkly and white in and make hoot noises, in which case you're Jacksoning-off.
I think Tek wins the thread...and the internet with that one.

Farnhamia wrote:
Northern Dominus wrote:...that seems well beyond BDSM norms.

Though it does add a new layer of meaning to saying someone "likes it rough."
Only if it's less than 80 grain.
Battletech RP: Giant walking war machines, space to surface fighters, and other implements blowing things up= lots of fun! Sign up here
We even have a soundtrack!

RIP Caroll Shelby 1923-2012
Aurora, Oak Creek, Happy Valley, Sandy Hook. Just how high a price are we willing to pay?

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:57 am

The Equine Dominion wrote:Your dictionary is faulty.


American Medical Association (AMA),
a professional association whose membership is made up of the largest group of physicians and medical students in the United States, including practitioners in all recognized medical specialties, as well as general primary care physicians. The AMA is governed by a board of trustees and house of delegates who represent various state and local medical associations and U.S. government agencies such as the Public Health Service and medical departments of the army, navy, and air force. The AMA maintains directories of all U.S. licensed physicians (including nonmembers) in the United States, including graduates of foreign medical colleges; researches prescription and nonprescription drugs; advises congressional and state legislators regarding proposed health care laws; and publishes a variety of journals that report on scientific and socioeconomic developments in the field of medicine. See also British Medical Association, Canadian Medical Association.


http://www.ama-assn.org/

I'd trust them rather than you.

User avatar
Parchelon
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 194
Founded: Jul 28, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Parchelon » Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:58 am

Tekania wrote:
Parchelon wrote:1. In the normal run of criminal justice systems courts must rule on weather someone is found guilty (beyond reasonable doubt) of a crime in order to be sentenced to jail time or whatever for a crime. Someone is either found guilty and sentenced or is declared innocent.


No they're not.... no one is "found innocent", nor "declared innocent"; they are either found guilty or acquitted ( "found not guilty").


regardless the point being in the eyes of the law you are either guilty or not.

User avatar
The Realm of God
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7562
Founded: Jan 26, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Realm of God » Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:58 am

Parchelon wrote:
The Realm of God wrote:
:rofl: no.

The Vatican follows the line of the philosopher Plato. Plato said that matter was evil and that the mind, the spirit and The Good are good.


Being a catholic myself I feel the need to say that I find this statement problematic. In pretty much everything I have heard from the Catholic Church matter has been deemed good, God made matter and said it was good, God was incarnated in matter. I could probably find a reference in the Catechism of the Catholic church if you wish. If memory serves properly this sounds like a gnostic approach to reality.


It means it's a sin against the flesh. But yes you are correct. I was just giving him a differnt veiw of dogma.

However it is more Orthodox in charactor.
British, Orthodox Christian, humanist and stoic.

Pro. Disraelian Progressive Conservatism, One Nation Toryism, Distributionism, Civil Liberties, Pro UK, Pro US Constitution. Pro USA.

Progressive Conservative Economic Right: 0.38 Social Libertarian -2.00.

Christian Democrat NSG Senate.

User avatar
Northern Dominus
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14337
Founded: Aug 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Northern Dominus » Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:58 am

Samuraikoku wrote:
The Equine Dominion wrote:Your dictionary is faulty.


American Medical Association (AMA),
a professional association whose membership is made up of the largest group of physicians and medical students in the United States, including practitioners in all recognized medical specialties, as well as general primary care physicians. The AMA is governed by a board of trustees and house of delegates who represent various state and local medical associations and U.S. government agencies such as the Public Health Service and medical departments of the army, navy, and air force. The AMA maintains directories of all U.S. licensed physicians (including nonmembers) in the United States, including graduates of foreign medical colleges; researches prescription and nonprescription drugs; advises congressional and state legislators regarding proposed health care laws; and publishes a variety of journals that report on scientific and socioeconomic developments in the field of medicine. See also British Medical Association, Canadian Medical Association.


http://www.ama-assn.org/

I'd trust them rather than you.
But noooo they don't count, the bible isn't explicitly mentioned in there somehow.
Last edited by Northern Dominus on Tue Jul 31, 2012 10:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
Battletech RP: Giant walking war machines, space to surface fighters, and other implements blowing things up= lots of fun! Sign up here
We even have a soundtrack!

RIP Caroll Shelby 1923-2012
Aurora, Oak Creek, Happy Valley, Sandy Hook. Just how high a price are we willing to pay?

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:58 am

Parchelon wrote:
Tekania wrote:
No they're not.... no one is "found innocent", nor "declared innocent"; they are either found guilty or acquitted ( "found not guilty").


regardless the point being in the eyes of the law you are either guilty or not.


Right, and the fetus is guilty.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:59 am

Parchelon wrote:
Tekania wrote:
No they're not.... no one is "found innocent", nor "declared innocent"; they are either found guilty or acquitted ( "found not guilty").


regardless the point being in the eyes of the law you are either guilty or not.


And not guilty doesn't mean innocent. It means there's no evidence to say they're guilty.

User avatar
Esternial
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 54369
Founded: May 09, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Esternial » Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:59 am

The Richard Bastion Republic wrote:4. People should have as many children as they can, and populate the Earth. Even though you might die, you wan't to have enough children to live on so that your family will continue, and not come to a end. People should be proud of haing lots of children, not ashamed of it. Besides, people can also use their eldest children to watch after the younger ones. The eldest children should receive the harshest discipline so that they can be like young parents.

Have fun feeding all of your kids with your moderate income.
Last edited by Esternial on Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:59 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Of the Free Socialist Territories
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8370
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Of the Free Socialist Territories » Tue Jul 31, 2012 10:00 am

The Equine Dominion wrote:
Indeed the images in your head are sinful. But it is still sinful to masturbate, because it is homosexual.

Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:

Sexual orientation to yourself is autoeroticism, which is introverted eroticism. Sexual orientation to others of the same gender is homosexuality, which is extroverted eroticism. It's not quantum physics.


Your dictionary is faulty. Homosexuality is attraction to people of your own sex. You are of your own sex. There is no distinction (or if there is, it is arbitrary) between extroverted and introverted sexuality.


No, it's you that's faulty, that dictionary was compiled by people more knowledgeable than yourself.

How is the distinction between being attracted to yourself or using yourself as a sexual implement (autoeroticism) and being attracted to other people and using them as a sexual implement (homosexuality) arbitrary? I'd say it's pretty clear.

You're demonstrating "exponential bullshitting", where someone realises that their argument is built on sand and so constructs more and more progressively weaker arguments in an attempt to secure their position.
Last edited by Of the Free Socialist Territories on Tue Jul 31, 2012 10:05 am, edited 2 times in total.
Don't be deceived when our Revolution has finally been stamped out and they tell you things are better now even if there's no poverty to see, because the poverty's been hidden...even if you ever got more wages and could afford to buy more of these new and useless goods which these new industries foist on you, and even if it seems to you that "you never had so much" - that is only the slogan of those who have much more than you.

Marat, "Marat/Sade"

User avatar
Parchelon
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 194
Founded: Jul 28, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Parchelon » Tue Jul 31, 2012 10:00 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Parchelon wrote:2. Yes but if a rock falls on someone you hardly would declare it anything other than innocent in the injury since it cannot chose to fall. Thus the unborn are just as innocent of the violation of their mother's rights because they simply cannot chose to do anything in the situation.


Are you admitting that a fetus is no more sentient and important than a rock?


No I am simply saying that an unborn foetus is not a fully fledged moral agent and is unconscious regardless. It can no more choose to inhabit the womb than a rock can choose to fall. As to a foetus being as important as a rock that is just hogwash.

User avatar
Zottistan
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14894
Founded: Nov 26, 2011
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Zottistan » Tue Jul 31, 2012 10:00 am

The Equine Dominion wrote:
Of the Free Socialist Territories wrote:

Sexual orientation to yourself is autoeroticism, which is introverted eroticism. Sexual orientation to others of the same gender is homosexuality, which is extroverted eroticism. It's not quantum physics.


Your dictionary is faulty. Homosexuality is attraction to people of your own sex. You are of your own sex. There is no distinction (or if there is, it is arbitrary) between extroverted and introverted sexuality.


Brief summary of what just went down;
Equine Dominion: "Masturbation is homosexual."
Free Socialist Territories: *explains why masturbation isn't homosexual*
Equine Dominion: "No. Masturbation is homosexual."
Ireland, BCL and LLM, Training Barrister, Cismale Bi Dude and Gym-Bro, Generally Boring Socdem Eurocuck

User avatar
Parchelon
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 194
Founded: Jul 28, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Parchelon » Tue Jul 31, 2012 10:02 am

Samuraikoku wrote:
Parchelon wrote:No i am trying to point out that there needs to be a balance between the mother and unborn child's rights.


Unborn have no rights.


Weather or not they have rights is not what is at debate but weather or not they should.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Altys, American Legionaries, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Bradfordville, Cannot think of a name, Chernobyl and Pripyat, Des-Bal, Elejamie, Fractalnavel, Habsburg Mexico, Hispida, Incelastan, La Xinga, Marimaia, New-Minneapolis, Raskana, Reich of the New World Order, Tarsonis, Techocracy101010, The Grand Duchy of Muscovy, The Jamesian Republic, The Rio Grande River Basin, The Snazzylands, The United Penguin Commonwealth, Umeria, Urkennalaid

Advertisement

Remove ads