All he's said is, "Slavery is like abortion! We tried to deny them personhood!" Except, black people meet every definition of the word "person." So his argument is bullshit. But of course he keeps ignoring this.
Advertisement

by Mavorpen » Mon Jul 30, 2012 4:27 pm

by Blakk Metal » Mon Jul 30, 2012 4:28 pm
Parchelon wrote:Blakk Metal wrote:It has, and currently does, many bad things. To start with, it wants to make every other government in the world turn into totalitarian states, and calls everyone who opposes them Nazis.
Well at the very least you aren't implicating Pope Benedict as being a Nazi, thats something at least.
But promotingthe culture of lifegovernmental violation of bodily possession,a greater respect for the human personthe imposition of totalitarianism, hardly represents the imposition of tyranny.
Possibly I will give you the debatable factor of abortion, but even so the Vatican has no temporal authority that I am aware of to force governments to do much of anything.
And they don't call people Nazis, sinners in need of love and prayer perhaps, but not Nazis.

by Danbershan » Mon Jul 30, 2012 4:29 pm
Mavorpen wrote:Danbershan wrote:
I doubt they'll be relevant, but I for one would like to debunk them anyway.
All he's said is, "Slavery is like abortion! We tried to deny them personhood!" Except, black people meet every definition of the word "person." So his argument is bullshit. But of course he keeps ignoring this.

by Mavorpen » Mon Jul 30, 2012 4:30 pm
Danbershan wrote:So he's saying that black people are mostly-inanimate lumps of tissue which can't survive on their own? Well, that seems fair...
My only real hope here is to teach the guy some better arguing skills.

by Individual Impersonators » Mon Jul 30, 2012 4:32 pm
Mavorpen wrote:Danbershan wrote:So he's saying that black people are mostly-inanimate lumps of tissue which can't survive on their own? Well, that seems fair...
My only real hope here is to teach the guy some better arguing skills.
Pretty much. I told him at least 5 times that he needs to stop insulting me by comparing me to a fetus. He doesn't care, as long as he gets to live in his fantasy world where abortion=slavery.

by Danbershan » Mon Jul 30, 2012 4:33 pm
Mavorpen wrote:Danbershan wrote:So he's saying that black people are mostly-inanimate lumps of tissue which can't survive on their own? Well, that seems fair...
My only real hope here is to teach the guy some better arguing skills.
Pretty much. I told him at least 5 times that he needs to stop insulting me by comparing me to a fetus. He doesn't care, as long as he gets to live in his fantasy world where abortion=slavery.

by Parchelon » Mon Jul 30, 2012 4:35 pm
Neutraligon wrote:Parchelon wrote:
1. Ok I can understand that a woman's rights should not be reduced merely because she is pregnant, yet the other life must be a factor.
2. ...
3. ...
4. In the current law in most nations you would be right, but weather or not abortion is morally right is the issue.
5. ...
6. should it be illegal is a separate question from is it legal. There is -regardless of what the law says- a planned killing of a member of the human species.
4. Based on whose morals?
6. But not a person, not a sentient being, self defense, war.

by Danbershan » Mon Jul 30, 2012 4:43 pm
Parchelon wrote:4.Objective morality, or perhaps the natural law. Rather like the killing of an innocent adult human as murder is instinctively know to be wrong.
Parchelon wrote:6.I already asked another person to try to find other examples in history of instances where human beings have been deprived of their personhood legally. I could easily list a few, the record is far from clean.

by Blakk Metal » Mon Jul 30, 2012 4:45 pm
6.I already asked another person to try to find other examples in history of instances where human beings have been deprived of their personhood legally. I could easily list a few, the record is far from clean.

by Danbershan » Mon Jul 30, 2012 4:54 pm

by Orcoa » Mon Jul 30, 2012 5:19 pm
The Grand World Order wrote:>inferring that abortions and contraceptives are the only thing Planned Parenthood does

by Dyakovo » Mon Jul 30, 2012 5:42 pm

by Danbershan » Mon Jul 30, 2012 5:44 pm
Dyakovo wrote:Parchelon wrote:
here we go again...how about this time I let you name other examples where humans have been deprived of the privilege of being called persons?
*shrugs*
You can try equating it to what-ever you like. The simple fact of the matter is that it takes more than being genetically human to be a person.

by Dyakovo » Mon Jul 30, 2012 5:45 pm
Parchelon wrote:Neutraligon wrote:
4. Based on whose morals?
6. But not a person, not a sentient being, self defense, war.
4.Objective morality, or perhaps the natural law. Rather like the killing of an innocent adult human as murder is instinctively know to be wrong.
6.I already asked another person to try to find other examples in history of instances where human beings have been deprived of their personhood legally. I could easily list a few, the record is far from clean.

by Dyakovo » Mon Jul 30, 2012 5:46 pm
Anvilonia wrote:ITT: Morons and trolling.

by Danbershan » Mon Jul 30, 2012 5:46 pm
Dyakovo wrote:Parchelon wrote:
4.Objective morality, or perhaps the natural law. Rather like the killing of an innocent adult human as murder is instinctively know to be wrong.
6.I already asked another person to try to find other examples in history of instances where human beings have been deprived of their personhood legally. I could easily list a few, the record is far from clean.
4: Morality is not objective.
6: A foetus is not, and never has been a person, so your attempts to make it seem like we're taking something away from the foetus are disingenuous at best.

by Dyakovo » Mon Jul 30, 2012 5:50 pm
Danbershan wrote:Dyakovo wrote:4: Morality is not objective.
6: A foetus is not, and never has been a person, so your attempts to make it seem like we're taking something away from the foetus are disingenuous at best.
I fail to see how Parchelon manages to continuously equate foetuses to black people as seen by the Catholic Church of the past.

by Danbershan » Mon Jul 30, 2012 5:55 pm

by Lost heros » Mon Jul 30, 2012 5:57 pm
Danbershan wrote:Dyakovo wrote:He doesn't understand the difference between saying something is (genetically) human and saying it is a human being.
Perhaps, due to having half a genetic code, each of the sperm cells I expel when ejaculating (through entirely accidental and not at all self-stimulated means) counts as half a person. We'd better put the entire male population in jail.

by Danbershan » Mon Jul 30, 2012 6:00 pm
Lost heros wrote:Danbershan wrote:
Perhaps, due to having half a genetic code, each of the sperm cells I expel when ejaculating (through entirely accidental and not at all self-stimulated means) counts as half a person. We'd better put the entire male population in jail.
Does that mean that each sperm cell have half the total rights of humans.

by Euroslavia » Mon Jul 30, 2012 7:19 pm

by Inky Noodles » Mon Jul 30, 2012 7:23 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Bienenhalde, Calption, El Lazaro, Ethel mermania, Forsher, Google [Bot], Grinning Dragon, Korvarkia, La Xinga, Lackadaisia, New haven america, Port Caverton, Saiwana, Scytharum, The Grand Fifth Imperium, Tinhampton, Uiiop, Utquiagvik, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement