NATION

PASSWORD

Have I no right?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
La Dame Sans Merci
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 9
Founded: Jun 21, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby La Dame Sans Merci » Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:21 pm

Rhodmhire wrote:
WWII History Geeks wrote: I'd like to see an eagle surf the web.


Image

Wish granted.


Smartass. :palm:

User avatar
Rhodmhire
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17421
Founded: Jun 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Rhodmhire » Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:21 pm

WWII History Geeks wrote:
Rhodmhire wrote:
WWII History Geeks wrote: I'd like to see an eagle surf the web.


Image

Wish granted.

:eyebrow: :palm:


I belong on Forum 7, who can blame me?

Oh come on, you know you thought it was hilarious.

If it was Maurepas or Sibirsky or Buffett and Colbert or Hydesland or someone like that they'd be laughing or making a joke to combat my smartass move.

La Dame Sans Merci wrote:Smartass. :palm:


I took a risk, and lost. Ah well, moving on.
Last edited by Rhodmhire on Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:29 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Part of me grew up here. But part of growing up is leaving parts of ourselves behind.

User avatar
Surote
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1928
Founded: May 19, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Surote » Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:21 pm

Quotation Marks wrote:Regardless, would it be okay for me to be murdered now if I had not been convicted of a crime? I think we'll all agree no. So would it have been perfectly fine to have killed me then?


You weren't alive you were nothing but a fetus

User avatar
Muravyets
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12755
Founded: Aug 18, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Muravyets » Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:21 pm

Hiddenrun wrote:
Muravyets wrote:I just enjoy the way some people seem to think that if they make the whole issue personal and extremely emotional it will...what? Make people feel awkward about debating it? They don't know us very well, do they?

Since (A) there is no way to know if the OP is lying or telling the truth and (B) it doesn't matter anyway because anecdotal arguments do not win debates, I dismiss the entire OP as being based on an appeal to emotion fallacy.

Oh look at me! I am going to spot the fallacy and win the game! Do I get a lollipop? Gosh I'm so smart.

Your bridge is missing you.
Kick back at Cafe Muravyets
And check out my other RP, too. (Don't take others' word for it -- see for yourself. ;) )
I agree with Muravyets because she scares me. -- Verdigroth
However, I am still not the topic of this thread.

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:21 pm

Hiddenrun wrote:
Grave_n_idle wrote:
That, my friend, is called a strawman.

It fits what you said pretty well. But don't worry, I don't expect you to admit it.


I didn't say it was okay to kill humans.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
Araraukar
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15899
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:21 pm

WWII History Geeks wrote:And really people, why aren't they considered people? And why do we protect Eagle eggs better than HUMANS?


There are more humans than eagles. You saying the eagles don't have the same rights to life as humans? :P
- ambassador miss Janis Leveret
Araraukar's RP reality is Modern Tech solarpunk. In IC in the WA.
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.

User avatar
CIB EMPIRE
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1052
Founded: Jul 29, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby CIB EMPIRE » Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:22 pm

Muravyets wrote:
WWII History Geeks wrote:
Iceland-Thule wrote:Good thing your mother didn't have an abortion. It should only be allowed if the mothers life is in danger.


Thank you. That's the right thing to do. Anyways, I feel sorry for you Quotation Marks. I know you're not trying to have a pity party or anything, but life must've been tough.

And really people, why aren't they considered people? And why do we protect Eagle eggs better than HUMANS?

Because there are fewer of them. The world needs more eagles a shitload more than it needs more people.

But according to you, the eagles arnt alive until they are born!
Btw, the eagle is not endangered anymore even tho it is still protected.
You guys do realize that none of us would be alive today had our mothers had an abortion! Its like you guys are fighting against your own kind, youll protect a lifeless clump of cells inside a bird egg before you protect a baby inside a mothers womb!
(I use the term lifeless clump of cells because isnt that what you pro choicers see it as?)
Join the Anti World Assembly

The AWA is dedicated to bringing down the World Assembly. Nations need the WA's permission to invading a region because only WA nations may invade!The WA is able to condemn non members but not vice versa. Members are forced to comply with the many unjust laws the WA imposes onto them. No one truely runs their own nation, you serve as a mere puppet of the WA unless you decide to do something about it! Others say it cant be done but why do so many try and stop us? The answer is simple, the WA can be brought down if enough nations band together and stand against it! The AWA is commited to uniteing all regions that are against the WA because a unified force will be unstopable! So join us and become part of the biggest thing that this game has ever seen!

User avatar
Dynamo2
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 46
Founded: Jul 20, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Dynamo2 » Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:22 pm

I think that a fetus becomes a human being when there is brain activity, so I don't believe that abortion is a bad thing until that developtment occurs. The brain and other vital organs don't begin to form until three weeks after conception, and don't function until the fourth. After that I personally wouldn't have an abortion, but there isn't a fix-all solution. Every pregnancy is different.
Last edited by Dynamo2 on Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Muravyets
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12755
Founded: Aug 18, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Muravyets » Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:22 pm

Quotation Marks wrote:Regardless, would it be okay for me to be murdered now if I had not been convicted of a crime? I think we'll all agree no. So would it have been perfectly fine to have killed me then?

Yes. Because you are a living human being now. You were not then.
Kick back at Cafe Muravyets
And check out my other RP, too. (Don't take others' word for it -- see for yourself. ;) )
I agree with Muravyets because she scares me. -- Verdigroth
However, I am still not the topic of this thread.

User avatar
Call to power
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6908
Founded: Apr 13, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Call to power » Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:22 pm

Quotation Marks wrote:Regardless, would it be okay for me to be murdered now if I had not been convicted of a crime? I think we'll all agree no. So would it have been perfectly fine to have killed me then?


well its certainly better to stop you before you do...unless by successful you mean a banker of course
The Parkus Empire wrote:Theoretically, why would anyone put anytime into anything but tobacco, intoxicants and sex?

Vareiln wrote:My god, CtP is right...
Not that you haven't been right before, but... Aw, hell, you get what I meant.

Tubbsalot wrote:replace my opinions with CtP's.


User avatar
South Lorenya
Senator
 
Posts: 3925
Founded: Feb 14, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby South Lorenya » Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:23 pm

You would have been born elsewhere if she got an abortion.

There's also the fact that fetuses are NOT babies, no matter how much the republican party claims it is. Similarly, abortion is not murder no matter how much the republicans falsely claim it is.
-- King DragonAtma of the Dragon Kingdom of South Lorenya.

Nagas on a plane! ^_^

User avatar
Hiddenrun
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1145
Founded: Jul 29, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Hiddenrun » Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:23 pm

Muravyets wrote:Your bridge is missing you.

Ho ho ho! I'm going to barge into threads, score my magical "fallacy" points, call people trolls and win some prizes, and then chortle about how I'm so far above these silly threads. So far above them that I can't stop myself from posting in them, because I honestly have nothing better to do with my time! It helps fill the gaping void.
Holder of unpopular opinions.

User avatar
Muravyets
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12755
Founded: Aug 18, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Muravyets » Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:23 pm

CIB EMPIRE wrote:
Muravyets wrote:
WWII History Geeks wrote:
Iceland-Thule wrote:Good thing your mother didn't have an abortion. It should only be allowed if the mothers life is in danger.


Thank you. That's the right thing to do. Anyways, I feel sorry for you Quotation Marks. I know you're not trying to have a pity party or anything, but life must've been tough.

And really people, why aren't they considered people? And why do we protect Eagle eggs better than HUMANS?

Because there are fewer of them. The world needs more eagles a shitload more than it needs more people.

But according to you, the eagles arnt alive until they are born!
Btw, the eagle is not endangered anymore even tho it is still protected.
You guys do realize that none of us would be alive today had our mothers had an abortion! Its like you guys are fighting against your own kind, youll protect a lifeless clump of cells inside a bird egg before you protect a baby inside a mothers womb!
(I use the term lifeless clump of cells because isnt that what you pro choicers see it as?)

If my mother had aborted me, I would never know how much I wouldn't miss you.
Kick back at Cafe Muravyets
And check out my other RP, too. (Don't take others' word for it -- see for yourself. ;) )
I agree with Muravyets because she scares me. -- Verdigroth
However, I am still not the topic of this thread.

User avatar
Balans
Secretary
 
Posts: 30
Founded: Sep 07, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Balans » Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:23 pm

No offense to you or anything, but in this society, sadly enough, as a person under the age of 18, you have little rights in the first place, especially if adults are involved, or are making the decisions. Also no offense to adults, but this is what the majority of "adults" does. -_-

Also, I say its the woman's decision. No where in that statement did I question your right to life, whether or not you were a person, or say that you had no say in it (which, well, as a fetus, you can't very well speak up and tell them you would like to live or die, now can you? xP ). I just said that I believe its the mother's decision whether or not she should let HER CHILD live. I personally believe she should not abort, but then again, I'm not the mother, who is making the decision.

User avatar
La Dame Sans Merci
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 9
Founded: Jun 21, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby La Dame Sans Merci » Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:23 pm

Araraukar wrote:
Quotation Marks wrote:Why can people abort at all? It's murder! Like I said, these are PEOPLE.


I'm starting to think your mother should have had an abortion... but think about it this way; what if she'd been raped by her daddy or brother? What if you'd been born with severe neural disorder because of that, and would have made her life a hell before dying off of "unspecified causes", in other words, being held a pillow over your face until you snuffed.

Yes, I'm pro-choice, but I would not force anyone to abort any more than I would force anyone throw their baby out of the window.


You bastard! Do you know what you're saying?! That's so low I'm getting sick. Do you people even value the human life? Go to f***ing war or see someone close to you die and think about it, kiddies. Life is a valuable and precious thing. View it as such or someday you might lose it when you don't want to.

User avatar
Surote
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1928
Founded: May 19, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Surote » Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:24 pm

CIB EMPIRE wrote:
Muravyets wrote:
WWII History Geeks wrote:
Iceland-Thule wrote:Good thing your mother didn't have an abortion. It should only be allowed if the mothers life is in danger.


Thank you. That's the right thing to do. Anyways, I feel sorry for you Quotation Marks. I know you're not trying to have a pity party or anything, but life must've been tough.

And really people, why aren't they considered people? And why do we protect Eagle eggs better than HUMANS?

Because there are fewer of them. The world needs more eagles a shitload more than it needs more people.

But according to you, the eagles arnt alive until they are born!
Btw, the eagle is not endangered anymore even tho it is still protected.
You guys do realize that none of us would be alive today had our mothers had an abortion! Its like you guys are fighting against your own kind, youll protect a lifeless clump of cells inside a bird egg before you protect a baby inside a mothers womb!
(I use the term lifeless clump of cells because isnt that what you pro choicers see it as?)


Cause eagles are our national symbol and when did eagles become part of the debate

User avatar
Hiddenrun
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1145
Founded: Jul 29, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Hiddenrun » Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:24 pm

Grave_n_idle wrote:
I didn't say it was okay to kill humans.

I know, I know, you get around that by defining unborn children as non-human. It's okay. I dehumanized the people I had to kill too. I understand the process well. You have to believe it, or you couldn't live with yourself.
Holder of unpopular opinions.

User avatar
Muravyets
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12755
Founded: Aug 18, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Muravyets » Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:24 pm

Hiddenrun wrote:
Muravyets wrote:Your bridge is missing you.

Ho ho ho! I'm going to barge into threads, score my magical "fallacy" points, call people trolls and win some prizes, and then chortle about how I'm so far above these silly threads. So far above them that I can't stop myself from posting in them, because I honestly have nothing better to do with my time! It helps fill the gaping void.

You know, technically, you are violating the forum rule against griefing. I'll solve the problem by putting you on ignore. 'Bye.
Kick back at Cafe Muravyets
And check out my other RP, too. (Don't take others' word for it -- see for yourself. ;) )
I agree with Muravyets because she scares me. -- Verdigroth
However, I am still not the topic of this thread.

User avatar
Treznor
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7343
Founded: Antiquity
Democratic Socialists

Postby Treznor » Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:25 pm

Up until the moment you became a viable living entity, you had no rights. If you had been aborted before you became viable, it wouldn't concern you overmuch.

Next question?

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:25 pm

Kamsaki wrote:
Grave_n_idle wrote:What are you complaining about?

There are no 'rights' except as societal constructs.

There is no intrinsic right to life.

Well... There's certainly no imperative to act on the theories of right that are not socially conventional, but that's not to say there is no non-social right. Going back to ye old Hegel, a right is when reality reflect's an individual's will to affect itself, and correspondingly, the right to life is one of those that are present both in society and in the state of nature.

Sure, there's nothing to stop people killing you, but they would have to use violent intervention in doing so, which doesn't actually deny that you had the right; merely that it is being respected.


If a right is when reality reflects an individual's will to affect itself, than an embryo has no rights. Indeed, we can detect coherent neural patterns at 22 weeks, but I'm not sure WHEN you can reliably claim individual will - you might actually be making an argument that means even (born) babies have no 'right to life'.

There is no 'right to life' inherent in nature. You're alive, or you're not. 'Rights' don't even have any meaning outside of the context of a society.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
Araraukar
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15899
Founded: May 14, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Araraukar » Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:25 pm

Iceland-Thule wrote:So its ok to kill unborn babies cause we aren't endangered?


1. They aren't babies until they're born.

2. If people would get spayed and neutered in their teenage years (like we do to pet cats and dogs), we wouldn't have the overcrowding problem.

3. Wanna volunteer? :P

4. No, I'm not a VHEMtian, though they have some good ideas.
- ambassador miss Janis Leveret
Araraukar's RP reality is Modern Tech solarpunk. In IC in the WA.
Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.
Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.

User avatar
Hydesland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15120
Founded: Nov 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydesland » Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:25 pm

Hiddenrun wrote:Ho ho ho! I'm going to barge into threads, score my magical "fallacy" points, call people trolls and win some prizes, and then chortle about how I'm so far above these silly threads. So far above them that I can't stop myself from posting in them, because I honestly have nothing better to do with my time! It helps fill the gaping void.


Which begs the question then... can the same not apply to you?

User avatar
Hiddenrun
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1145
Founded: Jul 29, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Hiddenrun » Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:26 pm

Hydesland wrote:
Which begs the question then... can the same not apply to you?

I'm not here nearly as much as Murvyeti. Nor do I run around calling people trolls, or gleefully going "omg fallacy I win!"
Holder of unpopular opinions.

User avatar
Kamsaki
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1004
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Kamsaki » Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:26 pm

Quotation Marks wrote:Regardless, would it be okay for me to be murdered now if I had not been convicted of a crime? I think we'll all agree no. So would it have been perfectly fine to have killed me then?

The thing about counterfactuals is that we have to try to discard a lot of actual truth in order to consider them. For instance, in the world in which you'd been killed then, you wouldn't have gone on to become the human being that you are now. This means that we can ignore anything that occurred between then and now in considering whether you could have been justifiably killed then.

As it turns out, I think that yeah, it would, if it was her decision. What's more, I don't think you can extrapolate your own case as a universal - there is a difference between a mother choosing to keep a child as a result of rape and a mother being obliged to keep that child.

User avatar
WWII History Geeks
Minister
 
Posts: 2257
Founded: Mar 12, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby WWII History Geeks » Mon Oct 05, 2009 3:27 pm

Surote wrote:
Quotation Marks wrote:Regardless, would it be okay for me to be murdered now if I had not been convicted of a crime? I think we'll all agree no. So would it have been perfectly fine to have killed me then?


You weren't alive you were nothing but a fetus


She (or he) had a heartbeat at 8 weeks. Specialized cells and a shape at 4. At 12, you can tell it's a human. At 20, the nervous system works.I think that constitutes ALIVE.
The goldfish crackers will win. Do you know why they smile? Because when they get inside you they start eating you from the inside out.

Grandtaria: "I would rather live my life each day thinking there is a God and die to find out there isn't, than to live my thinking that there isn't and die to find out there is."
Conservative Morality: "When in Rome, do as the Romans. When out of Rome, do as the Romans anyway, it's not like anyone is ballsy enough to piss off Rome."

Finally fixed: The thread may be gone, but I'm still a "To Hell with This'er!," damnit! :D

Boob sisters with Celestial Divinities!

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cretie, Experina, Foxyshire, Kannap, The Black Forrest

Advertisement

Remove ads