Slaytesics wrote:OOC: BAvin you are a thread stalker
I think the Woman has no right, and right, i mean i used to think just right, but now i am just like WTF!
Is there any chance we can get this in a language?
Advertisement

by Grave_n_idle » Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:08 pm
Slaytesics wrote:OOC: BAvin you are a thread stalker
I think the Woman has no right, and right, i mean i used to think just right, but now i am just like WTF!

by Grave_n_idle » Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:16 pm

by The Rifle Brigade » Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:27 pm
Slaytesics wrote:OOC: BAvin you are a thread stalker
I think the Woman has no right, and right, i mean i used to think just right, but now i am just like WTF!

by Ryadn » Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:28 pm
Poliwanacraca wrote:
...is it at least sugar-free chewing gum? Giving us all yeast infections on top of somehow plugging our vajayjays just seems needlessly cruel.

by Bavin » Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:34 pm
Slaytesics wrote:OOC: BAvin you are a thread stalker
I think the Woman has no right, and right, i mean i used to think just right, but now i am just like WTF!

by Ryadn » Tue Oct 06, 2009 9:35 pm
The Rifle Brigade wrote:Slaytesics wrote:OOC: BAvin you are a thread stalker
I think the Woman has no right, and right, i mean i used to think just right, but now i am just like WTF!
Exposure to your thoughts is like having a seizure in which I am compelled to run full speed backwards into a brass doorknob.

by The Isle of Biscay » Tue Oct 06, 2009 10:03 pm
Katganistan wrote:The Rifle Brigade wrote:I tried to put this in its own thread, but the Melkman says nono. So:
I am the potential father of an unconceived love child with Katganistan. This child has all the possibility of growing up to be a happy and productive member of society despite our most likely uneven parenting and most likely my complete absence after a few years.
However, Katganistan doesn't seem to believe that this child has the rights of a human being. In fact, she is valuing her choice and comfort as more important than our imaginary child's life.
To help convince her, I am putting forward the following pro-life arguments that are based on science and truth.
1. The 1st Law of Thermodynamics. Matter and Energy cannot be created or destroyed. The egg that are child will be developed from currently exists in Katganistan's left ovary. The material that will eventually be made into the sperm that I will propel into her body during eight minutes of sweaty, clumsy rutting in a Howard Johnson's budget suite and conference center followed by us watching a Benny Hill DVD in awkward silence while I eat cashews from the mini-bar and she sends text messages to her sister that I pretend I'm not trying to read with my peripheral vision but the only word I can make out is either "distraught" or "disappointing" also already exists, currently in the form of frozen protein in a chicken McNugget in a storage cooler in a McDonalds in Orem, Utah. Thus, our child already exists, in a form.
2. Causality. Causality is not the same as correlation. I say that because its true and makes me sounds smart. Katganistan's refusal to spread for me is causing our child not to exist. This is the same thing as murder. (see Pusey v. Bator, actual case).
3. Thus, if you value human life, you should value the life of our child and support me in seeking injunctive relief from the other mods, who can order Katganistan to refrain from refraining from having sex with me.
Remeber, Katganistan's failure to let me stick my turgid, throbbing tallywhacker into her hoo hoo dilly is the same as MURDER.
....
I don't know what to be outraged about first: the scenario which posits us knocking boots, or that it would be imagined to happen in a Howard Johnson's.

by Neo Art » Tue Oct 06, 2009 10:52 pm
Ryadn wrote:The Rifle Brigade wrote:Slaytesics wrote:OOC: BAvin you are a thread stalker
I think the Woman has no right, and right, i mean i used to think just right, but now i am just like WTF!
Exposure to your thoughts is like having a seizure in which I am compelled to run full speed backwards into a brass doorknob.
I've done that more than once. It wasn't this painful.

by New Kereptica » Tue Oct 06, 2009 10:58 pm
The Isle of Biscay wrote:I have the 'potential' to rape every person I come in contact with, as I also have the potential to murder every person I come in contact with. That potential however does not make me a murderer or a rapist. Also, any one person that does commit murder, is preventing that person that was murdered from murdering and raping, so does that make the murderer a saint for taking a potential murderer and rapist off the streets?
Discussions of 'potential' in these situations is just idiotic.
Yes, a sperm and an egg have the potential to create life, but if the denying of that potential of life is considered murder, then so is menstruation and masturbation.
Did you also know that scientists have fertilized an egg with a stem cell? Shit! Does that mean that everytime I lose blood, I am murdering potential babies?
Blouman Empire wrote:Natural is not nature.
KiloMikeAlpha wrote:Umm hmm.... mind if I siggy that as a reminder to those who think that it is cool to shove their bat-shit crazy atheist beliefs on those of us who actually have a clue?
Teccor wrote:You're actually arguing with Kereptica? It's like arguing with a far-Left, militantly atheist brick wall.
Bluth Corporation wrote:No. A free market literally has zero bubbles.
JJ Place wrote:I have a few more pressing matters to attend to right now; I'll be back later this evening to continue my one-man against the world struggle.
Mercator Terra wrote: Mental illness is a myth.

by The Rifle Brigade » Tue Oct 06, 2009 11:18 pm
The Isle of Biscay wrote:
I have the 'potential' to rape every person I come in contact with, as I also have the potential to murder every person I come in contact with.
The Isle of Biscay wrote: That potential however does not make me a murderer or a rapist. Also, any one person that does commit murder, is preventing that person that was murdered from murdering and raping, so does that make the murderer a saint for taking a potential murderer and rapist off the streets?
The Isle of Biscay wrote:Discussions of 'potential' in these situations is just idiotic.
Yes, a sperm and an egg have the potential to create life, but if the denying of that potential of life is considered murder, then so is menstruation and masturbation.
The Isle of Biscay wrote:Did you also know that scientists have fertilized an egg with a stem cell? Shit! Does that mean that everytime I lose blood, I am murdering potential babies?

by The Rifle Brigade » Tue Oct 06, 2009 11:19 pm

by Ryadn » Tue Oct 06, 2009 11:20 pm
Neo Art wrote:Ryadn wrote:The Rifle Brigade wrote:Slaytesics wrote:OOC: BAvin you are a thread stalker
I think the Woman has no right, and right, i mean i used to think just right, but now i am just like WTF!
Exposure to your thoughts is like having a seizure in which I am compelled to run full speed backwards into a brass doorknob.
I've done that more than once. It wasn't this painful.
admit it...you kinda liked it.

by The Rifle Brigade » Tue Oct 06, 2009 11:26 pm

by Grave_n_idle » Wed Oct 07, 2009 1:07 am

by Bottle » Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:14 am
Treznor wrote:The True Hell wrote:Poliwanacraca wrote:All people are also significantly more than just environments, which would be what I actually said. Otherwise, you would have no cause to object if someone decided to raise a culture of, say, Yersinia pestis in your lungs. Somehow I suspect that you see yourself as more than simply an environment, and would very strongly support your right not to support a plague colony against your will.
First of all when did children become a "plague"?
When a pregnancy is unwanted, "plague" is a polite phrase. Especially when you're the one expected to carry it to term.

by Bottle » Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:16 am
Dempublicents1 wrote:Assume I was suddenly an embryo again, but somehow retained all the knowledge and emotion I currently have. Personally, I would rather be aborted than have my mother forced to be used as an incubator against her will.
I pointed it out earlier in the thread, but the number of people who would see their own mothers forced to be incubators disturbs me.

by Jinkoku » Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:37 am

by The Isle of Biscay » Wed Oct 07, 2009 4:46 am
Jinkoku wrote:I don't know if anyone has said this yet, but you cannot truly call an egg a baby until it starts breathing. It's a ridiculous subject. It's a woman's choice to abort, only as long as the "speck" inside of her had no time to develop. You see, at that point, they are just a collection of cells/DNA. It'd be a different story if they aborted if they were, lets say 2 weeks pregnant? If you were a rape victim, it's ok to abort within the first two weeks. It is true at conception, the inevitable creation of the "foundations" for life are created, but I wouldn't that a baby right away... it couldn't exist outside of the womb.. and over those 9 months, the baby becomes an actual baby. BTW I am a child of a rape victim too. My mom was on a sleep over.. still in high school and was raped by a 49 year old. I would have to accept my fate if she had aborted me, it is a defiling moment for a woman when she gets victimized in that way. You'd feel dirty too, and you wouldn't know what to expect if you ended up preggers. Anyway, I don't think my soul would have ceased to exist just because of abortion. I would've only been born somewhere else by someone else. Like, who is next in line? Spirit and soul are two different things. It isn't taking life until I'd actually have organs and a beating heart.
Did anyone bring up a point.. what would you do if you knew the child you were carrying had something horribly wrong with it? This is such a touchy subject.

by Kryozerkia » Wed Oct 07, 2009 7:06 am
Kashindahar wrote:You create, very occasionally, incredibly shitty threads with your own idea.

by Bottle » Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:37 am
Jinkoku wrote:I don't know if anyone has said this yet, but you cannot truly call an egg a baby until it starts breathing.
Jinkoku wrote: If you were a rape victim, it's ok to abort within the first two weeks.
Jinkoku wrote: Did anyone bring up a point.. what would you do if you knew the child you were carrying had something horribly wrong with it? This is such a touchy subject.

by Araraukar » Wed Oct 07, 2009 1:34 pm
Poliwanacraca wrote:I really, really am. To be fair, though, you do have to remember that those 54 pages were also spiked with Python references, babies growing in fishbowls, the entire world completely failing to live in Texas, magical all-knowing bodies, and whatsherface's statement that she herself should be illegal, all of which make for a rather entertaining experience.

Apologies for absences, non-COVID health issues leave me with very little energy at times.Giovenith wrote:And sorry hun, if you were looking for a forum site where nobody argued, you've come to wrong one.

by Czardas » Wed Oct 07, 2009 1:38 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Commonwealth of Adirondack, Des-Bal, Elejamie, Ethel mermania, Eurocom, Fartsniffage, Fractalnavel, Greater Miami Shores 3, Greater Qwerty, Habsburg Mexico, Idkanymore, Juansonia, La Xinga, Sllonsonnopia, Snake Worship Football Club, Techocracy101010, Umeria, Urine Town, Valrifall, Vassenor, Washington Resistance Army, Washington-Columbia
Advertisement