NATION

PASSWORD

Stance on Abortion?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Stance on Abortion

Pro-Choice (For Abortion)
503
65%
Pro-Life (Against Abortion)
203
26%
Neither/Other (Explain Below)
69
9%
 
Total votes : 775

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:39 am

Raeyh wrote:
But the only way to protect against those things is to not have sex. It just sounds like they are giving out misinformation.


Attempts to impose narrow moralistic views about sex and sexuality on young people through sex education have failed.


http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/04 ... education/

This is the lowest national rate for teen births since the Centers for Disease Control began tracking it in 1940, and CDC officials attributed the decline to pregnancy prevention efforts . Other reports show that teenagers are having less sex and using contraception more often. Studies have backed this up. Researchers at the University of Washington in Seattle found that teenagers who received some type of comprehensive sex education were 60 percent less likely to get pregnant or get someone else pregnant. And in 2007, a federal report showed that abstinence-only programs had “no impacts on rates of sexual abstinence.”
But 37 states require sex education that includes abstinence, 26 of which require that abstinence be stressed as the best method. Additionally, research shows that abstinence-only strategies could deter contraceptive use among teenagers, thus increasing their risk of unintended pregnancy.


You're full of shit.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159117
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:43 am

Natair wrote:
Ifreann wrote:What a pointless generalisation.

Hey, they've got a point xD

No, he doesn't.

User avatar
Raeyh
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6275
Founded: Feb 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Raeyh » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:45 am

Mavorpen wrote:You're full of shit.


Correlation does not imply causation.
Last edited by Raeyh on Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:46 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:49 am

Raeyh wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:You're full of shit.


Correlation does not imply causation.


You're still full of shit.

http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Ad ... ne.0024658

Using the most recent national data (2005) from all U.S. states with information on sex education laws or policies (N = 48), we show that increasing emphasis on abstinence education is positively correlated with teenage pregnancy and birth rates. This trend remains significant after accounting for socioeconomic status, teen educational attainment, ethnic composition of the teen population, and availability of Medicaid waivers for family planning services in each state. These data show clearly that abstinence-only education as a state policy is ineffective in preventing teenage pregnancy and may actually be contributing to the high teenage pregnancy rates in the U.S.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Natair
Minister
 
Posts: 2786
Founded: Apr 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Natair » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:51 am

Ifreann wrote:
Natair wrote:Hey, they've got a point xD

No, he doesn't.

How often do you see a group of 1000+ teenagers in one place?
Every day, except on weekends >.>
Proud AFKer since 2013
Economic Left/Right: -8.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.67
I'm just going to say this now and get it out of the way: Mods, Admins, and Mentors are not out to get you. There is no conspiracy. They're not going to waste their time and energy on one insignificant human being who's feeling sorry for themself. The world ain't out to get you; you're just paranoid.

User avatar
Raeyh
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6275
Founded: Feb 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Raeyh » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:52 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Raeyh wrote:
Correlation does not imply causation.


You're still full of shit.

http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Ad ... ne.0024658

Using the most recent national data (2005) from all U.S. states with information on sex education laws or policies (N = 48), we show that increasing emphasis on abstinence education is positively correlated with teenage pregnancy and birth rates. This trend remains significant after accounting for socioeconomic status, teen educational attainment, ethnic composition of the teen population, and availability of Medicaid waivers for family planning services in each state. These data show clearly that abstinence-only education as a state policy is ineffective in preventing teenage pregnancy and may actually be contributing to the high teenage pregnancy rates in the U.S.


It didn't go up, it started out as high: "The United States ranks first among developed nations in rates of both teenage pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. In an effort to reduce these rates,"

So we just need to rework abstinence education so that it reaches young people, not just give up on it and teach hedonism.

User avatar
Natair
Minister
 
Posts: 2786
Founded: Apr 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Natair » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:53 am

Raeyh wrote:


It didn't go up, it started out as high: "The United States ranks first among developed nations in rates of both teenage pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. In an effort to reduce these rates,"

So we just need to rework abstinence education so that it reaches young people, not just give up on it and teach hedonism.

OBJECTION!
Proud AFKer since 2013
Economic Left/Right: -8.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.67
I'm just going to say this now and get it out of the way: Mods, Admins, and Mentors are not out to get you. There is no conspiracy. They're not going to waste their time and energy on one insignificant human being who's feeling sorry for themself. The world ain't out to get you; you're just paranoid.

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:54 am

Natair wrote:
Raeyh wrote:
It didn't go up, it started out as high: "The United States ranks first among developed nations in rates of both teenage pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. In an effort to reduce these rates,"

So we just need to rework abstinence education so that it reaches young people, not just give up on it and teach hedonism.

OBJECTION!

What is it about people trying things that didn't work in the past.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:55 am

Raeyh wrote:It didn't go up, it started out as high: "The United States ranks first among developed nations in rates of both teenage pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. In an effort to reduce these rates,"

:palm: No shit. Hence why my other source said that teenage pregnancies is decreasing. However, among the states with abstinence only education, there is a positive correlation with teenage pregnancies.
Raeyh wrote:So we just need to rework abstinence education so that it reaches young people, not just give up on it and teach hedonism.


No we don't. It has failed. Deal with it.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Tyler Schrakamp
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 50
Founded: Apr 13, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Tyler Schrakamp » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:55 am

The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:
Judepenic Empire Of God Jehovah wrote:Its a human(the fetus),so its still in the section of murder.

This. Killing a human is wrong. Women try to get away with it by saying its not human, or saying that if its legal its not murder. Its murder plain and simple, not to mention immoral.

Exactly.

User avatar
Raeyh
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6275
Founded: Feb 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Raeyh » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:57 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Raeyh wrote:It didn't go up, it started out as high: "The United States ranks first among developed nations in rates of both teenage pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. In an effort to reduce these rates,"

:palm: No shit. Hence why my other source said that teenage pregnancies is decreasing. However, among the states with abstinence only education, there is a positive correlation with teenage pregnancies.
Raeyh wrote:So we just need to rework abstinence education so that it reaches young people, not just give up on it and teach hedonism.


No we don't. It has failed. Deal with it.


What about adults who didn't become pregnant as teenagers? Are they more responsible in abstinence-only education areas? I would imagine they wouldn't be relying on worthless contraceptive methods.
Last edited by Raeyh on Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:57 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159117
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:57 am

Natair wrote:
Ifreann wrote:No, he doesn't.

How often do you see a group of 1000+ teenagers in one place?
Every day, except on weekends >.>

And you've recorded the facial expressions of those teenagers every single one of those days? Bollocks have you.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:58 am

Raeyh wrote:
What about adults who didn't become pregnant as teenagers? Are they more responsible in abstinence-only education areas? I would imagine they wouldn't be relying on worthless contraceptive methods.


Stop moving the goal posts. And you're now making a claim. Provide a source. Otherwise enough with this fantasy that abstinence education works. It does not.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Wed Jul 25, 2012 10:01 am

Raeyh wrote:
Mavorpen wrote: :palm: No shit. Hence why my other source said that teenage pregnancies is decreasing. However, among the states with abstinence only education, there is a positive correlation with teenage pregnancies.


No we don't. It has failed. Deal with it.


What about adults who didn't become pregnant as teenagers? Are they more responsible in abstinence-only education areas? I would imagine they wouldn't be relying on worthless contraceptive methods.

Hey I just met you
And this is crazy
But abstinence fail
So condom maybe
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Raeyh
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6275
Founded: Feb 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Raeyh » Wed Jul 25, 2012 10:02 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Raeyh wrote:
What about adults who didn't become pregnant as teenagers? Are they more responsible in abstinence-only education areas? I would imagine they wouldn't be relying on worthless contraceptive methods.


Stop moving the goal posts. And you're now making a claim. Provide a source. Otherwise enough with this fantasy that abstinence education works. It does not.


If it doesn't work, we need to make it work.

If methods other than abstinence are effective, they wouldn't need to turn to abortion. If teaching people to be responsible results in more teenage pregnancy, it's worth the cost.

User avatar
Northern Dominus
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14337
Founded: Aug 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Northern Dominus » Wed Jul 25, 2012 10:06 am

Raeyh wrote:
Mavorpen wrote: :palm: No shit. Hence why my other source said that teenage pregnancies is decreasing. However, among the states with abstinence only education, there is a positive correlation with teenage pregnancies.


No we don't. It has failed. Deal with it.


What about adults who didn't become pregnant as teenagers? Are they more responsible in abstinence-only education areas? I would imagine they wouldn't be relying on worthless contraceptive methods.
Worthless contraception methods....such as "just the tip" or "try and catch the cycle just right?"

Because condoms are pretty damned effective.
Battletech RP: Giant walking war machines, space to surface fighters, and other implements blowing things up= lots of fun! Sign up here
We even have a soundtrack!

RIP Caroll Shelby 1923-2012
Aurora, Oak Creek, Happy Valley, Sandy Hook. Just how high a price are we willing to pay?

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Wed Jul 25, 2012 10:07 am

Northern Dominus wrote:
Raeyh wrote:
What about adults who didn't become pregnant as teenagers? Are they more responsible in abstinence-only education areas? I would imagine they wouldn't be relying on worthless contraceptive methods.
Worthless contraception methods....such as "just the tip" or "try and catch the cycle just right?"

Because condoms are pretty damned effective.

To be fair, Raeyh never had sex before. Maybe he thinks that condoms are just glorified balloons.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Northern Dominus
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14337
Founded: Aug 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Northern Dominus » Wed Jul 25, 2012 10:08 am

Norstal wrote:
Northern Dominus wrote:Worthless contraception methods....such as "just the tip" or "try and catch the cycle just right?"

Because condoms are pretty damned effective.

To be fair, Raeyh never had sex before. Maybe he thinks that condoms are just glorified balloons.
Well to be fair I'll admit condoms are pretty damn hilarious wen inflated and taped to somebodies car...
Battletech RP: Giant walking war machines, space to surface fighters, and other implements blowing things up= lots of fun! Sign up here
We even have a soundtrack!

RIP Caroll Shelby 1923-2012
Aurora, Oak Creek, Happy Valley, Sandy Hook. Just how high a price are we willing to pay?

User avatar
Novraslavia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 916
Founded: Jul 23, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Novraslavia » Wed Jul 25, 2012 10:09 am

I'm pro-choice, but to call a fetus a parasite or a slaver is a bit much. I believe it's the woman's choice on what to do with her body, but if a man is involved he should have some say in the matter as well. It's wholly dependent on the situation, but no "god" has the right to tell a women, or man, what they can or cannot do.

User avatar
Raeyh
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6275
Founded: Feb 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Raeyh » Wed Jul 25, 2012 10:09 am

Northern Dominus wrote:
Raeyh wrote:
What about adults who didn't become pregnant as teenagers? Are they more responsible in abstinence-only education areas? I would imagine they wouldn't be relying on worthless contraceptive methods.
Worthless contraception methods....such as "just the tip" or "try and catch the cycle just right?"

Because condoms are pretty damned effective.


There effective enough to give people a false sense of security, but not effective enough to actually be relied on.

User avatar
Manahakatouki
Senator
 
Posts: 4160
Founded: Oct 20, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Manahakatouki » Wed Jul 25, 2012 10:10 am

Norstal wrote:
Northern Dominus wrote:Worthless contraception methods....such as "just the tip" or "try and catch the cycle just right?"

Because condoms are pretty damned effective.

To be fair, Raeyh never had sex before. Maybe he thinks that condoms are just glorified balloons.


They're still glorified balloons in my opinion...

Anyway, I'm pretty sure I'm Pro-Choice at the moment (If the name still means the same thing since I last checked...)...
And so it was, that I had never changed.

User avatar
New Heathera
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1082
Founded: Oct 21, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Heathera » Wed Jul 25, 2012 10:10 am

To all pro-lifers- Have you even considered anything beyond birth? Do you care at all what happens to a child after birth, or do you just want to see it born, regardless of what evironment it's born into, and what conditions it's born with?
Last edited by New Heathera on Wed Jul 25, 2012 10:15 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Kohlastan
Envoy
 
Posts: 299
Founded: Feb 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Kohlastan » Wed Jul 25, 2012 10:12 am

I used to tthink abstance education was a waste of time until my conservative HS intduced graphic std pictures and overdone symptoms of strew. Oh the horrible pictures. It worked though, it got me to look at abstaining a little more seriously.
Economic Left/Right: -5.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.15
Please note I'm too lazy to check for correct grammar and spelling
98% of all Internet users would cry if Facebook broke down. If you are part of that 2% who simply would sit back and laugh, copy and paste this into your sig.

User avatar
Northern Dominus
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14337
Founded: Aug 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Northern Dominus » Wed Jul 25, 2012 10:13 am

Manahakatouki wrote:
Norstal wrote:To be fair, Raeyh never had sex before. Maybe he thinks that condoms are just glorified balloons.


They're still glorified balloons in my opinion...

Anyway, I'm pretty sure I'm Pro-Choice at the moment (If the name still means the same thing since I last checked...)...
Except they're not... for one balloons and condoms use different chemical formulas.

Raeyh wrote:
Northern Dominus wrote:Worthless contraception methods....such as "just the tip" or "try and catch the cycle just right?"

Because condoms are pretty damned effective.


There effective enough to give people a false sense of security, but not effective enough to actually be relied on.
Hence why there's this thing called the morning after pill in case the condom breaks. If that happens and a couple doesn't get the morning after pill within the time restriction then they're idiots.
Battletech RP: Giant walking war machines, space to surface fighters, and other implements blowing things up= lots of fun! Sign up here
We even have a soundtrack!

RIP Caroll Shelby 1923-2012
Aurora, Oak Creek, Happy Valley, Sandy Hook. Just how high a price are we willing to pay?

User avatar
Raeyh
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6275
Founded: Feb 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Raeyh » Wed Jul 25, 2012 10:13 am

New Heathera wrote:To all pro-lifers- Have you even consideredanything beyod birth? Do you care at all what happens to a child after birth, or do you just want to see it born, regardless of what evironment it's born into, and what conditions it's born with?


We are talking about first world countries, right? Your life is going to be pretty cozy no matter what if that's the case.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Achan, Albaaa, Australian rePublic, Cappedore, Democratic Poopland, Dimetrodon Empire, Enormous Gentiles, Kostane, The marxist plains, THM, Utquiagvik, Valentian Elysium

Advertisement

Remove ads