NATION

PASSWORD

Stance on Abortion?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Stance on Abortion

Pro-Choice (For Abortion)
503
65%
Pro-Life (Against Abortion)
203
26%
Neither/Other (Explain Below)
69
9%
 
Total votes : 775

User avatar
Monlyth
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1125
Founded: Jan 13, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Monlyth » Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:59 am

Mavorpen wrote:
The Darwinian People wrote:
I am talking about emotionality in law and that we should take emotions into consideration when we are talking about the law and morality.


Who said we shouldn't take emotion into consideration?

You previously posted to what's-his-name about making an argument driven by his emotions.
"It was a piece of shit but I enjoyed it. What more do you want?!"

User avatar
The Darwinian People
Diplomat
 
Posts: 830
Founded: Jul 10, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Darwinian People » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:00 am

Hamste wrote:
The Darwinian People wrote:
I am talking about emotionality in law and that we should take emotions into consideration when we are talking about the law and morality.


So if 67% of the population says abortion is ok and find it morally ok then abortion should be legal


Depends. If you're living in a democracy then; yes.
Economic Left/Right: -7.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.59
Arkinesia wrote:Life sucks when your movement is choked by retards.

Unhealthy2 wrote:Wait, aren't the terrorists even more prudish about sex than us? Oh wait, logic is for commies.

I am a National Socialist.
Libertarian/Authoritarian: 5.6
Left/Right: 8.99
Non-Interventionist/Neo-conservative: 6.93
Liberal/Conservative: 2.11
Pro: Civic nationalism, Guild socialism, Totalitarianism, Vegetarianism, Cromwellian Republicanism, British Fascism, Environmentalism
Anti: Class internationalism, Free-market capitalism, Libertarianism, Anthropocentrism, Monarchism, Liberal democracy, Environmental skepticism

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:00 am

Monlyth wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
Who said we shouldn't take emotion into consideration?

You previously posted to what's-his-name about making an argument driven by his emotions.


Exactly. Driven by emotions. It should be driven by logic and reasoning, and if there is an emotional side, present it. But basing and driving your argument mainly on emotion is silly and doesn't deserve to be taken seriously.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Raeyh
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6275
Founded: Feb 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Raeyh » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:01 am

Farnhamia wrote:Terrible analogies. And there are precautions one can take to prevent pregnancy.


The only one that works is not having sex.

Ifreann wrote: You pull over, stop the car, and turn the key the other way. You don't have to continue driving for nine months every time you turn the ignition.


But you do have to work for nine months to buy more gas.

OK, maybe gas isn't that expensive.

User avatar
Monlyth
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1125
Founded: Jan 13, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Monlyth » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:01 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Monlyth wrote:You previously posted to what's-his-name about making an argument driven by his emotions.


Exactly. Driven by emotions. It should be driven by logic and reasoning, and if there is an emotional side, present it. But basing and driving your argument mainly on emotion is silly and doesn't deserve to be taken seriously.

Didn't look at it that way before. :meh:
"It was a piece of shit but I enjoyed it. What more do you want?!"

User avatar
Desperate Measures
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10149
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Desperate Measures » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:01 am

Ifreann wrote:
Desperate Measures wrote:Is the fetus fearful of getting aborted? I missed the entire reason why this assault point is brought up. I tried to get it but I don't.

I think it's something to do with emotions having a bearing on the law or something something dark side.

Isn't it a question of who's (wait... is this where I use the word "whose"... "whoms?" I don't think I can use whoms...) emotions have a bearing, though? I don't think the fetus is afraid and I'm prepared to stand behind that position. So prepared.
"My loathings are simple: stupidity, oppression, crime, cruelty, soft music."
- Vladimir Nabokov US (1899 - 1977)
Also, me.
“Man has such a predilection for systems and abstract deductions that he is ready to distort the truth intentionally, he is ready to deny the evidence of his senses only to justify his logic”
- Fyodor Dostoyevsky Russian Novelist and Writer, 1821-1881
"All Clock Faces Are Wrong." - Gene Ray, Prophet(?) http://www.timecube.com
A simplified maxim on the subject states "An atheist would say, 'I don't believe God exists'; an agnostic would say, 'I don't know whether or not God exists'; and an ignostic would say, 'I don't know what you mean when you say, "God exists" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignosticism

User avatar
Hamste
Minister
 
Posts: 3337
Founded: Sep 10, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Hamste » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:01 am

Bokcha wrote:
Hamste wrote:
So if 67% of the population says abortion is ok and find it morally ok then abortion should be legal


Welcome to democracy.


I love democracy, except when it tells me I can't eat dead people. I mean come on they are dead, why let them be eaten by other creatures when family members can eat them. Anyways why do people keep whining about a thing that doesn't feel, has never felt, doesn't think and has never thought gets aborted?
Can you imagine a world without hypothetical situtations?

Logic is like thumbs, it is not necessary but it sure is helpful.

User avatar
The Darwinian People
Diplomat
 
Posts: 830
Founded: Jul 10, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Darwinian People » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:03 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Monlyth wrote:You previously posted to what's-his-name about making an argument driven by his emotions.


Exactly. Driven by emotions. It should be driven by logic and reasoning, and if there is an emotional side, present it. But basing and driving your argument mainly on emotion is silly and doesn't deserve to be taken seriously.


Okay, I've got to be going (I'm off to see The Dark Knight rises, if I don't log back on then you know I've killed myself). I'll concede rather than leave the argument unresolved. You can decide which argument I am conceding to because I am not sure which ones are dead and which ones are still going.
Economic Left/Right: -7.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.59
Arkinesia wrote:Life sucks when your movement is choked by retards.

Unhealthy2 wrote:Wait, aren't the terrorists even more prudish about sex than us? Oh wait, logic is for commies.

I am a National Socialist.
Libertarian/Authoritarian: 5.6
Left/Right: 8.99
Non-Interventionist/Neo-conservative: 6.93
Liberal/Conservative: 2.11
Pro: Civic nationalism, Guild socialism, Totalitarianism, Vegetarianism, Cromwellian Republicanism, British Fascism, Environmentalism
Anti: Class internationalism, Free-market capitalism, Libertarianism, Anthropocentrism, Monarchism, Liberal democracy, Environmental skepticism

User avatar
Altorum
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 189
Founded: May 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Altorum » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:04 am

If you want to deny a woman her rights, congrats. All I'm saying is that you have no right to interfere with her choice.
Last edited by Altorum on Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
A peacemongering, pseudo-isolationist state with a large, well-funded military but mediocre social programs.

Willing to host peace conferences within Altorum. TG if interested.

This nation does not represent my own political views.

User avatar
Goodclark
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1509
Founded: Jan 08, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Goodclark » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:04 am

pro-life
Christian Socialist. Only post once every few years.

User avatar
Bokcha
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 180
Founded: Jul 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Bokcha » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:05 am

Hamste wrote:
Bokcha wrote:
Welcome to democracy.


I love democracy, except when it tells me I can't eat dead people. I mean come on they are dead, why let them be eaten by other creatures when family members can eat them. Anyways why do people keep whining about a thing that doesn't feel, has never felt, doesn't think and has never thought gets aborted?


I am no longer going to argue, but I will answer questions and comment randomly.
They care (or at least I do, and I believe it is the reason many pro-lifers also care) is because the thing is a human being with the capacity to reason. The example I used earlier was a man in a coma.

User avatar
Desperate Measures
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10149
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Desperate Measures » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:05 am

Raeyh wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:Terrible analogies. And there are precautions one can take to prevent pregnancy.


The only one that works is not having sex.


Nothing has failed harder than abstinence programs. Got any other ideas for making people not do the mattress mambo?
"My loathings are simple: stupidity, oppression, crime, cruelty, soft music."
- Vladimir Nabokov US (1899 - 1977)
Also, me.
“Man has such a predilection for systems and abstract deductions that he is ready to distort the truth intentionally, he is ready to deny the evidence of his senses only to justify his logic”
- Fyodor Dostoyevsky Russian Novelist and Writer, 1821-1881
"All Clock Faces Are Wrong." - Gene Ray, Prophet(?) http://www.timecube.com
A simplified maxim on the subject states "An atheist would say, 'I don't believe God exists'; an agnostic would say, 'I don't know whether or not God exists'; and an ignostic would say, 'I don't know what you mean when you say, "God exists" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignosticism

User avatar
Hamste
Minister
 
Posts: 3337
Founded: Sep 10, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Hamste » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:06 am

Bokcha wrote:
Hamste wrote:
I love democracy, except when it tells me I can't eat dead people. I mean come on they are dead, why let them be eaten by other creatures when family members can eat them. Anyways why do people keep whining about a thing that doesn't feel, has never felt, doesn't think and has never thought gets aborted?


I am no longer going to argue, but I will answer questions and comment randomly.
They care (or at least I do, and I believe it is the reason many pro-lifers also care) is because the thing is a human being with the capacity to reason. The example I used earlier was a man in a coma.


That's just it, it doesn't have the capacity to reason and never has. If you wait long enough it will but until that point it isnot murder to kill it.
Can you imagine a world without hypothetical situtations?

Logic is like thumbs, it is not necessary but it sure is helpful.

User avatar
Bokcha
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 180
Founded: Jul 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Bokcha » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:08 am

Hamste wrote:
Bokcha wrote:
I am no longer going to argue, but I will answer questions and comment randomly.
They care (or at least I do, and I believe it is the reason many pro-lifers also care) is because the thing is a human being with the capacity to reason. The example I used earlier was a man in a coma.


That's just it, it doesn't have the capacity to reason and never has. If you wait long enough it will but until that point it isnot murder to kill it.


The argument I raised earlier, then, was "is it okay to kill unconscious people".

User avatar
Raeyh
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6275
Founded: Feb 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Raeyh » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:08 am

Desperate Measures wrote:
Raeyh wrote:
The only one that works is not having sex.


Nothing has failed harder than abstinence programs. Got any other ideas for making people not do the mattress mambo?


Abstinence programs have failed but that doesn't mean abstinence has failed. It's just a hard idea to sell.

User avatar
Bokcha
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 180
Founded: Jul 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Bokcha » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:09 am

Desperate Measures wrote:
Raeyh wrote:
The only one that works is not having sex.


Nothing has failed harder than abstinence programs. Got any other ideas for making people not do the mattress mambo?

Abstinence is foolproof. People are just too swayed by their impulse to actually do it.

User avatar
TheSurvived
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 142
Founded: Jul 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby TheSurvived » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:10 am

Pro-choice.
It's personal decision.

User avatar
Desperate Measures
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10149
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Desperate Measures » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:10 am

Raeyh wrote:
Desperate Measures wrote:Nothing has failed harder than abstinence programs. Got any other ideas for making people not do the mattress mambo?


Abstinence programs have failed but that doesn't mean abstinence has failed. It's just a hard idea to sell.

Well, the best chance you have for making abortions non-existent is to get people to stop fucking.
"My loathings are simple: stupidity, oppression, crime, cruelty, soft music."
- Vladimir Nabokov US (1899 - 1977)
Also, me.
“Man has such a predilection for systems and abstract deductions that he is ready to distort the truth intentionally, he is ready to deny the evidence of his senses only to justify his logic”
- Fyodor Dostoyevsky Russian Novelist and Writer, 1821-1881
"All Clock Faces Are Wrong." - Gene Ray, Prophet(?) http://www.timecube.com
A simplified maxim on the subject states "An atheist would say, 'I don't believe God exists'; an agnostic would say, 'I don't know whether or not God exists'; and an ignostic would say, 'I don't know what you mean when you say, "God exists" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignosticism

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:10 am

Bokcha wrote:The argument I raised earlier, then, was "is it okay to kill unconscious people".

That's just it, it doesn't have the capacity to reason and never has. If you wait long enough it will but until that point it isnot murder to kill it.


Reading goes a long way.
Last edited by Mavorpen on Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Natair
Minister
 
Posts: 2786
Founded: Apr 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Natair » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:10 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Bokcha wrote:
That's rich. I'm not even gonna bother elaborating on that red herring.


http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/fb_induc ... tion.html/ You're saying that only people who can afford to keep the children should have sex. Sounds like discrimination to me.

Only people who can afford to provide for the kid or are willing to sacrifice their own comfort to provide enough for the kid to live should be parents. Otherwise EVERYONE is miserable.
Proud AFKer since 2013
Economic Left/Right: -8.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.67
I'm just going to say this now and get it out of the way: Mods, Admins, and Mentors are not out to get you. There is no conspiracy. They're not going to waste their time and energy on one insignificant human being who's feeling sorry for themself. The world ain't out to get you; you're just paranoid.

User avatar
Hamste
Minister
 
Posts: 3337
Founded: Sep 10, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Hamste » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:11 am

Bokcha wrote:
Hamste wrote:
That's just it, it doesn't have the capacity to reason and never has. If you wait long enough it will but until that point it isnot murder to kill it.


The argument I raised earlier, then, was "is it okay to kill unconscious people".


But a person in a coma once has the capacity to reason, where as a fetus never had the capacity to reason. What is more the choice to pull the plug on the life support system is a person in a coma is the next of kin, the same thing should apply with fetuses the next of kin (the mother or father) should be able to choose to stop the life support system (the mother) from supporting the baby.
Last edited by Hamste on Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:12 am, edited 2 times in total.
Can you imagine a world without hypothetical situtations?

Logic is like thumbs, it is not necessary but it sure is helpful.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159117
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:11 am

Raeyh wrote:
Desperate Measures wrote:Nothing has failed harder than abstinence programs. Got any other ideas for making people not do the mattress mambo?


Abstinence programs have failed but that doesn't mean abstinence has failed. It's just a hard idea to sell.

Abstinence doesn't work either. Because, you know. Rape.

User avatar
Bokcha
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 180
Founded: Jul 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Bokcha » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:11 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Bokcha wrote:The argument I raised earlier, then, was "is it okay to kill unconscious people".

That's just it, it doesn't have the capacity to reason and never has. If you wait long enough it will but until that point it isnot murder to kill it.


Reading goes a long way.


:roll:
I already said I'm done arguing with you, dear. Reading goes a long way.

User avatar
Desperate Measures
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10149
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Desperate Measures » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:11 am

Bokcha wrote:
Desperate Measures wrote:Nothing has failed harder than abstinence programs. Got any other ideas for making people not do the mattress mambo?

Abstinence is foolproof. People are just too swayed by their impulse to actually do it.

I feel like you argued against abstinence for me.
"My loathings are simple: stupidity, oppression, crime, cruelty, soft music."
- Vladimir Nabokov US (1899 - 1977)
Also, me.
“Man has such a predilection for systems and abstract deductions that he is ready to distort the truth intentionally, he is ready to deny the evidence of his senses only to justify his logic”
- Fyodor Dostoyevsky Russian Novelist and Writer, 1821-1881
"All Clock Faces Are Wrong." - Gene Ray, Prophet(?) http://www.timecube.com
A simplified maxim on the subject states "An atheist would say, 'I don't believe God exists'; an agnostic would say, 'I don't know whether or not God exists'; and an ignostic would say, 'I don't know what you mean when you say, "God exists" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignosticism

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:11 am

Bokcha wrote:
Desperate Measures wrote:Nothing has failed harder than abstinence programs. Got any other ideas for making people not do the mattress mambo?

Abstinence is foolproof. People are just too swayed by their impulse to actually do it.


About that...
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Achan, Albaaa, Australian rePublic, Cappedore, Democratic Poopland, Dimetrodon Empire, Enormous Gentiles, The marxist plains, The Two Jerseys, THM, Utquiagvik, Valentian Elysium

Advertisement

Remove ads