NATION

PASSWORD

Stance on Abortion?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Stance on Abortion

Pro-Choice (For Abortion)
503
65%
Pro-Life (Against Abortion)
203
26%
Neither/Other (Explain Below)
69
9%
 
Total votes : 775

User avatar
Bokcha
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 180
Founded: Jul 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Bokcha » Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:29 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Bokcha wrote:I didn't assume shit. The cum is still inside of you, even if it's wrapped up in a plastic bag.
If you consent to having cum in your vagina, you consent to the possibility of getting pregnant. End of story.


No, it's inside of the condom which is inside of you. You consent to the sperm being inside of the condom, nothing more.


Even you don't believe that there is no responsibility on the couple fucking. You're lying to yourself.

User avatar
The Darwinian People
Diplomat
 
Posts: 830
Founded: Jul 10, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Darwinian People » Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:29 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Bokcha wrote:
If you allowed the male to cum inside you (ie, "not pull out"), you invited it in. You try again.


Nice straw man. I never said anything about not using contraception or not in that post. You assumed I meant they weren't using contraception. Despite this, the woman still doesn't consent to the fetus.


And? If you willingly do something that could result in pregnancy what does it matter? It's like mating your two dogs and then killing the puppies because you 'didn't consent to having puppies in your house'.
Economic Left/Right: -7.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.59
Arkinesia wrote:Life sucks when your movement is choked by retards.

Unhealthy2 wrote:Wait, aren't the terrorists even more prudish about sex than us? Oh wait, logic is for commies.

I am a National Socialist.
Libertarian/Authoritarian: 5.6
Left/Right: 8.99
Non-Interventionist/Neo-conservative: 6.93
Liberal/Conservative: 2.11
Pro: Civic nationalism, Guild socialism, Totalitarianism, Vegetarianism, Cromwellian Republicanism, British Fascism, Environmentalism
Anti: Class internationalism, Free-market capitalism, Libertarianism, Anthropocentrism, Monarchism, Liberal democracy, Environmental skepticism

User avatar
Raeyh
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6275
Founded: Feb 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Raeyh » Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:30 am

Desperate Measures wrote:
Bokcha wrote:
I didn't assume shit. The cum is still inside of you, even if it's wrapped up in a plastic bag.
If you consent to having cum in your vagina, you consent to the possibility of getting pregnant. End of story.

People in submarines are technically drowning in your opinion?


Certainly. I would never get on one of those death traps.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:30 am

Bokcha wrote:
Even you don't believe that there is no responsibility on the couple fucking. You're lying to yourself.


No I'm not. That's why I think they should get an abortion. They're taking responsibility for an accident.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Bokcha
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 180
Founded: Jul 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Bokcha » Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:31 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Bokcha wrote:
Even you don't believe that there is no responsibility on the couple fucking. You're lying to yourself.


No I'm not. That's why I think they should get an abortion. They're taking responsibility for an accident.


Taking responsibility would be raising it or giving it to someone else to raise, not murdering it.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:31 am

The Darwinian People wrote:And? If you willingly do something that could result in pregnancy what does it matter? It's like mating your two dogs and then killing the puppies because you 'didn't consent to having puppies in your house'.


When did I say we should force mothers to have abortions? Go ahead, quote me.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Desperate Measures
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10149
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Desperate Measures » Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:31 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Bokcha wrote:
Even you don't believe that there is no responsibility on the couple fucking. You're lying to yourself.


No I'm not. That's why I think they should get an abortion. They're taking responsibility for an accident.

And that should end the argument. But it won't.
"My loathings are simple: stupidity, oppression, crime, cruelty, soft music."
- Vladimir Nabokov US (1899 - 1977)
Also, me.
“Man has such a predilection for systems and abstract deductions that he is ready to distort the truth intentionally, he is ready to deny the evidence of his senses only to justify his logic”
- Fyodor Dostoyevsky Russian Novelist and Writer, 1821-1881
"All Clock Faces Are Wrong." - Gene Ray, Prophet(?) http://www.timecube.com
A simplified maxim on the subject states "An atheist would say, 'I don't believe God exists'; an agnostic would say, 'I don't know whether or not God exists'; and an ignostic would say, 'I don't know what you mean when you say, "God exists" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignosticism

User avatar
Bokcha
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 180
Founded: Jul 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Bokcha » Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:32 am

Desperate Measures wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
No I'm not. That's why I think they should get an abortion. They're taking responsibility for an accident.

And that should end the argument. But it won't.


Because fucking and then killing your offspring is the pinnacle of responsibility, right? :roll:

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111674
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:33 am

Desperate Measures wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
No I'm not. That's why I think they should get an abortion. They're taking responsibility for an accident.

And that should end the argument. But it won't.

It's Chinatown.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:33 am

Bokcha wrote:Taking responsibility would be raising it or giving it to someone else to raise, not murdering it.



responsibility Pronunciation: /rɪˌspɒnsɪˈbɪlɪti/

Definition of responsibility
noun (plural responsibilities)
[mass noun]
1the state or fact of having a duty to deal with something or of having control over someone:
women bear children and take responsibility for childcare
2the state or fact of being accountable or to blame for something:
the group has claimed responsibility for a string of murders
[in singular] (responsibility to/towards) a moral obligation to behave correctly towards or in respect of:
individuals have a responsibility to control their behaviour
3the opportunity or ability to act independently and take decisions without authorization:
we expect individuals to take on more responsibility
[count noun] (often responsibilities) a thing which one is required to do as part of a job, role, or legal obligation:
he will take over the responsibilities of Overseas Director

According to Oxford dictionary, they are definitely taking responsibility.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:33 am

Desperate Measures wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
No I'm not. That's why I think they should get an abortion. They're taking responsibility for an accident.

And that should end the argument. But it won't.

Because we're "killing the poor, poor embryos".

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:33 am

Bokcha wrote:
Desperate Measures wrote:And that should end the argument. But it won't.


Because fucking and then killing your offspring is the pinnacle of responsibility, right? :roll:


If you don't want it, and it's in your body without consent, then yes.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Desperate Measures
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10149
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Desperate Measures » Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:33 am

Farnhamia wrote:
Desperate Measures wrote:And that should end the argument. But it won't.

It's Chinatown.

You know I like it in Chinatown. I get all the cheap thrills here. :P
Last edited by Desperate Measures on Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
"My loathings are simple: stupidity, oppression, crime, cruelty, soft music."
- Vladimir Nabokov US (1899 - 1977)
Also, me.
“Man has such a predilection for systems and abstract deductions that he is ready to distort the truth intentionally, he is ready to deny the evidence of his senses only to justify his logic”
- Fyodor Dostoyevsky Russian Novelist and Writer, 1821-1881
"All Clock Faces Are Wrong." - Gene Ray, Prophet(?) http://www.timecube.com
A simplified maxim on the subject states "An atheist would say, 'I don't believe God exists'; an agnostic would say, 'I don't know whether or not God exists'; and an ignostic would say, 'I don't know what you mean when you say, "God exists" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignosticism

User avatar
Bokcha
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 180
Founded: Jul 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Bokcha » Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:34 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Bokcha wrote:Taking responsibility would be raising it or giving it to someone else to raise, not murdering it.



responsibility Pronunciation: /rɪˌspɒnsɪˈbɪlɪti/

Definition of responsibility
noun (plural responsibilities)
[mass noun]
1the state or fact of having a duty to deal with something or of having control over someone:
women bear children and take responsibility for childcare
2the state or fact of being accountable or to blame for something:
the group has claimed responsibility for a string of murders
[in singular] (responsibility to/towards) a moral obligation to behave correctly towards or in respect of:
individuals have a responsibility to control their behaviour
3the opportunity or ability to act independently and take decisions without authorization:
we expect individuals to take on more responsibility
[count noun] (often responsibilities) a thing which one is required to do as part of a job, role, or legal obligation:
he will take over the responsibilities of Overseas Director

According to Oxford dictionary, they are definitely taking responsibility.


Ah. So using a dictionary is only okay if it supports your argument. Gotcha.

User avatar
Raeyh
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6275
Founded: Feb 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Raeyh » Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:34 am

Bokcha wrote:
Desperate Measures wrote:And that should end the argument. But it won't.


Because fucking and then killing your offspring is the pinnacle of responsibility, right? :roll:


That's going too far, I don't think anyone is considering having sex with the aborted fetuses. Plus that would probably kill them before the act occured.

User avatar
The Darwinian People
Diplomat
 
Posts: 830
Founded: Jul 10, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Darwinian People » Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:34 am

Mavorpen wrote:
The Darwinian People wrote:And? If you willingly do something that could result in pregnancy what does it matter? It's like mating your two dogs and then killing the puppies because you 'didn't consent to having puppies in your house'.


When did I say we should force mothers to have abortions? Go ahead, quote me.


When did I imply that you said that? Your argument was that it's okay for a women to have an abortion because she 'didn't consent to having the foetus'. All I am saying is that it doesn't matter whether or not she consented, she did something knowing that pregnancy was a likely consequence.
Economic Left/Right: -7.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.59
Arkinesia wrote:Life sucks when your movement is choked by retards.

Unhealthy2 wrote:Wait, aren't the terrorists even more prudish about sex than us? Oh wait, logic is for commies.

I am a National Socialist.
Libertarian/Authoritarian: 5.6
Left/Right: 8.99
Non-Interventionist/Neo-conservative: 6.93
Liberal/Conservative: 2.11
Pro: Civic nationalism, Guild socialism, Totalitarianism, Vegetarianism, Cromwellian Republicanism, British Fascism, Environmentalism
Anti: Class internationalism, Free-market capitalism, Libertarianism, Anthropocentrism, Monarchism, Liberal democracy, Environmental skepticism

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111674
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:34 am

Divair wrote:
Desperate Measures wrote:And that should end the argument. But it won't.

Because we're "killing the poor, poor embryos".

No, you're "killing the poor, poor children." That's the emotional appeal every anti-choice person makes.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Bokcha
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 180
Founded: Jul 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Bokcha » Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:34 am

Raeyh wrote:
Bokcha wrote:
Because fucking and then killing your offspring is the pinnacle of responsibility, right? :roll:


That's going too far, I don't think anyone is considering having sex with the aborted fetuses. Plus that would probably kill them before the act occured.


Wow. You read that wrong. :rofl:

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:35 am

Bokcha wrote:
Ah. So using a dictionary is only okay if it supports your argument. Gotcha.


Is there a biological definition for responsibility? Please, tell me what it is. It doesn't matter what you say, they are taking responsibility. Get over it.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Bokcha
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 180
Founded: Jul 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Bokcha » Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:35 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Bokcha wrote:
Because fucking and then killing your offspring is the pinnacle of responsibility, right? :roll:


If you don't want it, and it's in your body without consent, then yes.


You are willingly putting sperm in your body. How is that without your consent? You can't pick and choose.

User avatar
The Darwinian People
Diplomat
 
Posts: 830
Founded: Jul 10, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Darwinian People » Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:36 am

Bokcha wrote:
Raeyh wrote:
That's going too far, I don't think anyone is considering having sex with the aborted fetuses. Plus that would probably kill them before the act occured.


Wow. You read that wrong. :rofl:


I think he was making a funny.
Economic Left/Right: -7.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.59
Arkinesia wrote:Life sucks when your movement is choked by retards.

Unhealthy2 wrote:Wait, aren't the terrorists even more prudish about sex than us? Oh wait, logic is for commies.

I am a National Socialist.
Libertarian/Authoritarian: 5.6
Left/Right: 8.99
Non-Interventionist/Neo-conservative: 6.93
Liberal/Conservative: 2.11
Pro: Civic nationalism, Guild socialism, Totalitarianism, Vegetarianism, Cromwellian Republicanism, British Fascism, Environmentalism
Anti: Class internationalism, Free-market capitalism, Libertarianism, Anthropocentrism, Monarchism, Liberal democracy, Environmental skepticism

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:36 am

The Darwinian People wrote:
When did I imply that you said that? Your argument was that it's okay for a women to have an abortion because she 'didn't consent to having the foetus'. All I am saying is that it doesn't matter whether or not she consented, she did something knowing that pregnancy was a likely consequence.


You made an analogy implying I believe that other people should make the choice for the mother, when I never hinted that.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Desperate Measures
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10149
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Desperate Measures » Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:36 am

Bokcha wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
No I'm not. That's why I think they should get an abortion. They're taking responsibility for an accident.


Taking responsibility would be raising it or giving it to someone else to raise, not murdering it.

And that is how you view your responsibility. I didn't ask you to define my sense of responsibility and I'd prefer you didn't. Killing does not equal murder.
"My loathings are simple: stupidity, oppression, crime, cruelty, soft music."
- Vladimir Nabokov US (1899 - 1977)
Also, me.
“Man has such a predilection for systems and abstract deductions that he is ready to distort the truth intentionally, he is ready to deny the evidence of his senses only to justify his logic”
- Fyodor Dostoyevsky Russian Novelist and Writer, 1821-1881
"All Clock Faces Are Wrong." - Gene Ray, Prophet(?) http://www.timecube.com
A simplified maxim on the subject states "An atheist would say, 'I don't believe God exists'; an agnostic would say, 'I don't know whether or not God exists'; and an ignostic would say, 'I don't know what you mean when you say, "God exists" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignosticism

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:36 am

Bokcha wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
If you don't want it, and it's in your body without consent, then yes.


You are willingly putting sperm in your body. How is that without your consent? You can't pick and choose.


You are willingly driving. How is that without your consent? You can't pick and choose.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:37 am

Desperate Measures wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
No I'm not. That's why I think they should get an abortion. They're taking responsibility for an accident.

And that should end the argument. But it won't.


No, what should have ended it was Vlad's post proving that making abortion illegal does not work. But no, they always move the goal post and shift the topic.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Achan, Bienenhalde, Emotional Support Crocodile, Grinning Dragon, Juansonia, Ostroeuropa, Philjia, Stellar Colonies, The Huskar Social Union, Zapato

Advertisement

Remove ads