Stance on Abortion?

[Deus Malum]

No chance? Artificial insemination, bro. The fact that you didn't know the egg is fertilized in the uterus is troubling too.

I don't think those places just accept everyone.

Uterus is latin for womb.

Fertilization of the egg actually occurs in the fallopian tubes.

[Raeyh]

I don't think those places just accept everyone.

Uterus is latin for womb.

Fertilization of the egg actually occurs in the fallopian tubes.

I'll just take your word on that.

[Des-Bal]

Look at the word "abortion." You are stopping what is currently going on, right?

Just like your stopping the egg from being fertilized by removing the egg from the equation.

[Raeyh]

Look at the word "abortion." You are stopping what is currently going on, right?

Just like your stopping the egg from being fertilized by removing the egg from the equation.

What, do you mean like forcibly separate people who are dating so they don't impregnate each other? That would be equally wrong, unless one of them is a criminal, obviously.

[Deus Malum]

They accept most anyone with money. Of course, their doctors will want to decide if you're capable of conceiving.

There you go, our teenager doesn't have money so we are left with him having 0% potential of having children again.

I was mocking the usage of womb vs uterus but it might be construed as trolling so I retract that. But you still haven't set a line between [sperm] [egg] and [spermegg]. They are both not human, yet contain the same potential for becoming human.

The line that separates them is sex/insemination. Without that action, there is no chance for reproduction to occur.

And the line that separates a fertilized egg that's just been passed out of the uterine wall and will die unnoticed and unmourned and one that will remain in the uterus and potentially (again, with a roughly 50% probability) carry to term is something called "implantation." Blocking this, is, incidentally how the "morning after" pill works. You may wish to read up on and educate yourself on the subject.

[Deus Malum]

Fertilization of the egg actually occurs in the fallopian tubes.

I'll just take your word on that.

Why? Do you have some crippling inability to use Google or Wikipedia?

[Des-Bal]

What, do you mean like forcibly separate people who are dating so they don't impregnate each other? That would be equally wrong, unless one of them is a criminal, obviously.

No by whacking off into a sock. There's no egg therefore no baby.

[Raeyh]

I'll just take your word on that.

Why? Do you have some crippling inability to use Google or Wikipedia?

All I found say that the tubes allow sperm to travel to the egg, which basically contradicts what you just said, but whatever.

No by whacking off into a sock. There's no egg therefore no baby.

There is no egg at all in that situation. You are not removing anything.

[Mavorpen]

Why? Do you have some crippling inability to use Google or Wikipedia?

All I found say that the tubes allow sperm to travel to the egg, which basically contradicts what you just said, but whatever.

Here.

[Lakabi]

Being the proud father of a little girl, I can say wholeheartedly that I could not consider the possibility of going through an abortion, and neither could.my (now) wife.

However, this was our choice. As much as it may upset me to hear of others who did have an abortion, it is their choice and their lives, they have to live with the consequences.

No-one should be able to take away their right to choice.

[Globexanter]

I'm surprised this thread hasn't been locked yet, have the heated arguments not erupted yet?

Personally I'm pro-choice: Her body, Her choice. Answer to me with some "omg its murder" if you want to, but doing so shall be only a waste of your time.

[Deus Malum]

Why? Do you have some crippling inability to use Google or Wikipedia?

All I found say that the tubes allow sperm to travel to the egg, which basically contradicts what you just said, but whatever.

No by whacking off into a sock. There's no egg therefore no baby.

There is no egg at all in that situation. You are not removing anything.

When an ovum is developing in an ovary, it is encapsulated in a sac known as an ovarian follicle. On maturity of the ovum, the follicle and the ovary's wall rupture, allowing the ovum to escape. The egg is caught by the fimbriated end and travels to the ampulla where typically the sperm are met and fertilization occurs; the fertilized ovum, now a zygote, travels towards the uterus aided by activity of tubal cilia and activity of the tubal muscle. After about five days the new embryo enters the uterine cavity and implants about a day later.

The release of a mature egg does not alternate between the two ovaries and seems to be random. After removal of an ovary, the remaining one produces an egg every month.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallopian_ ... tilization

So I'm going to go ahead and say "yes," you have some crippling fear of using Wikipedia as an information resource. Presumably Wikipedia ran over your dog, or something.

[Mavorpen]

I'm surprised this thread hasn't been locked yet, have the heated arguments not erupted yet?

Personally I'm pro-choice: Her body, Her choice. Answer to me with some "omg its murder" if you want to, but doing so shall be only a waste of your time.

Everything currently being debated was addressed earlier in the thread. Some people just refuse to be wrong.

[Farnhamia]

I'm surprised this thread hasn't been locked yet, have the heated arguments not erupted yet?

Personally I'm pro-choice: Her body, Her choice. Answer to me with some "omg its murder" if you want to, but doing so shall be only a waste of your time.

Everything currently being debated was addressed earlier in the thread. Some people just refuse to be wrong.

I myself find it very difficult to be wrong. I do try but then it almost always turns out that I'm right.

[Globexanter]

I'm surprised this thread hasn't been locked yet, have the heated arguments not erupted yet?

Personally I'm pro-choice: Her body, Her choice. Answer to me with some "omg its murder" if you want to, but doing so shall be only a waste of your time.

Everything currently being debated was addressed earlier in the thread. Some people just refuse to be wrong.

It is not a case of "refusing to be wrong", is it a case of not wanting to look inferior by going back on your argument and admitting you are wrong. Of course there is nothing wrong with this, yet it is something which many just cannot even think of doing.

[Frisivisia]

Fertilization of the egg actually occurs in the fallopian tubes.

I'll just take your word on that.

Ever taken a seventh-grade health class?

[Raeyh]

I'll just take your word on that.

Ever taken a seventh-grade health class?

Yeah, that's what I got my given explanation from.

[Nordengrund]

The nucleus of a cell is the center of the cell and is like the brain of the cell. Even if it is not a brain, it is a living organism. A baby (or fetus, or whatever you want to call it) is made up of a cluster of these cells. Since these cells are living things, the fetus itself is a living thing.

[Mavorpen]

The nucleus of a cell is the center of the cell and is like the brain of the cell. Even if it is not a brain, it is a living organism. A baby (or fetus, or whatever you want to call it) is made up of a cluster of these cells. Since these cells are living things, the fetus itself is a living thing.

So cancer cells are living and killing it is murder. Got it.

[Fascist Iberia]

Of course Not .

When the women is having a Sex relationship should take protections to avoid get pregnant .

So if they don't take protection it was is fault and she should carry the baby since the kid doesn't deserve to be aborted .

[Samuraikoku]

Of course Not .

When the women is having a Sex relationship should take protections to avoid get pregnant .

So if they don't take protection it was is fault and he should carry the baby since the kid doesn't deserve to be aborted .

Hello Mr. Limbaugh.

[Farnhamia]

Of course Not .

When the women is having a Sex relationship should take protections to avoid get pregnant .

So if they don't take protection it was is fault and he should carry the baby since the kid doesn't deserve to be aborted .

"He" should carry the baby?

[Nordengrund]

The nucleus of a cell is the center of the cell and is like the brain of the cell. Even if it is not a brain, it is a living organism. A baby (or fetus, or whatever you want to call it) is made up of a cluster of these cells. Since these cells are living things, the fetus itself is a living thing.

So cancer cells are living and killing it is murder. Got it.

Yes, cells can reproduce, dispose of waste, work, have irratibility, have respiration, and even die. Therefore a cell is alive.
As you say, the unborn bay (fetus, or whatever you want to call it) is made up a cluster of these cells. Because these cells are alive, the unborn baby itself is alive.

[Samuraikoku]

So cancer cells are living and killing it is murder. Got it.

Yes, cells can reproduce, dispose of waste, work, have irratibility, have respiration, and even die. Therefore a cell is alive.
As you say, the unborn bay (fetus, or whatever you want to call it) is made up a cluster of these cells. Because these cells are alive, the unborn baby itself is alive.

Except it's not unlawful to kill cancerous cells. Nor is it, via Roe vs. Wade, abortion.

[Farnhamia]

So cancer cells are living and killing it is murder. Got it.

Yes, cells can reproduce, dispose of waste, work, have irratibility, have respiration, and even die. Therefore a cell is alive.
As you say, the unborn bay (fetus, or whatever you want to call it) is made up a cluster of these cells. Because these cells are alive, the unborn baby itself is alive.

Couldn't stay away, huh? It's still none of your business what choices I make.