Mavorpen wrote:What does Stalin have to do with anything?
Really?
Advertisement

by Mavorpen » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:14 pm
Milks Empire wrote:Ha! Ha ha! Ha ha ha! Ask the Indians of the former Spanish colonies in the Americas about that!

by Des-Bal » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:14 pm
Grenartia wrote:1. Yes.
2. Yes.
3. He has a plan. Somehow, He would've influenced circumstances to make his plan happen if they refused to eat the fruit.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Mavorpen » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:15 pm

by Locyrmor » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:16 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Simple question, does god know what you'll do before you'll do it?
Did God know that dangling the forbidden fruit in front of Adam and Eve while serpents were about would cause them to eat it?
So god knew by creating the universe that people would build cities where they have? They would wage war for the reasons they have? If god set the stage and knew what would happen then he's basically Jigsaw the fact he never touched anybody doesn't change the fact it's his fault.

by Inzijard » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:18 pm
Milks Empire wrote:Ha! Ha ha! Ha ha ha! Ask the Indians of the former Spanish colonies in the Americas about that!
Mavorpen wrote:Again, what does Stalin have to do with anything? Stalin's anti-religion was because of his political views, not his religious views.

by Grenartia » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:19 pm
Seleucas wrote:Can't say I'm that shocked; there are people who say ALL of the victims are in Hell.

by Des-Bal » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:19 pm
Locyrmor wrote:I am a molinist, so yes.
By the definition of omniscient, yes. However, he never dangled it in front of Adam and Eve, according to Genesis he only said "there are two trees, one is good, one is bad. Don't eat bad tree."
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Inzijard » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:21 pm
Grenartia wrote:Seleucas wrote:Can't say I'm that shocked; there are people who say ALL of the victims are in Hell.
Indeed. Because no ture Christian would be watching a Batman movie, especially at the ungodly hour of 12am. True Christians can't watch/listen/read anything that doesn't totally 100% blab about God for the entire time, even if the evil secular books/movies/TV/music is more entertaining. Its infinitely more desireable to be bored to death and get sent to Heaven than to be entertained before going to Hell.
Somebody is bound to read this post and think I'm serious, so let me clarify that this post is intended as sarcasm. If you respond to this post thinking I'm serious, and fail to see this disclaimer, then that reflects more on you than me.

by Mavorpen » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:21 pm
Inzijard wrote:Stalin's personal stance on religion
Stalin followed the position adopted by Lenin that religion was an opiate that needed to be removed in order to construct the ideal communist society.
He certainly did it for political reasons, but not because he had no say in the matter. Stalin was an avowed atheist, which is entirely relevant to his campaign.

by Locyrmor » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:22 pm
Actually, when they think that an act of bigotry is somehow an act of love, then yes, one can be a devout Christian bigot.
Des-Bal wrote:Do you know what an attractive nuisance is? If I don't fence my pool in and the neighbor kid drowns in it it's my fault.
So god KNEW that if he said there are two trees they WOULD eat from the bad tree?
Wouldn't it make more sense to say "there are two trees, one good and one bad. The Bad Tree is hidden behind an impassable mountain range don't eat it."

by The Rich Port » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:23 pm

by The Kadeshi Alliance » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:23 pm
Mavorpen wrote:Inzijard wrote:Stalin's personal stance on religion
Stalin followed the position adopted by Lenin that religion was an opiate that needed to be removed in order to construct the ideal communist society.
He certainly did it for political reasons, but not because he had no say in the matter. Stalin was an avowed atheist, which is entirely relevant to his campaign.
Again, no it wasn't because he did it for pure political reasons. Did you know that in 1941 when Nazi Germany attacked, he revived the Russian Orthodox Church to increase patriotism? If he was such a horrible man driven by his atheism, why would he bring back religion when he needed a political boost? The answer is that atheism had jack shit to do with it.

by Adafdfadfasdf » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:23 pm
Grenartia wrote:Seleucas wrote:Can't say I'm that shocked; there are people who say ALL of the victims are in Hell.
Indeed. Because no ture Christian would be watching a Batman movie, especially at the ungodly hour of 12am. True Christians can't watch/listen/read anything that doesn't totally 100% blab about God for the entire time, even if the evil secular books/movies/TV/music is more entertaining. Its infinitely more desireable to be bored to death and get sent to Heaven than to be entertained before going to Hell.
Somebody is bound to read this post and think I'm serious, so let me clarify that this post is intended as sarcasm. If you respond to this post thinking I'm serious, and fail to see this disclaimer, then that reflects more on you than me.

by Mavorpen » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:24 pm
The Kadeshi Alliance wrote:Further, I point to the fact that the Modern Russian Orthodox Church seems to think quite highly of him.

by Des-Bal » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:25 pm
Locyrmor wrote:Des-Bal wrote:Do you know what an attractive nuisance is? If I don't fence my pool in and the neighbor kid drowns in it it's my fault.
Except that kids do not need to be able to drown in order to allow the exercise of free will.
If it was impossible to not follow God, then we wouldn't have any decisions to freely make.So god KNEW that if he said there are two trees they WOULD eat from the bad tree?
That is what I just said.Wouldn't it make more sense to say "there are two trees, one good and one bad. The Bad Tree is hidden behind an impassable mountain range don't eat it."
That would limit free will because Adam and Eve would be forced to only eat from the good tree.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by The Kadeshi Alliance » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:25 pm

by Occupied Deutschland » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:25 pm
Aquophia wrote:This is pretty tame compared to what could have been said. I was expecting some sort of WBC "god did this because we let fags roam free." statement.

by Locyrmor » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:26 pm
The Rich Port wrote:Heh heh, it's funny because more and more people are leaving the Christianity every year.
... I feel sad now.

by The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:27 pm

by Grenartia » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:28 pm
Locyrmor wrote:Actually, when they think that an act of bigotry is somehow an act of love, then yes, one can be a devout Christian bigot.
What they think does not represent the biblical definition of love, however. Paul gives a pretty good description of Love somewhere (I can't recall it at this time).
Inzijard wrote:Grenartia wrote:
Indeed. Because no ture Christian would be watching a Batman movie, especially at the ungodly hour of 12am. True Christians can't watch/listen/read anything that doesn't totally 100% blab about God for the entire time, even if the evil secular books/movies/TV/music is more entertaining. Its infinitely more desireable to be bored to death and get sent to Heaven than to be entertained before going to Hell.
Somebody is bound to read this post and think I'm serious, so let me clarify that this post is intended as sarcasm. If you respond to this post thinking I'm serious, and fail to see this disclaimer, then that reflects more on you than me.
Pretty much. Extremists are ... a different sort, indeed.
I enjoyed the movie though. Aside from the negative publicity surrounding it given a sudden turn of events, that is.

by Inzijard » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:30 pm
Mavorpen wrote:Again, no it wasn't because he did it for pure political reasons. Did you know that in 1941 when Nazi Germany attacked, he revived the Russian Orthodox Church to increase patriotism? If he was such a horrible man driven by his atheism, why would he bring back religion when he needed a political boost? The answer is that atheism had jack shit to do with it.

by Grenartia » Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:32 pm
Adafdfadfasdf wrote:Grenartia wrote:
Indeed. Because no ture Christian would be watching a Batman movie, especially at the ungodly hour of 12am. True Christians can't watch/listen/read anything that doesn't totally 100% blab about God for the entire time, even if the evil secular books/movies/TV/music is more entertaining. Its infinitely more desireable to be bored to death and get sent to Heaven than to be entertained before going to Hell.
Somebody is bound to read this post and think I'm serious, so let me clarify that this post is intended as sarcasm. If you respond to this post thinking I'm serious, and fail to see this disclaimer, then that reflects more on you than me.
I once had the following conversation with an evangelical regarding secular entertainment:
E: You have to either be "of God" or "of the world".
Me: Didn't God make the world and call it "good".
E: That's not the point.
Me: <slow blink>
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Fartsniffage, Galloism, Nimzonia
Advertisement