NATION

PASSWORD

I Find This Disgusting, Does NationStates?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40525
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:35 pm

Locyrmor wrote:Many of you don't seem to understand Christian doctrine at all, juuuuust saying. Not intending this to be an insult or anything, it's just that many atheists pretty much get all of their stuff from the wrong sources--people with an agenda.

The reason we can't go to heaven normally is because we all suck. Nobody's perfect.

Jesus died in our place to satisfy the fact that we all deserve to die. Faith in him is the only way to receive the gift.

That begs the question of whether or not people who have never heard of Jesus go to heaven. You could say that a) they never would have believed even if they got the chance or b) they can be saved if they realize they are sinful beings and repent.

You guys are jumping on a pastor for reaffirming Christian doctrine in a somewhat, I would agree, insensitive manner. But this reaction is exactly what I would expect from somewhere like /r/Atheism, and please don't tell me you consider them role models...

Neutraligon wrote:


People are not saved based on semantics. A maximally great being (God) does not require saving.


You know there are people commenting on this who are theists. Even if I go with your claim that Jesus is God, he was still a man on earth and born to a religion. I am not being semantic, I am trying to understand how this heaven thnig works since it is so different from my religions beliefs.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:37 pm

Inzijard wrote:A man with God has a moral focal point and accountability. He does not lie, cheat, steal, or kill, because his faith in God and his morality prohibit him from doing so. A man without God, raised in the belief that life is meaningless, godless, and temporary, has no reason to remain accountable to anyone or anything. This is the dangerous man, who lies, cheats, steals and, sadly, kills.


Too bad this is bullshit.
Last edited by Mavorpen on Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Hamste
Minister
 
Posts: 3337
Founded: Sep 10, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Hamste » Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:38 pm

Locyrmor wrote:Many of you don't seem to understand Christian doctrine at all, juuuuust saying. Not intending this to be an insult or anything, it's just that many atheists pretty much get all of their stuff from the wrong sources--people with an agenda.

The reason we can't go to heaven normally is because we all suck. Nobody's perfect.

Jesus died in our place to satisfy the fact that we all deserve to die. Faith in him is the only way to receive the gift.

That begs the question of whether or not people who have never heard of Jesus go to heaven. You could say that a) they never would have believed even if they got the chance or b) they can be saved if they realize they are sinful beings and repent.

You guys are jumping on a pastor for reaffirming Christian doctrine in a somewhat, I would agree, insensitive manner. But this reaction is exactly what I would expect from somewhere like /r/Atheism, and please don't tell me you consider them role models...

Neutraligon wrote:


People are not saved based on semantics. A maximally great being (God) does not require saving.


Can you clarify the rule where no one will honour an idol or false god before him? Wouldn't that include a lot of religions and that is a core rule in the religion isn't it?
Can you imagine a world without hypothetical situtations?

Logic is like thumbs, it is not necessary but it sure is helpful.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:39 pm

Locyrmor wrote:Many of you don't seem to understand Christian doctrine at all, juuuuust saying. Not intending this to be an insult or anything, it's just that many atheists pretty much get all of their stuff from the wrong sources--people with an agenda.


*cough*Bullshit*cough*
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:40 pm

Inzijard wrote:
The simple answer there is free will. God afforded man the freedom of choice, and it's not something he's going to go back on. Free will has created greed, free will has created murder, and free will created atheism. Free will and social ignorance also created distasteful ways of conveying religion, but I think we've been there, done that.

The most prevailing argument I face when discussing God's "benevolence" with agnostics is the destructive, inhuman nature of this world and how He appears to be doing nothing about it. What people fail to realize is that destruction and inhumanity is the product of man itself.

A man with God has a moral focal point and accountability. He does not lie, cheat, steal, or kill, because his faith in God and his morality prohibit him from doing so. A man without God, raised in the belief that life is meaningless, godless, and temporary, has no reason to remain accountable to anyone or anything. This is the dangerous man, who lies, cheats, steals and, sadly, kills.

This man then looks at the world and watches his cities burn, and then spits at the prospect of God, who could have stopped everything. But God would not intervene, because he gave this man free will. He gave the man a choice, and the man chose to forsake God to enjoy his life however he pleased. People were hurt, people were lost, and people were left hopeless because this man reveled in the fact that there was no God to hold him back.

Well, I'm not really here to preach to you (though it looks as though I have). My point is simply that humanity destroys itself. If the world does not want God, then that's their choice to make, but God is not going to step in and say "hey now, this is going to end badly" every time someone picks up a gun.

All the talk surrounding the Aurora incident deeply saddens me, and I do not wish to offend anyone. If I have, you have my sincerest apologies. I know there are legitimate people out there, regardless of their beliefs, and I just seek to shed a little light on what I feel God actually means, without the lens of a fanatic.


1.Free will and an omniscient creator cannot coexist. If you set up dominos you know exactly what they're going to do.

2. If you're telling me that your relationship with god is the only thing keeping you from lying, cheating, stealing, or killing you are a fucking psychopath for the love of god get help.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Pretty Awesome Persons
Minister
 
Posts: 2116
Founded: May 08, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Pretty Awesome Persons » Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:41 pm

Reminds me of what my pastor said in church yesterday, preaching about the same thing ironically.

He said that since people refuse to believe in hell or in any of the more difficult or "scary" parts of Christianity, more people are going to hell and he brought up the Colorado shooting and about how many people there died and went to hell.

I'm used to it though, when the Haiti earthquake happened, she said it was God's punishment for all the voodoo that happens there.
DEFCON 1 2 3 4 [5] Nothing going on here...
It's currently 2056 in Pretty Awesome Persons
Denomynm: Awesomite

Cup of Harmony 47 Champions

Economic Left/Right: 1.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.15

volim partizan crno bele boje

User avatar
Locyrmor
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 13
Founded: Jul 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Locyrmor » Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:45 pm

1. Molinism answers this by stating that being ominiscent God knows what choices people will make and acts accordingly, which is perfectly compatible with free will.
2. I've heard this a lot. What's wrong with being a psychopath?

Mavorpen wrote:
Locyrmor wrote:Many of you don't seem to understand Christian doctrine at all, juuuuust saying. Not intending this to be an insult or anything, it's just that many atheists pretty much get all of their stuff from the wrong sources--people with an agenda.


*cough*Bullshit*cough*


1) I said many, not most.
2) Way to completely take my post out of context. I was referring to the thread.
3) I never made a claim about other Christians knowing actual Christian doctrine.

The first sign of a troll is when they're more interested in embarrassing you rather than having a reasonable conversation.

Can you clarify the rule where no one will honour an idol or false god before him? Wouldn't that include a lot of religions and that is a core rule in the religion isn't it?


As far as I know Paul talks about Abraham's faith being accounted to him as righteousness.

I'm not really well read on the subject of salvation to non-believers. You can look up WIlliam Lane Craig's website if you really want to do some research. I've been oversaturated with pointless discussions with trolls in a lot of places, so I'm a bit rusty on that. :P
Last edited by Locyrmor on Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:48 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Inzijard
Diplomat
 
Posts: 836
Founded: Jul 03, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Inzijard » Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:46 pm

Mavorpen wrote:Too bad this is bullshit.


I do not speak on behalf of the religious world. I simply speak on behalf of my experience and knowledge of faith, and what it actually means to me. What man chooses to do with his free will, whether he is faithful or not, is not always what he ought to do in the name of God (no surprise there).

I am not innocent. I have lied and stolen, and I'll admit to that. Nobody is innocent, and God does not expect perfection or innocence. He does, however, expect acknowledgement of such guilt and an effort to make right. Those faithful people who abuse their freedom and commit atrocious acts against humanity and God, all in the knowledge that "God will forgive them" have another thing coming. I have no respect for these people, and they are becoming increasingly prevalent. In fact, I don't know very many devout people anymore.

Heaven and hell may be one thing, but God does not operate a Boolean system. If you waste your life away and the lives of others, faithful as you may be, you will be judged accordingly. There are always intermediate steps between life and the end goal.
Factbook
Ruridova wrote:"Capitalism rewards the intelligent and the industrious. Which is why Nikola Tesla died broke and Paris Hilton is swimming in cash."
- RCWP General Secretary Alexandre Thibault

condition, military: peace (5)
position, polity: +3
position, culture: -5
position, economy: -7

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:47 pm

Locyrmor wrote:1. Molinism answers this by stating that being ominiscent God knows what choices people will make and acts accordingly, which is perfectly compatible with free will.
2. I've heard this a lot. What's wrong with being a psychopath?



1) I said many, not most.
2) Way to completely take my post out of context. I was referring to the thread.
3) I never made a claim about other Christians knowing actual Christian doctrine.

The first sign of a troll is when they're more interested in embarrassing you rather than having a reasonable conversation.

Many christians are rapists, many supported Nazis, many are Klan members, many are my next door neighbor and their kids. You've removed all meaning from the word many, this is the world you have created.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:48 pm

Isointania wrote:You've heard my opinion, now I want to hear yours. What does NationStates think?

If anybody does not love the Lord Jesus Christ let him be accursed O Lord come amen.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:49 pm

Locyrmor wrote:
1) I said many, not most.
2) Way to completely take my post out of context. I was referring to the thread.
3) I never made a claim about other Christians knowing actual Christian doctrine.

The first sign of a troll is when they're more interested in embarrassing you rather than having a reasonable conversation.


It was to your point that...
Locyrmor wrote:Many of you don't seem to understand Christian doctrine at all, juuuuust saying. Not intending this to be an insult or anything, it's just that many atheists pretty much get all of their stuff from the wrong sources--people with an agenda.
I also don't care if you said most. I'd still need a sorcer for "many." I also never said you claimed anything about Christians. I was addressing your claim about Atheists. My post had nothing to do with Christians. So no, the only person who took anything out of context was you.
Last edited by Mavorpen on Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Inzijard
Diplomat
 
Posts: 836
Founded: Jul 03, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Inzijard » Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:49 pm

Des-Bal wrote:2. If you're telling me that your relationship with god is the only thing keeping you from lying, cheating, stealing, or killing you are a fucking psychopath for the love of god get help.


Where did that idea come from?

I never once said or implied that. I respect all people who offer the same degree of respect to me, and the fact that you think I'm governed solely by God's interests is true testament to just how shallow you are.

I am a human being too. I can empathise with people. I can share their enjoyment and their suffering. God does not govern my emotions and I am appalled by your statement.

Yes, I used a fancy word. I am appalled.
Last edited by Inzijard on Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Factbook
Ruridova wrote:"Capitalism rewards the intelligent and the industrious. Which is why Nikola Tesla died broke and Paris Hilton is swimming in cash."
- RCWP General Secretary Alexandre Thibault

condition, military: peace (5)
position, polity: +3
position, culture: -5
position, economy: -7

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:49 pm

Pretty Awesome Persons wrote:Reminds me of what my pastor said in church yesterday, preaching about the same thing ironically.

He said that since people refuse to believe in hell or in any of the more difficult or "scary" parts of Christianity, more people are going to hell and he brought up the Colorado shooting and about how many people there died and went to hell.

I'm used to it though, when the Haiti earthquake happened, she said it was God's punishment for all the voodoo that happens there.

And you keep going there why?
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Northern Dominus
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14337
Founded: Aug 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Northern Dominus » Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:50 pm

Pretty Awesome Persons wrote:Reminds me of what my pastor said in church yesterday, preaching about the same thing ironically.

He said that since people refuse to believe in hell or in any of the more difficult or "scary" parts of Christianity, more people are going to hell and he brought up the Colorado shooting and about how many people there died and went to hell.

I'm used to it though, when the Haiti earthquake happened, she said it was God's punishment for all the voodoo that happens there.
Does this sum it up for your pastor?
Battletech RP: Giant walking war machines, space to surface fighters, and other implements blowing things up= lots of fun! Sign up here
We even have a soundtrack!

RIP Caroll Shelby 1923-2012
Aurora, Oak Creek, Happy Valley, Sandy Hook. Just how high a price are we willing to pay?

User avatar
Pretty Awesome Persons
Minister
 
Posts: 2116
Founded: May 08, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Pretty Awesome Persons » Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:51 pm

Norstal wrote:
Pretty Awesome Persons wrote:Reminds me of what my pastor said in church yesterday, preaching about the same thing ironically.

He said that since people refuse to believe in hell or in any of the more difficult or "scary" parts of Christianity, more people are going to hell and he brought up the Colorado shooting and about how many people there died and went to hell.

I'm used to it though, when the Haiti earthquake happened, she said it was God's punishment for all the voodoo that happens there.

And you keep going there why?

I'm 15, and even though my parents are aware of the fact that I'm atheist, they believe that it's because I'm not opening my heart and ears enough to what's said at church. So they drag me, and I can't tell them otherwise.
DEFCON 1 2 3 4 [5] Nothing going on here...
It's currently 2056 in Pretty Awesome Persons
Denomynm: Awesomite

Cup of Harmony 47 Champions

Economic Left/Right: 1.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.15

volim partizan crno bele boje

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:51 pm

Inzijard wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:2. If you're telling me that your relationship with god is the only thing keeping you from lying, cheating, stealing, or killing you are a fucking psychopath for the love of god get help.


Where did that idea come from?

I never once said or implied that. I respect all people who offer the same degree of respect to me, and the fact that you think I'm governed solely by God's interests is true testament to just how shallow you are.

I am a human being too. I can empathise with people. I can share their enjoyment and their suffering. God does not govern my emotions and I am appalled by your statement.

Yes, I used a fancy word. I am appalled.


" A man without God, raised in the belief that life is meaningless, godless, and temporary, has no reason to remain accountable to anyone or anything. This is the dangerous man, who lies, cheats, steals and, sadly, kills."
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:51 pm

Inzijard wrote:I do not speak on behalf of the religious world. I simply speak on behalf of my experience and knowledge of faith, and what it actually means to me. What man chooses to do with his free will, whether he is faithful or not, is not always what he ought to do in the name of God (no surprise there).

Nice No True Scotsman here. I don't care if you believe they aren't "true Christians." You made an incorrect claim.
Inzijard wrote:I am not innocent. I have lied and stolen, and I'll admit to that. Nobody is innocent, and God does not expect perfection or innocence. He does, however, expect acknowledgement of such guilt and an effort to make right.

Which doesn't require belief in a God.

Inzijard wrote:Those faithful people who abuse their freedom and commit atrocious acts against humanity and God, all in the knowledge that "God will forgive them" have another thing coming. I have no respect for these people, and they are becoming increasingly prevalent. In fact, I don't know very many devout people anymore.

Funny, the most devout people I know are the most bigoted.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Milks Empire
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21069
Founded: Aug 02, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Milks Empire » Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:52 pm

Pretty Awesome Persons wrote:
Norstal wrote:And you keep going there why?

I'm 15, and even though my parents are aware of the fact that I'm atheist, they believe that it's because I'm not opening my heart and ears enough to what's said at church. So they drag me, and I can't tell them otherwise.

That complicates things. :( :hug:

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:52 pm

Pretty Awesome Persons wrote:
Norstal wrote:And you keep going there why?

I'm 15, and even though my parents are aware of the fact that I'm atheist, they believe that it's because I'm not opening my heart and ears enough to what's said at church. So they drag me, and I can't tell them otherwise.

Heh, I'm 20 and I'm in the same position as you mate...

Just until I'm done with college anyways.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Locyrmor
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 13
Founded: Jul 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Locyrmor » Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:53 pm

I also don't care if you said most. I'd still need a sorcer for "many."


Does personal experience count in the context of my comment?

I also never said you claimed anything about Christians. I was addressing your claim about Atheists.


I was referring to the thread and my experiences. If I have encountered "many" atheists that have misconceptions, then it is sufficient for me to make the claim that "many atheists have misconceptions." That was all I was claiming.

My post had nothing to do with Christians.


Your post was a link to a source titled "Atheists, agnostics most knowledgeable about religion, survey says."

So no, your post had everything to do with Christians as your source implied that atheists know more about religion than Christians, which asserts the opposite--that Christians know less.

So no, the only person who took anything out of context was you.


That's strike two. I don't respond to trolls online, sorry.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:54 pm

Pretty Awesome Persons wrote:I'm 15, and even though my parents are aware of the fact that I'm atheist, they believe that it's because I'm not opening my heart and ears enough to what's said at church. So they drag me, and I can't tell them otherwise.


That's really bad. My parents don't make me go to Church. They don't even bother me with religion. We just don't talk about it, and sometimes when we do, it's a calm discussion. None of the, "ACCEPT JESUS OR BURN!" shit.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:56 pm

Locyrmor wrote:
Does personal experience count in the context of my comment?

No, it doesn't.
Locyrmor wrote:I was referring to the thread and my experiences. If I have encountered "many" atheists that have misconceptions, then it is sufficient for me to make the claim that "many atheists have misconceptions." That was all I was claiming.

It may be sufficient for you, but not for us. And I'm still going to call bullshit because most of the Atheists on NSG are knowledgeable about religion.
Locyrmor wrote:Your post was a link to a source titled "Atheists, agnostics most knowledgeable about religion, survey says."

So no, your post had everything to do with Christians as your source implied that atheists know more about religion than Christians, which asserts the opposite--that Christians know less.

No, my source had something to do with Christians. My post had nothing to do with Christians because your post was speaking about Atheists. I provided a source to address the specific claim about Atheists, not about Christians.
Locyrmor wrote:That's strike two. I don't respond to trolls online, sorry.

You don't have an actual argument, do you?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Locyrmor
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 13
Founded: Jul 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Locyrmor » Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:58 pm

Nice No True Scotsman here. I don't care if you believe they aren't "true Christians." You made an incorrect claim.


If I called myself a member of a group, that does not automatically make me a member of my group.

If a Christian by definition means that you have faith in Christ (which directly means a Christian is by definition saved) then Matthew 7-8 would indicate that there certainly are people who call themselves Christians that cannot be considered Christians.

Which doesn't require belief in a God.


Belief in God certainly justifies it though.

Funny, the most devout people I know are the most bigoted.


"Love your neighbor" is one of Jesus' primary teachings. If these people are truly "devout" then they cannot be bigoted.

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:58 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Inzijard wrote:
The simple answer there is free will. God afforded man the freedom of choice, and it's not something he's going to go back on. Free will has created greed, free will has created murder, and free will created atheism. Free will and social ignorance also created distasteful ways of conveying religion, but I think we've been there, done that.

The most prevailing argument I face when discussing God's "benevolence" with agnostics is the destructive, inhuman nature of this world and how He appears to be doing nothing about it. What people fail to realize is that destruction and inhumanity is the product of man itself.

A man with God has a moral focal point and accountability. He does not lie, cheat, steal, or kill, because his faith in God and his morality prohibit him from doing so. A man without God, raised in the belief that life is meaningless, godless, and temporary, has no reason to remain accountable to anyone or anything. This is the dangerous man, who lies, cheats, steals and, sadly, kills.

This man then looks at the world and watches his cities burn, and then spits at the prospect of God, who could have stopped everything. But God would not intervene, because he gave this man free will. He gave the man a choice, and the man chose to forsake God to enjoy his life however he pleased. People were hurt, people were lost, and people were left hopeless because this man reveled in the fact that there was no God to hold him back.

Well, I'm not really here to preach to you (though it looks as though I have). My point is simply that humanity destroys itself. If the world does not want God, then that's their choice to make, but God is not going to step in and say "hey now, this is going to end badly" every time someone picks up a gun.

All the talk surrounding the Aurora incident deeply saddens me, and I do not wish to offend anyone. If I have, you have my sincerest apologies. I know there are legitimate people out there, regardless of their beliefs, and I just seek to shed a little light on what I feel God actually means, without the lens of a fanatic.


1.Free will and an omniscient creator cannot coexist. If you set up dominos you know exactly what they're going to do.

2. If you're telling me that your relationship with god is the only thing keeping you from lying, cheating, stealing, or killing you are a fucking psychopath for the love of god get help.


1. I see it like this:

God knows all, and has given us free will. He knows everything we will consider doing, and knows the consequences of every possible action and reaction. Essentially, He plans for everything we might do, as well as for every possible action/reaction on the part of everybody else. Hard to adequately explain, but suffice it to say that it is infinitely more complex than dominos.

Think of it more as knowing every possible opening move in a game of chess, as well as every move in response, and so on.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:59 pm

Reminds me of the guy who got out of the army for pysch issues.

He asked the Chaplin wouldn't it be a good thing to kill a hundred babies because it would ensure they all go to heaven?
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: El Lazaro, Fartsniffage, Galloism, Google [Bot], Nimzonia

Advertisement

Remove ads