What part of "instituted" do you need explained to you, then?
Advertisement

by Adafdfadfasdf » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:30 pm

by Abatael » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:33 pm

by Adafdfadfasdf » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:35 pm

by Lialoth » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:35 pm
Abatael wrote:Legally it won't be valid. Religiously, however, it would be valid, and that is what I care about the most, when I get married.

by Chalkfarm » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:35 pm
I used to believe in the BS line of "hate the sin but love the sinner" but I quickly learned it was just a nice way to feel good about treating others bad.

by Yuktova » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:35 pm
Goldsaver said: This is murder, not a romantic date!

by Abatael » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:38 pm

by Abatael » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:39 pm

by Revolutopia » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:40 pm
Yuktova wrote:"Chick-fil-A in a statement said it has a history of applying biblically-based principles to its business, and that it strives to treat everyone with honor, dignity and respect."
If CFA actually cared about being "Christian" then they would be for gay marriage, not against.

by Unchecked Expansion » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:40 pm

by Greed and Death » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:42 pm

by Abatael » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:44 pm

by Yuktova » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:45 pm
Goldsaver said: This is murder, not a romantic date!

by Unchecked Expansion » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:46 pm
Abatael wrote:And, this thread is about the Muppets "dum[ing]" Chick-fil-a.

by Abatael » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:47 pm

by Abatael » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:48 pm
Yuktova wrote:Abatael wrote:
You seem to be trying to change this from a discussion about what type of institution marriage is to something about same-sex marriage.
There are several definitions of "classical, religious, or traditional marriage" which one do you mean? Do you mean the one where you can marry four women, plus concubines, plus sex slaves? Do you mean the one where you can marry slaves? What is a traditional viewpoint of a wedding?

by Lialoth » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:48 pm
Abatael wrote:You seem to be trying to change this from a discussion about what type of institution marriage is to something about same-sex marriage.

by Unchecked Expansion » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:48 pm
Abatael wrote:Yuktova wrote:There are several definitions of "classical, religious, or traditional marriage" which one do you mean? Do you mean the one where you can marry four women, plus concubines, plus sex slaves? Do you mean the one where you can marry slaves? What is a traditional viewpoint of a wedding?
I am currently talking about a religious marriage.

by Adafdfadfasdf » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:50 pm

by Raeyh » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:51 pm
Revolutopia wrote:Yuktova wrote:"Chick-fil-A in a statement said it has a history of applying biblically-based principles to its business, and that it strives to treat everyone with honor, dignity and respect."
If CFA actually cared about being "Christian" then they would be for gay marriage, not against.
I enjoy how they serve cheese on their chicken, despite God firmly declaring that one should not mix dairy with meat. I guess they skipped that page on accident, someone should contact them about that mistake.

by Vitius » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:53 pm

by Unchecked Expansion » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:54 pm
Vitius wrote:Ah, I'm glad that they made the decision to drop Chick-fil-a as a partner.
Still, they should've given the money back to Chick-fil-a. That's just slapping someone in the face because you don't agree with their beliefs.

by Revolutopia » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:55 pm
Raeyh wrote:Revolutopia wrote:
I enjoy how they serve cheese on their chicken, despite God firmly declaring that one should not mix dairy with meat. I guess they skipped that page on accident, someone should contact them about that mistake.
Saint Peter got rid of that law along with not eating pork. So it doesn't apply to Christians.

by Abatael » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:55 pm
Lialoth wrote:Abatael wrote:You seem to be trying to change this from a discussion about what type of institution marriage is to something about same-sex marriage.
Religion is a government-run institution that is also provided, as service, by some religions (The religious service it is). Some churches want to allow same-sex marriage and others don't.
Why should the churches against allowing same-sex marriage get to dictate to the others what they can or cannot perform?
Again, have your little "religious marriage". Just don't try to keep marriage away from me, or people like me.

by R Ev0lution » Mon Jul 23, 2012 1:56 pm
Raeyh wrote:Revolutopia wrote:
I enjoy how they serve cheese on their chicken, despite God firmly declaring that one should not mix dairy with meat. I guess they skipped that page on accident, someone should contact them about that mistake.
Saint Peter got rid of that law along with not eating pork. So it doesn't apply to Christians.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Canarsia, Eahland, EuroStralia, Great Nelson, Gregandua, Riviere Renard, Teremara Caretaker, Torisakia, Washington Resistance Army, Xi Jinping Thought
Advertisement