Advertisement

by Abatael » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:05 am
by Cannot think of a name » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:05 am
New Nassrau wrote:Well, people are entitled to voice their opinions.
New Nassrau wrote: I do not encourage violence against gays.
New Nassrau wrote: I have a neutral opinion on them. It seems as though that if anyone says anything about a minority, the response is vicious and biting.
New Nassrau wrote: Not everyone will accept gays, and people need to understand that.
by Cannot think of a name » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:06 am
Vetalia wrote:The guy's got a right to his opinion just like anyone else...if you disagree, don't support Chick-fil-a.

by No Water No Moon » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:06 am
Adafdfadfasdf wrote:No Water No Moon wrote:
A boycott is not an over-reaction. If someone has started burning their restaurants down or something? THAT would be an over-reaction.
The Mayor of Boston's reaction was an overreaction as well:
“Chick-fil-A doesn’t belong in Boston. You can’t have a business in the city of Boston that discriminates against a population. We’re an open city, we’re a city that’s at the forefront of inclusion...If they need licenses in the city, it will be very difficult — unless they open up their policies."
Not twice this day
Inch time foot gem

by Lialoth » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:09 am

by Greed and Death » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:10 am
No Water No Moon wrote:Adafdfadfasdf wrote:
The Mayor of Boston's reaction was an overreaction as well:
“Chick-fil-A doesn’t belong in Boston. You can’t have a business in the city of Boston that discriminates against a population. We’re an open city, we’re a city that’s at the forefront of inclusion...If they need licenses in the city, it will be very difficult — unless they open up their policies."
I'm not seeing an over-reaction. If the city has a policy of equality, they can choose to oppose people who discriminate - just as 'dry' towns can choose to oppose people who want to sell alcohol.

by Abatael » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:10 am
No Water No Moon wrote:Adafdfadfasdf wrote:
The Mayor of Boston's reaction was an overreaction as well:
“Chick-fil-A doesn’t belong in Boston. You can’t have a business in the city of Boston that discriminates against a population. We’re an open city, we’re a city that’s at the forefront of inclusion...If they need licenses in the city, it will be very difficult — unless they open up their policies."
I'm not seeing an over-reaction. If the city has a policy of equality, they can choose to oppose people who discriminate - just as 'dry' towns can choose to oppose people who want to sell alcohol.
by Cannot think of a name » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:10 am
Arkinesia wrote:A boycott over a phrase taken out of context is an overreaction.
I mean, what's next? We boycott McDonald's because someone sneezed in the store and it offends your sense of hygiene?

by No Water No Moon » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:10 am
Arkinesia wrote:No Water No Moon wrote:A boycott is not an over-reaction. If someone has started burning their restaurants down or something? THAT would be an over-reaction.
A boycott over a phrase taken out of context is an overreaction.
I mean, what's next? We boycott McDonald's because someone sneezed in the store and it offends your sense of hygiene?
Not twice this day
Inch time foot gem

by Arkinesia » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:12 am
Cannot think of a name wrote:Arkinesia wrote:A boycott over a phrase taken out of context is an overreaction.
I mean, what's next? We boycott McDonald's because someone sneezed in the store and it offends your sense of hygiene?
By 'phrase' you mean 'donates money' and if 'out of context' you mean 'to an anti-gay marriage organization'...
Disappointment Panda wrote:Don't hope for a life without problems. There's no such thing. Instead, hope for a life full of good problems.

by Aleckandor » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:12 am

by Abatael » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:13 am
greed and death wrote:No Water No Moon wrote:
I'm not seeing an over-reaction. If the city has a policy of equality, they can choose to oppose people who discriminate - just as 'dry' towns can choose to oppose people who want to sell alcohol.
So in a dry town, I can not open a book store because I personally support legalizing the sell of alcohol. The mayor of Boston better hope his officials do not discriminate against Chik-fil-a for exercising their first amendment rights.
You can not run people out of town for having opposing viewpoints, nor can you make it impoissble to have a job for those who disagree wiht you.

by Adafdfadfasdf » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:13 am
Abatael wrote:No Water No Moon wrote:
I'm not seeing an over-reaction. If the city has a policy of equality, they can choose to oppose people who discriminate - just as 'dry' towns can choose to oppose people who want to sell alcohol.
Wait, I just want a full understanding of this. Are they forbidding Chick-fil-a from conducting business there, or is the guy just making a statement saying he disagrees?

by The Realm of God » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:14 am
Mavorpen wrote:TaQud wrote:i didn't say I hate it (i'm neutral so I don't really care) its just where I live thats opposed to it
Is it the younger generation or the older generation? I live in Texas and it's not a problem usually (although I've been to the poorer parts of Texas and it's horrible) with the younger generation. And when it is, it's not because they're Christian, it's because they're closed-minded assholes in general.

by Lialoth » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:14 am
Abatael wrote:Wait, I just want a full understanding of this. Are they forbidding Chick-fil-a from conducting business there, or is the guy just making a statement saying he disagrees?

by No Water No Moon » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:15 am
greed and death wrote:No Water No Moon wrote:
I'm not seeing an over-reaction. If the city has a policy of equality, they can choose to oppose people who discriminate - just as 'dry' towns can choose to oppose people who want to sell alcohol.
So in a dry town, I can not open a book store because I personally support legalizing the sell of alcohol. The mayor of Boston better hope his officials do not discriminate against Chik-fil-a for exercising their first amendment rights.
You can not run people out of town for having opposing viewpoints, nor can you make it impoissble to have a job for those who disagree wiht you.
Not twice this day
Inch time foot gem

by Abatael » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:15 am
Adafdfadfasdf wrote:Abatael wrote:
Wait, I just want a full understanding of this. Are they forbidding Chick-fil-a from conducting business there, or is the guy just making a statement saying he disagrees?
It wasn't an official declaration that they would actually forbid Chick-fil-a from doing business, but a somewhat veiled threat. It really pisses me of though. Because in this instance, I have to defend the fucking bigots.

by No Water No Moon » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:15 am
Not twice this day
Inch time foot gem

by The Black Forrest » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:16 am
Abatael wrote:I already loved Chick-fil-a, but this makes me love them even more. Chick-fil-a is now my favorite fast food restaurant.

by Osthia » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:16 am

by Gauthier » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:17 am
No Water No Moon wrote:greed and death wrote:So in a dry town, I can not open a book store because I personally support legalizing the sell of alcohol. The mayor of Boston better hope his officials do not discriminate against Chik-fil-a for exercising their first amendment rights.
You can not run people out of town for having opposing viewpoints, nor can you make it impoissble to have a job for those who disagree wiht you.
It'll be an interesting one to watch, for sure - they did block a Wal-Mart expansion plan last year, by claiming it would have a negative impact.

by Adafdfadfasdf » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:17 am
Abatael wrote:Adafdfadfasdf wrote:
It wasn't an official declaration that they would actually forbid Chick-fil-a from doing business, but a somewhat veiled threat. It really pisses me of though. Because in this instance, I have to defend the fucking bigots.
Is there a link to the statement, or something I can see?

by No Water No Moon » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:17 am
Abatael wrote:I already loved Chick-fil-a, but this makes me love them even more. Chick-fil-a is now my favorite fast food restaurant.
Not twice this day
Inch time foot gem

by No Water No Moon » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:18 am
Gauthier wrote:No Water No Moon wrote:
It'll be an interesting one to watch, for sure - they did block a Wal-Mart expansion plan last year, by claiming it would have a negative impact.
Wal Marts tend to be referred to as Poverty Bombs for a reason. Their very presence and business practices are designed to obliterate local small businesses.
Not twice this day
Inch time foot gem

by Gauthier » Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:18 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Achan, Bienenhalde, Emotional Support Crocodile, Grinning Dragon, Juansonia, Ostroeuropa, Philjia, Stellar Colonies, Techocracy101010, The Huskar Social Union, The Orson Empire, Zapato
Advertisement