NATION

PASSWORD

Repeal the 2nd Amendment

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

What is your opinion on gun control?

no restrictions on firearms
213
17%
some restrictions, but less restriction than there is now
375
31%
tighten regulation of guns by increasing registration or by banning certain types of guns
527
43%
all guns should be banned
110
9%
 
Total votes : 1225

User avatar
Mk Steele
Envoy
 
Posts: 312
Founded: Aug 21, 2010
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Mk Steele » Fri Jul 27, 2012 4:27 pm

Would a criminal or any person who harbors the intent to kill other people for no other reason than to just do it really follow the rules and not break the law? If that were the case then right now there should be no murders/massacres in the world because that's illegal, cartels and drug lords would not exist because their activities are by definition "illegal". In the end any type of restrictions or attempts to repeal the 2nd Amendment would only serve to inhibit the ability for responsible civilians to purchase firearms.
The Official Future Factbook of the Federal Republic here [Currently WIP]
Official Modern Factbook here WIP
(Factbook updates are going a little slow, I haven't forgotten about them)

[Future Factbook updated, various pages reorganized. Added on October 27, 2013 ]
Modern Factbook Not updated

Member of The Anti-Terrorism Alliance

User avatar
Gaelic Celtia
Minister
 
Posts: 3179
Founded: Oct 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Gaelic Celtia » Fri Jul 27, 2012 4:33 pm

I don't agree that guns should be outright banned, but i do think there should be some tighter restricitions on who can buy and what type of firearm. People should be able to keep handguns, rifles, and shotguns for hunting and self defence but I don't think we should be able to sell an assault rifle or submachine gun to the genreal public.
Last edited by Llywelyn ap Iorwerth on Thur May 6, 1208 11:45 am, edited 100 times in total.

Sibirsky wrote:You are offensive to me.
Welsh
Pride!
Economic Left/Right: -7.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.00
Social Attitude Result
Cosmopolitan Social Democrat
Pro: Gay Rights, secularism, Welsh independence, democratic socialism, gun control, choice, progressive tax, death penalty, environmental protection, Plaid Cymru, Stark
Conflicted/Unsure About: Israel, Catalan Independence
Anti: Theocracy, Fundamentalism, Communism, Fascism, National Socialism, Nationalism, USA, Golden Dawn, nuclear weapons, chemical weapons, Lannister

User avatar
Lessnt
Senator
 
Posts: 3926
Founded: Jul 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Lessnt » Fri Jul 27, 2012 4:34 pm

Gaelic Celtia wrote:I don't agree that guns should be outright banned, but i do think there should be some tighter restricitions on who can buy and what type of firearm. People should be able to keep handguns, rifles, and shotguns for hunting and self defence but I don't think we should be able to sell an assault rifle or submachine gun to the genreal public.

We do not.
Without special permission.
This is federal law.

User avatar
Gaelic Celtia
Minister
 
Posts: 3179
Founded: Oct 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Gaelic Celtia » Fri Jul 27, 2012 4:36 pm

Lessnt wrote:
Gaelic Celtia wrote:I don't agree that guns should be outright banned, but i do think there should be some tighter restricitions on who can buy and what type of firearm. People should be able to keep handguns, rifles, and shotguns for hunting and self defence but I don't think we should be able to sell an assault rifle or submachine gun to the genreal public.

We do not.
Without special permission.
This is federal law.

I understand that, but i think even that should be gone. there is no need to have an AR-15 laying around the house. Keep everything else on the market, but not ARs and SMGs
Last edited by Llywelyn ap Iorwerth on Thur May 6, 1208 11:45 am, edited 100 times in total.

Sibirsky wrote:You are offensive to me.
Welsh
Pride!
Economic Left/Right: -7.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.00
Social Attitude Result
Cosmopolitan Social Democrat
Pro: Gay Rights, secularism, Welsh independence, democratic socialism, gun control, choice, progressive tax, death penalty, environmental protection, Plaid Cymru, Stark
Conflicted/Unsure About: Israel, Catalan Independence
Anti: Theocracy, Fundamentalism, Communism, Fascism, National Socialism, Nationalism, USA, Golden Dawn, nuclear weapons, chemical weapons, Lannister

User avatar
Ridicularia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 524
Founded: Feb 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Ridicularia » Fri Jul 27, 2012 4:38 pm

Gaelic Celtia wrote:I understand that, but i think even that should be gone. there is no need to have an AR-15 laying around the house. Keep everything else on the market, but not ARs and SMGs

AR-15s aren't really assault rifles, and SMGs aren't allowed at all, without a pain-in-the-ass Class III license.

User avatar
Lessnt
Senator
 
Posts: 3926
Founded: Jul 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Lessnt » Fri Jul 27, 2012 4:51 pm

Gaelic Celtia wrote:
Lessnt wrote:We do not.
Without special permission.
This is federal law.

I understand that, but i think even that should be gone. there is no need to have an AR-15 laying around the house. Keep everything else on the market, but not ARs and SMGs

California laws have definitions on assault weapons.Including Ar 15s as a banned weapon.
And any gun with a mag capacity of more than 10 is illegal.
We still had a case where a korean student went and kill 11 or more people with a 45 acp pistol.
He just went around executing people.
And ran away before the police set up a perimeter and told some store clerk he just killed some people.

He did not need an AR 15 to kill.He did not need a mag capacity of over 10 to kill.
He just needed everyone to be helpless and do nothing while he murdered them.

User avatar
Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9191
Founded: Jan 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f » Fri Jul 27, 2012 4:58 pm

Lessnt wrote:
Gaelic Celtia wrote:I understand that, but i think even that should be gone. there is no need to have an AR-15 laying around the house. Keep everything else on the market, but not ARs and SMGs

California laws have definitions on assault weapons.Including Ar 15s as a banned weapon.
And any gun with a mag capacity of more than 10 is illegal.
We still had a case where a korean student went and kill 11 or more people with a 45 acp pistol.
He just went around executing people.
And ran away before the police set up a perimeter and told some store clerk he just killed some people.

He did not need an AR 15 to kill.He did not need a mag capacity of over 10 to kill.
He just needed everyone to be helpless and do nothing while he murdered them.


Pretty simplistic view of the Virginia Tech shooting...given that the shooter had been demonstrating unbalanced behaviour quite a while before the shooting.
PLEASE DO NOT SEND ME TG's. MODERATORS READ YOUR TG's WITHOUT YOUR PERMISSION.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tommy_Flowers Call me Rubi for short or Vonners

User avatar
Lessnt
Senator
 
Posts: 3926
Founded: Jul 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Lessnt » Fri Jul 27, 2012 5:02 pm

Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f wrote:
Lessnt wrote:California laws have definitions on assault weapons.Including Ar 15s as a banned weapon.
And any gun with a mag capacity of more than 10 is illegal.
We still had a case where a korean student went and kill 11 or more people with a 45 acp pistol.
He just went around executing people.
And ran away before the police set up a perimeter and told some store clerk he just killed some people.

He did not need an AR 15 to kill.He did not need a mag capacity of over 10 to kill.
He just needed everyone to be helpless and do nothing while he murdered them.


Pretty simplistic view of the Virginia Tech shooting...given that the shooter had been demonstrating unbalanced behaviour quite a while before the shooting.

Wrong shooting bud.

User avatar
Mk Steele
Envoy
 
Posts: 312
Founded: Aug 21, 2010
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Mk Steele » Fri Jul 27, 2012 5:05 pm

Gaelic Celtia wrote:
Lessnt wrote:We do not.
Without special permission.
This is federal law.

I understand that, but i think even that should be gone. there is no need to have an AR-15 laying around the house. Keep everything else on the market, but not ARs and SMGs


I disagree, to many people who own guns, they will probably tell you they have those guns as a hobby and because it's just plain awesome, an example of this would be supercars, no one needs to have a lamborghini or a bugatti veyron, yet these cars exist for the people who can afford an expensive toy that can go 190+mph and drain the gas tank in less than an hour, and they still buy them. AR-15s, Civilian SMGs exist for the same purpose, people want them because they simply want them, who are we to tell them that they shouldn't buy them and go find another hobby.
The Official Future Factbook of the Federal Republic here [Currently WIP]
Official Modern Factbook here WIP
(Factbook updates are going a little slow, I haven't forgotten about them)

[Future Factbook updated, various pages reorganized. Added on October 27, 2013 ]
Modern Factbook Not updated

Member of The Anti-Terrorism Alliance

User avatar
Lessnt
Senator
 
Posts: 3926
Founded: Jul 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Lessnt » Fri Jul 27, 2012 5:09 pm

Mk Steele wrote:
Gaelic Celtia wrote:I understand that, but i think even that should be gone. there is no need to have an AR-15 laying around the house. Keep everything else on the market, but not ARs and SMGs


I disagree, to many people who own guns, they will probably tell you they have those guns as a hobby and because it's just plain awesome, an example of this would be supercars, no one needs to have a lamborghini or a bugatti veyron, yet these cars exist for the people who can afford an expensive toy that can go 190+mph and drain the gas tank in less than an hour, and they still buy them. AR-15s, Civilian SMGs exist for the same purpose, people want them because they simply want them, who are we to tell them that they shouldn't buy them and go find another hobby.

Id own a single shot rifle just because I want one despite it not being practical for anything compared to other available guns.

User avatar
Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9191
Founded: Jan 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f » Fri Jul 27, 2012 5:09 pm

Lessnt wrote:
Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f wrote:
Pretty simplistic view of the Virginia Tech shooting...given that the shooter had been demonstrating unbalanced behaviour quite a while before the shooting.

Wrong shooting bud.


Oh.

We still had a case where a korean student went and kill 11 or more people with a 45 acp pistol.
He just went around executing people.
And ran away before the police set up a perimeter and told some store clerk he just killed some people.


Which are you referring to? Bud.
PLEASE DO NOT SEND ME TG's. MODERATORS READ YOUR TG's WITHOUT YOUR PERMISSION.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tommy_Flowers Call me Rubi for short or Vonners

User avatar
Lessnt
Senator
 
Posts: 3926
Founded: Jul 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Lessnt » Fri Jul 27, 2012 5:11 pm

Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f wrote:
Lessnt wrote:Wrong shooting bud.


Oh.

We still had a case where a korean student went and kill 11 or more people with a 45 acp pistol.
He just went around executing people.
And ran away before the police set up a perimeter and told some store clerk he just killed some people.


Which are you referring to? Bud.

Was not that big of a media thing.
It happened less than 2 years ago.
Its one of the reasons I think we cannot carry weapons in california anymore.

User avatar
Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9191
Founded: Jan 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f » Fri Jul 27, 2012 5:16 pm

Lessnt wrote:
Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f wrote:
Oh.



Which are you referring to? Bud.

Was not that big of a media thing.
It happened less than 2 years ago.
Its one of the reasons I think we cannot carry weapons in california anymore.


yes yes...source?
PLEASE DO NOT SEND ME TG's. MODERATORS READ YOUR TG's WITHOUT YOUR PERMISSION.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tommy_Flowers Call me Rubi for short or Vonners

User avatar
Lessnt
Senator
 
Posts: 3926
Founded: Jul 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Lessnt » Fri Jul 27, 2012 5:19 pm

Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f wrote:
Lessnt wrote:Was not that big of a media thing.
It happened less than 2 years ago.
Its one of the reasons I think we cannot carry weapons in california anymore.


yes yes...source?

no source bud.
Keep up on the news.

User avatar
Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9191
Founded: Jan 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f » Fri Jul 27, 2012 5:21 pm

Lessnt wrote:
Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f wrote:
yes yes...source?

no source bud.
Keep up on the news.


so yer talking outta yer arse? ok.
PLEASE DO NOT SEND ME TG's. MODERATORS READ YOUR TG's WITHOUT YOUR PERMISSION.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tommy_Flowers Call me Rubi for short or Vonners

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32063
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Fri Jul 27, 2012 5:22 pm

Lessnt wrote:no source bud.
Keep up on the news.


Uh bullshit, you can't talk about a specific event without being able to substantiate that it actually happened.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Lessnt
Senator
 
Posts: 3926
Founded: Jul 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Lessnt » Fri Jul 27, 2012 5:22 pm

Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f wrote:
Lessnt wrote:no source bud.
Keep up on the news.


so yer talking outta yer arse? ok.

Your free to think so.
Its not like I get any rewards for proving you guys wrong in your beliefs.

User avatar
Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9191
Founded: Jan 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f » Fri Jul 27, 2012 5:25 pm

Lessnt wrote:
Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f wrote:
so yer talking outta yer arse? ok.

Your free to think so.
Its not like I get any rewards for proving you guys wrong in your beliefs.


Well no...you highlighted a specific incident. You should be able to provide some reference that is reputable. That's the way it works, bud.

As for my beliefs, irrelevant but also quite clearly you have no idea what my beliefs are.

You are really not aiding your position in any way.
PLEASE DO NOT SEND ME TG's. MODERATORS READ YOUR TG's WITHOUT YOUR PERMISSION.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tommy_Flowers Call me Rubi for short or Vonners

User avatar
Mk Steele
Envoy
 
Posts: 312
Founded: Aug 21, 2010
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Mk Steele » Fri Jul 27, 2012 5:25 pm

Actually the reason is because California has such strict gun laws is because it's Democratic to the core, it's an unfortunate trend, I live in Illinois and the gun laws here while not as strict as Cali, it's still bothersome. As far as I know we are the only state that requires one to get a Firearms Ownership ID card (FOID) before being able to buy a gun, and then if you live in Chicago you need to get a Chicago Firearms License along with the FOID as well as registering your weapons with Chicago PD as well as paying $50-100 every so years so you can continue owning firearms within city limits. BUT before that you also need to take classes at a registered firearms dealer to learn how to shoot a gun and take the safety course before you can buy a gun, (If you live in Chicago that is.)

Extremely bothersome if you ask me.
The Official Future Factbook of the Federal Republic here [Currently WIP]
Official Modern Factbook here WIP
(Factbook updates are going a little slow, I haven't forgotten about them)

[Future Factbook updated, various pages reorganized. Added on October 27, 2013 ]
Modern Factbook Not updated

Member of The Anti-Terrorism Alliance

User avatar
Our Most Resplendent Goddess Sen
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1625
Founded: Apr 24, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Our Most Resplendent Goddess Sen » Fri Jul 27, 2012 5:25 pm

Gaelic Celtia wrote:
Lessnt wrote:We do not.
Without special permission.
This is federal law.

I understand that, but i think even that should be gone. there is no need to have an AR-15 laying around the house. Keep everything else on the market, but not ARs and SMGs


AR-15s are not assault rifles.

Why is an AR-15 worse than, say, any other semi-auto rifle?
The Exaltation of the Celestial Court of Our Most Resplendent Goddess Sen

User avatar
Grinning Dragon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10391
Founded: May 16, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Grinning Dragon » Fri Jul 27, 2012 5:28 pm

Lessnt wrote:Id own a single shot rifle just because I want one despite it not being practical for anything compared to other available guns.

I got each of the kids a single shot .22 Cricket, great training tool for the young ones as it is designed for young children, so there is a practicality to a single shot weapon.

User avatar
Lessnt
Senator
 
Posts: 3926
Founded: Jul 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Lessnt » Fri Jul 27, 2012 5:29 pm

Grinning Dragon wrote:
Lessnt wrote:Id own a single shot rifle just because I want one despite it not being practical for anything compared to other available guns.

I got each of the kids a single shot .22 Cricket, great training tool for the young ones as it is designed for young children, so there is a practicality to a single shot weapon.

sure....you could have gotten them bolt action though.Teach them about magazines and what not.

User avatar
Grinning Dragon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10391
Founded: May 16, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Grinning Dragon » Fri Jul 27, 2012 5:31 pm

Our Most Resplendent Goddess Sen wrote:
Gaelic Celtia wrote:I understand that, but i think even that should be gone. there is no need to have an AR-15 laying around the house. Keep everything else on the market, but not ARs and SMGs


AR-15s are not assault rifles.

Why is an AR-15 worse than, say, any other semi-auto rifle?

Because the bubble headed beach blond with a gleam in her eye told me so. :p
That and they are evil looking, with the thingy that goes up and all. :rofl:

User avatar
Lessnt
Senator
 
Posts: 3926
Founded: Jul 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Lessnt » Fri Jul 27, 2012 5:32 pm

Mk Steele wrote:Actually the reason is because California has such strict gun laws is because it's Democratic to the core, it's an unfortunate trend, I live in Illinois and the gun laws here while not as strict as Cali, it's still bothersome. As far as I know we are the only state that requires one to get a Firearms Ownership ID card (FOID) before being able to buy a gun, and then if you live in Chicago you need to get a Chicago Firearms License along with the FOID as well as registering your weapons with Chicago PD as well as paying $50-100 every so years so you can continue owning firearms within city limits. BUT before that you also need to take classes at a registered firearms dealer to learn how to shoot a gun and take the safety course before you can buy a gun, (If you live in Chicago that is.)

Extremely bothersome if you ask me.

Criminals get illegal guns and bypass all that right?

User avatar
Grinning Dragon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10391
Founded: May 16, 2011
Anarchy

Postby Grinning Dragon » Fri Jul 27, 2012 5:35 pm

Lessnt wrote:
Grinning Dragon wrote:I got each of the kids a single shot .22 Cricket, great training tool for the young ones as it is designed for young children, so there is a practicality to a single shot weapon.

sure....you could have gotten them bolt action though.Teach them about magazines and what not.

In time. They both started off with BB / pellet guns, then i worked them up to the .22
I also go about training my kids a lil differently then the other parents. I require my kids to be able to disassemble and reassemble the weapon before going to go shoot. With that I also explain each part of the weapon and its function, then it is dry fire practice drills, then we go to the range and kill evil paper targets.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Achan, Bienenhalde, Emotional Support Crocodile, Grinning Dragon, Juansonia, Ostroeuropa, Philjia, Stellar Colonies, The Huskar Social Union, Zapato

Advertisement

Remove ads