Advertisement

by Jakeland » Fri Jul 20, 2012 11:42 pm

by Dyakovo » Fri Jul 20, 2012 11:54 pm

by Seperates » Fri Jul 20, 2012 11:57 pm
Jakeland wrote:Of course! Even more in Christian schools! See, Evolution (I'm an Atheist btw) does not contradict God. It may take the concept of God outside the concept of the Bible, but the idea that a God can create and start the evolutionary process should be sound Christians as plausible and acceptable. I, myself, reject the concept of God, but I don't see how Christians, Muslims and Jews should have a problem with the idea of Evolution. It only corresponds with the notion, for them, that God is great and all-mighty.

by Dyakovo » Fri Jul 20, 2012 11:58 pm

by Cu Math » Sat Jul 21, 2012 12:02 am
Seperates wrote:Jakeland wrote:Of course! Even more in Christian schools! See, Evolution (I'm an Atheist btw) does not contradict God. It may take the concept of God outside the concept of the Bible, but the idea that a God can create and start the evolutionary process should be sound Christians as plausible and acceptable. I, myself, reject the concept of God, but I don't see how Christians, Muslims and Jews should have a problem with the idea of Evolution. It only corresponds with the notion, for them, that God is great and all-mighty.
See, here's the problem with that assessment. It isn't scientific. It assumes that humans are the evolutionary "end-game" in "God's creation", what with the Abrahamic religions human-centered dogma. There is no reason to assume this. There is no reason to assume that God made this world specifically to evolve us. Perhaps we are not the endgame in his creation. Perhaps cockroaches are the endgame and everything else is merely byproducts. Evolution is not compatible with Abrahamic religious dogma, which is why it is opposed so vehmently. Sure, we can pretend it is compatible for the sake of apologetics, but that does not change the facts of the matter.

by Athorack » Sat Jul 21, 2012 12:04 am
Big Jim P wrote:Saliu wrote:I don't want this thread ruined with religous debating, take that somewhere else!
This is a question of morale, should Evolution be taught in schools?
First of all, Evolution is a religous belief, just the same as Creation is. The major difference is that Evolution is supposidly not the belief of a religion, but of the irreligous. However, even that is wrong, is it not the Atheist belief? Are Atheist truly irreligous? They have a theology and beliefs, therefore that must make Atheisim a religion.
Anyway, the topic is should Evolution be taught in Public /State (Government Owned) Schools. I also encourage your thoughts on Atheisims status, is it a religion?
Evolution is not a religious belief, it is a scientific theory. Of course it should be taught in school. Creation is a religious belief and should be taught in church.

by Norstal » Sat Jul 21, 2012 12:05 am
Cu Math wrote:We humans are the best creatures! We're the only ones who have evolved the ability to kill thousands over who has the cooler imaginary friend!

Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Seperates » Sat Jul 21, 2012 12:05 am
Vault 1 wrote:Seperates wrote:Abstinence, in theory, has 100% effetiveness. Unfortunatly, in practice... it doesn't because we are humans and humans are fallible and make mistakes.
Then STD are part of the penalty for these mistakes.Seperates wrote:Real reminder when it happens to babies.
In the 10th Plague of Egypt, Lord killed every first born Egyptian child.
An occasional child of sinners is nothing in comparison, and, yes, it is a real reminder.
Anyway, can this thread get back to why teaching of evolution should be eliminated from state schools?

by Seperates » Sat Jul 21, 2012 12:07 am
Cu Math wrote:Seperates wrote:See, here's the problem with that assessment. It isn't scientific. It assumes that humans are the evolutionary "end-game" in "God's creation", what with the Abrahamic religions human-centered dogma. There is no reason to assume this. There is no reason to assume that God made this world specifically to evolve us. Perhaps we are not the endgame in his creation. Perhaps cockroaches are the endgame and everything else is merely byproducts. Evolution is not compatible with Abrahamic religious dogma, which is why it is opposed so vehmently. Sure, we can pretend it is compatible for the sake of apologetics, but that does not change the facts of the matter.
We humans are the best creatures! We're the only ones who have evolved the ability to kill thousands over who has the cooler imaginary friend!

by Seperates » Sat Jul 21, 2012 12:09 am

by Seperates » Sat Jul 21, 2012 12:11 am

by Seperates » Sat Jul 21, 2012 12:15 am
(for myself) Wow... it's gonna be one of THOSE nights isn't it. And yes... no matter how much you water down the shit... that doesn't change the fact that it is stil shit.
by Person012345 » Sat Jul 21, 2012 12:28 am

by Cu Math » Sat Jul 21, 2012 12:31 am


by Divair » Sat Jul 21, 2012 12:33 am
Vault 1 wrote:Seperates wrote:Abstinence, in theory, has 100% effetiveness. Unfortunatly, in practice... it doesn't because we are humans and humans are fallible and make mistakes.
Then STD are part of the penalty for these mistakes.Seperates wrote:Real reminder when it happens to babies.
In the 10th Plague of Egypt, Lord killed every first born Egyptian child.
An occasional child of sinners is nothing in comparison, and, yes, it is a real reminder.
Anyway, can this thread get back to why teaching of evolution should be eliminated from state schools?

by Mavorpen » Sat Jul 21, 2012 12:42 am

by Vault 1 » Sat Jul 21, 2012 4:04 am
Seperates wrote:Unprotected sex is not worthy of life long punishment... and only a megalomaniac dictator would say it was.

by Keronians » Sat Jul 21, 2012 5:20 am
Seperates wrote:Jakeland wrote:Of course! Even more in Christian schools! See, Evolution (I'm an Atheist btw) does not contradict God. It may take the concept of God outside the concept of the Bible, but the idea that a God can create and start the evolutionary process should be sound Christians as plausible and acceptable. I, myself, reject the concept of God, but I don't see how Christians, Muslims and Jews should have a problem with the idea of Evolution. It only corresponds with the notion, for them, that God is great and all-mighty.
See, here's the problem with that assessment. It isn't scientific. It assumes that humans are the evolutionary "end-game" in "God's creation", what with the Abrahamic religions human-centered dogma. There is no reason to assume this. There is no reason to assume that God made this world specifically to evolve us. Perhaps we are not the endgame in his creation. Perhaps cockroaches are the endgame and everything else is merely byproducts. Evolution is not compatible with Abrahamic religious dogma, which is why it is opposed so vehmently. Sure, we can pretend it is compatible for the sake of apologetics, but that does not change the facts of the matter.

by Cu Math » Sat Jul 21, 2012 5:23 am
Keronians wrote:Seperates wrote:See, here's the problem with that assessment. It isn't scientific. It assumes that humans are the evolutionary "end-game" in "God's creation", what with the Abrahamic religions human-centered dogma. There is no reason to assume this. There is no reason to assume that God made this world specifically to evolve us. Perhaps we are not the endgame in his creation. Perhaps cockroaches are the endgame and everything else is merely byproducts. Evolution is not compatible with Abrahamic religious dogma, which is why it is opposed so vehmently. Sure, we can pretend it is compatible for the sake of apologetics, but that does not change the facts of the matter.
You know, you can always rely on the assumption that God wanted humans to become the dominant species on the planet.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Immoren, Majestic-12 [Bot], Point Blob
Advertisement