Mavorpen wrote:So it's not education, it's the system needing to be redone.
You're right, it needs to be privatized and not be mandatory.
Yandere Schoolgirls wrote:Sure, it may affect you, but does it effect you? Does the poor eating habits of some one else effect you? or some coke addict shooting up heroin? Indirectly maybe, but that's arbitrary. Directly though? unlikely. Unless, of course, you were forced to pay a portion of your wage into a system that propagates poor behavior.
Yes, it does actually. Poor eating habits uses up more healthcare. Doing coke in your home obviously doesn't affect me, unless he overdoses, and thus uses up more resources. How is me being affected indirectly arbitrary just because you say so?
I think they word you're looking for is effected, not affected. Regardless, it's arbitrary, because anything they do with the exception of you being raised by a coke addict can be labelled as an "effect" on you. Examples: Drug addicts work less! the economy is dragged down! Drug addicts do nothing, my taxes pay for them to eat! The effects are randomly chosen and unfounded. In reality a druggy probably has no real effect on you, because if you don't like his behavior you can simply walk away.


